karen's Reviews > Beautiful Creatures
Beautiful Creatures (Caster Chronicles, #1)
by Kami Garcia (Goodreads Author), Margaret Stohl (Goodreads Author)
oh my god, shusshify with all the loving on this book! this is another example of the world conspiring to tell me untruths. like, that sarah jessica parker is really hot.
"yeah, i don't know, she's kind of got a weird face, i am just not attracted to her"
"no! she is hot!! look at her dress!!! look at her shoes!!"
"yeah, no - i get it - her clothing is expensive, but she's just so oddly skinny and she has devil eyes."
"noooo - she is hot - here i made you a drink. you will like it, it is like hawaiian punch."
but this time i am not drinking.
here's the deal - two authors, one book. rarely works in practice. one lady said "i want to write a paranormal romance!" the other lady said "i want to write a civil war-era southern love story. well, let's smooosh them together! it is a great idea!!"
it's not a great result. it is a huge book that is very densely plotted, for teen fiction, which would ordinarily be a good thing if it weren't so shallowly conceived. it seems bloated with plot, but shy on the details. i had several "wait, but what?" moments.
and much of it seemed so... familiar. two teens in love, but both of their families are trying to keep them apart because of some ancient and unresolved family squabble. but also because she has powers, (this is the part shakespeare dropped the ball on)powers which might complicate her relationship to a mortal boy. but when they are together their kisses are like thunder and their embraces cause furniture to break and a teenage heart attack (cured by supernatural means, though. phew)
i worry for kids growing up on the new crop of teen fiction. the relationships always seems to have one paranormal participant, and it's hardly fair for actual teens. how can they compete with these? do kids get all sad after they lose their virginities and it is not as magical as they have been led to expect?? when beds do not rotate and literal sparks do not fly and they are not transported to the past?
it just seems like a lot of pressure to be put on them.
on the one hand - it is cool to have a male protagonist in a teen love story; most of then ones i have read are still goofy girls pining after unworthy boys. this is also the second book i have recently read in which telepathy occurs between the lovers. see - this i think is a bad idea. especially in teen lovers. i don't care how in love i am - once i find out you have the ability to read my mind, i am out. it is too creepy. no one will steal my inventions.
this is such a popular book, and it has such attractive cover-colors, i want to understand its appeal. conceptually, i thought it was a great idea, and with some adjustments, maybe it could have been better. i just thought there were too many loopholes, too many missed opportunities. and i hate this title. i kept calling it a combination of



i know i am no longer supposed to use pictures in my reviews, because it makes them too awesome, but
by Kami Garcia (Goodreads Author), Margaret Stohl (Goodreads Author)
oh my god, shusshify with all the loving on this book! this is another example of the world conspiring to tell me untruths. like, that sarah jessica parker is really hot.
"yeah, i don't know, she's kind of got a weird face, i am just not attracted to her"
"no! she is hot!! look at her dress!!! look at her shoes!!"
"yeah, no - i get it - her clothing is expensive, but she's just so oddly skinny and she has devil eyes."
"noooo - she is hot - here i made you a drink. you will like it, it is like hawaiian punch."
but this time i am not drinking.
here's the deal - two authors, one book. rarely works in practice. one lady said "i want to write a paranormal romance!" the other lady said "i want to write a civil war-era southern love story. well, let's smooosh them together! it is a great idea!!"
it's not a great result. it is a huge book that is very densely plotted, for teen fiction, which would ordinarily be a good thing if it weren't so shallowly conceived. it seems bloated with plot, but shy on the details. i had several "wait, but what?" moments.
and much of it seemed so... familiar. two teens in love, but both of their families are trying to keep them apart because of some ancient and unresolved family squabble. but also because she has powers, (this is the part shakespeare dropped the ball on)powers which might complicate her relationship to a mortal boy. but when they are together their kisses are like thunder and their embraces cause furniture to break and a teenage heart attack (cured by supernatural means, though. phew)
i worry for kids growing up on the new crop of teen fiction. the relationships always seems to have one paranormal participant, and it's hardly fair for actual teens. how can they compete with these? do kids get all sad after they lose their virginities and it is not as magical as they have been led to expect?? when beds do not rotate and literal sparks do not fly and they are not transported to the past?
it just seems like a lot of pressure to be put on them.
on the one hand - it is cool to have a male protagonist in a teen love story; most of then ones i have read are still goofy girls pining after unworthy boys. this is also the second book i have recently read in which telepathy occurs between the lovers. see - this i think is a bad idea. especially in teen lovers. i don't care how in love i am - once i find out you have the ability to read my mind, i am out. it is too creepy. no one will steal my inventions.
this is such a popular book, and it has such attractive cover-colors, i want to understand its appeal. conceptually, i thought it was a great idea, and with some adjustments, maybe it could have been better. i just thought there were too many loopholes, too many missed opportunities. and i hate this title. i kept calling it a combination of



i know i am no longer supposed to use pictures in my reviews, because it makes them too awesome, but
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Beautiful Creatures.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-50 of 150) (150 new)
message 1:
by
Tenderine
(new)
Oct 12, 2010 04:15am
I wanted to read this one but then thought it was another similar to twilight book. Anxious to know your opinion on it.
reply
|
flag
*
i have to finish it before class today, and i still have 200 pages!!! portland weekend ruined my reading habits - i could only read 2 1/2 books with all the fun i was having!! and don't hold your breath for a review - i am several behind, and who knows if i shall ever review again. but i can say right now, about this... "mediocre"
i want to read a review of "my give a damn's busted." quick before it becomes a teen movie sensation!
THANK YOU! I have teachers who want me to recommend this to the students because it is "clean", whatever that means. Who cares if it is "clean" if it is dreck?
the kids seem to like it, but i haven't met any adults who do.and i thank ariel for talking me out of buying it that night at books of wonder. ariel, you are a star...
Totally on board with your remarks on weird-face-devil-eyes. She's also just really annoying to top it all off.I loved the part about teen, shall we say, sexpectations being distorted by paranormal YA fiction. It reminded me of this thing this really cool writer guy once said once: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scdgE2...
And your final image was pure WIN.
Boys couldn't even compete with John Cusack. Too puny to lift the boombox. Old Shia and his iPod were reasonable enough and now comes these coming consecutively boys. Unfair. At least girls get to be boring and clingy.
Great review. I'm pretty much in love with that last image. I want that book cover so I can frame it and put it on my wall. One thing: Sarah Jessica Parker is more horsey-faced then anything else. I keep thinking she should be eating out of a bucket of oats or something.
i can totally send you the book cover - we have like 5 in the store...my "live-up-to-this, boys" was always duckie
sorry, but it's better you find out sooner rather than later. you guys can still make catty comments about SJP together (she is something of a fashion icon, though... and we know duckie loves his fashions and his fey dancing and his old show tunes). (nttawwt.)
a little googling will also turn up an article in which molly says john cryer told her he was playing duckie as gay. or maybe john hughes told her he'd written duckie as gay. it's confusingly worded. someone's gay anyway.
This almost sounded like a one-star review. I think Joel is right, Duckie was kind of gay. He wold have sooooo come out in college....
i would've preferred this review had it been written 18 months ago. fuckit, i'll throw it a pity vote.
That would have been about three months before the second golden age that produced the masterpiece, "animals are diiiirty"
Uh, guys, pay attention, the bronze age doesn't start until January. 100% agreed about SJP. But don't you think people mean, "Look at what makeup and clothing can DO to a person!" when they say she's pretty? She's got a charm, though.
Also, totally agreed about telepathy. Total deal breaker in real life.
I was lucky enough to dodge this bullet. I had it in a pile of three and had my daughter pick the one I would read. She picked Beautiful Creatures. So I asked her to pick the other book that I wouldn't read. And I was left with whatever that last one was.I must admit that a male protagonist would have been nice. They's not many of them about these days.
not in this genre, no, but most of the mystery ones i read were boys. and soon i will read action/adventure, and i think those are mostly boys, too.care for a recommendation??
excellent book-choosing method, by the way!
Meredith wrote: "Uh, guys, pay attention, the bronze age doesn't start until January. 100% agreed about SJP. But don't you think people mean, "Look at what makeup and clothing can DO to a person!" when they say ..."
the new ad she has for hair dye terrifies me. she is like an alien...
karen wrote: "care for a recommendation??"Not unless it's horror. I'm moving on to an all new kind of YA shit.
i just finished fantasy/horror and am working on sci-fi for this week. i love that we are nearly doing the same shit.
I know that a small part of myself, perhaps the ghost of my 9 year old self, is still disappointed that every girl I meet isn't Kelly Kapowski. I can't imagine how it would be like if she had superpowers.
karen wrote: "i just finished fantasy/horror and am working on sci-fi for this week. i love that we are nearly doing the same shit."Hit me with some horror!
and she was in adventures in babysitting,. right?? i used to like that movie...and a.j. - like, if she could read your mind?? eek!
Caris wrote: "karen wrote: "i just finished fantasy/horror and am working on sci-fi for this week. i love that we are nearly doing the same shit."Hit me with some horror!"
you will not like the reading list. it was twilight, the secret hour, which i did not read because it didn't look very good (we only had to read one), and i also read the monstrumologist, which was gory, but not great (but male protagonist!!), blood and chocolate, which i did like but might not be your cup of tea, a book of short stories:restless dead, mixed authors, and salem's lot
but the book you are reading now has a sequel!! or a companion book, anyway. i can take a trip to the floor and see what i see, if you like.
I've been going back and forth on Twilight and its ilk. Is it horror? If it can be categorized as such, then I've got a shit ton of options. I've got The Monstrumologist at home; I'm glad to know it's a good option. To be honest, no horror is my cup of tea (at least not to this point). Anything and everything helps- even if it just looks awesome and you want some other asshole to read it first.
Caris wrote: "I've been going back and forth on Twilight and its ilk. Is it horror?"Caris, you should be able to see this: http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/p...
Caris wrote: "I was lucky enough to dodge this bullet. I had it in a pile of three and had my daughter pick the one I would read. She picked Beautiful Creatures. So I asked her to pick the other book that I woul..."from now on I am going to pick books using this method and my mom.
Caris wrote: "Ha! I guess that counts."Just so you're clear, no vampire book is ever actually horror, in my experience. Not that I've read horror, but Twilight is not scary even a little. You'll hate it, Caris, and it'll totally hurt my feelings if you read Twilight and not the Hunger Games. That's a little more horror, probably.
Totally agreed on all the SJP comments. She's kind of a monster now, and that mole - is it there? Is it not there? Did she get it removed? It's like that conjoined twin in the one X-Files episode. O TEH HORROR! But Girls Just Want to Have Fun is wonderful.
Meredith wrote: "Caris wrote: "Ha! I guess that counts."Just so you're clear, no vampire book is ever actually horror, in my experience. Not that I've read horror, but Twilight is not scary even a little. You'l..."
Don't worry. I'm not reading Twilight. I never had any intention.
See, this is what I was getting at. Depending on who is doing the classifying, lots of paranormal stuff gets classified as horror even though there are not any horror elements. I'm doing this project where I have to become well-versed in YA horror and it's much easier to find paranormal books than ones that actually try to be scary. So, my question to myself was: Should I, considering the scope of this project, include these Twilight-style paranormal novels even though they're not really horror?







