Alex's Reviews > Cutting for Stone

Cutting for Stone by Abraham Verghese

by
3144945
's review
Nov 01, 10

bookshelves: africa, 2010
Read in October, 2010

But it was only now, near the end, and far too late, that the pieces suddenly - dreadfully - clicked into place. Like a long Tetris piece slamming down, making a whole block of mystery blink and vanish. Only now did he realize what suddenly seemed so obvious: everyone who had suggested this book to him – every single one – was a middle-aged woman. This book…it was about the importance of family.

A wave of cold horror washed over him.

It would take months of porn and comic books to counteract this book’s effect. Months.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Cutting for Stone.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-44 of 44) (44 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Trudy Latzko I LOVED this book....one of the rare books I could see myself reading again.

Enjoy.

Trudy


Alex So far Ka was right: some harrowing medical descriptions up in here. About halfway through now.


message 3: by Cindy (new) - added it

Cindy Brilliant! It says a lot about you and the people you associate with. No, I won't elaborate.


message 4: by Ka (new)

Ka Oh Alex you are such a loser. If you want a book about the importance of family, suffer through Freedom. How about: this book is about medicine in Africa, about African cultural practices, about the immigrant experience, about twinness. -To name a few themes.


message 5: by Alex (last edited Nov 02, 2010 07:49am) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Alex A couple of neighbors who've read it came to a similar conclusion. They thought there were three stories: one about family, one about medicine, and one about Ethiopia. I liked the Ethiopia parts a ton; the medical bits made me think the guy really wanted to write about surgery and came up with a plot so that people would put up with the medicine bits; the family stuff, I thought, was pretty schmaltzy and predictable.

And yes, thank you, I most likely will suffer through Freedom. After which I'll probably come back and upgrade my rating for this book.


message 6: by Ka (new)

Ka OK well I agree with that analysis. Sorry to be so crabby, I have a good excuse though. . .


Joyce Maybe it's because middle aged women read more.

Sorry, that ruined any desire I have to review this one. Why do online reviews always turn to little personal tirades instead of actually looking at the literary aspects.


Alex Sorry to offend you, Joyce! It was supposed to be funny, not a personal tirade.


Trudy Latzko I found the discussion thought-provoking. Why do people read certain books? The subject matter may be only a small part of the reason. All books about the major themes of Cutting for Stone wouldn't interest me. How the author handles the story line, the language he uses and whether or not you care about the charactersare part of the equasion.


message 10: by Ka (new)

Ka Trudy wrote: "I found the discussion thought-provoking. Why do people read certain books? The subject matter may be only a small part of the reason. All books about the major themes of Cutting for Stone wouldn't..."

I think whether or not you care about the characters is a very interesting aspect of why you like, don't like, or even finish reading a book. I personally usually don't like books/movies/TV shows where I think the characters are totally unlikeable. In the case of C4S, I liked the twins a lot. Didn't like the doctor -- Stone. What did you others think of his character?


Trudy Latzko Case in point: The new film with Harrison Ford and I think her name is Amy Mc Adams. I have no idea whether the story or the dialogue is exemplary...I don't intend to wach a souped up woman interacting with a zombie-like HF.
I read C4S so long ago I don't recall Stone's character


message 12: by Alex (new) - rated it 3 stars

Alex I thought Stone was interesting and well done. He certainly wasn't likable, of course, but I thought he was compelling enough that I enjoyed reading his parts.

I know what you mean, though: there are people who're awful in interesting ways, and folks who're just annoying to watch, so it lessens the experience.


Kulbreez97 Ummmm - I am a "middle aged woman" (42) and I would have suggested you run screaming from this book - warning the towns people to beware.

I find the fact that you think this a book liked only by middle aged women offensive. NO ONE should like this book!


message 14: by Alex (new) - rated it 3 stars

Alex Ha!


Trudy Latzko Don't take offence with Alex' remark about middle aged women. It could be considered complimentary since that group of the population are more likely to be avid readers and bring a lot of experience to the process of reading.


message 16: by Alex (last edited Jan 08, 2011 01:43pm) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Alex And it's all tongue-in-cheek; I'm just ribbing on real-life friends Trudy and my mom, both of which are on here with me. :)


message 17: by Cathy (last edited Jun 02, 2013 08:23pm) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Cathy Opps! Now I see middle-age was meant humorously. Sometimes we middle aged women go off half-cocked :)

And I agee with your assessment of the book and I gave it 3 stars as well. Though I think political upheaval in Ethiopia, the state of medicine in Africa, and female multilation were also issues raised in the book that gave me pause.


Kristin I'm a middle aged woman reading this book, I like this book and I also laughed when I read Alex's review - it was funny...lighten up people!


Ruthmgon I cant say I like the book, not yet, but I busted out when I read Alex's comment. Thanks for giving me a guffaw at the end of the day!!!


message 20: by Anne (new) - rated it 4 stars

Anne Loved this book, your review made me laugh...thanks!


Katherine Can I be in your book club? Pretty please? Best review ever!!!


Diane C. This book is the next one at my bookclub, and when i read the plot synopsis, i thought, okay I'll get it from the library but may not waste my time. Definitely one of those schmaltzily written books for the low info citizen to read about another culture.


Katherine Diane wrote: "Definitely one of those schmaltzily written books for the low info citizen to read about another culture." That's hardly a fair assessment, especially since, by your own admission, you haven't read the book! (Talk about low info). I'd say it's flawed and even unevenly written in parts, but the descriptions of life in Ethiopia, and especially the parts describing what it's like to be a doctor under difficult conditions, shine. And believe me, I have low tolerance for schmaltz!


Diane C. And probably won't read the book.


message 25: by Amy (new)

Amy I think you're funny. I am not groovin' on it either & I am the demographic it was written for. It needs some serious editing. I'll finish but I can already see that 3 stars will be generous.


Diane C. Yes, Amy, whatever happened to the intrepid editors of past days? Really miss 'em. Have read more than a few books that were just okay and could have been GREAT with proper editing.


message 27: by Joanna (new) - added it

Joanna Hilarious comment!


message 28: by wintermute314 (new)

wintermute314 Love your comment. But it points out that being able to divide the ratings into sex and age groups as they allow on IMDB would be a very welcome addition to goodreads.


Suzie Your dislike for this novel must not be too severe. Three stars? I wanted to hate you, mock you even. Then..I checked out your page and reads and found that you had some semblance of intelligence. Needless to say, I have thoroughly relished this book. Have a great summer.


message 30: by Alex (new) - rated it 3 stars

Alex Ha...some semblance of intelligence. That's the nicest thing anyone's ever said about me! Thanks Suzie, you too. :)


Annette2009 Yep, I'm a middle aged woman,and your review is my laugh for the afternoon. Well done!


message 32: by Alex (new) - rated it 3 stars

Alex Thanks Annette!


message 33: by Amy (new) - rated it 2 stars

Amy You're Hilar! How can I be friends with you and see all of your reviews?! Made me laugh.


message 34: by Alex (new) - rated it 3 stars

Alex Thank you Amy, that's really nice of you to say. Some of my favorite reviews are here.


message 35: by Jani (new)

Jani I too find the middle aged women stereotype offensive. I am a middle aged woman and I LOVE porn and comic books! I however hated this book.. ;)


message 36: by Dana (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dana From reading these comments, I've just learned that I'm middle-aged at 40. But I didn't love the book, though I thought it was good. Definitely could do w/out the LONG medical descriptions.


Shana I just finished this book, and your review made me laugh!


message 38: by Jan (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jan thoroughly enjoyed the boo AND your review. this middle aged (that may be generous) will check out your books for some reading suggestions. I read eclectically, and enjoy almost everything


Kristin Wright This review is hilarious.


message 40: by Anton (new)

Anton Hey man, I don't know who you are; but I found this review hilarious. You have a very wry, Farside-esk delivery. Your review was a perfect counter-weight to the 3 female recomendations I received for this book. Well done Sir.


Miss GP Ah, Alex, if only I'd heeded your warning.


message 42: by Alex (new) - rated it 3 stars

Alex Well, I hope you've learned a valuable lesson, Kim.


Mkrinsky loved your review! tee hee


Rachael When exactly will I be considered 'middle-aged'?!? 50?
I thought the book was a fantastic read. Ghosh, what a wonderfully developed character. Maybe because I'm married to a surgeon, I don't remember feeling overwhelmed or bored by the medical 'jargon'. The terms and procedures were actually,familiar. I imagine that would make a difference in someone's experience.
--39 year old mother of two, ages 3 and 18 months


back to top