Callista 's Reviews > A Study in Scarlet
A Study in Scarlet (Sherlock Holmes, #1)
by Arthur Conan Doyle
by Arthur Conan Doyle
Callista 's review
bookshelves: mystery-suspense, literature-esd
Jan 25, 11
bookshelves: mystery-suspense, literature-esd
Read from October 12 to 16, 2010
** spoiler alert **
I was pleasantly surprised at the beginning of this story--it was more engaging than I expected for a work of its era. I'd been afraid that those stodgy PBS Jeremy Brett {?} episodes were more true to the source material than the Robert Downey, Jr. & Jude Law movie was. I enjoyed seeing the beginning of Watson's and Holmes' friendship. And, as the recent moviemakers asserted, there is more to Watson and Holmes than some productions would lead you to believe. Watson is a veteran of the wars in Afghanistan and not a bland wimp. Holmes is an expert swordsman and boxer (though not much of those skills is seen in this installment). While I'm familiar with the way Holmes goes about solving cases, mostly through his acute powers of observation and deduction, it was neat to see the original.
I did, though, have a moment about halfway through in which I wondered if something was wrong with my book. The murder suspect was caught, and then suddenly the narrative switched from the first person account by Watson to a third person account beginning with two people dying in the Utah desert. Ah...but it turns out this was the backstory of the killer and his victims. The prose in this portion was more purple than in Watson's account, but I reminded myself it's a product of its time. While, at first, I found the transitions jarring, I realised that similiar techniques are used to this day, especially in film and television. Overall, the story does come together. It held my interest, and I want to read more Holmes and Watson adventures.
I would caution devout Mormons about reading this story, however. It turns out that the main villain in the backstory is Brigham Young. Some might not want to see him portrayed in such a light.
I did, though, have a moment about halfway through in which I wondered if something was wrong with my book. The murder suspect was caught, and then suddenly the narrative switched from the first person account by Watson to a third person account beginning with two people dying in the Utah desert. Ah...but it turns out this was the backstory of the killer and his victims. The prose in this portion was more purple than in Watson's account, but I reminded myself it's a product of its time. While, at first, I found the transitions jarring, I realised that similiar techniques are used to this day, especially in film and television. Overall, the story does come together. It held my interest, and I want to read more Holmes and Watson adventures.
I would caution devout Mormons about reading this story, however. It turns out that the main villain in the backstory is Brigham Young. Some might not want to see him portrayed in such a light.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read A Study in Scarlet.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-9 of 9) (9 new)
date
newest »
newest »
Hmmm, I think that last comment was directed at me ;) I may have to read it just because you said not to. I'm so persnickety! Interesting that the recent movie was closer to their characters than the older movies and tv shows.
Chris--maybe I just had the misfortune to see a few weak examples of that series. Maybe it was the writing. I just could not get into that version of Holmes.I did, though, really like the Rupert Everett one a few years back; and what I saw of a Richard Roxburgh Baskervilles wasn't bad.
Julia--Oh, you rebel! The comment was meant for you and Corrine, whom I may have improperly presumed to also be LDS, but also anyone else who might run across my review. I wanted to give fair warning to anyone of your persuasion who might look at that 3-star review and give it a whirl, only to end up mightily offended.
Oh--and I don't know if you can truly say that the recent Holmes movie was more *accurate* (but I really like that movie). I've yet to run into anything blowing up in a Holmes story. :-) There is a scuffle in Scarlet in which Holmes is the winner, but nothing like what's in the movie. But the filmmakers definitely picked up on things mentioned in the story and fleshed them out.
Duly noted--and yes, Corrine is LDS like me. I think we're probably both open-minded enough to not be offended when reading something by someone who doesn't know any better, though.
I know you well enough to know that you are open-minded. But some things are still going to clash with your beliefs. As happens with everyone. :-)
I've encountered some who might be. Just like there are Roman Catholics offended by The DaVinci Code or Christians offended by Phillip Pullman's atheist works. I wouldn't stop anyone from reading this, of course, but I just wanted to give fair warning without detailed spoilers. ...Hhm, I think I may go back and just post the spoilers.


But I also loved the new Sherlock Holmes movie. I was skeptical before seeing it, despite the good cast. But I loved all the little details.