Vivienne's Reviews > Room

Room by Emma Donoghue

by
272081
's review
Sep 14, 10

bookshelves: 2010-man-booker, chicklit, coming-of-age, orange-2011, suspence
Read from September 13 to 14, 2010

This was the first of my Man Booker Shadowing Group reads and as such I am looking at it from a dual perspective: as to whether I judge it worthy of the 2010 award and if it works as a novel.

I feel 'Room' could herald a new sub-genre - the fictional equivalent of the Misery Memoir - MizFic. Oh dear.

It felt much more suited to being chosen for the Oprah Book Club than on the shortlist for a literary prize of this calibre. It is literary chiclit appealing to sentiment and at times it really milks it. I'm pretty immune to that sort of thing.

In its own terms it does work as a work of popular fiction. There is nothing wrong with chicklit - literary or otherwise - it just isn't something that appeals to me. Like many people I found this hard to put down because I wanted to know what happened.

Yet I did not really feel that Jack, just having turned 5, really could have had the level of comprehension expressed within the novel. Thus, I found some bits felt very much the kind of rambling consciousness of a child of this age but plenty of the book felt as if it were an adult perspective. Can a 4/5 year old really understand the concept of sarcasm? Not in my experience or that of friends who have raised kids.

I feel that if she had tackled it as other authors have as an older child/teen looking back and recalling their earlier memories it might have rung more true.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Room.
sign in »

Reading Progress

09/13/2010 page 20
6.0% "Just started the first of my Man Booker shortlist for the shadowing group. Not really loving it so far. It seems a gimmick having a 5-year old narrator."

Comments (showing 1-8 of 8) (8 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by K.D. (new) - rated it 1 star

K.D. Oliveros You gave the right voice to us who did not like it. I share the sentiments. Nice review!


Vivienne Thank you. I actually couldn't find any negative reviews of the book aside from some folk on the Man Booker forums.


message 3: by K.D. (new) - rated it 1 star

K.D. Oliveros Great marketing campaign. All media hype for a few weeks. Negative reviews will come out eventually. I sent you an invite to be my friend. Please accept.


Elizabeth Joseph Even I was confused about the comprehensive capacity of a 5 year old...Since I was the youngest in my home, I had no one to compare Jack with..Probably the new age kids are more alert than us...I find my 8 year old niece knows many things that I never heard about at her age


Trisha I disagree. The mother was obviously very focused on her son's intellectual growth. She was the only human interaction he had (with an adult) so it would not be very far reaching for him to understand sarcasm.


April I wish you wouldn't insult chik-lit by calling this disturbing book by that moniker.


Holly I completely agree with you about Jack's level of comprehension. In one moment he's talking about 'hotting the air' instead of 'heating the air', but then on the same page he goes on about being part of his mom's cells, but also separate from her. It seemed completely inconsistent to me in tone between some of what Jack is able to express and other things that see babyish. I don't know. I think what disappoints me most is that the reviews I've read of this book universally praise it, while I would suspect had she had a better editor, maybe some of the tonal shifts in Jack's perspective would have been able to have been fixed. I don't know. It just seems like it was completely inconsistent and that's part of what bothered me the most about it.


Rachelle I understood those shifts to be a combination of his own childish insight, and his "parroting" of things his mother told him, the same way he "parroted" statements from tv. I've heard many people say that children who have an advanced mature way of speaking are usually around more adults than children, but that doesn't mean they always understand deeply everything they hear and repeat. I got the sense that Jack was repeating word for word some of what he said, including the part about sarcasm, but of course he still had his own childish way of perceiving things as well. I think it's important to remember that perhaps we shouldn't compare Jack's speech to that of a normal five-year-old because he isn't in a normal situation. Oddly enough, the thing that bothered me most about his speech was that he so over-used the word "bit". Did this bother anyone else?


back to top