Megan's Reviews > Charles and Emma: The Darwins' Leap of Faith

Charles and Emma by Deborah Heiligman

by
1226802
's review
Sep 07, 10

bookshelves: ya

This was a Printz honor book. I don't get that. I don't smell teen appeal here whatsoever or even think that a teen would pick this up, unless someone was doing a report on Darwin. What's more, I'm unhappy that a book about such an interesting person turned out to be so dull.

It's a run of the mill biography, not heavy on the theory, although science is addressed, and most of it revolves around Charles and Emma's home life. She was religious, he was not, but they got along swimmingly, truly loved and respected each other, and were decidedly warm and un-Victorian to their kids. And poor Charles got sick a lot. Like, a lot a lot. Like, "Okay, another water cure, can we talk about your work now?" a lot. That's the gist. There are a few interesting anecdotes scattered throughout, but overall it doesn't make for very interesting reading. Charles and Emma never really reconcile their religious differences or confront them too heatedly, although Emma writes the odd letter or two, hoping Charles will read some passage of the bible or other and feel differently than he does. And Charles wibbles and wobbles and usually writes back some kindhearted loving words to her and we all get the warm fuzzies...? I guess? Good for them, I'm glad they were happy together, but again: it's just not that interesting.

One good thing is that the best writing here is excerpted from Darwin's writing (which Emma played a large role in shaping), so maybe it will inspire the odd reader to read more of his work or read more about the pair. But teens getting into this? What? Not buying what you're selling, Printz committee, sorry.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Charles and Emma.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jenn (new)

Jenn Estepp I had this checked out from work forever, but just couldn't get into it.


message 2: by Meghan (new) - added it

Meghan I'm no longer surprised by what adults can convince themselves has "teen appeal". What we want teens to read and what they want to read can be quite different...


Snow Just to address the issue of teen appeal, that is not part of the criteria for the Printz Award. The award is given based solely on literary quality. Yes, ultimately the committee hopes that teens will like the book, but that was not part of our consideration when we chose the award winner and honors.


Megan I realize teen appeal isn't the half of it, but fail to see how this was a book for teens. Number of pages? Because that's how the publishers marketed it? Genuinely curious.


Megan I mean, I read the criteria. I fail to see the excellence, and as for audience, the fact that the publisher's marketing and say-so are at the top of the list is... Eh. And if, as said above, a teen did pick up this book while doing a report on Darwin, I think they'd develop a profound lack of curiosity, which is a shame. The framing story of the marriage is not something that makes this... Okay, not more appealing, but shall we say more accessible? to teens, and I felt like the science took a backseat to that. But that's this reporter's opinion! The Printz award highlights many good books and helps them gain a wider audience. I happen to thunk this one misses the mark.


Megan Or think. Damn you, autocorrect.


Snow Well, that's fair enough. If you think it missed the mark in terms of being a book for teens, then I can certainly understand your hesitation. For me, even as a teen, I was always a sucker for a good romance, whereas I am not and have never been a fan of biographies, so it was the romance aspect that appealed to me the most about this book.

As for the publishing/marketing, we were to consider books published for teens and since this came out under Henry Holt's Books for Young Readers line, that was all the qualifications it needed to be eligible for the award. That makes the Printz a little different than the National Book Award, where the publisher can suggest that a book be considered for the Young Readers category, even if it was not originally published for young readers (for example, Stitches by David Small).

But I do know that not everyone is going to agree with the decisions made by an award committee. I know I've certainly questioned the wisdom of some of the winners for various awards!


back to top