Keely's Reviews > Arrows of the Queen

Arrows of the Queen by Mercedes Lackey

by
84023
's review
May 26, 07

bookshelves: fantasy, novel, reviewed, american
Read in January, 2005

I've read a lot of fantasy, and I've spent a lot of time looking for fantasy that won't disappoint. When fantasy disappoints me, it usually does so predictably: either the world is poorly-built, the entire story is derivative, it is filled with creepy repressed sexuality, or the Hat Trick.

An equestrian friend of mine suggested this series: it was one of her favorites. However, her suggestion was somewhat tentative. She had previously passed Eragon and Eye of the World along to me, which are so derivative and poorly-written that they just felt like babelfish translations of Tolkien. However, she had also forced me to read the Potter books (I was recalcitrant due to their popularity) and Pullman's Dark Materials, which weren't bad.

Now, I am as disappointed in modern Feminism as your average gender-queer culture-jamming existentialist transhuman chaos magician, so I am slow to suggest that the gender of an author should inform us about their ability to write. However, I will concede that in this culture, the way you are gendered will have long-lasting effects.

Apparently, as a man, you end up entirely unable to write sex in a fantasy novel; maybe sex full stop. Tolkien just kept his romantic leads a few thousand miles apart the whole story. Goodkind creeped us the fuck out with lots of fetishized stabbing. Jordan made spanking a part of his world's justice system. Gor.

Of course, there are female authors guilty of making their books into lewd, plotless sex romps, like Anne Rice and Laurell Hamilton, but at least the sex is still mostly about the characters; and sex should be. It should be an event in the character's life that causes some emotional reaction, and reveals something about the character's personality. Reading most popular male authors, you get about the same emotional depth as a child smacking two naked barbies together. There were times, particularly later in their careers, when both Rice and Hamilton managed to make sex almost as impersonal as their male colleagues, and I'd suggest in Rice's case that her (less and less) latent Christian repression did a passable job standing in for male sexual discomfort.

The sex in Lackey's work is of another breed. It feels human. It feels pleasant. It doesn't make you feel frightened that you might be a bad person if you're turned on by it. In short, it blew my fucking mind. I mean sure, there are male authors like Gaiman, Moore, or Mieville who can write a complex, personal, natural sexual interaction, but they are all authors of allusive, thickly-textured works that draw from literary tradition. What makes Lackey remarkable to me is that she writes a fairly standard, fun piece of pop fantasy and somehow, the sex isn't terrible.

But it's not just the sex. It's all pretty naturalistic and refreshing. Except for the magic--and the psychic horses. The world building is not grade A, but it isn't chicken feet. The magic is pretty new age touchy-feely, but so is the world, so it mostly works. In fact, the only thing that tips off the esscapist fantasy is the psychic equine love-bond. However, I'm not going to look into that too closely: I don't want to find that Lackey's sexual repression was staring me in the face all along.

My Fantasy Book Suggestions

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Arrows of the Queen.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-13 of 13) (13 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by mark (new)

mark monday very enjoyable review.

Now, I am as disappointed in modern Feminism as your average gender-queer culture-jamming existentialist transhuman chaos magician...

and funny as well!


Keely Heh, thanks.


Katharine Kimbriel Interestingly, the "horse love" bond comes from Lackey's first meeting with Lipizzan horses. Judith Tarr is a breeder of Lipps, and says that this "clicking" between a Lipp and a person does happen. In fact, she had a mare for many years -- still has several of her offspring -- who was a great horse, a good riding companion -- yet that mare went gaga over one of Judith's students. Tarr let the woman buy the horse.

So there is a root for that attraction, other than girls and horses (an old bond.)

Good review -- thanks!


Keely Yeah, my mom owns a horse farm and I was in a relationship for several years with a working student at a four star eventing stable, so I do know a few things about the (platonic) love affair between women and horses. Unfortunately, that means I've also seen the dark, obsessive side of that love.

I've learned that when you join the world of a niche interest, you're going to meet a few great, inspiring people who are there because of a genuine passion, and a huge number of terrible people who will test your faith in humanity and only ended up in that niche because they had nowhere else to go.

Part of the implied joke in my review is that I like to think of Lackey as someone with a healthy, general love for horses, but from long experience I've been trained to expect the most awkward kind of sexual maladjustment from fantasy authors--especially since a lot of these authors start things off slow and only get into full-blown wacky fetish mode, later.

And I know as well as anyone on COTH that the same thing is often true of horse folk: the first few meetings seem normal enough, maybe even months go by leading to a productive relationship, and then all the sudden, one day, you learn that the person you've been training with is completely crazy. You spend a year training some nice-tempered, well-conformed horse for a sweet older couple, only to discover that the husband has been drugging all the horses to try to hide the neurological condition that his award-winning certified breed standard stallion has been reliably passing on.

But sometimes, that's horses. Thanks for the comment and the info, glad you liked the review.


message 5: by [deleted user] (new)

"Gor."

HAHAHAHA


message 6: by Jocelyn (last edited Dec 11, 2012 05:21pm) (new) - added it

Jocelyn Wow, this review was quite...different from your other reviews. But no less eloquent because of it, if anything it's even better!

Goodkind creeped us the fuck out with lots of fetishized stabbing. Jordan made spanking a part of his world's justice system. Gor.

Oh my fucking god. That was HILARIOUS.


Keely Glad you guys enjoyed it, thanks for the comments. sometimes, for whatever reason, a certain mood overtakes me and I get a bit silly--luckily it seems to have worked out this time.


message 8: by ala (new)

ala Reading most popular male authors, you get about the same emotional depth as a child smacking two naked barbies together.

This is maybe the best line I've read in a review ever. And I so agree... :-) Thanks for the review!


Keely Heh, very kind of you to say so, glad you found it amusing.


Rowyn I enjoyed your review and would like to say the more books she writes set in the world of Valdemar the better the world becomes. The psychic horse bond is explained in great length and finally in some of the later books revealing what they really are. ( no freaky fetish as far as I could tell) Of course you should take my die hard rabid fan girl feelings towards The Heralds of Valdemar series into consideration.


Keely Rowyn said: "Of course you should take my die hard rabid fan girl feelings towards The Heralds of Valdemar series into consideration."

Heh, will do. Thanks for the comment.


message 12: by Littlemisstake (new)

Littlemisstake I just wrote a very long comment about how I enjoyed your review which gave me an insight into my problem with fantasy, and how I disappointed with these books because I thought they were epic and awesome and complex until I realised that nothing was ever going to tie together. Something that should be epic turned to rambling crap. Also I agree with what you said about sex and fantasy. The app crashed and deleted it, so this is my condensed version of my comment =)


Keely Yeah, I can't count the number of times that's happened to me. Thanks for the comment, I'm glad you found something in the review that made sense to you.


back to top