Emily Ann Meyer's Reviews > Blood: An Epic History of Medicine and Commerce
Blood: An Epic History of Medicine and Commerce
by Douglas Starr
by Douglas Starr
Emily Ann Meyer's review
bookshelves: science, paperback-swap, 2011
Jan 11, 11
bookshelves: science, paperback-swap, 2011
Read from January 05 to 11, 2011
Written in a conversational narrative style that made the technical subject interesting and approachable, I really enjoyed this book. I found the earlier history (up to WWII) the most fascinating of the aspect as very obvious things like the fact that the history of transfusion is only about 75 (now closer to 85) years old as compared to the 2500 year old history of blood letting blew my mind--especially when you consider that it's now pretty much standard and accepted practice. Later--into the standards and quality war, while an important public-policy topic (especially given the issue with AIDs-tainted blood products that became the highlight of the final chapters) was almost too "current" to captivate me and change my thinking the way the early stuff was.
The author's analogy as well of comparing blood and its component costs to oil and its component costs was a big attention-grabber, and actually made me look forward to my next "DONATION."
The author's analogy as well of comparing blood and its component costs to oil and its component costs was a big attention-grabber, and actually made me look forward to my next "DONATION."
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Blood.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 01/05/2011 | page 106 |
|
21.0% | "I find I really enjoy these "history of science" type books. About 1/3 of the way through and already can't wait to get back to it (and must look for more by this author). This is full of truisms that manage to still blow my mind as well as shattering what I thought I knew (e.g., Charles Drew did not die b/c white doctors in the deep south refused to transfuse him; his injuries were fatal)." |
