Seth Hahne's Reviews > Olive Kitteridge

Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout

by
160319
's review
Aug 15, 10

bookshelves: bookclub
Read in August, 2010

I'll begin with my finale, so those who don't want to take the time to read several paragraphs will get the gist of it upfront: Elizabeth Strout strikes me as being an Alice Munro cover band. And with that, my review.

Really, my problem in reviewing Strout's collection of short stories is that I didn't hate it or love it. I didn't even like it or dislike it. I'm not in any sense ambivalent toward it. Save for the fact that I'm baffled by its Pulitzer status (and the other fact that I wasted countless minutes actually reading the thing), I'd say that I couldn't be bothered to care about Olive Kitteridge one way or another.

So I'm having a hard time mustering emotion enough to make you care about the book one way or other. Instead, I'll just talk about some things I know.

I know that Olive Kitteridge is not well-written. It's not awful stuff and is mostly competent, but it's certainly not good. Strout falls into familiar patterns of withholding information in enough of her stories that one comes to expect it. The kind of thing where she'll open with "After Event X, nothing was ever the same again" and then keep the reader in the dark over what the event actually was, only revealing the nature of the event pages past the point at which anyone could continue to care. She deposits point-blank iterations of Chekov's gun in stories—in one case, it's actually a gun too—telegraphing story intention with painful clarity. She does that thing that's common in comic books where a character in the midst of some unbelievably implausible circumstance remarks (with a figurative nudge-and-wink) that the circumstance is unbelievably implausible and were it not really happening, people would be certain it was the product of bad fiction. (Only she's not writing a comic book. And it's cliched and unfunny even in comics.) And she reintroduces Olive and her circumstance with tedious frequency. I realize that several of these stories were written years ago, but some editing for flow would have been awesome.

On the other hand, I know that Olive Kitteridge develops its characters generally pretty well. Especially its secondary characters, the ones who inhabit the book for only the space of a chapter or less. Those are the ones to whom Strout breathes life. Suicidal Kevin, jilted Julie, infidelitous Harmon. These are the people I wished the book would have continued with. Strout builds them into characters of interest and one wonders how they might recover from their stories.

I also know that if the state of Maine has the means and opportunity, they should ban Strout from entry or residency. Strout paints a picture of Maine that makes it perhaps the least likely target for any of my future vacationing plans. And I certainly wouldn't ever choose to live there if the author's portrait is in anyway accurate. Essentially, if Olive Kitteridge is to be believed, the state is built out of a) crazy and b) infidelity. I think perhaps it was only the final chapter that was free of the stuff. It got to the point where I'd begin a new chapter and sigh audibly a couple pages in and then explain to my wife that I was reading another chapter about another person whose quietly (or even not so quietly) insane.

I know that I did appreciate Strout's empathy for the aged. She brings to mind several of the difficulties and problematic philosophies of life that those of advanced age may surely feel if they are a) crazy or b) miserable. Reading Olive Kitteridge brought me forcefully to the conclusion that should I grow old, I honestly will beg with my mind to be forged of neither of these two (apparently common in Maine) characteristics. This is also a book that will be popular Christmas gifts from elderly parents to their grown-and-moved children, because nothing says Christmas Spirit like 270 pages of paperback guilt trip.

I also know that had this book not been assigned reading, I would have put it down after maybe the fourth chapter and probably never gotten around to finishing it. It wasn't so much that it was bad as it was just plain not that compelling a read. I never cared for the story of the title character and knowing that the side characters wouldn't be returning left me nowhere to hang my hat. And there isn't really anything going on in the book beyond the surface elements of the very-disjointed story, so Strout really needed to make Olive's character and story sing.

And it just didn't.

And this brings me to the final thing I know and that I've already kind of given away from the start. I know that I feel like Elizabeth Strout is an Alice Munro cover band. She's probably alright if you're a fan of the real deal but for some reason can't get the real deal. Like you wanted to hear the Scorpions play "Rock Me Like a Hurricane" but you're on a party boat and all you've got is Scrantonicity II to play Scorpions hits. It might scratch your itch or it might not. Of course, for those who were never big fans of the Scorpions, you'll probably be up on deck for the entire set.

That's me. I wish I had been up on deck reading some Paul Auster or Murakami or, heck, even some A.A. Milne while Olive Kitteridge played to the drunken several on the deck below.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Olive Kitteridge.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-8 of 8) (8 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Seth (last edited Aug 15, 2010 11:36pm) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Seth Hahne Also, I evidently don't know what a Pulitzer is for. I thought it meant Worthwhile Book. Apparently, I was led astray. So now I am at a complete loss for its purpose.

Also, I hate that Goodreads rates on a five-star scale.


Sarah What if I don't really care for Alice Munro, but do like Olive Kitteridge? What does that make me? Is it like wearing a Ramones t-shirt when I've never seen the band?

Should I be taking cover from the authenticity police?


Seth Hahne I could see liking a Scorpions cover-band in an ironic way. Or like if you were friends of the bassist or something.

But the short answer is: you should never ever stop wearing that Ramones t-shirt. Ever. It's perfect on you. I like the way it sets off your post-teenage angst.
______________
I'm not a big fan of Munro myself, but I've read enough of her to know that she's very good at what she'd doing and it's more that what she's doing doesn't particularly interest me often than that I don't like her. With Strout, I didn't feel like she was very excellent at what she was doing. Her writing is rather flat and occasionally cliched, but her strong point is definitely characterization.

However, based on reading Olive Kitteridge, I'm kind of forced to wonder if she doesn't do better at sketching characters than actually drawing them. Several of her characters from the book are worthwhile and interesting and feel like they could have some real life in them. Olive herself however never felt more than a pastiche of whatever attributes Strout needed for a particular chapter.

Early in the book, Strout establishes that Olive is quietly mad, which alleviates Strout of the problem of consistent characterization. Any time Olive behaves in an irrational manner or in a way that deviates from what we'd guess, we can merely chalk it up to her being Crazy Olive and move on. To me, it felt like a cheat to cover up for a weak grasp of her title figure.


Sarah But, let's be honest. Haven't you met a crazy Olive? And it seems like these crazy people sometimes make common bonds between us (notice I'm including you here) less crazy folks. It's sort of like buying a Volkswagen and then suddenly feeling like everyone else on the road is driving one. The lunatic confirmation bias, let's say.


Seth Hahne I've totally known Crazy Olive. I just didn't want a whole novel about the particular Crazy Olive that Strout delivered. I think she would have made a better background character and about 50% of the time, Strout seemed to agree (it was the other 50% that was more trying).

Steve Martin wrote a more interesting crazy in The Pleasure of My Company, but that may be because he used a Diagnosed Crazy whereas Olive was just this vaguely monstrous, Gaussian blur of crazy.

Also, thanks for including me in your exclusive Less Crazy club.


Margaret I put this book down after 4 chapters (as you predicted) but it was due more to the feeling of sadness it gave me - and fear of aging. Upon reading your review and reflecting a bit, I have to agree with your diagnosis that it just wasn't that compelling. Although I don't expect as much flow in a collection of short stories as you seem to. Certainly Olive wasn't interesting at all. If she were, the sad would have been tolerable.

Thank you for this review because it relieves me of the guilt of not finishing!


Margaret I put this book down after 4 chapters (as you predicted) but it was due more to the feeling of sadness it gave me - and fear of aging. Upon reading your review and reflecting a bit, I have to agree with your diagnosis that it just wasn't that compelling. Although I don't expect as much flow in a collection of short stories as you seem to. Certainly Olive wasn't interesting at all. If she were, the sad would have been tolerable.

Thank you for this review because it relieves me of the guilt of not finishing!


Ryandake "This is also a book that will be popular Christmas gifts from elderly parents to their grown-and-moved children, because nothing says Christmas Spirit like 270 pages of paperback guilt trip."
hahahhhahahaha nailed it in one!


back to top