Grumpylibrarian's Reviews > The Pillars of the Earth

The Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
674012
's review
Jan 23, 08

bookshelves: fiction, 2008
Read in January, 2008

** spoiler alert ** I don't know really where to start or if I want to elaborate on this. Conceptually, this book is strong. It has covers a broad and interesting historical period with significant religious topics etc that make it hypothetically my particular cuppa.

That being said, it took me a full 350 pages to even begin to like the characters. The book starts off painfully slowly, lacking intrigue beyond the endless misery of Tom Builder. Then, when I finally began to enjoy him, he dies a seemingly random and undermentioned death. And in a book that easily stretches 983 pages (Signet Mass Market Edition), underdevelopment is a real crime.

Another irk is that the book goes back and forth in time-tense. Not to say the author intersperses modernity with the 12th century, but Ken Follett does use language, style, and syntax that I feel are indicative of the late 20th century. I just don't get the colloquialisms in this context.

I gave this 3 because I felt like it was a battle to read, and I can't give a 1000 page book a 2 without feeling stupid myself for finishing it. But do not mistake, I think this book is a pretty large misstep and not "brilliant." It's epic and enormous, but nothing spectacular.
likeflag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Pillars of the Earth.
sign in »

No comments have been added yet.