Rhiannon Ryder's Reviews > The Necromancer

The Necromancer by Michael Scott
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3290187
's review
Jul 19, 10


With awesome covers and an intriguing story these books have fascinated me since the day I picked the first one up (with absolutely no idea this was part one of six! ugh). I'd be lying though if I didn't say I've struggled with them, and I just couldn't pin point why. I love the story, it's action packed and full of great reveals and monsters. There's an intriguing cast of characters, many of whom are immortal and have rich histories for Michael Scott to divulge at his leisure. So what is it, exactly, that rubs me the wrong way about these books? Why is it I feel kind of unsatisfied every time I finish one?

At first I thought it was because although I was intrigued by the characters I didn't like any of them. Especially the Twins, Josh and Sophie, who are sort of the Hero's of the story. There's nothing worse than when an author, in attempt to be gritty and realistic, ends up taking away all the redeeming factors from a character leaving you with some unlikable, often cruel, protagonist. But while reading The Necromancer I decided that although Michael Scott repeatedly makes Josh a whinny temperamental teenager (ugh, my least favorite, their bad enough in person! please don't follow me into my reading too!), and insists on hinting at Nicholas and Pernelles potentially less than heroic past (I think he's just trying to be mysterious and keep you guessing but really it just gets frustrating), the real problem is the pacing of the books coupled with the one year breaks between them.

Four books into a six part series, Michael Scott has only covered 7 days. They have been an astoundingly action packed seven days, honestly it's shocking when you get reminded of just how little time has gone by, but if you think of it this way, it means he's averaging less than two days per book. With each book spread apart by a year. See what I mean?
And that is what I think the problem is.
Take a series that is gogogogogogo, and cut it off right in the middle of something big, annnnnnnnnnnd, wait for a year to read the next two days of gogogogogogogo, annnnnnnnnd, wait for another year to jump right back into the action and gogogogogogogo.

Honestly, I think this series has awesome potential, once it's fully released in two more years. Until then, it just sort of drives me crazy, and i doubt I'm enjoying the full scope of it reading it as it releases each year. Will I keep buying it as it comes out? Yes. Do I recommend it? Yes, at this point four of the six books are out, so it's a good time to jump on board. But for us suckers who started with the first book? Honestly it just isn't working for me. I'm pretty sure I'll feel differently about it once I double back and read it in one go, but since the ending of The Necromancer was completely annoying(seriously does it always have to end on such a cliff hanger?) I'm not in any hurry to go back to them right away.
2 likes · likeflag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Necromancer.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Ashley I totally feel the same way, but didn't realize my own issue with the books until I read your comment. You're right on. Back to back, the books are going to be 5 stars. Waiting another 2 years to finally wrap up....it's killing me!


Rhiannon Ryder yah, I couldn't put my finger on it for the longest time, but then I read the last one and I started thinking about books like Harry Potter and I realized what the problem was. After all Harry Potter did one story arc per book, so even though they fed into each other at least you had some closure before you had to sit around for a year (or four) for the next part.


back to top