Angel 's Reviews > Warrant for Terror: Fatwas of Radical Islam and the Duty to Jihad
Warrant for Terror: Fatwas of Radical Islam and the Duty to Jihad
by Shmuel Bar
by Shmuel Bar
Angel 's review
bookshelves: current-affairs, history, politics-and-political-science, religion-studies
Jul 19, 10
bookshelves: current-affairs, history, politics-and-political-science, religion-studies
Recommended for:
anyone interested in current affairs, learning more about Islam and terrorism
Read from July 12 to 19, 2010, read count: 1
This book's conclusion is basically something I have been saying for a while: until the moderates in the religion (Islam in this case, but a lot of what is in the book could apply to a lot of Christians in the U.S.) not only condemn, but flat out reject, denounce, and kick out of their groups the radical elements, things are not going to change. Pure and simple. A lot of radical extremism in religion thrives because of the silent majority that either says nothing (because they do not want to create dissension within the religion) or approves tacitly of what the radicals do in the first place.
I gave the book three stars, but it is not because it is a bad book. It is not a riveting book, but it is an important book that more people should be reading. Personally, I read it to further my understanding of Islam, the Islamist movement, and so on. The book works in that regard. The book looks at fatwas in Islam and the role of those documents in promoting and encouraging terrorism using Islam as the basis for said terrorism. In the end, if those who claim to be pious and decent (I am sure there are some of those folk out there) do not act, then they are as bad as the extremists. Read this book to understand how they think. To understand what motivates them. But not all may be hopeless. There is a small minority trying to use fatwas as a tool to condemn terrorism. True, they have not entered the Islamic mainstream (Islam is extremely resistant to any kind of change from within, another reason that allows terrorists to thrive), but those trying to change may be the only real way to defeat the radicals.
I gave the book three stars, but it is not because it is a bad book. It is not a riveting book, but it is an important book that more people should be reading. Personally, I read it to further my understanding of Islam, the Islamist movement, and so on. The book works in that regard. The book looks at fatwas in Islam and the role of those documents in promoting and encouraging terrorism using Islam as the basis for said terrorism. In the end, if those who claim to be pious and decent (I am sure there are some of those folk out there) do not act, then they are as bad as the extremists. Read this book to understand how they think. To understand what motivates them. But not all may be hopeless. There is a small minority trying to use fatwas as a tool to condemn terrorism. True, they have not entered the Islamic mainstream (Islam is extremely resistant to any kind of change from within, another reason that allows terrorists to thrive), but those trying to change may be the only real way to defeat the radicals.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Warrant for Terror.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 07/16/2010 | page 80 |
|
53.0% | "Finished section on money and jihad (yes, money can and is involved), including forms of economic jihad. And the small note on treaties and ceasefires. Again, the lines of thinking and rationalizations are not as easy as most people looking from outside make it look (let alone the MSM)." |
| 07/16/2010 | page 73 |
|
48.0% | "Have read on issue of hostages, beheadings (yes, they are used to strike terror), and mutilation of enemy bodies, permissible or not (maybe. Issue of retaliation). Also, on the use of nuclear weapons (fatwas divided. Some say yes, some say no, or only for deterrence)." |
| 07/16/2010 | page 60 |
|
39.0% | "Started chapter on targets. How war and terror targets are justified. Then Muslims v. Muslims, and now on suicide bombers. Interesting, though suicide not really forbidden in Qu'ran (prohibition implied), the Hadith does prohibit, so fatwas validate it. Again, very legalistic (if albeit twisted)." |
| 07/16/2010 | page 46 |
|
30.0% | "Finished chapter on individual duty for defensive jihad. How 9/11 and other attacks are justified. Role of women bombers (valid or not, depends on who you ask)." |
| 07/16/2010 | page 36 |
|
24.0% | "Difference between offensive and defensive jihad. Idea of the caliphate and its restoration, which motivates many extremists now (because they can then go on offensive jihad). Again, the sense of manifest destiny (we are right, everyone better convert or else)." |
| 07/14/2010 | page 20 |
|
13.0% | "Going over the idea of the House of Islam vs. the House of War (pretty much everyone else not Muslim, acc. to Muslims in the radical and classic views). There are some moderate views, but do not seem as prominent." |
| 07/13/2010 | page 1 |
|
1.0% | "Actually, read a bit more since I finished the intro where author lays out what the book will cover." |

