Kat Kennedy's Reviews > Fallen

Fallen by Lauren Kate

by
3270188
's review
May 20, 13

bookshelves: kat-s-book-reviews, just-plain-bad, books-that-deserve-painful-death, kat-s-rants, ya-pnr-maddness
Recommended for: No one. Ever. For any reason other than to teach them how NOT to write.
Read in March, 2010, read count: 1

"In this lifetime you're nothing more than you appear to be: a stupid, selfish, ignorant, spoiled little girl who thinks the world lives or dies on whether she gets to go out with some good-looking boy at school. Even if your death wouldn't accomplish something so long-awaited, glorious, and grand, I'd still relish this moment, killing you."

I'm sorry, was I supposed to agree with absolutely everything the evil villain said and wait, with baited breath, for her to kill Lucinda Price painfully on my behalf?

This review has spoilers, by the way.

I have a list of rules for authors. Kind of like a checklist to ensure that their novel is going to be good. This book breaks them all. For posterity I'm going to list exactly which ones and why.

1. Don’t assume that your audience isn’t as smart as you.

Statistically speaking, you’re probably sitting on a fat, old average like the rest of us. Try to flex our grey matter. Please.


Lauren Kate thinks we're idiots. She really, really does. The prologue basically immediately informs the reader that Lucinda Price has been reincarnated and that black shadows follow her around ready to engulf her and take her away. The title of the book is Fallen, and at page 51 Daniel's last name is revealed to be Grigori. Anyone with half a brain already knows the gist of this story. That Daniel is a fallen angel and the Lucinda Price is his loved one reincarnated. yet 389 pages later, Lauren Kate pulls this out like it's some kind of massive reveal. No. Fuck no. Having your main character come to a conclusion almost four hundred pages after the reader is just an insult. You never learn more than this by the way. Other than a vague explanation as to the true function of the shadows - that is it. *Kat's attempts to pierce her own eyes a la Jocasta*

2. Don’t cover up bad writing and plot with a sexy, smoldering character.

Chances are they won’t be nearly sexy, or smoldering enough. It is painful to read badly written literature so just get it right the first time, please.


The writing in this novel is terrible, by the way. The editing is even worse. Perhaps the copy-editor had a hard time focusing on the text while her brain hemorrhaged as well. The sentences were choppy, they flowed poorly and the word choices were sometimes just plain weird.

5. Characterization is everything.

This doesn’t mean that your characters have to be likable at all times – or likable at all. But they have to be interesting, worth reading and fleshed out. They have to react to situations within their character or in relation to their personal growth and they have to reflect the plot and the changes in your story.


Characterization... where do I even start. *sighs* okay. Here we go, but this is going to be painful and filled with profanities.

Lucinda Price - If I ever saw this girl in the street, I would probably punch her in the face. I have never read such a useless, pathetic, tragically stupid female protagonist IN MY LIFE.

Luce's first encounter with Daniel results in him flipping her off. After that he ignores her, rejects her, accuses her of stalking him, ditches her, suggests that she is annoying, accuses her of being an intruder... the list goes on. GET A HINT, WOMAN! HE DOESN'T LIKE YOU! Only he does, and why they fall in love or want anything to do with each other is probably the only fucking mystery in this whole book. No wait, I scratch that. They DO belong together. They're both prats. I wouldn't wish them on anybody else.

She's a useless, stupid idiot and he's a selfish, moronic asshole. It must be true love. Daniel treats Luce like shit. Luce accepts Daniel's treatment of her (the fact that she does this causes ME to agree with Daniel's assessment), internalizes it, agonizes over it and still goes back for more. Again and again. The ONE time. I mean it. ONE FUCKING TIME that Luce sticks up to Daniel and tells him not to treat her like an idiot (the idiot that she is) he kisses her (probably just to shut her up - for which I'm eternally grateful) then she immediately stops requesting that he treat her like an adult and an equal and he goes right back to muttering cryptic things without explaining them because her puny female mind couldn't possibly comprehend them.

Oh. And ANOTHER thing! She obsessively stalks him, against all odds seeks him out again and again. Finally, when he DOES tell her the truth, what does she do? She runs away. That's right. Like a big fucking pansy, it turns out that her puny female mind really CAN'T handle information. I feel like muttering that scene out of anchorman where Ron Burgundy says:

"I'm a man who discovered the wheel and built the Eiffel Tower out of metal and brawn. That's what kind of man I am. You're just a woman with a small brain. With a brain a third the size of us. It's science."

Daniel is crap. Need I say more? Crappity crap crap CRAP! "Oh dear, I love this girl, but if I kiss her she's going to DIE!"

Well here's a fucking idea, dickhead, DON'T KISS HER! (Or don't kiss her on the lips *winks* at least not the ones on her face! *Chuckles evilly*) when she shows up, as she inevitably will, run away. Go to a club and pick up a chick and take her home for "coffee" or to show her your special angel wings. Whatever floats your boat. Don't stick around and interact with her and torture yourself by getting close.

Other characters in this book are two-dimensional. If there were such a concept as one-dimensional, I'm sure Kate would have striven to achieve that instead. They are stand in cardboard cut outs and easily forgettable and inconsequential.

6. Your story needs to have an actual story.

It needs to have conflict, resolution; climax, dénouement; beginning and an end. They don’t always need to occur in the standard order, but something needs to happen.


Can you read that, Lauren Kate? Something needs to fucking happen! Not just 401 pages of stalking! That's not a fucking story!

7. Research.

Know what the hell you’re writing about and put the work and research into your story. Nothing is more annoying then reading a book about an Anglican Preacher in the seventeenth century burning witches, when you know perfectly well how very historically inaccurate that is.


This author knows nothing about angels. Or the Bible. Or religion. She shows no concept for the Biblical nature of angels, their real function, how they differ from humans. It's. Just. So. Fail. Kill me now. I felt like putting on my sexy librarian outfit, pulling out my cain (hyuk hyuk) and giving a very interesting instruction about the Bible in both its modern context and the times in which it is historically acknowledged to be written as well as the spiritual nature or angels and demons and heaven. Probably would have been a lot more fun than reading this book because I look very sexy in my outfits and I give great feedback to my students!

And finally - the last rule that this story broke:

8. Consider what message your story is telling.

Remember that usually, and historically, stories don’t usually exist just for the hell of it. Stories have messages and meaning. They teach us and give us a perspective on life. Storytelling carries a great responsibility because there are few things more emotive to people than stories.


My husband and I have been together for seven years now and I can confidently say I love him. I love him. I think about him. I know him. Most of all, I know WHY I love him and I know WHY he's perfect for me and why nobody else on this planet would ever do.

Fallen seems to think it has something to say about Love. Albeit, I wonder if even it knows what its opinion on love is. Maybe that love conquers all? No, not really since in the book it doesn't. Maybe that love is eternal? Well, yeah maybe. An eternal pain-in-the-ass is the theme it really seems to be going for.

However, I hate the version of love in this book. It's some mystical, unexplainable tie in this book. Something that just is without any further information provided. I can't help but compare Daniel's alleged "sacrifice" in losing Luce over and over again because he keeps selfishly kissing her (when he kisses her she dies apparently) with real love. If he really loved her then he'd leave as soon as he caught a glimpse of her. He'd move across the country. He'd keep running from her until the end of time for her own good.

When I compare it to how completely unselfish my husband is with his love, I can never excuse either Daniel or Luce for their actions.

The relationship in this book is so unbalanced. There is SO much information that Daniel never gives her because she just needs to trust him and apparently her fragile little female mind won't be able to handle it. Then of course, there is the complete and utter power imbalance in their relationship. This book is almost an argument against feminism. To make the boy love you, you must accept his treatment and patiently wait out his scorn and derision. You're supposed to obsess over the boy of your dreams and imagine who he is in complete contradiction to the person he's shown you to be. Somehow this is supposed to be romantic. This is supposed to be real love.

Well, I live real love. I live it every day in its very boring, mundane existence. I live with my soulmate and we go day from day. This book is nothing like love. This book knows obsession, hormones and drama. It knows nothing about love. It is devoid of respect, attention, tenderness and the freely giving love that I know to be real.

The back of the book has a teaser for the next book stating:

"Can you bear the... TORMENT

The next book in the Fallen series by Lauren Kate"

The answer is: No. I really, really can't bear it. I'll leave it to people who don't mind having their braincells sucked into a black hole of anti-feminist propaganda.





This review can also be found on my blog, Cuddlebuggery Book Blog.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Fallen.
sign in »

Reading Progress

06/30/2010 page 1
0.0% "Yes, it's come in from the library and I'm reading it out of some sense of masochistic intrigue." 7 comments
07/01/2010 page 51
11.0% "W-wh-WHAT!? I have 401 pages to fucking go and the author has already given away what the whole plot is. Grigori?! Grigori?! Does she think we're all uneducated idiots not to pick up THAT little tidbit? Give me a freakin' break!" 15 comments

Comments (showing 1-50 of 257) (257 new)


message 1: by Bry (new) - rated it 1 star

Bry Booooo sorry you didn't like it either! Some books are just such crap!


message 2: by Jillian -always aspiring- (last edited Jul 04, 2010 01:00am) (new) - rated it 1 star

Jillian -always aspiring- Goodness, Kat. You outdid yourself with this review. I enjoyed reading it and I learned 250% more from it than I did from the 50 pages I managed to read of Fallen before I threw it on the bottom of my to-read pile. Kudos to you for the fabulous-ness of this review (loved your "rules" for writers when they're writing a novel!) -- and, of course, for bearing the torment that was this book!


Jasmin Ditto! :))


Tanya I'm mightily amused by your review. I thought I was the only one that thought this book was meh.
Thank you. :)


Kat Kennedy Thank you all!

Bry - let's be honest, we all knew I was going to dislike this one!

Jillian - you make me blush! Yeah, I could definitely see you throwing the book aside after fifty pages!

Jasmin and Tanya - :D


message 6: by Tatiana (last edited Jul 04, 2010 07:22pm) (new)

Tatiana I wonder why do people actually like this book? I've heard nothing but bad stuff about it from GR people I know, and yet this book is a bestseller? A mystery...

A glorious review:)

P.S. Did you lose a couple of rules? 3 and 4?


Kat Kennedy Thanks! Rules 3 & 4 didn't apply:

3. Listen to your fanbase.

They can indicate how you’re progressing in your story-telling as an author.

4. Don’t listen to your fanbase.

At least half of them are likely to be less intelligent then you, remember?


I'm quite sure she'll fail at both of these with the next book, though! So I wasn't disappointed that she didn't manage to break ALL the rules.

I have no idea why its popular at all. I found it so painful to read!


message 8: by Tatiana (new)

Tatiana Sometimes I am just so amazed how low some people's reading standards and expectations are. As if some brooding and kissing and teen angst is all it's required for people eat up stuff like this.


Kat Kennedy I know. I find it really odd as well, but I suppose some people just don't require a certain standard to what they read. *shrugs* it's nothing against them - this kind of stuff just isn't for me.


message 10: by Anila (new) - rated it 1 star

Anila I have bookmarked this review, and I wanted you to know.

Also, as I was reading, I noticed something-
" I felt like putting on my sexy librarian outfit, pulling out my cain and giving a very interesting instruction about the Bible..."
That right there, was that intentional? If so, you are too clever by half and I applaud you. (Granted, I applaud you anyway for this review.)


message 11: by Megan (new) - rated it 1 star

Megan I'm guessing this book is a best seller because the cover is so beautiful??? Or the fan base is very young YA ~ middleschool girls maybe?


Kat Kennedy What does it mean when you bookmark a review? Sorry I am clueless! And yes - the Cain was intentional. Teehee, sometimes I can't help myself!

Megan - I would venture to say that both of those reasons factor into it greatly. The cover is quite lovely.


Annalisa I noticed the Cain thing and smiled too. I'm just glad there are other reasonable people who hate, hate, HATE this book as much as I did so I don't have to weep too much for the future literacy of the upcoming generation.


Kat Kennedy Oh, thanks Brian! I'll try to viciously tear apart books more thoroughly in the future for you! :D

Annalisa - I know. Reading this book made me worry. But then, every generation always weeps for the future. My parents generation looked on us and wept and now we're weeping too. *shrugs* I suppose I'll just have to start getting used to the slippery slope of decay and find some way to enjoy it!


message 15: by Eh?Eh! (new)

Eh?Eh! I agree with Brian! Angry Kat reviews are tops!


Well, I live real love. I live it every day in its very boring, mundane existence. I live with my soulmate and we go day from day. Some days we love each other more than we could imagine, other days it's a good thing we're friends because otherwise things would be awkward.

Sigh. This makes me clasp my hands over my heart. Very sweet.


Kat Kennedy Aw, Eh! You're so sweet! I adores you! I'm glad you liked my review!


message 17: by Tammy (new)

Tammy Walton Grant Awesome review Kat -- isn't it funny how anger can make you so prolific!

Loved it.


message 18: by Anila (new) - rated it 1 star

Anila Kat- all it means is that I added it to my general internet favorites bar- I think I'll put it under 'writing resources'.


Kat Kennedy Oh! I'm glad you think of it as a writing resource. I said it to the authors I work with as an aid but I never know if they seriously think its helpful.

Tammy - anger certainly makes me very vocal! :D


message 20: by Bry (new) - rated it 1 star

Bry Seriously. The best review I have ever read on GoodReads. Bar none.

You hit on every thing I hated about this dam book. Not to mention I laughed at so many of your comparisons. Fantastic!


I am Isis There are a lot of YA books I've really started to hate for EXACTLY the anti-feminist reasons you've outlined in this review.

Maybe, for once, we could read about a boy who actually LIKES the girl and treats her like a human?

:-P


message 22: by Architeuthis (new)

Architeuthis Kat, awesome review. Fallen just got served.


Synesthesia Hello. This was a great review. If I were not shy, I'd friend you.
As, I am struggling through this book and Cam seems to be a nice guy!
He gave her a picnic and a snakey necklace.
No one ever gives me picnics and snakey necklaces.
Whereas Daniel is being an arse. I don't know who is worse, Patch or Daniel. I had to give up on Hush Hush because I was yelling at the characters.
In public.


message 24: by Penny (last edited Jul 15, 2010 08:18pm) (new) - rated it 1 star

Penny Okay. I hate to say "I told you so", but yeah, I totally did. I warned you. It's your fault you wasted your time and energy on this piece of garbage, and for that I am sorry. But, had you not read it, your review of this piece of fail wouldn't exist, which really would be a shame. This book is the worst thing published in the twenty-first century, amirite?

Anyway, fantastic review, as always. (btw, why would goodreads consider getting "professional" reviewers when they already have awesome reviewers like you, Ceridwen, Tatiana, Annalisa, and the rest?)


Kat Kennedy Penny, I know. I knew it was bad but I went ahead anyway. My fault. I'm glad you enjoyed the review though! Goodreads should totally pay me, though! I wouldn't oppose paid reviews if I were one of the paid reviewers!


message 26: by Annalisa (last edited Jul 15, 2010 11:29pm) (new) - rated it 1 star

Annalisa Penny wrote: "This book is the worst thing published in the twenty-first century, amirite?"

Yes, yes you are. And that's quite a challenge when she has Breaking Dawn to compete with. And thanks. I can't say I'm as humorous as Kat or you, Penny, though. You should be on that list too.

And we did warn Kat, but I get that sometimes you just have to know why people so passionately hate a book. Curious people make good readers.


Nicole After reading this book, I thought I was missing something, I just didn't get the point of it all and I guess I put too much trust in writers that they know what they're doing. Your review just nailed it! I enjoyed your review 100 times more than the book!


message 28: by Mara (new) - rated it 1 star

Mara YES. Thank you for sharing all of your awesome rage. I gave up early on in this and skimmed to the end, fuming the entire way and confused as to just what the HELL was going on.


Alkyoni ~ Kingfisher of books Lol. Am currently on page 84 and am still wondering WHY did I buy this book? I believe it is because everyone has to go through obstacles to achieve something. In my case: write decently enough that people won't goug out their eyes.
Either that or I am a masochist and I'm beating around the bush.
Anyway, wrote this whole comment because I wanted to ask: Is this book worse than the Succubi one? with the extremely stupid heroine??


Kat Kennedy There are several reasons why this book is worse than Gentlemen Prefer Succubi.

1. It's longer
2. Luce is just as stupid yet at least everyone in GPS fully recognise that what's-her-name is an idiot. In Fallen, everyone adores and loves Luce.
3. GPS is, at least, meant for adult women and is unabashedly and unashamedly cheap and slutty. Fallen is aimed at teenage girls and is pretentious and ridiculous.

I'm truly sorry you actually spent money on this trash!


Alkyoni ~ Kingfisher of books At least I bought the English edition! The Greek costs twice as much!
Talking about teen fiction, you may like Tina's web. It's from a Greek author.I just hope the translation's good


Kat Kennedy Awesome - can you send me a rec for that?

Also forgot to add that at least GPS has sex!


Alkyoni ~ Kingfisher of books Oh God. Tell me that at least Fallen doesn't have what Blue Moon did (haven't read it yet - and probably won't - but a friend told me): the heroine does some major bullshit move (sorry for the language) that has as a consiquence she and her guy can't even touch (let alone have sex). What the hell is wrong with YA/Adults (plain) authors???
Am going to send a rec in a minute.


message 34: by CeCe (new) - added it

CeCe Wow. You have just prevented me from reading what is, apparently, 400 pages of utter crap. I've read alot of bad reviews on this book, but yours really sold me. I think it was when you mentioned Nora from "Hush, Hush". I've just finished reading that book and at the end I felt like inventing a machine that could bring Nora to life just so I could slap her.

So if Luce is in any way WORSE than Nora, I want no part of this book.

Thank you for the warning that has most likely saved me several hours of mind-numbing reading. *bows gratefully*


Kat Kennedy It's what I'm here for, CeCe! It's what I'm here for!


message 36: by Penny (new) - rated it 1 star

Penny Your review makes me happy. And yes, I read this review every time I get attacked for not liking this book (which happens to be more often then you'd think).


Kat Kennedy Why do you get attacked and I don't? Send them my way! I'm spoilling for a fight!


Kat Kennedy Oh my goodness, Penny! You're right! That review was awesome! You should have won some kind of award for it!


message 39: by Kaylenamarie (new)

Kaylenamarie I have to say that I absolutely loved your review. When I read the summary of the book I wasn't that hooked into it in the first place. I mean it sounded like she was some passive little doormat stalker just reading that and I could never like a heroine that just let some guy beat up on her self esteem- if she even had any to begin with- which I doubt.

So I didn't like it at all to begin with but your review just cemented my dislike for it. I've been expanding the paranormal romance section of my little personal library and came across this author and book and was immediately attracted by the cover art more than anything else. I always think of that as the window dressing and it took some time to prevent myself from being fooled by all the pretty pictures but I succeeded- I think...sometimes...I hope. It takes so much more than a hot cover to make a book which I surely hope this author finds out.

I sometimes hate YA fiction as some authors flesh out their characters unrealistically or to be emo brats that just make me want to slap some sense into them. Sometimes it's especially tough for some adult authors writing YA fiction because they have an unrealistic view of the younger generation- a generation they are partly targeting- while they forget there are some people over 14 that read such stories. Maybe it's working for her if she's getting all these "fav" reviews from the kiddies but I sure hope she learns soon that there are more people out there with a lot more brain cells that can't be fooled.

But anyhoo, great review and I thank you for saving me some time, bottle of extra strength Excedrin, and a trip to the liquor store as I try to work out my frustration over an entirely unsatisfying storyline- if you can call it that. Kudos!


message 40: by Oana (new)

Oana god,how i hate you... so what if she writed about grigori? it's a book for teenagers, and i am one. not everybody knows about grigoris... for me, it's a pretty good book. so stop trashing lauren just because you're grownups!!


Kat Kennedy Here at Casa Kat Kennedy, we save the environment by not feeding the trolls.


message 42: by Penny (last edited Sep 25, 2010 01:18pm) (new) - rated it 1 star

Penny Kat wrote: "Here at Casa Kat Kennedy, we save the environment by not feeding the trolls."

Must. Feed. Troll. Can't. Stop.

Okay, so I can. But yeah, did you notice that your newest troll went out of it's way to create a new account just so it could slam you? Yeah, that's not ridiculous or a waste of time.

Anyway, did I tell you that out of all your reviews this ones my favorite? Its because of this review I no longer get trolls. Plus this review is way funny and full of truthiness (Colbert Report anyone?). So thanks. :)


Kat Kennedy It's amusing because out of all of your reviews, you Fallen one is my favourite!

I know the harder the trolls try - the more I'm doing my job!


Teresa ha i found your review 1,000 times better/wittier/ intelligent than the actual book. Thanks for not being afraid to tear a book apart and critic it truthfully because the editor failed to do so.


message 45: by [deleted user] (new)

Look I see what your saying and yes you have some good points but really there is no need to be this cynical. Most of the people who write reviews of books on this site go into reading the book looking for mistakes and flaws and you know what? Just read the book for fun! For example your point about characterisation being everything well ok I understand, but the author, in my opinion, wrote the character of Luce pretty accurately. She made her awkward, and stalker like, and boring, which is what makes her so interesting because, news flash, that is what every teenager is like, especially when they have a crush.


message 46: by [deleted user] (new)

Although I do admit that you hit on some very good points and pointed out many a thing wrong with this book. Exceptional review- I enjoyed reading it.


message 47: by Kat Kennedy (last edited Oct 09, 2010 01:36pm) (new) - rated it 1 star

Kat Kennedy Kimtalie wrote: "Just read the book for fun!"

This becomes an issue, Kimtalie, when I had absolutely no fun reading this book. Infact, I found the book really painful to read. In general, I love reading and I think, based on my library, that I have enjoyed a great number of books that could hardly be classified as great literature. This book, however, was just absolutely horrible.

but the author, in my opinion, wrote the character of Luce pretty accurately. She made her awkward, and stalker like, and boring, which is what makes her so interesting because, news flash, that is what every teenager is like, especially when they have a crush.

The funny thing is, I expect more from a character than the attributes of awkward, stalkerish and boring.

But Luce is more than that. She's also spineless and a complete coward with pretty much no self respect. It's not really someone I want to read about. Even the lamest teenager is a more complicated and interesting person than Luce or Daniel.

So do I think there's anything wrong with being so critical of this book? No, not really. Actually, I think it really deserves it.


Lady Eilonwy Kimtalie wrote: "She made her awkward, and stalker like, and boring, which is what makes her so interesting because, news flash, that is what every teenager is like, especially when they have a crush.
"


I didn't realize that every single person under the age of 18 was boring and awkward! And here I thought characters with only these attributes were the result of poor and lazy writing. Silly me.


message 49: by [deleted user] (new)

haha. this thread never ceases to amaze.


message 50: by Anila (new) - rated it 1 star

Anila Kimtalie wrote: "She made her awkward, and stalker like, and boring, which is what makes her so interesting because, news flash, that is what every teenager is like, especially when they have a crush.
"


As a teenager, I'm deeply insulted by this and wanted you to know.
I don't have any idea what your teenage years were like, or for that matter how long ago they were, or if they're ongoing, and I don't care because that's irrelevant. You simply cannot make generalizations like this about an entire age group, especially one that populates the internet and this site in large numbers.
Having had a number of crushes, I can say this for myself: While there is an element of awkwardness on one end always, it's perfectly possible to maintain normal interaction with the subject of one's affection. Stalking is by no means necessary- a general heightened awareness of said subject is normal, but following them around or breaking into files is extremely uncommon.
And boring? Don't get me started.


« previous 1 3 4 5 6
back to top