Jonathan's Reviews > The Shining
The Shining (The Shining, #1)
by Stephen King
by Stephen King
** spoiler alert **
This is one of those books that I'm glad I read after seeing the film adaptation. I wouldn't have enjoyed Stanley Kubrick's movie version nearly as much had I read the book first.
Stephen King, you may know, was not too pleased with Kubrick's adaptation. For one, he thought Jack Nicholson's interpretation of the character of Jack Torrance left little doubt that he would go insane and try to murder his family. When we meet him, he seems halfway there already.
Indeed, Jack Torrance was a far more complex character in the novel, and the film by necessity dispensed with much of his backstory. Jack Torrance of the film was clearly ill-suited for domestic life, and barely cared to conceal it. The Torrance of the novel, however, was a loving father who wanted to be a good husband. Nonetheless, he was beset by demons that cost him his job, and it was out of desperation that he agreed to become the caretaker for the Overlook Hotel.
In the book, Jack Torrance struggled against insanity, but was overcome by the hotel's malignant power. This was a tragedy in the novel; in the film, it was the subject of black comedy. Torrance was merely a horror film monster that had to be evaded and destroyed. I do give the film credit, however, for providing a more chilling ending than the book. At the end of the novel, the hotel was destroyed, its evil laid to rest. But in the film, it lived to fight another day, and Jack Torrance had become part of its dark history.
Stephen King, you may know, was not too pleased with Kubrick's adaptation. For one, he thought Jack Nicholson's interpretation of the character of Jack Torrance left little doubt that he would go insane and try to murder his family. When we meet him, he seems halfway there already.
Indeed, Jack Torrance was a far more complex character in the novel, and the film by necessity dispensed with much of his backstory. Jack Torrance of the film was clearly ill-suited for domestic life, and barely cared to conceal it. The Torrance of the novel, however, was a loving father who wanted to be a good husband. Nonetheless, he was beset by demons that cost him his job, and it was out of desperation that he agreed to become the caretaker for the Overlook Hotel.
In the book, Jack Torrance struggled against insanity, but was overcome by the hotel's malignant power. This was a tragedy in the novel; in the film, it was the subject of black comedy. Torrance was merely a horror film monster that had to be evaded and destroyed. I do give the film credit, however, for providing a more chilling ending than the book. At the end of the novel, the hotel was destroyed, its evil laid to rest. But in the film, it lived to fight another day, and Jack Torrance had become part of its dark history.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Shining.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-4 of 4) (4 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Robbie
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Nov 16, 2008 02:55pm
Great comparison of the book and the movie! Unfortunately, I stayed up almost all night reading the book as a kid, because I knew I'd be watching the movie the next night. And, yes, I was disappointed. The silver lining was that I figured out at an early age that books are almost always better than the movies, and are often still worth reading.
reply
|
flag
*
It was good that you compared the book to the movie, but my opinion is in fact much much different. I read the book as quickly as I could knowing that I was going to be seeing the movie when I finished it. When I had finished it, I absolutely loved the concept of the book and the whole story line. My mom, my friend, and I then sat down and watched the movie one night. As the movie went on, I began to compare it to the book itself, thinking how different the two were. I was left asking myself during the movie, how did Jack start to go crazy? How would people know what was happening? As I asked myself these questions, I discovered that I myself wouldn't know what was going on if I hadn't read the book first. I found that I strongly disliked the movie, but I recommend the book to anyone who loves a good novel.
Really good comparison, Jonathon. I read the book after seeing the movie as well, and definitely feel that they are a lot different from each other. It's a lot easier to sympathize with Jack Torrence in the book and his character is painted so much better. I did however really like the movie...it's just really different when you think about it...The movie is about a psychopath basically and the book is about a man with a very troubled past being tormented by spirits and then driven to madness. anyways. both were good. just different.
I read the book after seeing the movie and have to admit that, although I liked the film, I didn't fully understand it until I read the book. Actually my favourite thing about the movie was Jack Nicholson - I love the way he does 'madness.' However if I had read the book first I would've been frustrated that the storyline (out of necessity) was moving too fast. I do think they missed out on some key parts. The book was brilliant though!
