Jim O'Donnell's Reviews > The Amber Spyglass

The Amber Spyglass by Philip Pullman

by
674114
's review
Jan 26, 08

Read in January, 2008

Oooooof.

Too much. Way too much.

Pullman's series concludes like it started. Good but nothing great. And tiring. Very. The Amber Spyglass weighs as much as the other two books put together....and then some. Pullman pulls in still MORE main characters and still MORE beings and still MORE complications and still MORE unlikely, unbelievable turns-of-event. It just got to be too much. Between the witches and the angels and the cliff-ghasts, the shadows, the specters, the ghosts, the Gallivespians, the armored bears....you come away feeling tha the author is trying to beat you over the head.

And yet, you cant stop turning the pages. It is well-written, suspensful and you just cant help wanting to know what happens next. Thus the extra star.

The vast assortment of characters and beings would be fine if it hadnt detracted from the well-crafted main characters of the first book. Mrs. Coulter becomes less of a player and less interesting by the page. The same with Asriel and...characters that should have been better fleshed out and worthy of the weight they carried in this war (The President, Father Gomez, Metatron...)were left virtually unknown.

Most maddening was Lyra. She began the series as an admirable, sympathetic, tough little woman-to-be; a wonderful, powerful heroine driven to do what was right. By the end of the series her subservience to the boy Will is complete. The woman must bow before the man. This book is much too full of "Oh Will! What will we do Will?" followed by her sobbing and Will saving the day. I found that very chauvenistic and quite a turn off.

Still, the ideas of the book are interesting - but not earth shattering. What initially drew me to this series was that the Christians are busy crying about how this series and the movie based on the books are going to corrupt our children and kill God and wreck havoc on our peaceable society. Laughable to say the least.

Understanding that this book was geared towards young teens, I still couldnt help but think that any teen who had not had these doubts or questions or wonderment about God should be tossed out in the snow. Many of the "anti-God" things in this book were things my friends and were arguing about over cases of Miller Genuine Draft in Stephanie Montez's basement. There's nothing new here.

So I dont understand the fuss. In fact, there is only one atheist character in the book, Mary Malone and she felt and empetiness and a loss without her connection to God. I found her rejection of the Church odd. She ate marzipan and kissed an Italian. Whoa! I ate roasted chesnuts and kissed a Colombian once but it didnt make me an atheist. Cant we believe in God and enjoy the world at the same time? Pullman seems not to think so. Therefore there is something ironic about the near heavenly place Dr. Malone finds herself stranded (in fact, the mulefas, thier trees and wheels and her relationship with them was the most interesting part of the book).

In any case, Pullman doesnt say that there is no God. In fact, he allows that there may be a creator, a greater force but the war isnt against God. The war is against the supposed Kingdom of Heaven, a brutal dictatorship run by an angel who wields power through the Church. What is atheistic about that? Nothing. What drives the Christians nuts is that the books but the very valid question in the reader's mind...who does The Church 'work' for? If you arent or havent asked yourself that question you too should be chucked out in the snow. Here, the Church clearly works for a corrupt and evil angel and considering little things like the Crusades and the Inquistion...not to mention the insane theocratic drive of our current President and candidate Huckabee...Pullman may have hit it on the head. God may indeed exist (for me It does)but 'His' spokesmen on earth, indeed his most ardent supporters, clearly do not work for US or for HIM.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Amber Spyglass.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-6 of 6) (6 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Alexandra I agree with your reasoning, but I also don't think Phillip Pullman should have...oh, I don't know. That's the great thing about books. You can spread your ideas out, get other people to read them and comment. Not everyone is going to like a certain way you did this or that, but they are not being forced to read it. If you don't like the story, all you have to do is put it down.
Sometimes, you can get an overall feeling for a book that others don't get. I nearly felt my head was going to explode after I finished this series...but it was still well written. I got the feeling that he really didn't believe there was a god out there, and that there never was...but I didn't know that was just a corrupt angel.
I (obiviously) got a little confused.


Pandy I also agree with your reasoning in many places, despite having loved this book. Pullman sets up so much in the last two volumes that the incredibly large amount of characters and plot complications are enevitable. I particularly found the hair bomb idea not to be the strongest, though I don't see Lyra as subservient in any way. Metatron and those of the Church are Pullman's weakest characters, but as for the others, I find them very engaging and I think Pullman is wonderful at characterization. Coulter and Asriel seem as remarkable as always.


Megagle The atheistic part comes with the destruction of the "heave" aka purgatory. When all the souls come to the decision to no longer exist because the place they where was even worse than non-existance in of itself.

Is that Atheism? Eh not so much. This book reminds me of the stories elders tell to "explain the way things are". There once was souls and you can decide to stay as a soul, but that'll suck and you'll want to kill yourself.
That sorta thing.

As far as Lyras' character goes I was also saddened that he down played her self reliablity and made her dependant on Will. But the question I find worthwhile is do you think Lyras character could have been different or did Phillips "force himself" upon the poor defenseless character? I dont know, I'm going to have to re-read to find out.

I liked your comment, it made me think differently about the book I love and it makes me want to re-read it again. Thank you :)


message 4: by Dian (new) - rated it 1 star

Dian Fitria am so agree with the word : way too much


message 5: by Magdalen (new) - added it

Magdalen Dobson I'm a Christian myself and I wasn't so upset at the fact that it did seem to have atheistic elements but that to me Pullman was SO PUSHY about it. The Golden Compass I found pretty easy to just read as fantasy, but it wasn't the same in The Subtle Knife. I have no objection to an author working his/her own opinions into a story--if they didn't, it would make things very dull--but what I don't like is when it's completely undisguised and very overbearing. THAT'S what I haven't liked about these books.


message 6: by Evelyn (new) - added it

Evelyn You are SOO right Lyra keeps saying "Will, what do we do?" "Will, I'm scared!" "Will, help me!!" .....TOO MUCH WILL NOT ENOUGH LYRA!!! THIS STORY IS ABOUT LYRA NOT WILL!!! the first book was genius but now you just messed it up, Pullman. :(


back to top