Rachel's Reviews > The Imperfectionists

The Imperfectionists by Tom Rachman

by
60552
's review
Jul 15, 10

bookshelves: crap
Read from June 24 to 30, 2010

This isn't the worst thing I've read this year. Rachman, over and over again, convinced me to care about his characters and their relationships. I can't agree with Goodreads's assessment that the interspersed chapters on the history of the paper are dull; I found them warm and subtle. Neither, however, can I agree that Rachman "creates a diverse cast of fully realized characters." They may have diverse physical descriptions, but all speak with exactly the same voice. He even has one character, supposedly from Georgia, repeatedly use the word "proper" as a generic modifier, as in, "a proper shower" or "a proper relationship." Um, is Atlanta the seat of county called Georgia in England that I'm unaware of? Also, 100% of the characters are wretches hell-bent on unmooring themselves from the only harbor of human connection they have. Utlimately, that makes the experience of reading this book extraordinarily unpleasant, like being repeatedly kicked in the face by someone wearing really nice shoes.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Imperfectionists.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Shauna Nicely put. I agree completely.


message 2: by Jaclyn (new)

Jaclyn That ending simile is stellar.


Richard Nice catch on the "proper" bit. I missed that, but maybe it was a result of the character's pretensions to being somehing more than a Georgia boy. Was that Oliver? Your simile is fun. But, I enjoyed the read. Imperfect as it was.


Mythili some people make a career out of "being repeatedly kicked in the face by someone wearing really nice shoes," you know! I enjoyed your review, though the book had a very different effect on me.


Donna What, we in the USA can't refer to a "proper" something? It isn't used often, but it certainly is used, and Atlanta is just the sort of place it would be used, especially among people with money enough to hire servants. What I objected to (upon reflection) was the unfavorable way women were depicted. Desperate and single, or hard and aggressive in both their relationships and business.


Rachel It's not the use of proper I object to: it's the use of proper as a generic modifier meaning, simply, "real," which is a total Britishism.


Lonah I loved this book for other reasons, but your criticisms have merit and are kind of hilarious.


back to top