Rachel's Reviews > The Imperfectionists
The Imperfectionists
by Tom Rachman
by Tom Rachman
This isn't the worst thing I've read this year. Rachman, over and over again, convinced me to care about his characters and their relationships. I can't agree with Goodreads's assessment that the interspersed chapters on the history of the paper are dull; I found them warm and subtle. Neither, however, can I agree that Rachman "creates a diverse cast of fully realized characters." They may have diverse physical descriptions, but all speak with exactly the same voice. He even has one character, supposedly from Georgia, repeatedly use the word "proper" as a generic modifier, as in, "a proper shower" or "a proper relationship." Um, is Atlanta the seat of county called Georgia in England that I'm unaware of? Also, 100% of the characters are wretches hell-bent on unmooring themselves from the only harbor of human connection they have. Utlimately, that makes the experience of reading this book extraordinarily unpleasant, like being repeatedly kicked in the face by someone wearing really nice shoes.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Imperfectionists.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Shauna
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Jan 16, 2011 03:18pm
Nicely put. I agree completely.
reply
|
flag
*
Nice catch on the "proper" bit. I missed that, but maybe it was a result of the character's pretensions to being somehing more than a Georgia boy. Was that Oliver? Your simile is fun. But, I enjoyed the read. Imperfect as it was.
some people make a career out of "being repeatedly kicked in the face by someone wearing really nice shoes," you know! I enjoyed your review, though the book had a very different effect on me.
What, we in the USA can't refer to a "proper" something? It isn't used often, but it certainly is used, and Atlanta is just the sort of place it would be used, especially among people with money enough to hire servants. What I objected to (upon reflection) was the unfavorable way women were depicted. Desperate and single, or hard and aggressive in both their relationships and business.
It's not the use of proper I object to: it's the use of proper as a generic modifier meaning, simply, "real," which is a total Britishism.


