Annalisa's Reviews > The Maze Runner
The Maze Runner (Maze Runner, #1)
by James Dashner (Goodreads Author)
by James Dashner (Goodreads Author)
Annalisa's review
bookshelves: young-adult, speculative, sci-fi, dystopia, apocalypse, mystery-thriller
Jun 25, 10
bookshelves: young-adult, speculative, sci-fi, dystopia, apocalypse, mystery-thriller
Read from June 20 to 22, 2010
If Dashner got anything right, he delivered with the suspense. The writing can be a little dry and non-descript (maybe it's a guy thing), but once I became involved with the story, I didn't want to put it down. My problem with the book is that Dashner sometimes sacrificed the story for the suspense. It didn't always feel organic, the character choices and the plot direction, and it made me pull out of the story a little. Also, because he built up the suspense so much, the story didn't always deliver.
(view spoiler)
Dashner explains why Thomas has an easy time in the maze, but still. I would have liked more discovery from him instead of him just knowing stuff from his erased memory and that goes for the whole glade and all the people, not just the maze. It's tough to balance a plot-driven story with the slow pace of character development, and I think this story needed to be faster paced, but I would have liked a little more development, a little more showing of the other characters instead of Thomas telling us what they were like. More depth to the stereotypes and even with Thomas, a few fatal character flaws, a few catastrophic mistakes (other than going into the maze), that made me have to figure out if I liked and trusted him and fear for his life a little more. Also, the fake swears didn't ring true. Normally I love made-up words in a dystopia, but these didn't feel like made-up words so much as replacements for real swear words Dashner didn't want to use. There were a few times that it was too obvious what words they were supposed to be and that they were a straight-across replacement.
I think the story could have used a few more drafts before publication, but overall it's a solid, suspenseful story. I really liked the idea of the grievers and the maze test and WICKED: intense, unique, creative. When all my nitpicking fades, I'll remember that I liked the story.
If I'm in a good mood 3.5 stars.
(view spoiler)
Dashner explains why Thomas has an easy time in the maze, but still. I would have liked more discovery from him instead of him just knowing stuff from his erased memory and that goes for the whole glade and all the people, not just the maze. It's tough to balance a plot-driven story with the slow pace of character development, and I think this story needed to be faster paced, but I would have liked a little more development, a little more showing of the other characters instead of Thomas telling us what they were like. More depth to the stereotypes and even with Thomas, a few fatal character flaws, a few catastrophic mistakes (other than going into the maze), that made me have to figure out if I liked and trusted him and fear for his life a little more. Also, the fake swears didn't ring true. Normally I love made-up words in a dystopia, but these didn't feel like made-up words so much as replacements for real swear words Dashner didn't want to use. There were a few times that it was too obvious what words they were supposed to be and that they were a straight-across replacement.
I think the story could have used a few more drafts before publication, but overall it's a solid, suspenseful story. I really liked the idea of the grievers and the maze test and WICKED: intense, unique, creative. When all my nitpicking fades, I'll remember that I liked the story.
If I'm in a good mood 3.5 stars.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Maze Runner.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 06/22/2010 | page 374 |
|
100.0% | "I'll review when I get home on Thursday." |
Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Tatiana
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Jun 20, 2010 12:54pm
I am interested to know your opinion about this one. I am in minority (again) in regards to this novel.
reply
|
flag
*
Oh wow now I'm really excited to read this! I agree, I think non-descript is usually a guy thing, as is (sometimes) dry-characterization. But I'm glad you gave it 4 stars!
Thanks. I don't think it was as good as Hunger Games, but i was still intense. I think you'll like it.


