<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="10780084">
    <user id="398518">
    <name><![CDATA[Mike]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brooklyn, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/398518-mike-banino]]></url>
    
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">68143</id>
  <isbn>0385721706</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780385721707</isbn13>
  <ratings_count type="integer">1074</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">183</text_reviews_count>
  <title>The Wisdom of Crowds</title>
  <average_rating></average_rating>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170686255m/68143.jpg</image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/68143.The_Wisdom_of_Crowds</link>
<author>
  <id type="integer">38391</id>
  <name>James Surowiecki</name>
  <ratings_count type="integer">1196</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">200</text_reviews_count>
</author>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>5</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue May 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Dec 20 16:29:41 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Dec 20 16:48:13 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Two heads are better than one. And a hundred heads are even better. And a thousand are almost perfect. Watch the asymptote as it approaches infinity... You are getting veeeerrrry sleeeeepy...<br/><br/>This is a very interesting concept, fleshed out into a very boring book. It seems like a graduate thesis that got stretched to book length for publication in hopes of drafting the popular slipstream of writers such as Malcolm Gladwell.<br/><br/>The premise is fascinating, and the first chapter delivers. After that it reminds me of papers I wrote in high school, where I'd state a proposition and then strip-mine all available research materials in a singleminded quest for [only] supoorting information. It feels very one-sided.<br/><br/>Overall, as I'm sure you can tell,  I found it a bit of a disappointment because it could have been a very enjoyable article or even a book if it wasn't so heavy-handed in pursuing the thesis's applicability to every aspect of human endeavor.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10780084]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>