Alex's Reviews > The Lacuna
The Lacuna
by Barbara Kingsolver
by Barbara Kingsolver
Placed in context with Kingsolver's other books this is essentially worthless. She turns Freida Kahlo into the most magical pixie dream girl ever and gives us a main character so thoroughly desexed and generally grey that one sort of imagines him as a Ken doll, completely generic and non-threating in every possible way. And I KNOW that's sort of the point of the main character, but still, he is pretty much one of the least enjoyable protagonists I've ever read since all you do is spend time with his guilt and boring unhappiness.
Additionally, and you may not have known this, brace yourselves, but the House Un-American Activities Committee was BAD (NOOOooooooo I've blown your mind!!). Also bad: newspapers and media. Good? Trotsky and NOTHING ELSE. Especially Americans, unless you are a hillperson. I do admire how with the Violet Brown character Kingsolver has reconfigured the Noble Savage idea (and yet it still offends me!), maybe in these kinds of cases we could call it the Magical Hillbilly?
Oh, and just so I am not coming off as some kind of dumbass "America: Love it or Leave it" type I have no problem when American wrongdoings such as the internment/concentration camps for Japanese or the aforementioned Committee are rightfully brought to task, but it almost offends me when its done so lazily and without even the slightest attempt to think about why these things happened beyond "most Americans are sheep who like to buy stuff".
ETA (Man I just keep on thinking of things to dislike about this book): Her use of slang! Oh. My. GOD. Apparently someone issued Ms. Kingsolver an urban dictionary of the 30s-50s with the challenge of using every phrase in it, no matter the fact that when people do use slang they don't use all of it at once. About 60% of the characters sounded like parodies of people from their eras (see: The mother, Salome-I-don't-know-how-to-type-accents).
Additionally, and you may not have known this, brace yourselves, but the House Un-American Activities Committee was BAD (NOOOooooooo I've blown your mind!!). Also bad: newspapers and media. Good? Trotsky and NOTHING ELSE. Especially Americans, unless you are a hillperson. I do admire how with the Violet Brown character Kingsolver has reconfigured the Noble Savage idea (and yet it still offends me!), maybe in these kinds of cases we could call it the Magical Hillbilly?
Oh, and just so I am not coming off as some kind of dumbass "America: Love it or Leave it" type I have no problem when American wrongdoings such as the internment/concentration camps for Japanese or the aforementioned Committee are rightfully brought to task, but it almost offends me when its done so lazily and without even the slightest attempt to think about why these things happened beyond "most Americans are sheep who like to buy stuff".
ETA (Man I just keep on thinking of things to dislike about this book): Her use of slang! Oh. My. GOD. Apparently someone issued Ms. Kingsolver an urban dictionary of the 30s-50s with the challenge of using every phrase in it, no matter the fact that when people do use slang they don't use all of it at once. About 60% of the characters sounded like parodies of people from their eras (see: The mother, Salome-I-don't-know-how-to-type-accents).
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Lacuna.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-10 of 10) (10 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Joanne
(new)
-
rated it 1 star
Aug 31, 2010 11:58am
I'm working hard to get through this book, I'm not sure why I don't just give up. The main character is an irritating twerp. So he can bake with white flour, do I have to hear that twenty times ? Plus I also hate the stupid slang, and simplistic politics. I learned that at my mother's knee, or some other joint, I don't need to read it now.
reply
|
flag
*
I haven't got very far with this book yet, but I kind of get the impression that the overuse of slang from Salomé is intentional. English is not her first language, right? So she's mimicking the slang she hears from all these rich Americans she's trying to cop off with, in an attempt to fit in and sound like a genuine American herself (since she is desperate to leave behind her 'Indian' indentity) and is actually unaware of how silly she sounds when she completely saturates her speech with colloquialisms. That's how I read it anyway, and I think it works.And desexed? In the bit I'm up he's just been thrown out of school for irregular conduct with another boy, strongly implied to be a sexual relationship with that kid he was friends with, forgotten his name at the moment.
I do understand what you're saying about the school incident, but even that is handled in the most sterile way possible. All before and after and nothing in between. Because I never truly know what happened (the friend's response, the discovery) it's impact was muted/non-existent for me. It was simply something that happened that I had no way of even trying to understand. I'm not saying a graphic blow by blow was necessary, but I think it was a missed opportunity on Kingsolver's part to add some real depth, to make him more human.
I was very disappointed in this book. I've enjoyed all her other books and I so wanted a new novel on the order of Prodigal Summer. The only person I cared about in this book was Harrison's secretary/helper.
there is so much sexual yearning implied, perhaps you people are missing the subleties in this book?
why the lack of sex is more important than the actual point of the book? Harrison is not with 'boring unhappiness' simply because he never complained about how his mother ditched him or how his father did and how in his almost whole life everyone treated him like someone worthless.Simply psychologically he was hypothesised to have even worse psychological well-being. The book is more than lack of some sex lame scenes for early adolescents
I love your "Magical Hillbilly" analogy. It's almost perfect. Normally I might have liked the character of Violet if I was reading any other novel but this one, but she was only a sort of poor foil, I think. And yeah, the sexual yearning was so subtle as to be nearly nonexistent. Harrison was dead to me.
But if other people enjoy it, good for them. I'm glad I am done with the book, seriously.
I enjoyed your review and decided the movie Frida is better compared to the book. I am not going to waste my time.

