Synesthesia's Reviews > Oryx and Crake

Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood

by
2348494
's review
Jun 21, 12

Read in June, 2012

Uh, this is getting a bit squicky.

I'm having a hard time putting this book down. It's been a while since that has happened. I really must stop reading it and work but it's so good.

I don't know how to feel about this book. I finished reading it so I'm re-reading it in between other books but the idea of a post-Apocalyptic world is so upsetting to me to put it mildly. All I can do is go, scientists, please do not destroy the world or give everyone some kind of disease because I really love the world the way it is for the most part, so make it better and not worse!
I kind of like the Crakers, but I can always identify with aliens and mutants more than normal people. They seem so innocent. They haven't a clue that their "god" is a psycho of the highest degree.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Oryx and Crake.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-12 of 12) (12 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Christine (new) - added it

Christine I've had this on my "to read" list for a few months now and haven't been able to decide if I'm in the mood for this kind of thing or not. I have to admit, though, when I'm in the right mood I do enjoy the emotional roller coaster of the post-apocalypse story.


Dianna Rostad Am reading this right now. At that part where they are mucking through their pot-smoking teen years, absorbing the most depraved acts of humans. Getting tough. Do I hang on?


Synesthesia Yes, but it is a very disturbing book though. but so good.


Dianna Rostad I know Atwood has a bigger message here, but it's the nightmare kind. Thanks, I really need to push through for my book club :-)


Cecily The Year of the Flood has far more about god(s), set in the same post-apocalyptic world, but told in a very different way.


Synesthesia I will have to check that out


Cecily And then this summer, the third of the trilogy is due out: MaddAddam


message 8: by Gary (new)

Gary McTiernan Cecily wrote: "And then this summer, the third of the trilogy is due out: MaddAddam"

That is very good news. The first two books were both upsetting, though strangely satisfying. I read some place (probably on GR) that Atwood doesn't consider them as science-fiction.


Cecily She generally prefers the term "speculative fiction", I believe, which is fair enough. There is little science in the books of hers that might otherwise be classed as sci-fi.


message 10: by Gary (new)

Gary McTiernan Thank you Cecily. I probably first heard that term from you.


Dianna Rostad Gary wrote: "Cecily wrote: "And then this summer, the third of the trilogy is due out: MaddAddam"

That is very good news. The first two books were both upsetting, though strangely satisfying. I read some place..."


I can understand why Atwood doesn't feel they belong in the Sci-Fi category because I believe her view and message is that this is where/what we are devolving into.


message 12: by Gary (new)

Gary McTiernan Good point. I can't wait for #3 of her trilogy of speculative fiction.


back to top