Alex's Reviews > Frankenstein

Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

by
3144945
's review
Jun 14, 10

bookshelves: 2010, reading-through-history, perfect-novels
Read on May 25, 2010

This and Anna Karenina are as close as I know to perfect. The only thing that holds Frankenstein back is the writing style; at times you're reminded that Shelley was only 18 when she wrote it. The plot and pacing are perfect, and the scenes are terrific - particularly the exquisite first bit of the monster's story - but there are sometimes some minor rough patches in the sentences.

It's a warning, of course, about creating things we don't understand. Everyone knows that. What I'm interested by, though, and where I think some people misinterpret Frankenstein, is that Frankenstein's monster isn't a flawed creation. Some people think the warning is that we overreach and create...well, monsters, right? But Frankenstein's creation is instinctively good. He's smart, rational and kind, until he's irrevocably alienated. It's not in the creation that Frankenstein fails; it's in the raising of it.

So if Shelley is warning us against playing God, it's not because she thinks we can't create something wonderful. It's that she doesn't trust us to know what to do with it.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Frankenstein.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-8 of 8) (8 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Alex (new) - added it

Alex Y'know, it occurs to me that Mary Shelley isn't the most graceful of writers. I love this book; the plot itself is of course one of the greats. But I just finished chapter 10, where Frankenstein meets his monster and decides to hear him out - and really, the moment isn't handle very subtly. It's sorta "'I will kill you!' But then I changed my mind."


message 2: by Alex (last edited May 26, 2010 01:50pm) (new) - added it

Alex Never really changed my opinion about her style. Maybe it's because she was only 18 or 19 when she wrote the thing.

The chapters narrated by the "daemon" himself are amazingly handled, particularly the beginning when he knows nothing and has to learn about, for example, fire by trial and error - but even here, it's not great because of her mastery of language. I mean, it's great - just not for that reason.


message 3: by JSou (new) - added it

JSou I've had this on my to-read list forever. I'm hoping to get to it sometime this year.


message 4: by Alex (new) - added it

Alex It's not very long; I banged it out in a single afternoon. And it's awesome. Man, it's a really good book.


message 5: by JSou (new) - added it

JSou Really? If it's that quick of a read, I'll try and squeeze it in sooner rather than later.


message 6: by Alex (last edited May 26, 2010 03:38pm) (new) - added it

Alex Well, it was a long afternoon. But yeah, it's a novella, Heart of Darkness-style.


Jayme Write a review!


message 8: by Alex (new) - added it

Alex I know Jayme, I should...honestly, my main problem is that I have too much to say about it. But maybe I'll try to focus my thoughts today.


back to top