Cwn_annwn_13's Reviews > Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything
Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything
by Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner (Goodreads Author)
by Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner (Goodreads Author)
I assumed Freakonomics would be a book that used statistics to debunk various societal hysterias and fearmongering in a semi-humorous way. I quickly realized what I was in for when early in the book when the authors gave their background as Harvard Jews and profiled a guy that infiltrated the KKK for the ADL. The story sounds at least partially made up.
It then jumped into predictable white guilt inducing trash and goes into mental contortions using "data" and sociological explanations for black criminality and low IQ scores. The writers of this book are also obsessively pro-Abortion. The only surprise was they used statistics to show you are much more likely to die from an automobile or a swimming pool than a gun. This book would probably appeal to upper middle class liberals who like to consider themselves clever and politically astute from their isolated armchairs. For me Freakonomics was a big load of garbage.
It then jumped into predictable white guilt inducing trash and goes into mental contortions using "data" and sociological explanations for black criminality and low IQ scores. The writers of this book are also obsessively pro-Abortion. The only surprise was they used statistics to show you are much more likely to die from an automobile or a swimming pool than a gun. This book would probably appeal to upper middle class liberals who like to consider themselves clever and politically astute from their isolated armchairs. For me Freakonomics was a big load of garbage.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Freakonomics.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-1 of 1) (1 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Joseph
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Mar 02, 2013 11:40am
Obsessively pro-abortion? I didn't get that out of the book at all (and I am myself staunchly pro-life). I mean, they even concluded that chapter by saying that even in several thousand lives are saved every year, the cost (1.5 million abortions) are greater than even a moderate int he abortion debate would consider worthwhile. Simply pointing out that something has a positive result isn't the same as arguing that the thing is the right thing to do. Example: if we went around killing every homeless person in America, that would mean there are no more homeless people in America. That doesn't mean anyone would argue we should kill every homeless person in America!
reply
|
flag
*
