*sigh* This book is so true that it hurts. "He's Just Not That Into you: The No-Excuses Turth to Understanding Guys" presents a literal 'No Excuses' m*sigh* This book is so true that it hurts. "He's Just Not That Into you: The No-Excuses Turth to Understanding Guys" presents a literal 'No Excuses' method for dating. The book, only 165 pages long, states it simply and clearly "If the guy likes you, he'll work to catch you. Period."
In a way, it's a 'waste no time' dating style that sets a high bar. He's Just Not That Into You suggest that if you're searching for a serious, long-term relationship, why should you settle for someone who isn't going to contribute to that? It's the kind of logic people sometimes don't want to hear when they're smitten with someone. Which, of course, can lead to years of wasted time and broken hearts.
One of the main points the book tries to sell to the love-frustrated reader is the idea that there IS someone out there who's compatible and eager to be with you. It admits that the statistics seem stacked against you, but also points out that people who seem emotionally unavailable to one person will suddenly find a match in another person. He's Just Not That Into You argues that just because one (or two, or three, or ten) person doesn't stack up doesn't mean that there aren't others who are worth a shot. The search may feel endless, but all things considered, you just need one Mr. Right.
The book reminds the reader that it's okay to have needs in a relationship, and it's okay to require those needs to be met by a partner. It argues that a person who loves you, truly and deeply, will not only meet those basic requirements but enjoy meeting them (like, you know, actually calling you when he says he will. Or meeting your family and being polite about it, even if he's scared witless of your mother.)
The book is written by both a male and female, and it engages in a conversational Q&A advice column kind of style. It's easy to read (even when you might want to hear what it has to say sometimes,) and witty enough to keep you laughing even as you realize throughout the book your way just hasn't worked thus far. He's Just Not That Into You feels like listening to an older brother that every girl needs to have, letting them know, 'hey, if he's not into you, he's not into you, and it's his loss. Keep going and try something new this time.'
A must-read for anyone who finds themselves asking: "Why isn't this working quite right?"...more
AAAAHHHH THIS BOOK IS SO GOOD WHAT THE HECK WHY DO I HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL 2013 TO READ THE NEXT INSTALLMENT?!?!
I am such a sucker for fairytale inspirAAAAHHHH THIS BOOK IS SO GOOD WHAT THE HECK WHY DO I HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL 2013 TO READ THE NEXT INSTALLMENT?!?!
I am such a sucker for fairytale inspired stories and this story NAILED it. I LOVED the main character and the love interest and the plot development and srjfnejocksksdmenfke so good. My only wish is that I got a more satisfactory resolution, but since it's the first book in the series I understand but STILL WHY DID IT HAVE TO BE SUCH A CLIFFHANGER GAWSH I WANT TO READ WHAT HAPPENS NEXT RIGHT NOW.
The world is really cool. Going into this book, I only knew about the cyborgs so the Lunar people took me off guard at first, but then I warmed up to the idea. I'm interested to watch how the plague unfolds further in this world and what the characters plan to do about it. I also want to know what this world is like outside of New Beijing so I'm glad the next book takes place in France.
As long as the next book does not deviate from Cinder as the main character, I'm pleased to predict that followers of this series are in for an exciting and fulfilling reading experience.
As a side note, I listened to this book, and the narration is the best I've heard yet....more
Fantastic story. I was captured for the whole four hours it took to read it. I didn't want to stop.
I have yet to watch the movie, but I believe it's oFantastic story. I was captured for the whole four hours it took to read it. I didn't want to stop.
I have yet to watch the movie, but I believe it's on Netflix, so I'll have to watch soon. I've been told that the movie is fantastic as well.
What I liked most about The Shawshank Redemption was the ending. It felt like I got everything that I wanted for the characters, only it was given to me in a way that wasn't the most obvious or direct rout. It pulled on my heart strings just enough. In the span of these four hours, I met a stranger with a background unlike mine, and came to care about his troubles and rejoice when he overcomes them. It was very satisfying.
Some books I end up reading don't leave me with too many thoughts afterward. The Shawshank Redemption is not one of them. I don't know if it was Stephen King's intention to make me wonder about the prison system and the people (guilty or innocent) trapped inside it, but it certainly left me with thoughts that I'll have to chew on before they become opinions.
Excellent book, and well worth the time to read. Pick a free evening and enjoy! ...more
This story largely felt like a bad caricature of imagination. I completely couldn't get into the characters, and I didn't like the world either becausThis story largely felt like a bad caricature of imagination. I completely couldn't get into the characters, and I didn't like the world either because there was simply too many worlds with not enough depth. Good and evil were clearly defined without having any real active agents of good and evil.
And singing holy centaurs with wings made of rainbows and poetry? Are you kidding me?
Maybe I'm just flat-out too literal for this story. Which is saying something about the outlandish nature of the story considering I've always been willing to suspend disbelief. But please. Fantastical things were happening without a reason for their happening. It was just a literary acid trip.
Despite that, I did fall in love with one of the quotes. From Aunt Beast to Meg when trying to communicate in English:
"Oh child, your language is so utterly simple and limited that it has the affect of extreme complication." -Aunt Beast
The second half of the book was much better than the first half of the book. Likely because we finally got a 'bad guy' and direction for the characters....more
I went back and forth between really liking this book and being like 'eeeeehh, speed it up why don't ya'. At first I didn't like D'Artagnan because heI went back and forth between really liking this book and being like 'eeeeehh, speed it up why don't ya'. At first I didn't like D'Artagnan because he seemed like a complete brat, but he eventually turned out to be a character I really liked because he grew up throughout the book.
Of the three musketeers, Athos was easily my favorite. That guy is so cool.
Anyway- would I read this book again? Most likely not. The writing was too dense for my tastes. Characters got caught in long, winding conversations, some of which I actually enjoyed, but overall there was too much of it to keep me focused consistently. The sword fights were the best part, in my opinion. It was a fun way to see the characters' personalities shine through, and I always like to see characters work together as a team. ...more