I want to be very clear that I completely love Veronica Mars. I would spend hours just watching Logan-Veronica You Tube Montages. Sad, but too true. TI want to be very clear that I completely love Veronica Mars. I would spend hours just watching Logan-Veronica You Tube Montages. Sad, but too true. This is a fabulous story. The fact that it has blended across TV, Movie, and now books, is fascinating. They have done it so well!! The story is seamless and still gripping. I think there was a bit of complaining when the first book didn't have much of Logan in it, they redeemed it with this one. The movie was perfect and these stories continue it on. LOVE IT!!!!...more
This story is a slow build, but there is always something mystical about reading literature from the late 1800's. The elegant and enriched way that thThis story is a slow build, but there is always something mystical about reading literature from the late 1800's. The elegant and enriched way that they write takes me to a different time. Ms. Eliot is no different in that sense. Once the character of Eppie is introduced it begins to speed up and I didn't want to put it down. The happy ending was happy, but not what I expected. I guess I am used to depression porn readings, that never end well. I greatly enjoyed this book....more
I feel that Erica Jong is a good satirist. Her writing was authentic and even more honest than she may have felt comfortable with. How she felt duringI feel that Erica Jong is a good satirist. Her writing was authentic and even more honest than she may have felt comfortable with. How she felt during certain situations seemed universal to me, for western women of that age group anyway. There were times I felt very kindred with her and others I couldn't relate to, such as her wealth and her Jewish heritage. It is still always beneficial to delve into how others live and are, so I liked that she was also different. Like any human, so much the same and so much apart. She had interesting things to say about a few different topics. 1. Her comments on how writers are not always similar to what they write seems spot on. I even see it in myself. In normal life I feel way more crude than I expose in my writing. She is simply putting descriptions to archetypes, but archetypes exist for a reason. The miserable failed artist is definitely a truly bitter real human existence. 2. I always tell women in their 20's to not be judgmental about the fact that they are still so affected by judgement. It takes so many years to be what you wish you could be from a story you read. The Struggle of Women to feel self -secure and unaware of the judgements of the world is very much discussed in this book. It seems to be the topic that gets the most attention, but I didn't see it as revolutionary. She almost couldn't put words to it, like it was mixed in with the issues of marriage. In reality she just hadn't reached that point of aloof confidence and security, in a nut shell she lacked an aspect of self-confidence. It was embodied by her phrase of feeling like, "A dog without a leash", when she didn't have a man. 3. The comments on Marriage and Love were entertaining. It really spoke to the desire and pull between security and exhilarating freedom. Security by necessity has to reduce our free will and we willingly give that up. To Governments, Parents, Spouses, Friends. We need both. It is almost that every personal life and story is simply how they deal with that push and pull. Some people go to either extreme; Choosing to be Vagabonds or giving in to the Foretold Machine Conveyor belt of College-Marriage-Kids-Lifetime Job. I had a great conversation with a friend recently about risk aversion. He was explaining that he doesn't purposely seek out dating younger men, but that because he has a low risk aversion that tends to correspond with younger mind sets. That may have truth, we do change as we grow. I think in my own life I become more risk taking as I grow older, I think for many women that is also true, especially in sex and love. The end of the book was fabulous because it showed her finding peace in the way that I think everyone does, by accepting that life is change and evolution. It is the only way we truly feel both alive and secure at the same time.
On a final note, I loved the scene of her bleeding heavily in Paris and having to create a diaper out of a t-shirt. That is thing about being female. You can try to create life as a vestige of beauty and splendor for the soul, and sometimes it is, but you are always pulled back down to the dirty and gritty reality of what we really are. Animals, with desires and instincts that can take us over in an instant.
"People don't complete us. We complete ourselves. If we haven't the power to complete ourselves, the search for love becomes a search for self-annihilation; and then we try to convince ourselves that self-annihilation is love." ...more
I had no idea what this was really about and I expected nothing from it. There are not so many instances in my life where I see something that makes mI had no idea what this was really about and I expected nothing from it. There are not so many instances in my life where I see something that makes me wonder at the complexity and talent of the human mind, this book is one of them. Bret is a genuis writer in my mind and I will give more details as to why. First, let me say that I hate horror and I have no need to be scared. This isn't a horror book, it doesn't make you feel any fear. It sickens you and feels you with disgust, but for a very important reason. Before going into what I see as the true story of Bateman, I want to be clear that I understand that this may not be what Bret intended. I am ok with that, because either way I got to think deeply and differently about what looks very crude at surface level, and that is entertaining.
As I am reading I reached a point where things didn't feel right and I kept repeating to myself that, "My Bateman wouldn't do this." Here is Bret, a person that just wrote the most incredible first 3rd of a book. I'm having fun, I'm loving the characters, the complexity is crazy rich, and then he has the Bateman do things completely off character. Bateman wouldn't eat people, he wouldn't kill people without a show of emotion, IT ISNT HIM. It didn't happen. Cut away all the gore, and all the sex scenes that aren't even real, they are literally reels form porn. Images he rolls in his mind of what he believes an extreme heterosexual man would be like.
The Bateman character is these things : -Speaks truth to his friends about societal justice and what it should look like -"Wants .... to.... fit..... in" - Doesn't yell at a doorman specifically because he knows that his life is more miserable than his - Is a giving lover, in the one scene that I think was real - Loves Genesis, Huey Lewis, and Whitney - Constantly tries to connect & get people to truly talk to him - Cries at the Patty Winter Show - Starts sobbing at Random and often - Finds the idea of hiring little people as elves for a Christmas Party to be so disturbing he has to leave, which as a coincidence was also the item I found most subhuman in the book
Bateman has my sympathy from the get go. You can feel his rat like claws scratching at the cage. He is so trapped in something that isn't him, you can feel the pressure.
The Inconsistences that make my mind start to feel uncomfortable: -The sex scenes aren't real, not to mention that no one would be that giving of a lover to women he sees as "nothing" except food -Why does it never describe what he is feeling while he is killing them. -Why would Paul go to his house for a drink @ 2am after going to a secret restaurant for dinner. That makes bonkers sense, unless they are both gay and he was going for sex -Why is Luis so attached when they have basically never really talked -Why did he not kill the cab driver. He LET HIM rob him. No way would that happen, but it would with MY Bateman. If there is supposedly some wanted poster, why did no one else recognize him in all of New York. -How does he know sooooo many men??? Evelyn and others don't know them. -Why are all these women with gay men. Paul & Meredith, Courtney & Luis, Tim & Meredith -Why does Paul owe Meredith money WTF -Bateman is petrified of every openly gay man in the book. It is the only time he is completely blank and fearful. Timid and overwhelmed. That makes no sense. -Who thinks the kinds of things that he thinks unless you analyze yourself. "If I were an actual automaton what difference would there really be?"
ALL of this makes sense if Bateman is a closeted gay man, living in New York, in the 1980's. A very different time, it is easy to forget just how many people had to be closeted and how AIDS was so mixed in with that. I had been thinking that Bateman was either raped as a child or gay from pretty early on in the book. The AIDS thing didn't hit me until the end scene with Evelyn when she mentions the "Silence is Death" slogan and then Bateman is smiling and waving over at Another Random Dude.
So I come back to, "Why did Bret write this out of character shit that isn't really happening?" He wanted you to feel deeply the kind of disgust a human feels for themself when they are having to hide a basic part of themselves and be shamed by it. He wanted you to feel the disgust someone would have for themself for knowingly spreading AIDS, especially when it is because they are too afraid to admit they have it to themselves or to even being gay. He wanted you to also feel the disgust of being someone that knowingly makes the world a more horrible place every day, but is also trapped into the world they were born to. Bateman is a rat in a cage, doing horrible things to survive in the world he can never escape, but it isn't the horrible things that we are lead to believe. It is this that pushed Bret into being a literary genuis in my mind.
I believe when he is killing people, which he describes as a need he can't control any longer, he is having homosexual sex. I believe he had ongoing relationships with multiple men in the book. I believe Paul died of AIDS and that when he went back to Paul's apartment at the end, the realtor wasn't saying "don't make this difficult" because it had been the site of a dozen murders, but because a man had died of AIDS. This was when people still believed you could get it from touching the same surfaces.
Sexual desire, just like the desire for food, shelter, or acceptance can not be controlled for long. There are reasons that people will do things against what they believe is their moral self, in order to have these things. Is Bateman shallow and not the biggest humanitarian, well I guess that all comes down to how you see it. There are those of us that may not be given a lot in material goods, but we have a lot of freedom, and a general need for compassion in order to survive. If you come from a world that never needs to show compassion for others in order to survive, well to show even a glimmer of it is pretty unusual and I would say exceptional. The fact that his actions drive him insane and to tears, well I guess I think he is part of the few that aren't exactly as they are made to be.
In terms of literary critique. The entire book is filled with the wittiest humor and complex character scenes. I love the first sex scene with Courtney, showing just how clumsy and sometimes tragic real sex is. I find Bateman's friends and their discussions to be hillariously filled with absurdity; The horror over not having the best business card, the theory that you can get dyslexia from pussy, obsessions with TV shows, idolation of Donald Trump. My favorite scene in the book is when McDermott tricks Bateman into apologizing for saying Pastel's Pizza was not the best. The scene where his coked up friend runs down the tunnel screaming was a close second. I was laughing out loud through the entire book and I typically only laugh on the inside. The most disturbing scene was the eating of the urinal cake by Evelyn. I made a new Playlist called American Psycho, I think you can guess what is on it.
"If I were to disappear into that crack, say somehow miniaturize and slip into it, the odds are good that no one would notice I was gone. " His problem was not only that he was homosexual, or that he was stuck in the vacant world of Yuppies Are Us New York, but that he felt so much more than what he was allowed. If he could have been more vacant, like Evelyn, then he would have been what we call "mentally ok". Very similar to Tess of the D'ubervilles issues. On that that note, I bid you a farewell and good night. ...more
This was my first Classic Russian Novel. Strange, I know. I also wonder how that could have happened, but I think I chose the wrong one to go as a firThis was my first Classic Russian Novel. Strange, I know. I also wonder how that could have happened, but I think I chose the wrong one to go as a first. It was well written and had an ingenious story, but I felt it strayed. When people are getting paid by the word they can be tempted to put in long sections that go against their better judgement as a writer. He has a lot to express and the topics he chooses to tackle are worth discussing. He obviously is more in tune with the jealous and wicked side of female nature, than he is with the depths of being. His overall theme of the book is Religion vs. Nihilistic Atheism. He has a very corrupted view of atheism and only sees it as creating a nihilistic attitude. I felt the guilt coming from Ivan was not logical. He did think about the outcome of his philosophy. If he truly felt nihilistic about life, I don’t think he would have reacted so strongly to the death of his father, nor Smerdyakov’s trying to put the responsibility onto him. If he was a humanist atheist he would also see how it was not his one guilt to take on. For that reason, I feel Dostoyevsky is still struggling with religion and not being honest with himself about the fact that atheism is not by nature evil. He saw Parental bonds as having two distinct areas: the mystical and the actual. I found this focus quite intriguing. He described the bond all people have to the beings that created them, just thinking of those words, "created me", makes it become a mystical act. Some other being created me. Then there is the aspect of the "damage" all parents do, or so we see it that way. The child in everyone that craves safety and unconditional love, both of which no other human being can truly provide. Therefore parents will always fail to give the child what they see as the parents role to provide. The eternal story of disappointment in life, someone not living up to what you expect them to be in your mind. This also plays into the fact that psychology and ethics had just started to creep up as a science. You can tell that Dostoyevsky was very fascinated by how it would change the structure of Russian life. I see the father very differently in the story. I don’t see him as a buffoon. My favorite part of the book is when he is explaining that he has to keep his money from his son because as he gets older the pussy gets more expensive . He is honest, loving life, and generally creating children that are a direct product of himself. He is the "Religion" and his sons are the three aspects of all religion: The unattainable god, the body son, and the mind son. You can pick which one is which, but I thought it was obvious. I know I have a tendency to see patterns in things and generally books, when the author may not have meant it, but that is the fun of entering others worlds. One part that has to be mentioned is Alyosha’s speech to the boys at the stone. It was eloquent and magnificent. I printed it out so that I can just go back and read it at times when life seems not as heroic as it can be. There is a truth to remembering the times when we are our supreme best and to embracing where we form from. We are strongly physical beings that are defined by our memory of what comes in through our senses, more than the analyzation of the world around. I feel I am most joyful and content with life when I recall and embrace that fact. "The more I love humanity in general, the less I love man Individually" “Loves life, more than the meaning of it” “When you are older you will understand the affect of Age on convictions.” ...more
"The Tide of Darkness seemed to sweep him back to her, postponing from moment to moment his entry into the world of guilt & sorrow." There is somet"The Tide of Darkness seemed to sweep him back to her, postponing from moment to moment his entry into the world of guilt & sorrow." There is something about Southern Gothic writing that can disturb me to my core. O'Flannery's writing is beautiful and concise, everything I enjoy about language. It expresses an ethereal environment while placing you in the nitty gritty of what humanity truly is. There is a delicacy needed when describing anger, disappointment, envy, and disgust. The complexity that is humanity is hard to capture, and even harder in short story form. She had all the skill needed for that kind of story telling. Stories about the common man need to be told and aren't told enough. I will praise and remember her as one of the best writers I have ever read. It is hard to pick a favorite, but I think mine is "The Comforts of Home" It reminds me of Jude the Obscure, in that everything is appraised "not by their essential soundness, but by their accidental outcomes." That can really some up her entire work. What we give as our reasonings ultimately do not matter. How correct we may seem in our acts of anger matter naught, when faced with the reality that only our actions truly define us to our fellow members of humanity. "He wanted him to see the universe, to see that the darkest parts of it could be penetrated." O'Connor wants us to do the same....more