Probably a 3.5 rating, but I have a feeling I will be talking about zombie vampires for a long, long time. Always a sign of an enjoyable, memorable reProbably a 3.5 rating, but I have a feeling I will be talking about zombie vampires for a long, long time. Always a sign of an enjoyable, memorable read....more
I am pretty sure Ian McEwan starts writing all of his books with the same premise: introspective man and emotional woman come together for a moment thI am pretty sure Ian McEwan starts writing all of his books with the same premise: introspective man and emotional woman come together for a moment that changes everything. Everything leading up to the point and right after is fascinating, poetic, and worth the read. Somewhere along, though, McEwan gets so enamored with his prose that he loses it and forgets how it was supposed to end. He then asks himself, "What on earth would be the worst possible ending for this book...? I've got it!"
I don't know why this has to happen every. single. time. that I read a McEwan book, and yet I keep going back.
Three stars because I read it within a couple hours and was continuously entertained. Also because I cannot wait to hand it off to beach visitors needing a quick "beach read." Heh, this will be a goodie....more
I can't believe how much I enjoyed this book, and for the first time in so long, I did not want to put it down. Already I want to recommend it to everI can't believe how much I enjoyed this book, and for the first time in so long, I did not want to put it down. Already I want to recommend it to everyone, even if you think zombies are not your thing - which is not to say exactly how I felt before I picked this up - but horror reads in general are a genre I typically don't read.
So, zombies and all that are a very terrifying force, and Max Brooks has made them a reality. I've spent hours talking with my boyfriend about how to survive and what to do if a zombie apocalypse were to occur, and as silly as it sounds, I feel adequately prepared.
The most terrifying element about this book is that zombies - unlike werewolves, vampires, Frankensteins, etc. - are closest to what us humans can be, and perhaps this is why the subject of this book is such a frightening thought. They aren't individual attackers, as one would think a vampire is. And there is no way to avoid their wrath or to stop them without a swift blow to the head (brain, specifically).
I love how Brooks answered so many of my questions as the book moved along. What about people in space? How did they react to the zombie apocalypse? What about dogs? Do dogs become zombie dogs when they are bitten? When people die, can they still become zombies even if they weren't bitten before their death?
I have so many questions still about zombies - it's absolutely ridiculous. And yet, Brooks writes so that I can't feel silly about it. I, the innocent reader, feel like this could be a real, legitimate threat, to the point where I have developed a looming zombie-apocalypse evacuation plan. Or at least thought about it, seriously, and consulted some very smart people.
And perhaps that's also why this book is so great: the speculation of it all is fun, the "What if?" factor. Because really, who knows what kind of apocalypse could hit us next, be it zombie or plague or nuclear.
First off, I think it's important to share that I read reviews here before I finished the book. Since so many are negative, I was preparing myself forFirst off, I think it's important to share that I read reviews here before I finished the book. Since so many are negative, I was preparing myself for the absolute worst - specifically, at the ending. But I feel I owe this book a review, at least a defense, since Grossman is one of the most engaging modern writers I've encountered in quite a while.
Now, the ending was flat-out bad - bad enough for me to drop my four-star rating to a three, although that's not to say that I enjoyed the book any less. In fact, Codex might very well have sealed my fate now as a longterm Lev Grossman fan. But for me, the end is not what's important: it's the experience I had from the overall reading, and that experience was fulfilling. I love how Grossman employs his words, and in turn his sentences and paragraphs. He writes like a journalist, which is what he is, and that simple, elegant style is attractive and exciting to me. I want to know the description of a place, but not too much, and I want dialogue that propels a story forward, but not so much to where I lose track of who is actually speaking. Grossman works this balance, and esthetically Codex is top notch.
I do believe it helped that I have zero knowledge of any medieval workings, so book binding, estate titles - really anything pre-1600 - can get away with a lot of literary merit in my case because I am uneducated in this arena. If you are, sorry: I'm sure you'll have even more reason to be a critic. But Grossman is also a techie and a geek, and his interest in video games and computer systems shines through in a novel about a book from the days when fiction writing was simply blasphemous. In a way, Codex is a geeks' and bibliophiles' Da Vinci Code: the historical twists and turns are still there, only amplified by a computer game side story that might leave you less enthralled. Never fear, Grossman figures out a way to tie it together.
As a lead character, Edward is also going to be difficult for many to warm up to. He's not a tremendously lovable guy, but he works hard and is quietly observant - like the lead in The Magicians. Edward is snarky, but he's lonely. And this loneliness is what drives his decisions - a sad reason, but one that gave me even more reason to pity him enough by the end to forgive his foolishness. (I know I'm being vague, but if you haven't read or finished reading this yet, a spoiler is the last thing you'll want.)
While the ending is simply unsatisfactory for a book that liked to build things up, ultimately you have to remember that Codex is about one single character and his journey to rediscover himself. It takes a crazy turn of events for Edward to do this, but in the end he's rediscovered his passion. Somehow, someway, that's something we all need - whether it's a kick in the butt or a transcontinental, century-crossing trip.
Yes, Codex leaves many unanswered questions and takes the easy way out. But for some reason I am okay with that - just like Edward is with the codex. Is this a connection that Grossman wanted to make? Who knows, but it is a tie that I accept, appreciated, and thoroughly enjoyed.
Bring on the next one, Grossman. With each book you've put out, you're only continuing to improve....more
This would be a 2.5, but I'll bump it up to 3 for writing quality alone.
Not sure how I feel about this one. Honestly, the reviews on the back of theThis would be a 2.5, but I'll bump it up to 3 for writing quality alone.
Not sure how I feel about this one. Honestly, the reviews on the back of the book blew it so out of proportion that I felt I should feel underwhelmed, so the fact that I am is all the more disappointing. Ms. Byatt certainly knows how to turn a phrase, but her stories never found the niche I desired. Were they intended to be creepy? Insightful? Mesmerizing? One cannot know.
I think I hold short stories to a higher standard because I've read some truly incredible ones over the years, so finishing all five of these with barely feeling an ounce of fascination for the character stories is another reason I rate so harshly.
I do believe the last story, "The Pink Ribbon," was the highlight of the collection. This story did captivate me on a larger scale, and the final paragraphs gave me the "Aha" moment I desired. Short, sweet, and a conclusion I agreed with but still surprised me, I wish more of the book had been like this....more