Over the past few years, Bart Ehrman has earned a reputation for rankling Christian evangelicals and fundamentalists. Some of this is almost certainly...moreOver the past few years, Bart Ehrman has earned a reputation for rankling Christian evangelicals and fundamentalists. Some of this is almost certainly intentional. Compared to other NT scholars who take a similar stance on the historical Jesus (e.g., E.P. Sanders, Dale Allison, etc.), Ehrman's popular histories read like mystery novels. Ehrman's fans will call this energetic scholarship. His critics will call it breathless sensationalism. As with most things, the truth probably sits somewhere in between. But even allowing for the charge of sensationalism, nothing about Ehrman's claims is especially sensational.
The main ideas here--that the gospels present conflicting accounts of Jesus' life and teachings, that Jesus was most likely a first-century Jewish preacher whose message hinged on prophecies of imminent apocalypse, that the high christology espoused in the Nicene Creed was not a part of Jesus' own teaching--are neither new nor controversial among scholars. In fact, they reside comfortably within the mainstream consensus and have for over a century. But the way Ehrman articulates these positions cuts hard against fundamentalist shibboleths, in particular the doctrine of Biblical inerrancy. Frankly, I see no problem with this. Evangelicals have worked hard to make Christianity incompatible with critical thinking. The sooner the message gets out that their doctrine is undercut by a basic comprehension of the facts, and so then bankrupt, the sooner the church can move beyond the dubious theology that has come to characterize large swaths of twenty-first-century Protestantism.
So what about this book specifically? It's good. Where previous efforts focused on biography and scripture, the focus here is on the development of christology and doctrine in the early church. It's a little broad, simplifies some things (a necessity in books of this kind), and doesn't always give a clear sense of when Ehrman is straying from the consensus into more hotly contested territory, but if you're new to the world of NT studies, this book is a satisfying primer. The endnotes and citations are ample enough to keep you busy for a long time if you're someone inclined to check sources. And if you're already familiar with the historical Jesus, critical textual analysis, or the history of early Christianity, Ehrman's latest makes for a good refresher.
For Ehrman completists, it seems worth noting that he admits changing his mind on several points since his last book. One notable switch centers on the question of the empty tomb and a previous dispute with John Dominic Crossan. It's nice to see a scholar who's honest about his own process and serious about rethinking his assumptions; it sets a strong example for the rest of us.(less)
If my girlfriend hears me say "Nate Silver" one more time, she just might lose it. And I'll admit, I'm kind of a junky for Silver's FiveThirtyEight bl...moreIf my girlfriend hears me say "Nate Silver" one more time, she just might lose it. And I'll admit, I'm kind of a junky for Silver's FiveThirtyEight blog. But how can you not be? The guy writes sensibly and accessibly on difficult and complex topics, and when he makes a prediction, he usually gets it right. The Signal and the Noise is Silver's book on the science of prediction, and it covers a number of subject areas (politics, economics, sports, and weather to name just a few) where people use statistics to make predictions--some good, others not so good. In each of these subject areas, Silver breaks down the data and tries to distinguish signal from noise for his readers, but that isn't really what the book is about. Instead, Silver's goal is to get his readers thinking about the world probabilistically, with a truer sense of the things we know and the things we don't. As our world becomes increasingly data-saturated, the ability to think in this way will only become more crucial, and I'm about 85% sure of that.(less)
The strength of Dreams From My Father isn't so much in the nuts and bolts of the writing (though the President does turn a phrase nicely from time to...moreThe strength of Dreams From My Father isn't so much in the nuts and bolts of the writing (though the President does turn a phrase nicely from time to time). Rather, it resides in the fact of this book's existence. While most presidents and presidential candidates put their byline to a memoir at some point, very few penned their memoirs before ever becoming political figures. Because Barack Obama wrote this without any idea of where he would end up, we get candid access to his moral and intellectual development without any of the spin or compromises that would undoubtedly have shaped the book, had he written it later in life. How ironic then that this president, to whose youth and youthful indiscretions of mind and body we have such ready access, should also be one whose biography is awash in myths and conspiracy theories. Whether you support this President or are counting down the days until his term expires, read this book. It's a rare and precious thing to know the mind of the nation's chief executive.(less)
I'm famous (er, famous among my friends anyway) for making the only slightly hyperbolic claim that David Simon's HBO series The Wire is the greatest a...moreI'm famous (er, famous among my friends anyway) for making the only slightly hyperbolic claim that David Simon's HBO series The Wire is the greatest achievement of Western Civilization. It's not surprising then that I loved Simon's book chronicling the year he spent as a reporter embedded with the Baltimore Police Department's Homicide squad in 1988. Several characters and more than a few anecdotes here will be familiar to fans of The Wire. More importantly, the entire set bears traces of the Dickensian aspect (or is it the Simonian aspect?) that gave The Wire its poignancy and resonance. Homicide is less about the cases Simon bears witness to and more about the men he comes to know and love, men who confront America's worst on a daily basis. It's the story of their successes and failures, large and small, and the strategies that allow them to maintain their humanity in the face of the inhuman.(less)