I've really come to appreciate Inhabit Media publishing for the variety ofThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 4.5 of 5
I've really come to appreciate Inhabit Media publishing for the variety of books on Inuit themes. I can't say that I've ever been particularly knowledgeable, or even, perhaps, interested in, the Inuit history. But I realize now that it's likely because it's just never been in front of me. Since sampling a few books, I've become very interested in these hearty people. Kenn Harper's book, In Those Days, is a collection of newspaper articles he's written which are generally brief biographies of a variety of Inuit people. Now the Inuit as a 'people' become individuals.
Harper's writing is very clean and quite readable, without being dumbed-down. I've chosen to follow Harper's blog, and the on-line newspaper that he writes for, based on my enjoyment of this book.
In Those Days features a number of interesting articles, my favorite of which was "Inuit at the World's Fair" in which an Inuit girl, Nancy Columbia was voted prettiest girl at the fair with 8,000 more votes than the runner-up.
But articles such as "Who Was Albert One-Eye?" and "An Inuit Boy in Scotland" and "Simon Gibbon: First Inuit Minister" and "In Memory of John Shiwak, Inuit Sniper" are also extremely interesting. In fact, there's not a bad story in the book and each mini-biography is well researched and presented.
This is a wonderful book that opens windows to let the world look in on the early days and lives of the Inuit people. Even if you've never heard of the Inuit or never thought you'd be interested in learning more about them, Kenn Harper will change your mind.
Looking for a good book? In Those Days is a collection of mini-biographies of some early Inuit people and is a book you want to read, even if you don't realize it yet. ...more
I feel a little duped by this book. Let me share with you the Goodreads opeThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 2.0 of 5
I feel a little duped by this book. Let me share with you the Goodreads opening description of the book:
Sharing the lessons he's learned from over forty years as a magician and family man, Lon Milo DuQuette reveals his unique point of view about magick--its ups and downs, ins and outs, and how his family and home are the foundation of his practice. Written in Lon's humorous style that makes learning and discovery a joy, Homemade Magick will show you that everyday life events are, in fact, true magical adventures.
This sounds like a delightful, personable biography of a magician. For me, and I suspect the vast majority of readers out there, a magician is someone who performs illusions. Penn & Teller, Harry Blackstone, Harry Anderson, Criss Angel, David Copperfield, etc.
No. This is a book by someone who practices what most in the world would consider the occult or the dark arts (though that is a misnomer). This is a book by a self-made magick-as-religion magus.
Despite very quickly realizing that this was not at all what I was expecting, I did my best to accept it for what it was and give it the benefit of the doubt and read it cover to cover. This is made more difficult because it's not a topic I'm personally interested in (though I like to think I have an open mind and am willing to 'listen' to anothers' beliefs).
As a biography, I'm not very impressed with the book. There's very little biography here, frankly. This is more of a 'how-to' book. DuQuette does talk a little personal history, but only when referencing how he came by some of his magick, but as a biography, explaining his childhood and how he came to be interested in the life of magick rites and rituals? Not so much.
As a 'how to' book - how to perform rites and rituals and come by certain 'powers' without a magus in your area to teach you - this is probably a little more helpful. For those interested in this particular lifestyle (and let's face it, it is almost more of a lifestyle than a religion) this should prove helpful. But I couldn't help but wonder how ... shall I say 'authentic' a rite or a ritual is when it is performed by someone using make-shift props and incantations that are spoken without proper inflections. How important are these props and rituals if such substitutions can be made? Are they needed more for the person delivering the rites, to give them a sense that there's another power at work, than they are for actual necessity?
Not being interested in learning how to perform 'magick,' I grew bored with the book. there really was more of this than there was 'biography' and what biography there was really felt a little depressing. While DuQuette seems perfectly happy with his life and proud of what he's accomplished (this is good! More people should have such pride) I couldn't shake the sense that a 'biography' by such a person seemed really unnecessary. I'm not sure what the target market is here, though clearly it isn't me.
Two stars to this book because it MAY be helpful to people who want to know more about how to live this life, but it's NOT a biography, it does NOT show "that everyday life events are, in fact, true magical adventures" and it is not particularly interesting.
Looking for a good book? For the very small target audience, those interested in learning occult how-to, this might prove interesting, but otherwise it's not particularly worthwhile....more
What a fantastic concept! Convince NASA/JPL to allow an average joe to sitThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 2.5 of 5
What a fantastic concept! Convince NASA/JPL to allow an average joe to sit in on the Phoenix Mars Mission; hanging out with all the brilliant minds (it is, after all, rocket science) and living on 'Mars time' just to be able to go home and write a book about it. Kudos to NASA/JPL for agreeing to it and for letting the visitor in on as many meetings as he apparently did attend. Shame on NASA/JPL for apparently not vetting author Andrew Kessler and making sure he would be able to write coherently and appropriately on the subject.
Kessler tries to be 'personable' with his writing, assuming his lack of science and technical knowledge will make what he has to say more approachable to the average reader. Unfortunately, his style, or 'voice,' comes across as juvenile and forced and frankly, out of place.
"The RAC (Robotic Arm Camera) is attached to the RA just above the scoop. The instrument provides close-up, full-frontal color images of the Martian surface close to the ground, under the lander, or anywhere the RA can go. Its got all kinds of filters and scientific attachments to capture and makes sense of extreme close-ups of dirt or whatever else Phoenix can dig up. I for one am hoping for a secret decoder ring."
A secret decoder ring. The author is sitting in a room with some of the brightest minds on the planet, who are about to reach out to a different planet, and all he can do is remind the reader how out of his league he is by 'hoping for a secret decoder ring.' I know he's just trying to be cute, or funny, but he's not. The information he's sharing is great. His secret hopes and wishes? Not so much.
Kessler has an opportunity many of us would like to have ... a backstage glimpse at NASA on a major project. When he relates the actual information as to what's happening and how the scientists at NASA deal with obstacles, then this is a remarkable book. When a glitch on the lander stops the progress of taking soil samples, we get to see these scientists as people, problem-solving and arguing. How they come to the decisions that they do, is what many of us want to know. It is this that keeps the reader interested. But when Kessler's 'fan boy' sensibilities kick in, he lacks a personal filter and he comes across as the teenage, excited fan.
Dara Sabahi, the chief engineer on the Phoenix project tells Kessler, "Documenting the mission will be very important for the future. ... I'm counting on this documentation. ... The more people can read about the mission process, the more we can learn about improving the process." Yet as the mission moved on, Kessler began to be excluded from some of the important meetings. I took this as a sign that the powers-that-be at NASA/JPL began to recognize that they weren't going to get the 'documentation' that they were hoping for.
I was hoping for an inside look at how NASA works. What I got was a long college essay on how someone spent their summer. I give this two and a half stars for the glimpses of the NASA machinations that we did get.
Looking for a good book? Martian Summer offers a behind-the-scenes look at the trials, successes, and struggles of a true NASA interplanetary mission but the book gets bogged down with the inexperienced writer's ability to let go of his 'fan boy' obsession and just share the story....more
I knew nothing about Pauline Benton before reading this, but I've always haThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 3.5 of 5
I knew nothing about Pauline Benton before reading this, but I've always had a fascination for puppetry of all sorts, so I thought that a biography of a puppeteer or puppet-master might be interesting. It is!
Author Grant Hayter-Menzies clearly has a deep appreciation for Benton's work and has done extensive research on Ms. Benton and the Red Gate Shadow Theatre puppetry company that Benton founded and toured with. He beautifully weaves in Benton's history, along with shadow puppetry history as if the two were not independent of one another (and perhaps they are not).
Benton developed an interest in the shadow puppets at a relatively young age. Though there's no concrete evidence of when this happened, Hayter-Menzies makes some educated guesses based on some known facts, and it rings true.
Even throughout the book, in which Hayter-Menzies is clearly impressed with Benton, Pauline comes off as rather unremarkable. Quiet, but passionate about the art of shadow puppets, we never get the impression that she's particularly forceful, but rather understated. And yet she almost single-handedly preserved the art of shadow puppets when the Chinese Culture Revolution was seeing a loss of much Chinese art; she performed at the White House; and there's perhaps not enough credit given (though it is noted) that not only was she not Chinese or even of any Asian heritage, preserving and performing a Chinese art form... she was a woman doing this.
Part of the reason that even this is understated is that we get no peek at her sexuality. We do not know if she had any personal or physical relationships. Her life truly did seem to be about her puppets. Her life was so completely devoted to this puppet art form that Hayter-Menzies mentions in a footnote that he could find no evidence of any outside income for Benton and suggested that the income from Red Gate Shadow Theatre would hardly be sufficient and likely had inherited a healthy income when her parents passed away.
Although the book is titled Shadow Woman, suggesting that it is about Pauline Benton, it does go beyond Benton as Grant Hayter-Menzies gives us a little glimpse of what happened to Benton's puppets and stages upon her death in 1974. She had sold or donated a number of her pieces to museums in the 1960's and had saved some of the more valuable for herself. Those were given to friend and colleague Mercina Karam (who was with Benton when she died) and from there they've moved on to others who would appreciate them for both their beauty and functionality.
Hayter-Menzies concludes the book with an appendix of the five episodes for one of Benton's favorite plays, "The White Snake," which Benton translated in to English herself. This script could be worth the price of the book itself. It has all the classic Chinese story-telling ingredients, including a beautiful, poetic language.
While this was interesting to me because of my interest in theatre and puppetry, I think that anyone interested in reading biographies or looking to learn something new might find this of interest as well.
Looking for a good book? The story of Pauline Benton and Chinese shadow puppet theatre, Shadow Woman, is a fascinating read, well told by Grant Hayter-Menzies....more
It's been a little while since my review of The Boy Who Said No, but I had really liked that book and when I was informed that there would be a follow-up, I jumped at the chance to read it and made sure there would be room in my week of biography reviews for it! And I can report that the follow-up book ... does not live up to the predecessor.
First, a reminder that this is a novelized biography. Taking what we presume to be fact from Frank Mederos' life, author Patti Sheehy weaves a tale more like an espionage thriller than a biography. There are multiple times when the story isn't even on Frank, but rather back in Cuba, from where he escaped in the previous book. This novelized biography idea is new to me, but it worked very well the first time around so I was game for giving it another shot.
The problem with this book is not the format in which it is written... the problem is the subject. Part of what made the first book so compelling was Mederos' drive. He had a clear, focussed goal and despite an army (literally) standing in his way, he was determined to overcome every obstacle in order to get away from Cuba and in to the arms of his girlfriend. This was the motivating action throughout the entire first book, and Sheehy heightened the tension with her taught writing. But in this book, Mederos has already found the freedom he was searching for and is quickly married to the girlfriend who was his guiding force to freedom. So what motivates him? Nothing out of the ordinary, really. He wants to live the American dream ... and does.
Mederos' drive in this book is to live in peace. It is the peace that is shattered -- by his friend who leads him in to riot territory, then by the death of someone very close to him, and then by men, loyal to Cuba, who are looking to kill Frank Mederos.
It's a nice idea, but a goal of living in peace is hardly an active, exciting challenge. Certainly not when compared to trying to avoid an entire military and escape an island! It's a wonderful goal, but it's the same as mine ... to live the American Dream without disruption. Sheehy does everything she can to liven it up, but ultimately, the book is about a man living in New Jersey.
The book definitely picks up when we are back in Cuba with Pino, Frank's former military commander and the man who took the heat for Mederos' escape, but also with Lazo, Frank's former Special Ops fellow soldier who knew of Frank's plans to escape. Lazo's contributions to the book are mighty and provide the spark that is otherwise missing. Unfortunately, it's not nearly enough.
The book is titled "Stalk" and I think it's safe to assume, especially with Pino's early inclusion in the book, that we are going to see Frank being menaced ... stalked ... by the Cuban Special Forces, or by Pino at the very least. We do, and it's easily the best and most exciting part of the book, but it only comes about the last 62 pages of this 310 page book. That's right...we have 248 pages of Frank living the American Dream and Pino plotting revenge. There are moments that overcome the tedium of this... Frank's wandering blindly in to a riot zone, for instance ... but mostly we lack excitement. It's the biography, without the interesting novelizing.
***WARNING-- MAJOR SPOILER AHEAD!!***
In the first book, Frank was driven by his desire to be with Magda, his girlfriend. It felt as though anytime he was on the verge of giving up, thoughts of Magda kept him going. Here again, we have nothing, it seems, driving Frank. He meets up with and marries Magda. They have a child. Magda gets sick and dies. All within a relatively short passage of time. Magda's illness and death feel dragged out, to draw on some sympathies, but already in this book there's less spark between them than there was when they weren't even together.
Note: there's a sex scene in here that is pulled out of the steamier romance novels and just really feels out of place. It's beautiful that Frank and Magda get to live their dream and get married, but why is it necessary to describe, in detail, their sexual congress?
The best parts of this book don't really involve Frank. The best parts are back in Cuba, with Pino, with Lazo, with Damian. And then in the United States, with these same people. It is interesting to note, that while Frank struggled for years, trying to get away from Cuba, Lazo arrives to protect Frank, with no trouble ("Lazo arrived in Key West the next day, exhausted.... he had tossed and turned the night before..." -- we never learn HOW Lazo managed to get away from Cuba!), and Damian and his 'handler' arrive in the United States to stalk Frank. How is it so easy? Recognizing that time has passed (more than thirteen years), we don't know if it's just that much easier to flee/leave Cuba now, or if their insider help makes all the difference.
I was very excited and eager to read this, but it definitely didn't hold the magic that was in the first book.
Looking for a good book? Stalked: The Boy Who Said No tries to recreate the adventure and excitement of the first book in the biography/novel series but ultimately Frank Mederos' life in America lacks the danger and excitement that he had when, as a Special Forces soldier, he was trying to flee Cuba. ...more
This book is, as the bibliographical note states, "a republication of the tThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 2.5 of 5
This book is, as the bibliographical note states, "a republication of the third edition of the work originally published as Biography for Beginners: Being a Collection of Miscellaneous Examples for the Use of Upper Forms by T. Werner Laurie, London, in 1925."
It is my suspicion that Dover's republication of this is primarily for the 40 wonderful drawings by noted author G. K. Chesterton, given the number of other art-related titles in their republication catalog. The 'biographies' by Edmund Clerihew Bentley leave a little to be desired.
The biographies are actually four line poems (I understand they are referred to as "Clerihews") that sum up a famous life in a humorous fashion. They are clever and witty and typically outdated. Perhaps I underestimate the modern reader, but I think a great many of these people are unkown today. While we should certainly know Jane Austin, George Bernard Shaw, President Roosevelt, Edvard Grieg, Sir Walter Raleigh and likely know Sir Thomas à Mallory, Pizarro, Sir Christopher Wren, I wonder how many people know Lord Clive, the Rev. John Clifford M.A., L.L.B., D.D. or Mssrs Chapman and Hal, Mr. H. Belloc, or Besant and Rice?
Although clever, the 'clerihews' are really only fun if you already know the subject of the poem. In this case, the contents are clearly outdated (in ninety years, will anyone get references to Donald Rumsefeld, Colin Powell, or Lindsay Lohan?). The Chesterton cartoon drawings save this book. It doesn't matter whether or not you know the subject to appreciate the fine line sketches within.
Looking for a good book? There is some nice caricature art here by noted author G.K. Chesterton, but unless you have a special affinity for mostly obscure historical figures, this might not be the book for you. ...more
This is a very specialized book. While the book will be of some interest toThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 3.0 of 5
This is a very specialized book. While the book will be of some interest to those who might have an interest in cartography or early and contemporary map making, but this is much more about the role of women in cartography ... their journey to being recognized as cartographers, their training and their struggles to be given the appropriate due. As author Van Den Hoonaard writes in his conclusion of Chapter 4:
The premise of our argument is simple. The extent to which women participated in the map worlds of the eighteenth century and the early part of the nineteenth century does not reflect a linear, historic process. Rather, it is conditioned by the social organization of each prevailing map world. Such social organization was shaped by the advent of technological advances, social customs, scientific knowledge, and larger political forces.
While he may be talking about this particular chapter, I think the summation could be applied to women in the map industry at any time.
A portion of the book might be considered mini-biographies of some of the more recent or notable women such as Marie Tharp ("made the most notable contributions to sea floor cartography"); Mary G. Clawson ("considered a pioneer in the use of digital geospatial data to solve complex problems"); Mei-Ling Hsu ("the first woman to obtain a Ph.D. in (academic) cartography"); Judy Olson ("one of the first women to have developed and contributed to academic cartography, cartographic research...was an active participant in the NASA/ASEE programs"). Many of these brief biographies were very interesting and worthy of further reading. Judy Olson, for instance, is noted for being a major contributor in the field of the use of "colour in mapping and designing maps for people with defective colour vision."
Other notables include Kira B. Shingareva who "was busy for ten years at the USSR Academy of Sciences, participating in the Moon Exploration Project" and Barbara A. Bond whose "personal interests included escape and evasion maps in World War II."
Van Den Hoonaard does a great deal of research and manages to interview many of the contemporary cartographers. Given that there were/are still struggles in our modern age for women in nearly all industries, it is not surprising that women in cartography might find it difficult to receive the proper acknowledgements for their contributions. This is a nice, though small, means of acknowledgement. It is too bad, though, that even in a book which looks at the woman's role in cartography and seems to 'stand up' for women as cartographers in their own right, still has to have a section of the book which comments on the fact that "Husbands can make a tangible difference -- for better -- in the lives of these working cartographers." Would you ever see this same sentence, but with the word "wives" for "husbands" about any male cartographers?!
The book is a little academic and dry. Even though it's a book on cartography (which doesn't sound particularly exciting unless you are a lover of maps [and there are those people out there...I'm married to one]) the work that some of these people are doing could be truly exciting if not written about in a rather clinical way.
Looking for a good book? Map Worlds explores the role of women in cartography ... it's a pretty specific target audience, but if you fall in to that demographic the delivery of information herein is probably pitch perfect. ...more
Anyone who has even a passing interest in jazz music should know who CharliThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 3.0 of 5
Anyone who has even a passing interest in jazz music should know who Charlie "Bird" Parker is. And for those of us who are inspired by his music should be interested in a biography really letting us know he was. Sadly, this book doesn't give us too much.
In one paragraph: Charlie "Bird" Parker was focussed on two things. His music. Getting high. He had exceptional talent, played with lots of famous people, but was addicted to drugs and died from that addiction.
That's the book.
There are a lot of familiar names in the book. People whom Charlie played with or was at least contemporaries with, who are mentioned quite regularly, and are very recognizable names in jazz music. But never once did I get an impression of what Charlie thought of these people.
While a biography typically works best in a time-line format, there isn't much here other than a listing of where he played and who he played with. In his early days, we do learn about a doting mother and a girl-friend/wife whom he abandons to travel across the country and play music, but even these early days are filled up more with when he played certain gigs or how he talked his way in to the gigs. But for me, what I hope to get out of a biography is what made the man tick? What shaped his future and his abilities? Where did he develop the drive to play the way he did? Most of these questions are not answered, and those that are, could just as easily have come from watching the Clint Eastwood film, Bird.
I look for a biography to tell me a little something about what made the man (or woman) who he (or she) is. What can we find in his past or his education or his upbringing that was special or a trigger to bringing out the talent for which he is known. In this biography we do get a little information on his school days and that he practiced his horn a lot. Possibly as much as eleven hours a day. But we also learn that others thought of him as lazy.
But I think we miss the biggest opportunity, or the trigger, that changed him. The impression of Charlie in his early band days was:
"He had a thin, sweet tone that was pretty bad. I would see him from time to time and each time there was some improvement but not enough to show much chance of him ever becoming more than adequate musician." ... "He was very green. If you had told me then that he would be famous I wouldn't have believed it. He had a lot to learn."
Charlie was even fired from some of his early gigs. And while we come to understand that humiliation was the motivation for Charlie to improve,we only learn that he practiced a lot (and got married) and returned to the bands a stronger musician.
"When he came back, the difference was unbelievable." ... "...six months before he had been like a cryin' saxophone player." Equipped with his new alto, seventeen-year-old Charlie became an in-demand soloist on Twelfth Street.
What did he find? What brought about not only a change but the sudden rise to stardom? Was it simply a lot of practice? Or did he suddenly discover something about music, or his horn, or himself? This missing piece of information seems crucial to me.
At times I felt there was a little too much listing of names and songs. It's likely the easiest information to track down, but it started to sound as though what identified Charlie Parker was not himself, but the people he knew and the songs he played.
There's a lot of information here and I appreciate the research that went in to this book, though I'm disappointed at what's missing.
Looking for a good book? Bird: The Life and Music of Charlie Parker is a nice look at a jazz legend, though it misses a few crucial points in his life....more
It is very possible that I am the only person who will read this book who hasThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 3 of 5
It is very possible that I am the only person who will read this book who has never read a single "Pern" book in the Anne McCaffreey canon. I am, of course, familiar with the books...in large part due to the awesome covers by Michael Whelan, whose art I relished at a time I had hopes of becoming a professional artist. But I was not really in to fantasies filled with dragons at the time. But now...well, now... after reading this collection of remembrance essays on Anne McCaffrey, it seems that my impression of the Pern books may be flawed, and I just might really enjoy them after all. Add MORE books to my reading list -- check.
But to this book in particular... this seems to fit in the biography week theme because we not only learn a great deal about Anne McCaffrey as a person and a writer, we learn a little about a number of the people who offer up their thoughts as well. Sometimes a little too much.
We learn about Anne's interest in music and singing and her early desire to be an opera singer (and how she fittingly wove this interest in to the book The Ship Who Sang). We learn a little about Anne's being one of the first, respected women writing in a genre that was then dominated by men. We learn about Anne's generous, giving spirit and her ability to make long-lasting friendships. She definitely comes across, not just as a talented, gifted writer, but an incredibly wonderful human being.
The book does exactly what it sets out to do, which is to pay tribute to an author and one of her more popular creations (Pern). I was often moved by the stories, and I'm definitely intrigued to get to know Pern now.
What the book also does, though, is give us just a fraction of insight in to a number of other people, whom Anne knew. There's a the writer who learned to write by writing fan stories set in Pern. There's the artist, famous for his covers of many of McCaffrey's books. There are television writers. Book writers. Famous fans. And family.
Sometimes the stories are a little more about the author of the essay, rather than about Anne ("I met Anne once; she told me <blank> and so I did this and this and this and got all this ackowledgement...all thanks to Anne").
There's a saying -- you probably know it -- "You can measure a person not by how much they love, but how much they are loved by others." Anne clearly measures greatness.
Looking for a good book? This tribute book is clearly a must for fans of Anne McCaffrey and her Pern stories, but will also be of interest to anyone who enjoys biographical essays....more
It was a little daunting, looking at a 700+ page book, a biography of a GeThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 3.75 of 5
It was a little daunting, looking at a 700+ page book, a biography of a German playwright, but the research and presentation of Bertolt Brecht's life is thorough and meticulous.
This isn't your average, summer beach reading biography. This is a comprehensive look at a political playwright of 'epic theatre,' and a Marxist. One nice thing about a biography of a writer is that the writer often leaves a trail of thoughts, written and shared. The work here is in gathering those thoughts by and about Bertolt Brecht. The fact that Brecht was under surveillance by the FBI during his time in America in the late 1940's gives us additional glimpses of his actions and friends.
While I commented on another biography recently that there was a lack of information about the subject, this particular volume goes a bit in the other direction. There may actually be more here than I need to get a fairly comprehensive look at how this writer developed. In particular, his early life gives me more detail than I felt necessary. It is true, of course, that every moment in a person's life builds upon the previous moment and develops who the person becomes, but we don't necessarily need to relive every moment when looking back on someone's life.
Because my familiarity with Brecht is through his works written for the stage, it wasn't until we started to look at his theatrical involvements that I was truly drawn in. This is certainly not a fault of author Stephen Parker, but rather what it was I wanted to know about the man. To give us less would certainly feel incomplete if the information is at hand.
I learned a great deal about Brecht, and most definitely I will view his works in a new light, given what was presented here. What did I learn? ...Where do I start? I learned that "Improbable as it now sounds, Brecht's rise to fame began as a patriotic war correspondent" according to Parker. I learned that Brecht wrote a good deal of poetry -- my favorite of those included in this book is "The Mask of Evil":
On my wall hangs a Japanese carving The mask of an evil demon, decorated with gold lacquer. Sympathetically I observe The swollen veins of the forehead, indicating What a strain it is to be evil.
He also wrote nearly fifty film treatments while living in Hollywood; and considered himself to be an expert sexual operator (the latter a trait he may have picked up from his father).
I learned...well, let's face it...I learned a great deal. From his personal and professional partnerships, to his politics, to his theatrical works. Parker is incredibly thorough here and I can't imagine a year gone by in Brecht's life that we don't learn about what Brecht was doing or fearing or struggling against. And of course it all comes to play in his writing -- which is the whole point of reading a biography.
The book is a little dry at times. I did struggle, especially early, to get through this, but ultimately, I'm very glad this information is available and that I read it. I'm actually quite interested in seeing some of Brecht's plays again, given my new knowledge, and while his works may not be produced a great deal in my area, I am also eager to re-read his plays.
Looking for a good book? The biography, Bertolt Brecht:A Literary Life by Stephen Parker, may truly only appeal to dedicated theatre aficionados and hard-core biography readers, but the research is exhaustive and the presentation thorough....more
First, let's be clear that this is a memoir, and not a biography (or autobiThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 3.0 of 5
First, let's be clear that this is a memoir, and not a biography (or autobiography). What is the difference? A memoir is a collection of selected memories. They don't always have to be told sequentially, from youngest to oldest (though in this case they are). A biography, on the other hand, is the story of someone's life. I like the way Wikipedia puts it: "An autobiography tells the story of a life, while memoir tells a story from a life...".
Why is this an important distinction? Because if you are looking for a biography/autobiography of Dean Smith ... Olympic Champion and Hollywood stuntman ... you may be disappointed. But if you want to hear (read) stories that Dean Smith has to tell about his years running and doing stunts, you will be incredibly entertained.
What is nice about the narrative style that Dean Smith and Mike Cox have created is that you really do get the feeling that Dean is an incredibly personable guy who loves to sit around and tell stories. And because of the type of work that he's done and the people that he's met, he's got a lot of stories.
Smith starts the book with one of his most high-profile stunts...hanging from a helicopter as it flies over the Statue of Liberty and other New York sites for the film The Lonely Guy, and then quickly turns back the clock to set up his beginnings in Texas. Smith had a bit of a privileged upbringing, raised on a large ranch in Texas that had been in the family since the mid-1870's. We get a pretty good background on the family history, though even here we likely get equal parts anecdote and history. We learn that his mother died young and his father was an alcoholic and he was largely raised by his grandparents. Raised during the Great Depression, the Smith's managed to live off their own land.
Growing up on a ranch in Texas, it should be no surprise that Smith got involved in rodeos. Earning prize money at the age of fourteen. It seems like a fairly natural connection ... rodeos to stuntman.
In school, Smith joined the football team and it was there he discovered he had a gift of speed which inspired he coaches to talk him in to going out for track. Winning many (if not all) his track meets in the 100 yard dash through the next few years, Smith found himself on the Olympic track team for the 1952 Olympics in Helsinki. Smith makes sure we understand that he wasn't at his peak. A little 'lost' in a different country and not quite as fit as he should be. Still, in the final race, he says it was the closest race in Olympic history and took hours to determine the winner. Four runners all finished with a time of 10.4 seconds and Smith, it was announced, placed 4th. Smith seems sure that he should have been at least 3rd, and that if he had run the way he'd run all year, he would have won the race.
Yes, Smith has a little bit of hubris.
Smith and teammates did win gold in the 400-meter relay.
Dean continues to run (successfully) and enters the National Football League, but not for long. Joining the Los Angeles Rams, Smith chooses to leave football rather than be traded to the Steelers. His real desire is to work in film. Because of his background with the rodeo and having grown up around horses, Smith eases in to work as a stuntman doing saddle falls. It's 1957 and movie (and television) westerns are extremely popular. This is definitely a case of being the right person, in the right place, and the right time. Smith has a knack for the job and it appears that he manages to work quite consistently and on some of the biggest named westerns of the era (though he did turn down a job on Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid to work on a different film). He even seems to have been a founding member of the first stuntman's union (though I'm honestly not too clear on his role here, but I am clear that it is a necessary union).
It is ALL quite a delightful read, but I want to be clear again that it isn't so much a biography. While we learn that Dean was fast, very fast, and that he won a lot of races, more than a few of them we're told about, we don't really know anything about his training or his daily regimen or how he prepared for the Olympics. We do know, though, that while competing in Los Angeles, he ran in to Frank Sinatra and Ava Gardner in the hotel elevator and that Smith thought Gardner "was one of the most beautiful women (he'd) ever seen."
These are the sorts of anecdotes that you can expect throughout the read. Though told mostly sequentially, Smith doesn't delve too deeply into anything unless there's a story that he can tell about it. He talks about all the films he worked on, who the leading actors were, and what he thought of them. He mentions working on a film, Blood on the Arrow, for which he would be the stunt double for Dale Robertson. But the only thing he says about the film:
By this time in my career, I had already seen and done a lot while overcoming a lot of difficulties. But the cholla cactus there in Arizona was the most vicious cactus I had ever run across. Wranglers were always out there with the pliers picking the cactus needles out of the horses' legs.
I'm not sure what this has to do with the film or the difficulties he's overcome (honestly, I haven't seen a whole lot of difficulties for Smith to overcome ... certainly nothing out of the ordinary for an average human), but...well...it's an anecdote he remembered and wanted to share. Just as, when he talks about liking certain actors and why, he says of Strother Martin:
He had been a national swimmer and diver as a young man, so we got along fine.
This is a light, easy, fun read. Many people will love to read the stories about the actors and films. But if you can't tell by my tone... I would have preferred more of a biography and fewer anecdotal stories. I would have liked to have read about how he went about setting up the stunts, how much they were rehearsed (if at all), and what (if any) anxiety he had about performing the stunt, rather than how he had impressed the director and crew with his daring (hubris).
Looking for a good book? If you want a beach read that is easy and entertaining, this is probably exactly the book you are looking for; but if you want something with a little more meat on it, you might want to keep looking. ...more
Quite recently I reviewed a book of poetry that I didn't much enjoy. I'd prefeThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 4.0/5
Quite recently I reviewed a book of poetry that I didn't much enjoy. I'd prefer not to mention it by name as it doesn't need any sort of promotion (even bad publicity). But what that book thought it was (according to the author), this book is. And that is: Poetry of a most unusual sort, out of the ordinary ... extra-ordinary.
Jeff Griffin hasn't written a book of poetry as much as he has 'collected' a book of poetry by people who haven't realized what they have helped to create. Griffin has collected scattered papers from abandoned homes and trailers around the desert and selected a few to present here. It is moving and whimsical and a masterful method of identifying what it means to be 'man.'
Right from the start, I was hooked with "a budgie's linguistic development." What a great assortment of words and meanings! Once hooked, I didn't want to finish the book and read through it in one, patient sitting. It was a voyeuristic feeling, peeking in on the private writings of those not intending to be published. The twenty pages of letters and notes to and from Est'ee and Tony, detailing their love and fear and physical abuse, were mesmerizing and ended with the simple drawing "How to set a table" that was itself tremendously powerful and lonely.
The inclusion of well-selected photographs is beautiful. The images of a construction site, taken from indoors with ghostly reflections of the photographer is a haunted moment of time, frozen in the faded colors of a cheap print.
The title itself, Lost and, suggests something that isn't finished, which is a perfect metaphor for what Griffin has done. There will continue to be people picking up and leaving pieces of themselves behind, as long as there will always be greener pastures or the possibilities of a better life somewhere else. And the struggles that mankind faces, those of Tony and Est'ee and all those others represented here, are eternal struggles that aren't likely to have an end, until man himself is finished.
Looking for a good book? This poetic collection, Lost and, by Jeff Griffin, is a beautiful assortment of 'found' poetry and philosophy....more
For how much longer can we get mileage out of The Beatles? For quite awhile iThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 4.25/5
For how much longer can we get mileage out of The Beatles? For quite awhile is my guess, based on the number of books that continue to be released about the remarkable, iconic group. And as long as the books are well-written, strongly-themed and have something unique to say, then those books will continue to be welcomed. This is such a book.
The Beatles Are Here! is not so much a book about the Beatles themselves, but a reflection on the effect the Beatles had on our society, by way of the effect on individuals. This book contains a number of short essays from a mix of people, recollecting their introduction to the Beatles' music or appearance. The vast majority of these essays are very well written and insightful. Just a very few essays lacked merit and typically those were by people with 'name' recognition. I did wonder what the point of their inclusion might be. Is it possible that editor Rowlands or the publisher had committed to the works before they were written? Is it possible that they were included in order to help sell the book based on the essayists name? Anything is possible, of course. But really, this book doesn't need 'name' authors to sell it. The quality of most of the work here, and editor Penelope Rowlands' insightful placement of the essays holds its own and reads very well.
Although the bulk of the essays are unrelated (other than the obvious connection to the Beatles), there is a really nice, quite fascinating connection/correlation between a few of the essays.
If you take a moment to look at the photo on the cover of the book, you'll see a rather iconic photograph of a group of teenaged girls behind a homemade banner proclaiming "Beatles Please Stay Here 4-Ever." The girls are enthralled, screaming, reaching out. This is often how we picture the early days of the Beatles, especially in America ... with teenage girls screaming and crying.
That same photo inspired a piece by Gay Talese in the New York Times, September 21, 1964 (included in this book). The girl dead center, screaming, is Penelope Rowlands, editor of this collection. Through the magic of the internet, most of the girls centered in the photograph have reunited and contributed an essay to the book. Fascinatingly, none of them seemed to know each other before (or since) the photo was taken, but were brought together once by their love of the Beatles, and again by the circulation of the photograph.
The essays of these girls (now women) are among the most interesting. Rowlands sprinkles these essays throughout the book, rather than lumping them all together, which works quite well as, unless the essay is written by someone with a recognizable name, we are not sure if an essay is by someone connected to the photo or not. It was a small, brilliant method of giving the reader just a touch of mystery. Among those essays connected with the photo is a compelling essay by the photographer who took the picture, Henry Grossman, who travelled with the Beatles.
Even in a book of essays by people who typically didn't have a physical connection to the Beatles, we can glean some important tidbits. Nothing particularly new, perhaps, but for me at least, some things hit home here for the first time. Musician Janis Ian points out that
"The Beatles were fully formed by the time they started recording. From then on they just amplified what they were doing. If you listen to that first album, Meet the Beatles, it's incredible. it really shows how much time they spent on stage, working out arrangements.... There's a very different dynamic that happens to a song when you've played it live a lot in front of audiences."
This makes perfect sense, and I wonder why I haven't read this, this succinct, before.
I'm not sure that there's much new to be learned about the Beatles themselves, or even their music, but this book clearly shows that we can still learn about the effect that the Beatles (and their music) had on our society which was ripe for that which the Beatles provided.
Looking for a good book? Whether you're a fan of the Beatles, pop music, pop culture, or even social studies of the 1960's, The Beatles Are Here! is a remarkable, compelling book and highly recommended. ...more
I will admit right off the bat that I was not familiar with Julian HawthornThis review originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 3.0 of 5
I will admit right off the bat that I was not familiar with Julian Hawthorne before reading this book. His famous father, Nathaniel Hawthorne, of course is required reading somewhere along the way for any English major. So why read this biography of a famous author's son? It turns out that Julian was also an author ... and a bit of a cad.
This was a well researched and put-together biography of a 'lesser' literary figure.
It's not unusual for children with famous parents to have a difficult time succeeding, especially if trying to follow in their parents' footsteps. Julian Hawthorne is a classic example of this.
Living, somewhat, in the lap of luxury, thanks to his father's works, Julian grew up lacking the ambition to succeed, but with the expectation that success would come to him simply because he was Julian Hawthorne. Rubbing shoulders with giants in the literary field as he matured (Thoreau, Emerson, Melville, Alcott) he seemed to think that writing would come naturally and easily to him. He wasn't necessarily wrong, but writing well, is another matter.
Although he showed some promise in engineering, his lack of ambition, skill, and the matter of his father passing away while he was a teen had him falling back on a writing career to support his young bride and child. His works never achieved any sort of true success. On occasion he managed a good review, but for the most part, Julian might be considered one of America's first 'hacks' -- a writer who managed to output materials that were readable, but forgettable. In addition to his penny romance novels, Julian wrote essays and articles for newspapers, mainly Hearst's papers, which leaned toward the sensational more than newsworthy.
Again, based primarily on his up-bringing ... seeing famous writers and how they lived, it was important for Julian to keep up appearances. Living in a home that was too much for the family, and maintaining servants, when all the time he struggled to make enough money to feed his family. he borrowed from friends until they stopped loaning him money. He borrowed against advances on his writing. He raised his writing rates, despite the fact that his works weren't selling. He lived constantly in debt, and constantly working an angle to procure an income. But NEVER working a 'job.' He even took to selling off his father's work to provide some income.
Late in life, he teamed with some acquaintances and wrote ad copy for a mining stock. His payment for the work was a portion of the income. The stock was fraudulent. We are never quite sure whether Julian was fully aware of this or not, but he drew the short end of the straw and spent the most time in the Atlanta Federal Prison for his role in this mine stock fraud. It was a result of his time in prison that he perhaps achieved his most fame as a writer. Julian wrote a series of essays on the horrible conditions inside the Atlanta Federal Prison. From the food, to the crowding, to the punishment, he decried the penal system. His essays prompted a review of the prison by federal legislators and ultimately the dismissal of the warden. Julian was proclaimed a hero to those still incarcerated.
Julian Hawthorne is an unusual, and unlikely subject for a biography. It's not a particularly happy story, but it is an interesting one. If nothing else, it reminds us that when we don't teach our children to reach beyond us, they never learn to do for themselves. Though, by all accounts a failure; at writing; at being a family man; at being a friend; at managing finances ... Julian was, however, a survivor. A bit of a wolf and a cad, but tenacious.
I'm still not entirely sure why he was chosen for the subject of a biography. I can't honestly say I'm glad that I read this ... I don't think I was changed in any way, and certainly my impression of Julian Hawthorne wasn't changed as I was never aware of him in the first place.
Looking for a good book? If you enjoy biographies of little-known historical figures, this book is well researched and well written. But as a subject for a biography ... Julian Hawthorne leaves a lot to be desired. ...more
While it seems that most of this information has been available throuReview originally published in Looking For a Good Book. Rated 4.5 stars.
While it seems that most of this information has been available through other sources, this compendium packs it all together and ties it up with the perfect packaging.
I absolutely loved getting the little tidbits of information in quick, rapid form. This is not necessarily a book to sit and read cover to cover (although I did it that way), but rather it is intended to be used as a reference. Want to know about a particular Beatles song; who wrote it, who played on it, who sang, what instruments did they play, how many takes did it take to get it right, who the engineers were? Look it up here.
To learn that George is the one singing on "Roll Over Beethoven" and "Devil in Her Heart" -- I never knew! And while there's nothing I would specifically do with the information, it's interesting to learn what instruments are used and when someone changed instruments before the recording of a song.
I very much liked the relative simplicity to the lay-out and design of the book. I felt that I got a good amount of information for every song, and simply and easily. From sticky-note graphics that shared a Beatles tidbit, to the assortment of photos, to the technical information list, this book compiles all the information in a very easy to read format.
Almost daily I learned something from this book that was interesting or exciting enough that I shared it with my family (my sixteen year old son is a tremendous Beatles fan) at the dinner table.
I'm not sure that there's anything in this book that is new or revelatory, but Margotin and Guesdon have done a remarkable amount of research to pack as much factual information here as possible. The bibliography at the end of the book alone is almost worth the price of admission!
Yes, there are some errors. I've read some of the other reviews for this book (and am always amused at how certain some people are about how much they know to be factual ... even if they weren't there) and admit that there are some proofing errors and some date correlation that doesn't match up. I read an ARC, so I have to trust that some of this gets cleaned up before final print. But larger questions (who wrote which song, which instruments were used, etc) -- well... as this book points out, even the individual Beatles themselves don't always remember accurately how things happened. Paul and John might both claim 'ownership' of a particular song -- how can we expect that they will remember which guitar was used in the recording? Unless there are photos or written documentation (and even the written documentation is sometimes called in to question) ... much is often the result of deduction. Fair enough.
The book is written from the perspective of the British releases of the songs/albums.
I highly recommend this to anyone interested in the Beatles, music history, or music recording studies!
Looking for a good book? All the Songs is an indispensable reference book that every Beatles fan or music historian should have on hand!...more
I consider myself to be a moderately well-educated man and I am certainly familiar with the Civil Rights Movement and Martin Luther King, Jr., and wheI consider myself to be a moderately well-educated man and I am certainly familiar with the Civil Rights Movement and Martin Luther King, Jr., and when I first received this review copy of March, a graphic novel about the Civil Rights Movement, I was a little less than enthusiastic about reading it. I now wish I had jumped right in to it the moment I received it. This is wonderful!
Congressman John Lewis was an iconic figure in the Civil Rights Movement and is the only living member of the major leadership players at the time. This first of three planned books focusses on Lewis' youth, his desire to attend university, meeting Martin Luther King, Jr., and the beginnings of the peaceful Nashville Student Movement and sit-ins at local cafeterias. I whole-heartedly admit that I learned some very valuable history by reading this. I would also admit that, had this been a 500 page biography of John Lewis or even a history book on the Civil Rights movement, I probably would not have read it, fearing a dull, boring read.
And so...why a graphic novel? I think there are a number of good reasons for this. One: it makes it very easily accessible to a very young reading audience, or even a 'low' reading audience. I can see third graders reading this as part of their school's February reading program. Two: adults are more apt to pick up something that looks quick and simple, rather than a thick non-fiction book (as I admit to). And three: the pictures definitely help set the tone. It's very easy to read about non-violence, but something completely different to see people sitting calmly at a counter while others shout at them.
And let me be clear -- while I talk about the seeming simplicity in a graphic novel, compared to a long historical or biographical treatise, there is nothing 'simple' about this. This manages to be a very thorough look at a complicated time. We get a full sense of the power behind what was happening, while understanding that there's likely more to the story if we wish further study.
This is going to sound strange, but the art was so smooth, so perfectly apt for this book, that I often forgot I was reading/looking at a graphic novel. The pictures were such perfect additions to the story that I never felt that I was detached in any way. I read a lot of comics as a kid and I've read a fair number of graphic novels in the last year, since starting this blog, and I can say that I've never felt this symbiotic relationship between art and story so clearly before. I can't imagine any way of improving upon it.
If there's any down-side to this book (and I'm not sure there is), it would be that it's a book one. Graphic novels have come in some pretty thick volumes , so I can't imagine any reasonable explanation as to why this wasn't produced as one book. The only thought I can give is that the publisher wants to make more money and possibly win more awards by releasing this in installments. It's certainly a common publishing game, and I don't care for it. I subtract some points for this reason.
This book will move you. You will be a better person after reading it and you will have an even better understanding of both the good in humanity and the despicable.
Looking for a good book? This books deserves to be read, shared, and remembered by everyone who can turn a page.
I enjoy reading 'behind-the-scenes' books from the entertainment world. I suspect this comes from my own professional work backstage.
This particular bI enjoy reading 'behind-the-scenes' books from the entertainment world. I suspect this comes from my own professional work backstage.
This particular book caught my eye because 1) Murder, She Wrote was one of my wife's favorite television shows (along with Columbo), and 2) I lived and worked in LA at the same as most of this book takes place, and much of the industry was familiar to me then.
Fischer's writing is quite readable (no surprise, since he wrote popular mystery/drama for millions of people) and the book flows very easily. I did find it, shall we say, 'interesting' that he often chose the incorrect pronoun when writing me/I ("...both he and Angie wish Bob and I good luck.") .
His flowery prose often made me chuckle ("Her eyelashes were long enough to erase a blackboard"), especially at times when I thought I was expected to be familiar with something ("We all know the cliché. If we allow the camel to get his nose under the flap of the tent, pretty soon the rest of the camel is in your lap, taking up most of the space." -- Really? That's a cliché we all know?). And occasionally I'd stop and have to think about a misplaced modifier or odd simile ("...sipping inedible coffee..."). But for whatever reason, it actually all made me like the guy a little bit more. Made him seem down to earth. That's not to say a little tougher editing might have been helpful!
But Fischer works hard to come off as 'down to earth.' He tells us over and over how much of an outsider he really was in the Hollywood business. How he didn't always follow the rules and didn't play the games that were expected of him, often because he didn't know the rules of the game. And while there may be a great deal of truth in what Fischer says about this, the fact is, he was much more of an insider than 90% of the people 'in the business' in Hollywood. An outsider doesn't get office space at Universal. An outsider doesn't get calls from Peter Falk, asking him to write more Columbo episodes. An outsider doesn't set ground rules for Peter Falk! An outsider doesn't ... well, you get the point. Fischer may have gotten in to the business sideways, through a family member, but he became an insider and thereby help set some of the rules for Hollywood.
But that doesn't change the fact that Peter S. Fischer was (is) a talented writer and creator. And what most likely helped him tremendously (as he also points out on many occasions) was his ability to work fast. His ability to understand the medium, be creative, and write quickly most likely is what made his career the success that it was.
One thing that surprised me was Fischer's willingness to be blunt and name names and lay blames. If he didn't like someone or didn't think their work was quality, or if an actor was responsible for the failings of a show...he didn't mince words. Never did his observations seem vindictive or angry ... simply his outlook on the issue. Clearly this is someone who has retired from the industry and not looking to go back (Hollywood may be impatient, but it has a long memory).
Although I may disagree with his take on himself (being an outsider), I enjoyed his look at the Hollywood industry -- a perpective that we rarely get to see (we saw a similar perspective in When Variety Was King last year).
It is interesting to note that while this is labeled an autobiography (humorously modified as "unauthorized"), it really deals almost exclusively with his work in Hollywood. Fischer writes often of his wife, but the rest of the family is nearly non-existent until we learn that a son has helped set up a publishing company. read what you want in to this, since Mr. Fischer doesn't have much to say on family life. His life and focus is on writing and producing during those years (according to the book).
Since his retirement from Hollywood, Fischer, who feels the need to always be writing, has been working on novels. The last portion of the book talks a little more about them, along with information on where to find them (like his time in Hollywood, he decides to do novels his way instead of the mainstream publishers' way). I'm intrigued enough that I will check out one or two of these mysteries!
Looking for a good book? This is a very readable, fun look at Hollywood and the creating of a long-running, hit television series.
I will admit to a small bias against poetry. Despite studying it, writing it, promoting it, I've always had a hard time getting excited about readYes!
I will admit to a small bias against poetry. Despite studying it, writing it, promoting it, I've always had a hard time getting excited about reading poetry. So when I flipped this open and saw it was in verse, there was a momentary pause, I put it down and came back to it later. And I'm very glad that I returned to this!
In free verse, this tells the story of the slave, known as "Dave," purchased in 1815. His owner, Harvey Drake, is a potter and he teaches Dave the art of pottery. Harvey also happens to violate the law, and teaches Dave to read and write as well. Dave becomes an expert potter, often marking his pots with bits of writing.
Despite the short, free verse poems, we manage to learn a lot about what it's like to be a slave (having wives sold and sent away; the dangers of knowing too much; etc) and about life in the 1800's and about pottery. It's quite remarkable how much I picked up in this brief volume targeted toward elementary school readers. The writing captures a mood and tone of the era quite well.
I finished the book, feeling richer for what I learned, but also wanting to know more about pottery at this time, slavery and the fight for freedom, and the region in which this clay was found and turned in to pottery. Wanting to learn more is always good (provided it's not because we didn't learn anything).
Looking for a good book? This is all-around a fantastic, quick read. Aimed at young readers, adults should feel enriched after reading it to their children.
For about as long as I can remember, my heroes have always been writers, and any kind of a look at a writer's personal life has been a voyeuristic pleFor about as long as I can remember, my heroes have always been writers, and any kind of a look at a writer's personal life has been a voyeuristic pleasure of mine. This book does everything just about perfectly...it touches on a number of different writers and offers a nicely capsulated look at some of the most intense moments in their private lives. By being brief, it makes the reading move along smoothly, never getting boring. And yet we never feel cheated, as though we didn't get enough of the story and at the same time, we can take it on to read more if we'd like (authors Schmidt ad Rendon include a fantastic bibliography).
Despite the sub-title ("The Scandalous Romantic Lives of Legendary Literary Casanovas, Coquettes, and Cads") not all literary relationships end with heartbreak or feuds, and that, too is part of the charm of this book...we don't really know who comes out on top (so to speak) until we get through this.
I'm not convinced that writers are any more (or any less) inclined to scandalous living (affairs, broken marriages, unrequited love, homosexual affairs, etc) than any other group of people, but, with the exception of Hollywood stars and starlets, writers perhaps garner more attention than most. And unlike those Hollywood personnas, writers tend to be a bit better at wearing their hearts' on their sleeves (or at least declaring their passions in writing).
And because we look at twenty-five different writers (with nice sidebars to touch on even more literary figures!) there is almost certainly some author to appeal to every reader. I wasn't shocked by anything here ... I think I'd heard/read rumor to most of this (and every writer was familiar to me) ... but Shannon McKenna Schmidt and Joni Rendon clearly did their research on all of this and were masterful at condesning and relating the stories.
Looking for a good book? This is an all-around voyeuristic treasure....more
This is a book that every high school sociology or health class should have as required reading.
Written by teens, this anthology explores the lives ofThis is a book that every high school sociology or health class should have as required reading.
Written by teens, this anthology explores the lives of those who are bullied; those who have sat passively by while others are bullied; those who've intervened to defend/stop bullying; and the lives of bullies themselves. While I'm a bit past the days of being a bullied student, the remembrance of those days are still with me. Though admittedly, I don't think anything I experienced compares with much of what was written here.
It should not surprise anyone that bullying in schools continues to be a problem. It has become a major issue and often reported on local and national news services. As a school board member, I've been aware that it is definitely a hot topic that is being addressed (at least in our small school). None of the stories of being bullied in this collection surprises me. I was a little aghast at the vehemence and violence perpetrated by some (I'm sure I would never have been strong enough to deal with some of what I encountered here). Some of the stories by bullies (generally 'reformed') struck me as a little less than worthy of printing, though I understand the desire to get all points of view. Unfortunately, although none came out and said, "Feel sorry for the bullies because they have problems, which is what brings out the bully in them," (in fact, some said just the opposite), the under-current was there ... that bullies are dealing with issues (generally self-esteem) which bring out the worst in them.
I recognize that teens need over-sight, particularly in school, to prevent bullying. I think what enraged me the most in some of the articles were the stories of adults (typically teachers and administrators) who did nothing to stop or prevent the bullying. Particularly in cases where they were made aware of the issue! It is this, more than any bullying itself, that needs to be changed. It must not be tolerated. I recognize that there are many reasons this might happen, but there are no legitimate excuses.
One story struck me with it's brilliant deduction. The writer (I wish I could remember who this was...I may have highlighted it on my Kindle) commented that adults told her that she needed to stand up and be strong and ignore the bullying. That she needed to learn how to deal with the 'real' world. But as she points out, in the 'real' world, ther A) likely wouldn't be any teasing/taunting of a fellow employee and B) sexual harassment would likely result in firing. And yet when kids do it to other kids, it's somehow just an experience they have to learn to deal with. The young author makes a most brilliant point.
Sadly, there is bullying in the adult work place as well, but likely not at the same level that our teenagers face. This book is a great wake-up to adults and a resource that every teen should have available.
Looking for a good book? This book, written by teens, for teens, about bullying, is fantastic reading for everyone.
I've looked at the genre of memoir for awhile, read more than a few, and wondered why it is that anyone would read a memoir by someone they didn't knoI've looked at the genre of memoir for awhile, read more than a few, and wondered why it is that anyone would read a memoir by someone they didn't know or by someone not 'famous.' After reading Leaving Rollingstone, I think I found my answer...to learn a little more about one's self. And when you can do so with words so deliciously put together, such as Fenton's, it makes the self-discovery a joy.
Now I have to admit, despite my preceding paragraph, I do know Kevin, though I definitely learn a little about him (and myself) in this book.
Kevin's ability to get right to the heart of an emotion or evoke a memory through words is unparalleled. It is savory. There was a part of me that wanted to flash read the book -- to get through it quickly because I so wanted to read the next portion. But there was another part of me that only wanted to read a little bit each day, to let his words linger with me because they are so carefully chosen and decidedly well used. It is poetic, in all the best sense of the word.
The book emcompasses a great deal of Kevin's life...from early days on the farm in Rollingstone, through a period of alcoholism, to his life in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis/St. Paul and working in advertising. And while there is a great deal of sticking to a chronological timeline, this is not a chronological biography. He sets this up, showing how early influences act as pillars to what he will become; each moment defines us, and by looking back, we can see how the present has been shaped.
There is a strong sense of nostalga, and Kevin even writes:
I am nostalgic. I wrote this memoir because I have a crush on the past. I love the game Twister; streamlined toasters and ottomans with atomic/cocktail motifs; TV shows such as Laugh-In, The Avengers, Get Smart, and Batman; the originals of the movies Charade and Ocean's 11; and the music of Dave Brubeck and Stan Getz.
And this book appeals because Kevin isn't the only one with such a crush. Those who grew up in the sixties and seventies have all come to a period in their lives when reflection waxes notalgic. There is a reason so many movies and television shows are sad homages to the past -- those in charge have reached that age of reflection and often look to reliving a glorified past. But you can't recreate old glory, you can only unintentionally mock it, or you can reflect on it, as Kevin does.
I've known Kevin since our high school days. He has always been one of my favorite poker-playing friends (our poker days were not so much about playing cards but a means to sit with good friends and talk). Yet I learned much about him through this memoir. And, as I mentioned earlier, by learning about Kevin, I've learned some things about myself and my own history.
Leaving Rollingstone is an homage to a gentle past that gave way to a turbulent time in a man's life, and we understand that we all are leaving something, but that leaving something means a coming in to something else.
Looking for a good book? This is a beautifully written memoir that evokes strong emotions and memories in all of us.
If you've been reading any of my reviews lately, you'll note that I've read a fair number of graphic novels. IThe Beatles in a graphic novel? Why not?
If you've been reading any of my reviews lately, you'll note that I've read a fair number of graphic novels. It makes sense, if you know me... I'm a closet artist, and love the idea of illustrated books. But most of my life, growing up, graphic novels hadn't truly existed, and when they did come to life, it was as a vehicle for comic books. Superheroes, vigilanties, the usual fare. The idea of a comic book/graphic novel telling a different kind of story, one that didn't come in 33-page bytes, and especially something of a biographical kind...well, that still strikes me as unusual. But i love it.
And I've long been a Beatles fan.
I have to admit that I started this by reading only the title, and not the sub-title, and thought I was going to read a graphic novel about Pete Best. There was a momentary twinge of disappointment, but anything to do with the Beatles...I was all for it.
While a Beatle fan, I'm not deeply knowledgeable in all facets of their history. I've heard the name Brian Epstein associated with them , but wasn't sure quite how he was connected (unlike George Martin, whose name has become nearly synonymous with the Beatles). For this very reason, this book was incredibly great -- it raised awareness of one person's strong connection with the Beatles. In fact, if this story is true, it's more than a connection...Epstein is the first person responsible for the Beatles' rise to popularity (this is in no way intended to discount the Beatles' ability to write and perform music or the afore-mentioned George Martin's contribution).
What the book reveals about Epstein is quite personal (his homosexuality). There are some hints that Epstein's personal assistant had a serious crush on him, which he never recognized. I can't help but wonder the reason for this. It continued to make me wonder where this was going, but never appeared to actually be necessary to the story.
What was quite interesting, however, was the idea that it was through Epstein's family wealth and his drive to succeed, that led to the beatles' meteoric rise ... his buying thousands, hundreds of thousands of copies of early Beatles records to help get them on the charts; his making huge concessions and bargains with the likes of Ed Sullivan in order to get the Beatles on the show. I found this information quite fascinating.
So the question that comes to mind, though is: Why as a graphic novel?
A graphic novel doesn't go in to quite as much depth as a traditional biographical novel might, and I can't help wondering what I'm missing. On the other hand, if I saw a book on a shelf about the biography of Brian Epstein, I probably wouldn't pick it up. As a graphic novel, it was definitely much more accessible, and what it did do was make me interested enough in the subject matter to want to read more.
Because it's a graphic novel, clearly the art plays an important role in the book. The art here was very stylized...not super realistic, not manga, not Cartoon Network cartoony, but a hybrid that works very well. There were times that I couldn't tell the difference between which Beatle was which, but for the most part it worked.
And while I am mentioning the Beatles specifically, it might have been nice to actually see them a few more times, but we have to remember that this is a book about Brian Epstein, who had a connection with the Beatles, and not about the Beatles specifically.
Looking for a good book? This is an interesting vehicle for a biography, but it works....more
As the parent of three, one a graduating high school senior, one about to be a high school junior, and one soon to be a freshman, I had a particular,As the parent of three, one a graduating high school senior, one about to be a high school junior, and one soon to be a freshman, I had a particular, and obvious, interest in this book.
Overall, I was impressed with this book. It is definitely valuable and should be a ‘must read’ to the high school student looking to get a college education. All students…unless already offered a free ride by a university… should be able to take advantage of the advice offered here and get some (or all) of the schooling paid for by various granting organizations.
There’s a lot of memoir to this book of sage advice (hence the title) and early on I wondered if it would be worth reading. I really wanted to get to the meat of the book; the how-tos and advice. Instead we get some history on Kristina Ellis’s personal life and we learn what she had to over-come in order to get to where she is.
Personally, I found this distracting and wondered if Ellis might not be limiting her audience as surely very few youngster have overcome the adversity such as she has. She does address this, but it never rings true to me. Many of the scholarships which she won, seemed to come to her, in part, because of her perseverence to overcome her obstacles. As a parent who has been able to (and has attempted to) provide as many opportunities rather than obstacles for my children, I realize that it may be difficult for them to get a wide variety of scholarships and grants. Ellis’s trying to write about how anyone can gets these scholarships feels hollow because it is one of the few times that she is not writing from personal experience.
Also, the experiences of Ellis becoming a “Miss” Pageant winner also felt odd to me. This seemed even more limiting…but again… I was looking at this book more for the ‘scholarship’ part than for the ‘confessions’ part.
Despite these two major areas that didn’t draw me in to the informational aspect of the book, I did find Ellis’s tips and advice to be incredibly helpful. Some points seemed blatantly obvious, and yet she manages to explain things with incredible clarity and I found myself thinking, “Well, yeah! That makes total sense!”
I’m an old dog, but I did learna few tricks with this book, and I’m determined to have my son read it this summer as he prepares to go in to his junior year in high school. I think he, like his dad, will learn some things that could really help him be successful in his bids to getting scholarships for his goal to go to college for engineering.
For those of us who grew up in the 'space age' with rockets and moon landings and space walks, it's hard to imagine a world where this no longer takesFor those of us who grew up in the 'space age' with rockets and moon landings and space walks, it's hard to imagine a world where this no longer takes place. Unfortunately, with the current space policy, that is what is happening.
Books like this, Spacewalker, by and about our astronauts, are important historical records of a rare breed of explorers. Astronaut Jerry L. Ross was one of those fortunate explorer/adventurers.
Ross starts his book informing the reader that he had dreams of going to space at a very early age and that most of his life was spent with his goal of going to space in mind. He details what appears to be an honest account of what he sacrificed and missed out on in his single-focussed goal of being an astronaut; family life. Yet, probably due more to his wife's understanding and patience, he was able to retire from his career and still have a devoted family.
I found much of the first half of the book a bit slow and 'simple.' Too often I felt that the author (whether Jerry L. Ross or John Norberg I don't know) was talking down to the reader. Explaining simple facts in too much detail while missing out on some of the more opportune moments to give the reader a little insight. (And I think we get it... many astronauts came out of Purdue University ... I think we were told that many times.) I've seen other reviewers comment that the book has a very conversational tone, which is true, but I do feel it was conversational to a middle school student. This is not a bad thing. It IS our youth we need to get invested in the space program after all.
Once Ross gets to NASA and works with other astronauts, the book really picked up interest for me. I enjoyed seeing the 'back-end' of missions through the eyes of someone who was there. And when he gets the opportunity to fly himself, I didn't want to put the book down.
Experiencing lift-off, viewing the Earth from space, putting on a space-walking suit, working with tools wearing gloves that don't have a lot of flexibility, all through Ross's eyes was a delight. Even his part of the Shuttle Challenger disaster (his job was to be with the families of the people aboard the shuttle as it came back to Earth) was interesting to experience.
Despite what I felt was a slow, or simple start, I really enjoyed this refreshing and honest look at the space program from a man who was devoted both to the scientific cause of space exploration, and to his Christian faith -- two subjects that don't always seem to go together (or at least are not typically expressed together too often). I enjoyed it enough that once I was done reading my review copy, I purchased a hard-cover edition and gave it to my fifteen year old son who seems equally focussed on working for NASA and exploring Mars. I'm hoping that my son can see Ross's drive and apply some of his own toward his goals.
Thank you Jerry L. Ross for the work and the experience....more
If you are like me, you probably look at this title and wonder "Who the heck is Frank Peppiatt?"
But if you've watched any television, particularly inIf you are like me, you probably look at this title and wonder "Who the heck is Frank Peppiatt?"
But if you've watched any television, particularly in its formative years, you've not only encountered the work of Frank Peppiatt, but you've undoubtedly ENJOYED the work of Frank Peppiatt.
I have to admit that I have a soft spot for reading books about the entertainment industry. I like going behind the scenes and seeing how the creative process works. And let's face it... you can't do much better than being there when the creative moments first appear from the writer's mind!
Here we learn about the beginnings of Hee Haw (and, probably even more interesting, how it survived being cut by the network -- something I actually have wondered about). We dally with Doris Day. We play with Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney. We are there when Rich Little makes his first television appearance. We go backstage with Perry Como, Andy Williams, and even ol' blue eyes, Frank Sinatra (and yes, Frank could read music!). You could fill a phone book with the names of stars that Frank Peppiatt worked with. His was an era when big name movie stars were giving the likes of television a try.
Peppiatt's writing style is light, smooth and eminantly readable. It makes sense, of course -- he spent a long, distinguished career writing bits ... moments to fill between commercials that had to be entertaining enough to capture and audience's attention.
But while this style is his gretest strength, it is also a flaw. What works for a television audience doesn't always work for a book reading audience. There were many times that I wanted more information... more than a snippet of a story that seemed to be included more to drop a name or to set up a punchline than to actually tell us a story. For this, I felt cheated. I wanted the full story, not just the joke.
Fortunately, he does spend more than a little time telling about his family life and how his drive and work ethic often prevented him from living a happy family life. This COULD have been written in a single chapter, but he does let us know where he was in his personal life with each important television moment. It is a memoir after all, not a Hollywood expose.
One of the most curious moments about the book is the opening chapter. This memoir starts out with a story of Peppiatt and his partner meeting with Jackie Gleason who falls asleep three or four times in their brief pitch meeting, and everyone arond sits and waits quietly for Gleason to wake up. It's an interesting moment, and certainly it's an odd moment. Odd not only for the occurence, but an odd way to start out the book. I was expecting it to lead in to the memoir in some strange way, but it really didn't. It was just a slice of Peppiatt's life. It wasn't the start to his career, it wasn't the ending of his career. It was just a moment between his commercials. And such an odd moment. I almost didn't read any further. Fortunately, the rest of the book is quite linear and much easier to follow. If he didn't refer to the moment later in the book (when he had another meeting with Gleason), I would encourage the reader to skip the chapter and read it at the end instead.
All in all, a mostly interesting memoir of a man who created many many great television moments. A man whose name I now know and won't forget....more
I honestly can't remember why I read this book. I recall seeing a review or article about it somewhere (I wish I could remember where) and the reviewI honestly can't remember why I read this book. I recall seeing a review or article about it somewhere (I wish I could remember where) and the review caught my interest. So...sit down at the computer, order the book through the library system and a few days later i'm set to read.
What a disappointment though!
Bluntly...this book was dull.
Bodine clearly thinks he has a way with words simply because he can make a few colorful metaphors, but what I really got from this was that the man had a messed up childhood but he's okay now. Thanks to Jesus and his psychic ability. Yup. That's the story.
He seems to think that it was no big deal that before he was a teenager he was getting stoned and drunk and that he had a pet ghost named Jerry that encouraged him to get in to trouble (does anyone else see anything wrong with this picture?). It was the 70's and everyone was getting high, so no big deal, right?
I couldn't help but think, time and again, 'what a loser!' But of course, being an autobiography, he paints himself as a mis-understood, lonely boy, which is why he had the troubles he did. I don't doubt this at all; what I doubt is why anyone, including myself, would have a care in the world enough to read about it.
I am flabbergasted that anyone thought enough about this to consider making a movie about this man.
This was a waste of time. I would have stopped reading but I was able to speed-read through this, hoping there would be something that would make me say, 'Ah...this is why it's important to read,' but that moment never came....more
This book holds the distinction of being the first book I listened to exclusively at my computer (which is perhaps oddly appropriate).
Despite the crimThis book holds the distinction of being the first book I listened to exclusively at my computer (which is perhaps oddly appropriate).
Despite the crimes that Mitnick committed, it would seem to me that there are many worse hackers out there than Mitnick, and if what he writes is true, the vast majority of his more serious crimes are from the telephone and not the computer.
One of the things I found through this, though, is Mitnick's denial of any serious wrong-doing. He admits to illegal activities, but continues to mention that he never used his crimes for personal profit. But he never seems to acknowledge that he committed the crimes and that he deserved to pay the price for his crimes.
Arrogant and unpenitent, Mitnick does not come off well. However, the corporations that never bothered to change factory-installed passwords on their equipment don't come off too well either.
An interesting history of some of the early technology hacking....more
I first thought maybe I'd try to write a review without commenting on Sting's music, but frankly, it would be stupid to even try. You're unlikely to rI first thought maybe I'd try to write a review without commenting on Sting's music, but frankly, it would be stupid to even try. You're unlikely to read this memoir if you don't know who Sting is, and unless you've lived in a movie theatre and think he's only a bit player in a few flicks, you're likely to read this book (or not) based on his music.
What I found most interesting, though, is that this book is a lot like his music ... occasionally brilliant, mostly just okay, and sometimes downright hard to follow.
The book rambled some, and at one point I paged backward to see if I had skipped something, because I didn't understand why we'd just spent a dozen pages or more on an off-topic. But then, when he wrote about music, and his music in particular, I was interested.
Lots of artists suffer and starve before they make it 'big' and it's good to be reminded that some of these artists had tough times. Sting had a somewhat unique situation where he was in the starving/struggling camp, while working with the Police.
What I liked learning about him was that he was smart enough to hedge his bets ... joining with other musicians even while playing with a group.
All in all, it's not a book that will live with me forever, nor did it offer any great perspective on the world or even Sting's music, but it was a pleasant way to spend a weekend reading....more
Like millions of others, I'm a tremendous fan of Ferguson's Late, Late Night talk show. His off-the-cuff humor is brilliant and his interviews are unlLike millions of others, I'm a tremendous fan of Ferguson's Late, Late Night talk show. His off-the-cuff humor is brilliant and his interviews are unlike any other talk show hosts'. And so, I was really looking forward to his book, which didn't disappoint, but wasn't the "wow, zing, bang" book I was looking for.
While there are definitely traces of his humor throughout ... and if you know Ferguson, you'll definitely be able to read some of this work picturing and hearing him deliver it ... for the most part I thought this book was a slightly maudlin. It was a serious, honest (some would say "open") look at a life that wasn't rosy, though for no particular reason other than that he's always seemed to prefer adventure over stability. There's nothing wrong with this, but it's not the Craig Ferguson we've come to know and love on television.
Some might argue that this is the whole point of the autobiography ... to show us who he really is, that what we see on television isn't the real person. I understand this, but there's just enough in the book to lead us to think that who we see on Late, Late Night is Craig Ferguson, and at the same, time, the book doesn't deliver that Craig Ferguson. Just look at that cover and tell me you're not expecting some fun, whacky humor.
If you like Ferguson, read the book. He's led an interesting and most definitely a charmed life. If you don't know who he is, this probably won't mean a thing to you....more