Summary: There's nothing really wrong with this modern-fantasy-intercut-with-historical-fantasy. It's inexpensive and a quick read and a fine way to sSummary: There's nothing really wrong with this modern-fantasy-intercut-with-historical-fantasy. It's inexpensive and a quick read and a fine way to spend a few hours. I don't know that it starts a series I want to follow, but I'm glad enough to have spent some time with it.
This is one of that horde of self-published-on-Kindle genre fiction that keeps promising—someday—to give us gems that bypass the slush piles at overworked print houses but—in the meantime—keeps delivering good self-tests for aspiring copyeditors(1). The basic setup is stock enough to be comforting and unconventional enough to be tantalizing: cross-cut chapters between a modern, amnesiac, magic-wielding thief(2) and a 15th century magic-wielding monster hunter, thankfully without any real pretense that we don't know they're going to be the same person.
The main characters are likeable enough and the overall world setup is interesting. If you find the genre(s) enjoyable it's a reasonable way to clear the palate between books you'll care to remember.
And that's the problem. When I looked at the sequel (Born of Hatred) on the Amazon store, I realized that, despite having finished Crimes Against Magic less than three days ago, I can't actually recall the main character's situation at the end of the book. Or what his name was. Or what the actual primary conflict in the larger, modern setting was. I know it had something to do with someone trying to torture people to turn them into magical nasties, but I'm pretty sure that turned out to be uninteresting to the main character and he went off in search of someone else instead. I do think there was a fight scene against a gargoyle in the modern story. Maybe there were two. But I can't think of any reason to start the second book. It's $4.99 on Kindle, which may be above my "get it for a spare bus trip someday" level.
The 15th century story was much better presented. I knew what the character was doing and why he was doing it and I mostly cared that he succeeded. I definitely liked the secondary characters (and the villains) in that story. As a bit of fun, it was a bit of fun. As historical fantasy, it was just a bit of fun, though. I don't know that anything in the text couldn't have been transported to any other poorly-detailed time period or location that wasn't in a modern city. This wasn't "15th century France," it was "a generic place where mercenary werewolves were killing people on both sides of a war."
Oh, I remembered something else: there was a bit about someone claiming to be descended from Cassandra, despite the protag knowing that Cassandra died (well, was murdered) childless. This bit of interest was then promptly ignored and never picked back up.
So the modern story won't stack up for the modern, urban fantasy crime crowd; the backstory won't stack up for the historical fantasy crowd; and the actual plot has completely slipped my mind. But I definitely have a feeling that it was a pleasant way to spend some time when I was travelling over the holidays and the cheap price plus lack of weight to carry it along in digital form left me pleased enough to read it.
I'm happy to keep checking out Steve McHugh's new books. Sadly, I'm not sure I can talk myself into five bucks for the sequel to this one. I wouldn't look down on my friends if they read Crimes Against Magic the next time they want some discount comfort food. I'd even gladly lend them my copy (since digital lending is thoughtfully enabled on it, which I heartily applaud). And if one of my friends loaned me a copy of the sequel, I'd happily read it while watching TV or crocheting or something.
Maybe that isn't a bold, resounding endorsement, but it's a lot better than many of books that made it through the slush piles at some of the print houses.
1) Although the self-published-on-Amazon crowd (and, by and large, the self-published crowd) tend to poor line editing (typos, word confusion, bizarre layout, grammatical errors that distract the reader, etc.), this book didn't jump out in that way. I commented while I was reading it that it read very, very smoothly for the flock it flies with.
2) I think "modern, amnesiac, magic-wielding thief" is a common enough trope to warrant a name at this point. ...more
So far, the Sandman Slim books have been non-stop, rollicking fun. Our (anti)hero, Stark, just wants to be left alone and he'll kill anything that getSo far, the Sandman Slim books have been non-stop, rollicking fun. Our (anti)hero, Stark, just wants to be left alone and he'll kill anything that gets in the way of that, which keeps him picking up strays to care for and responsibilities to maintain at a disturbing rate. As of this short story, listed as volume "3.5" in the books, he's taken over the title of Lucifer and trying to keep hell from boiling over into rebellions that could affect the mortal world. After all, the mortal world is where he keeps his stuff. And his favorite bar. And the vampire-thing he's kind of dating. And the video rental store he stole.
You see how it is. A short story about him proving he's as tough as they say would come in handy right about now.
But it's barely a three-out-of-five, sadly, for two reasons.
First, setup isn't strong. It isn't clear if the story is intended to be only for readers familiar with book 3, but there are too many throwaway characters and too many lines explaining what someone who's read along so far already knows and somone jumping in at this story probably won't understand anyway.
The action is fine (and actually understated, for the series), and we get some great bits from Stark about why he's immune to the various psychological harrassment that does in the Hellions around him, but the mythology behind it, and the motivation for him to be involved at all, aren't handled as well as we know Kadrey can do in a longer form. It feels like the various mythology sections of book 3 pared down to a few dozen lines, which just doesn't work well.
But it's the second flaw that really hurts the story: It just doesn't matter. I mean, it really doesn't matter. At the end of the story, it might as well not have happened. We get some fun along the way, but it has one of those auctorial cop-outs that make a story basically a writing exercise. Story, but no plot.
It is possible, of course, that Kadrey intends to reference this story somewhere later, and it's possible that the cop-out is an important plot element. I hope so. It would be great. But even then, there would be ways to write the story (or maybe times to release the story) that wouldn't leave the reader feeling as cheated.
If you read the series, and if you're continuing after book 3, go ahead and spend the $0.99 to get this and enjoy it. But try to have the next book handy for when you realize it wasn't what you wanted....more