I have made it halfway through this book, and I just can't go any farther. I'm giving it two stars, because there was enough there to keep me going foI have made it halfway through this book, and I just can't go any farther. I'm giving it two stars, because there was enough there to keep me going for over 200 pages, but I'm just not getting any more out of it. It is exceedingly slow and introspective. The characters are, yes, self-conscious to a fault, anxious, defensive, and obviously don't have a clue what happiness is. The convoluted dialogue is hard for me to imagine anyone actually participating in. I realize this was written in the late 1960s but it felt so much older. I don't know what else was published in Britain in 1970, but seriously? this is the winner of the first Whitbread award?
KIRKUS REVIEW (Pub Date: Sept. 1st, 1972): Although this is basically a sentimental book (the title referring to the theme song of one of its two central characters -- a former band leader -- indicates that), it hasn't the appeal of her Logical Girl (1967) and it is more consistent with her earlier work which offered a substantial sociology of Anglo-Jewry. Throughout the first half of this book, ostensibly dealing with the making of a documentary by four or five people, Gerda Charles examines the soul of the Jew always suffering from his Jewishness without even the ""protection of stupidity""; always worrying his way, self-consciously but ambitiously, out of his ""small"" world of the People of the Book at a time, 50 years before this, when in their crass ignorance they were not even ""People of the Word."" This is the past inherited by the Jewish poet, minor, ingrown and consumptive, who will be the subject of the documentary; but it also imposes its allegiances on Michele, a writer and a teacher and a Rabbi's daughter, and Jimmy Marchant, the band leader, who have never found personal happiness. Less susceptible to it is Georges Franck, director of the documentary -- a charmer, a betrayer who finally will hurt everyone in connection with this project but still will enable Michele and Marchant to find some sort of compromise together for their half-lives. . . . The novel moves very slowly since the author is far more interested in permitting her characters to assess themselves and each other -- it is sometimes talky but not preachy. At one point she questions whether life should take precedence over art -- in this case it is life, and Gerda Charles, with her very level intelligence and practical realism, deals with it on just those terms.
3.5 stars really, but I'm rounding up. After reading all the controversy around this book's publication, I was quite pleasantly surprised. I loved the3.5 stars really, but I'm rounding up. After reading all the controversy around this book's publication, I was quite pleasantly surprised. I loved the stream of consciousness style back and forth between past and present. The humor of To Kill a Mockingbird is fully present here. And I thought the social commentary quite illuminating of that time and place in our history. While the ending was a bit weak (this story was not a finished novel), it made me think. About shedding childhood illusions and recognizing that the people we love aren't perfect. About racism and bigotry, which are still big issues today. This book probably cannot stand on its own - if you haven't read To Kill A Mockingbird, I would read that first. You don't have to, but I think having that context makes it more meaningful. I wish Harper Lee had gone on to write more. One could probably write a whole commentary on how her editors suppressed a voice for contemporary conscience in favor of the childhood fantasy. Not that To Kill a Mockingbird wasn't a gem, and a wake-up call for social justice - just that we all have to grow up and she had so much more to say.
Book Description: Maycomb, Alabama. Twenty-six-year-old Jean Louise Finch—"Scout"—returns home from New York City to visit her aging father, Atticus. Set against the backdrop of the civil rights tensions and political turmoil that were transforming the South, Jean Louise's homecoming turns bittersweet when she learns disturbing truths about her close-knit family, the town, and the people dearest to her. Memories from her childhood flood back, and her values and assumptions are thrown into doubt. Featuring many of the iconic characters from To Kill a Mockingbird, Go Set a Watchman perfectly captures a young woman, and a world, in painful yet necessary transition out of the illusions of the past—a journey that can only be guided by one's own conscience....more
Can't really add much to the description below without giving away spoilers. The story is anchored around the trip to NYC with Louise Brooks (a real pCan't really add much to the description below without giving away spoilers. The story is anchored around the trip to NYC with Louise Brooks (a real person), but encompasses so much more - Cora's childhood in the orphanage in NYC, being sent west on the Orphan Train, being adopted, her marriage and the secret that cannot be revealed to anyone, and the events that change her from a life circumscribed by propriety to become a supporter of birth control and women's rights, and a home for unwed mothers. The themes touched on are just as relevant to today as to the 1920s. Bottom line - Cora goes to NYC to look for her past and ends up finding her future.
Book Description: Only a few years before becoming a famous silent-film star and an icon of her generation, a fifteen-year-old Louise Brooks leaves Wichita, Kansas, to study with the prestigious Denishawn School of Dancing in New York. Much to her annoyance, she is accompanied by a thirty-six-year-old chaperone, who is neither mother nor friend. Cora Carlisle, a complicated but traditional woman with her own reasons for making the trip, has no idea what she’s in for. Young Louise, already stunningly beautiful and sporting her famous black bob with blunt bangs, is known for her arrogance and her lack of respect for convention. Ultimately, the five weeks they spend together will transform their lives forever. For Cora, the city holds the promise of discovery that might answer the question at the core of her being, and even as she does her best to watch over Louise in this strange and bustling place she embarks on a mission of her own. And while what she finds isn’t what she anticipated, she is liberated in a way she could not have imagined. Over the course of Cora’s relationship with Louise, her eyes are opened to the promise of the twentieth century and a new understanding of the possibilities for being fully alive....more