I really wanted to like this one more. I just didn't feel the chemistry between the two main characters and the writing style started to get on my nerI really wanted to like this one more. I just didn't feel the chemistry between the two main characters and the writing style started to get on my nerves after a while - I'm all for dual pov but this felt like it switched between the two in all the wrong places and consequently there were gaps in character development, especially with Linda.
But it was clearly meticulously researched and the author balanced the many issues here really well. And the fact that so many people are reading and talking about this book is a wonderful thing. ...more
Still made me laugh. And I think I may have read it more than a couple of times as a kid because I found myself reciting bits before they'd even happeStill made me laugh. And I think I may have read it more than a couple of times as a kid because I found myself reciting bits before they'd even happened....more
Although this book is set in 1934, I'm not going to put it in my Past on Paper feature because it just feels all wrong calling it historical fiction.Although this book is set in 1934, I'm not going to put it in my Past on Paper feature because it just feels all wrong calling it historical fiction. Even though it's historical and a work of fiction.Yes, the voice very much depends on this particular time period but (and there's massive clue in the title here) this is very much in the realms of the mysterious for me. It pays homage to both Agatha Christie and her ilk as well as classic boarding school stories but somehow manages to be something else entirely.
First admission: the crime element wasn't the page-turner I thought it was going to be. Maybe it was the 'school girl investigators' angle because this subsequently put a bit of distance between the main characters and the other players or just that the plot didn't unfold quickly enough for me. Not really sure, but the book made up for it in other ways...
The cover design and synopsis gave the impression of something light-hearted - apart from that whole murder thing - and even though the tone was upbeat, it surprised me with an underlying darkness, not to do with the murder (maybe partly to do with the murder *resists urges to say MURDER in Taggart-like fashion*) but with the relationship between Hazel Wong and Daisy Wells, our two detectives. Hazel is the put-upon 'secretary' of their secret society who records everything in her casebook and describes the frustration and occasional upset the actions of her best friend cause. Daisy is definitely manipulative, possibly slightly sociopathic (can someone be slightly sociopathic?) but never boring. What kept me turning the pages was their 'friendship' - a very realistic depiction of how one personality can dominate another and it gave the book another dimension.
A good voice can make a book and here it never falters. Hazel is a very sympathetic character and the combination of her keen observation and naivety make her a great storyteller - I would have loved to hear more about her life in Hong Kong but hopefully this might be developed further on in the series. And even though this is Hazel's story, I hope Daisy and her background get featured in future adventures, especially after that little taster at the end...
Despite being the tiniest bit disappointed in the actual crime (although I applaud the clever resolution), this was a surprising mystery in more ways than you might think... ...more
Might come back to this one at another time. Not really feeling it tbh. Don't object to not very likeable characters but just feel a bit manipulated aMight come back to this one at another time. Not really feeling it tbh. Don't object to not very likeable characters but just feel a bit manipulated as a reader by this premise, if that makes sense....more
The best thing by far about this book was the premise. It's an exciting story, only told in a not-very-exciting way by a main character who doesn't reThe best thing by far about this book was the premise. It's an exciting story, only told in a not-very-exciting way by a main character who doesn't really shine as much as some of the supporting characters. That ending though.......more
The strength of the voice pushed it up to 3 stars but this was a tough one to like. I have thoughts, so I might actually write a review for the firstThe strength of the voice pushed it up to 3 stars but this was a tough one to like. I have thoughts, so I might actually write a review for the first time in a long time......more
4.5 stars. Maybe a fraction under 5 stars. A few things that made it not quite perfect, but a great story well told.
Probably won't write a review bec4.5 stars. Maybe a fraction under 5 stars. A few things that made it not quite perfect, but a great story well told.
Probably won't write a review because the less you know about this book before you start it the better.
Let's just say I'm I glad I didn't read those last few chapters on public transport. So much snot. So many tears...
Ok, I scratch that. I decided to write a review after all...
When I finished this, I stated on Goodreads that I probably wasn't going to write a review because the less you know about this book before you read it the better. Even though I didn't know any concrete facts, I had heard whispers on the breeze and even whispers can do damage to a reading experience such as this. But then certain books live on in your head long after you've finished them and they deserve to be praised. I've successfully managed to write a spoiler-free review of a book before, a similar sort of book that requires spoiler-free reading and I think I did an alright job if I say so myself. So here goes. If you really, really don't want to know anything else about We Were Liars before you start it, I suggest you stop reading here (but only after I've said you really need to think about starting it very soon)...
I'm rubbish with books that are steeped in hype. I become a very cynical sort and even more judgey than I usually am (not something I'm particularly proud of) but this makes it all the more satisfying when a book does live up to all the praise. Let's start off with the best thing about We Were Liars - the writing. It's sparse, but I like sparse. Why use five words when you can use one? And because this style is so uncompromising, the voice is too and I don't think it needs pointing out that this is a Very Good Thing indeed (but I will anyway - it is a Very Good Thing). Cadence is the perfect character to lead us through the lives of the Sinclair family - revered, but enough of an outsider to show them warts and all.
From my own experience, there is not much to relate to with the wealthy Sinclairs but as with all good storytelling, this didn't matter a jot. This may have been a book about rich white dudes but it was also a book about prejudice and the abuse of power and love, common themes in many novels but here used in a very clever way. It felt very old-fashioned in some ways, perhaps to do with the setting. On starting it, I kept getting flashbacks of scenes from Dynasty, but here there were less should-pads and more shabby-chic preppiness. I guess this is all testament to the strength of the writing again and her amazing ability to build this world of privilege in such amazing and convincing detail.
There were a few things that made it not quite perfect - it slowed down quite a lot in the middle for me (that's all I will say about this because to say anymore would be alluding to those whispers on the breeze mentioned above) and I would have enjoyed a bit more detail about the other Liars at the beginning. This is quite a quick read and we're thrown into the middle of events early on - as a consequence, it took me a little while to get to grips with some of the characters.
But these are minor gripes. We Were Liars deserves all the attention it's been getting. It is a clever, involving story with plenty of mystery, and I'm all for clever stories, especially when they are told this well.