It's an autobiography written by Morrissey. I knew what I was getting into when I cracked the cover open, but it was a gift and I felt obliged to carrIt's an autobiography written by Morrissey. I knew what I was getting into when I cracked the cover open, but it was a gift and I felt obliged to carry on, so I gave it the old school try. Silly me.
This was an agonizing read that took several months to finish because I didn't have the patience to tackle more than 10 to 15 pages at a time. What an insufferable slog this was! Self-indulgent, self-important, whining, arrogant, paranoid, petulant, truculent, hubristic, preening . . . such adjectives may frequently have been leveled at the author but remain inadequate to describe the tone of what basically amounts to 450 pages of really badly written self-aggrandizing prose. Cheap alliteration, relentless self-quoting, and multiple pop-culture allusions do not turn navel-gazing schoolboy ruminations into poetry or philosophy! I can deal with the difficult personality, the narrative disconnect of the random observations, and the extraordinary self-pitying belligerence, but I cannot accept that nobody along the way was willing to take the author's immature scribblings and EDIT the text. There are subject/verb disagreements, incorrect tenses and cases, dangling and misplaced modifiers, and dismal attempts at clever wordplay (giving the author the benefit of the doubt that they were intentional) which fail to be clever and instead read like, well, glaringly bad typos.
There is, however, one very nice and quotable (for reasons not of mockery or derision!) line toward the very end of the book: " . . . I know that life's biggest prize is to have the day before you as yours alone to do with as you wish." That said, I wish I had the time back that I spent reading this book, but I guess I take responsibility for my choice to keep plugging along, knowing I was getting nowhere other than more exasperated with every line.
Take responsibility? Ah, if only Morrissey would consider doing such a thing! Perhaps then his story would be more rewarding.
This book does not diminish my affection for the musical work of the author either as a member of the Smiths or as a solo artist, but any good will I may have had toward Morrissey the individual has left me. ...more
While I didn't mind the conceit (speculative fan fiction, nothing more), I did mind the writing, which was awkward, sometimes riotously pretentious, oWhile I didn't mind the conceit (speculative fan fiction, nothing more), I did mind the writing, which was awkward, sometimes riotously pretentious, occasionally ungrammatical, and often downright clunky — it had nothing of the flow or poetry of Crevel's fiction. The point of view was confused and sometimes contradictory, and the pronouncements of the "voices" struck me as rather silly (especially in regards to their totally accurate predictions of the future — convenient, I suppose, but a no-brainer for an author writing so many decades after Crevel's death!). Such a short book should have taken me maybe one or two commutes to finish reading, but instead I could only struggle through a couple of pages at a time without losing patience. Now I must go back and reread Crevel to clear my mind of this literature-student-quality experiment. ...more
I have not seen the film based on this book, but I've heard many good things about it. Unfortunately, now that I've read the book, I have lost interesI have not seen the film based on this book, but I've heard many good things about it. Unfortunately, now that I've read the book, I have lost interest in seeing the film that was based on it because I found the book tedious and rather dull. I didn't find it entertaining or clever or surreal. I didn't find it particularly engrossing, nor did I find it dreamlike or magical. While I appreciate some of the Gothic cliches the author was trying to subvert, they weren't subverted effectively enough for me to feel secure in assuming that was entirely his intention — the writing just came off as a bad attempt at replicating Gothic cliches but with the addition of a forced, superficial whimsy. Maybe they read much better in the original Czech, but a lot of the passages were clumsy, cheesy, and downright clunky. As this was a very quick read (a bath and a bus ride), I can't call it a total waste of my time, but I kept reading even when I wanted to put it down because I was waiting for it to get better . . . and it never did. ...more
I hesitate to give this a low rating because the author has clearly lived through some horrors and this memoir was intended more for therapeutic and dI hesitate to give this a low rating because the author has clearly lived through some horrors and this memoir was intended more for therapeutic and documentation purposes than as a narrative for publication. I imagine it was difficult for her to write this in any detail and I applaud her for having done so. Still, the writing is dreadful — it's meandering, repetitive, and cliched, with an excess of exclamation marks and some gaping holes in terms of clarifying information. Tragic events unfold with no emotional impact because spoilers have been given earlier in the text. I would read several pages and think, "Wait, didn't I read this already?" And I wondered if the effect were intentional — surviving under the Khmer Rouge was mind numbing and painful, the labor was a deadening slog, and emotions were forcibly suppressed, so perhaps the author wanted to cause the reader to experience the same thing on an intellectual level as she did on a physical level? The word that to me best describes the book is flat. I felt distanced from, and not always interested in, what she was recounting, and that is troublesome when the subject matter is something so intense and horrific. The book was not helped by wretched editing, either. Often a verb or a crucial bit of punctuation was missing, prepositions were repeated, and incorrect words were used — for that, the author cannot be blamed, but the text should have been tightened and proofread before publication to prevent such jarring disruptions in flow. (Side note: I found myself quite annoyed by the author's insistence on claiming the privilege of her French citizenship and expectation that France should come to her rescue when she had never set foot on French soil before her Vietnamese liberators allowed her to leave southeast Asia. Unlike the majority of those who endured the Khmer Rouge, she did not have to deal with the after-effects of the regime and the rebuilding of her nation. I admit that starting afresh in a strange land is rough, but the emphasis and amount of time spent on details of her departure for and subsequent life in France somewhat minimize the hellishness of what she left behind.)...more
An engaging idea — what if Rimbaud and Verlaine (well, characters meant to represent them) were in New York City in the early 1970s — is let down by aAn engaging idea — what if Rimbaud and Verlaine (well, characters meant to represent them) were in New York City in the early 1970s — is let down by a belabored story-within-a-story conceit that just becomes confusing and tiresome. The language alternates between overly precious and dreadfully clunky, and the egregious typos and homophone errors in the edition didn't help the prose. Furthermore, while the unpleasantness of the characters may have been plausibly representative of the real poets on whom they were based, most of the examples of the literary cleverness (I hesitate to refer to it as poetry) attributed to the two main characters and their peers were just wretchedly written. ...more