In accordance with the FTC, I would like to disclose that I received this book through Book Crossing. The opinions expressed(From my blog: Quill Café)
In accordance with the FTC, I would like to disclose that I received this book through Book Crossing. The opinions expressed are mine and no monetary compensation was offered to me by the author or publisher.
Jamalee Merridew, the girl with the tomato red hair, wants nothing more than to get out of the Ozarks with her younger – and far more beautiful – brother, Jason and away from their prostitute mother.
Enter Sammy Barlach, a drifter with no aim in life and no expectations for himself. He's pulled into the Merridews' lives and finally feels like he has found somewhere with people who will have him...but what price will his place with the Merridews finally bring?
This book was handed to me at a Book Crossing meet-up. I had never heard of the author or the book before, although I was also informed that another one of his books, Winter's Bone, had been made into a film and was now in cinemas.
I was pulled into 'Tomato Red' right away by the writing and the narrative voice. The book is told in first person by Sammy Barlach, who begins his journey in the novel, high on the drug dubbed "crank." Sammy is a humble character, who doesn't think much of himself or where his life is going. His narrative voice is sardonic and he has a unique view on the mundane things around him. The similes and metaphors are written in such an inventive way that I could not help but reread them and marvel at the excellence of the writing.
The book is a lot more about characters and their way of life than it is about plot development. I really liked the character of Sammy. He was wonderfully written and so real. The character of Jamalee Merridew was a real contrast to Sammy, who wants nothing but to get away and have a better life. She can never be satisfied with the poor state of her life and she strives to get away at any cost.
I liked Jamalee's character just for her stark difference to Sammy. I could empathise with her because of her desire to run away from a place where she felt trapped, but I also felt removed from her because of her situation with her family, where she held her prostitute mother in disdain but would still use her brother’s stunning good looks to get her where she wanted to go. She sulked a little too much and didn't seem to have the willpower to do anything on her own, which I think just showed the juxtaposition of how she wanted to be independent and free but was caught in the need to depend on others.
Tomato Red is a fascinating read and a fantastic example that reading outside the box can introduce you to some brilliant writing....more
John Watson has returned from Afghanistan and is looking for lodgings in London. An old friend introduces him to Sherlock Holmes, a consulting detectiJohn Watson has returned from Afghanistan and is looking for lodgings in London. An old friend introduces him to Sherlock Holmes, a consulting detective and the two of them take up abode in 221B Baker Street. Thus begins Watson's insight into the life and mind of Holmes.
When a man shows up dead with no signs of a struggle, the police are stumped. They call in Holmes to help them solve the mystery of his murder. The policemen are at odds, trying to trump the other by solving the case first but Holmes is clever. Using his powers of deduction, can he solve the crime before the killer strikes again? Or could there be more cunning to this murder scheme than even Holmes can catch?
Revenge is the agenda - but what could prompt such vengeance?
The only insight I have ever had into Sherlock Holmes has been through adaptations or hearsay. He has become such a quintessential character that he is threaded throughout modern literature and television. I had no idea what Sherlock was really meant to be like, so I was determined to get it straight from the source. I like to start at the beginning if I can and so 'A Study in Scarlet' was the only option. The very beginning of the Watson and Holmes duo.
The novel was divided into two parts, which I wasn't aware of before I began it. The first half is much the mystery and watching Holmes go about his business of being clever but refusing to tell anyone his conclusions until everything is resolved. My fascination with the characters and the cleverness of Holmes was what kept me intrigued. The second part, however, is all about the back story. It is the lead-up to the reason of the crime.
The mystery structure I am most familiar with is one that gives an insight into possible reasons for the murder and the background of potential suspects as it goes along. This one kept me in the dark for the first half and dished out the answers in part two. It was an interesting experience.
The second part of the novel did grip me. I had my doubts. I was thrown and I wasn't sure if I was going to be interested but it proved to be a gritty telling that got right under my skin and held my attention. It is up to the individual reader to decide whether they sympathise with the murderer but I found that it was empathetic at least.
A Study in Scarlet gives an insight into religious communities in that time period that I had a faint idea of but hadn't grasped. It is a story well worth reading...or in my case listening to. I purchased it on audio book, narrated by Derek Jacobi.
I have no idea which installment comes after this one but I'm keen to find out.
When one of her workers is found murdered, with a window cut through her middle, Liv Bergen reconnects with her old college friend Lisa Henry, who isWhen one of her workers is found murdered, with a window cut through her middle, Liv Bergen reconnects with her old college friend Lisa Henry, who is the FBI profiler on the case. Offering her hospitality to the FBI, Liv finds herself wrapped up in the killer’s twisted schemes.
FBI agent, Streeter Pierce, is hunting the dubbed “Venus de Milo” murderer. Can he find him before he strikes again? This killer is close but clever. Who will stumble into his path next?
I read this book in practically one sitting. I’ve never been one to read many murder mystery novels because I’ve always been overwhelmed by the number of them my mum has stacked up on her shelves. This book was mine though, sitting on my shelf waiting for me. One I had opened it, I was sucked in.
Is it bad of me that I like serial killers with an artistic or literary bent? I was utterly absorbed by ‘Brother Grimm’ by Craig Russell, where the killer positions his victims in the style of the Grimm fairy tales. This was much the same, where “de Milo” is inspired by/obsessed with a particular artist.
The artist in question was one that I had heard of and seen the works of but seeing the twisted mind of the killer made me look at the art in a way that transcended more than, “That’s interesting.” Unless you’re very familiar with the artist, you will be as quizzical and enlightened as I was reading the book.
‘In the Belly of Jonah’ is written alternately in Liv’s first person perspective and third person. The close third person P.O.V. allows the reader to not only observe Streeter Pierce and the killer but also see into their thought processes.
Liv is a brilliant protagonist. She is intelligent and hardworking, vulnerable without being weak. She had a quirky sense of humour and a quick witted way of thinking and speaking that made me all the more drawn to her.
Streeter is a really peculiar first name. I just had to throw that out there. I was fascinated by the way he handles people. He knows how to get people to want to work with him, instead of feeling like they are being pressured by his position to work for him. He is manipulative in the subtlest of ways.
I was torn between repulsion and fascination for the killer. Even after his identity was disclosed, I can’t stop thinking about his twisted mind and the insights I had into it. A brilliant accomplishment by the writer.
Liv and Streeter’s roles in the novel are quite separate but I never felt as though the narrative was disjointed. It was constantly captivating and I look forward to reading the next Liv Bergen novel, ‘Lot’s Return to Sodom.’
‘In the Belly of Jonah’ is a book I would recommend to mystery lovers but also those who, like me, are fascinated by the concept of a serial killer with an artistic bent.
In accordance with the FTC, I would like to disclose that I received this book from the author. The opinions expressed are mine and no monetary compensation was offered to me by the author or publisher....more
When Enola Holmes' mother disappears, she is frantic to finder her - but her two older brothers, Mycroft and Sherlock disapprove. Convinced that theirWhen Enola Holmes' mother disappears, she is frantic to finder her - but her two older brothers, Mycroft and Sherlock disapprove. Convinced that their mother has run away, Enola's brothers are determined to send her off to boarding school...but she is having none of that.
Setting off to find her mother, Enola stumbles across the case of a missing boy and finds herself in more trouble than she had ever conceived. London is not the sparkling place she had imagined and there are horrid figures that crawl the streets.
Katherine Kellgren is quick becoming my favourite audio book narrator, so after reading the above review I was ecstatic to discover that she narrated the Enola Holmes Mysteries.
Enola is a compelling character, sympathetic without being petty, head-strong and intelligent. Reiterated through the story are her mother's words, "Enola, you will do very well on your own." Boy, is it true! Even Enola's name spelled backwards is "alone." She is a driven character and I was drawn to her.
I will admit that I am not overly-familiar with the original novels by Conan Doyle. I listened to A Study in Scarlet and then gave up on the second installment. Springer does make references to A Study in Scarlet (in the sense of it being a non-fiction account by Watson) but I have nothing to really compare or criticise the borrowed characters in the book. Speaking of references, I did like the one Springer made to The Importance of Being Earnest with Lane and the cucumber sandwiches.
While I am not familiar enough with the Holmes brothers to know if they were portrayed well, I can say that they appear to me to be right arses. They belittle Enola less because she is young and more-so because she is female. Sexism to the max. This is what made me like the book all the more. It hones in on the issues of sexism but also shows Enola's cleverness and gives a right "stuff you" to the notion of her inferiority.
The descriptions Springer gives of East London and even the steel corsets young women are made to wear to refine their body shape was horrific. Almost as horrid as Mycroft's attitude. (If you nap so often, you'll get diabetes, Mycroft.) There was a wonderful grit to the novel and it was riddled with plenty of dangers, mostly "unmentionable" things which made the subtext all the stronger.
I wouldn't say that the case of the missing boy was the most interesting thing in the plot but rather Enola's own journey and how she thought outside the box - even outfoxing the great Sherlock Holmes who she honestly made look a bit of a ninny. I've already purchased the second novel, 'The Case of the Left-Handed Lady' and look forward to starting it...now.
Christopher Holmes is in a slump. The sales for his series about an elderly amateur sleuth and her cat are dwindling and his partner of ten years hasChristopher Holmes is in a slump. The sales for his series about an elderly amateur sleuth and her cat are dwindling and his partner of ten years has run off with his PA. When his agent encourages him to attend a writer's retreat - in the middle of nowhere - he isn't anticipating much beyond boozing and catty conversation, let alone the appearance of a dead body.
It's not long before Christopher is the primary suspect, facing the scrutiny of gossiping writers with expansive imaginations and J.X. Moriarity: best-selling novelist, ex-cop, and Christopher's ex-fling. With all suspicion on him, Christopher is determined to do some sleuthing of his own...an act which may just get him killed.
This is my second encounter with one of Josh Lanyon's novels, the first being 'A Snowball in Hell.' The premise of 'Somebody Killed His Editor' hooked me because I loved the idea of writers holed up in the middle of a crime scene, but the actual execution of the novel far exceeded my expectations.
What really carried the book is its voice. It is narrated in first person by the protagonist, Christopher Holmes, whose outer sarcastic self is only trumped by his inner snark. Not that his perspective isn't often called for, with an abundance of backhanded comments and cattiness at the retreat, plenty of which is targeted at Christopher and his career. His wit lends itself to his likeable and sympathetic nature, and he becomes a well-rounded character who feels like a real person with insecurities, flaws and flusters...and excellent comedic timing.
I liked that the conflict between Christopher and J.X. wasn't contrived. They had a history and J.X.'s cold attitude had a foundation, rather than being an irritating "love interest insults the protagonist even though they met five minutes ago" scenario. There is nothing forced about their interaction and it made for a far more intriguing dynamic.
The main reason I was so quick to purchase this book was that it was narrated on audio by Kevin R. Free, who co-narrates The Kane Chronicles. His narration didn't dissapoint and amplified Christopher's voice and my enjoyment of the novel.
'Somebody Killed His Editor' is a book I would highly recommend to anyone who loves mystery with a sublime sense of wit.