This is a retelling of Peter Pan that I read for my fairy tale book club. I'm not going to write a whole detailed review of this book because it's impThis is a retelling of Peter Pan that I read for my fairy tale book club. I'm not going to write a whole detailed review of this book because it's impossible to review this book without giving spoilers. And while I won't give spoilers about the actual story, I *will* be spoilering the tone.
"Let me tell you something straight off. This is a love story, but not like any you've heard. The boy and the girl are far from innocent. Dear lives are lost. And good doesn't win. In some places, there is something ultimately good about endings. In Neverland, that is not the case."
That's how the book starts and that's pretty much a spoiler of the tone right there. Don't think this is a trick. Or an exaggeration. Or a lie. This book is a tearjerker. And even knowing that going in -- being warned on the very first page -- you still cry. Even when you are pretty sure you know exactly what is going to happen, it's more poignantly painful than you think it will be when it actually does.
It's a superb book. From start to finish I enjoyed it. It's a fast and easy read, but rich and heartfelt nonetheless....more
Not going to bother with a long-winded review because either you've read up to here in the series and you're already going on with this oThis is good.
Not going to bother with a long-winded review because either you've read up to here in the series and you're already going on with this one, in which case my review would just be "this is good!" fist-bump. Or you've read up to here in the series and you are somehow not interested in this one, in which case nothing I saw is probably going to convince you.
As with the others in the series, this book does a great job of following the original fairy tale (Rapunzel) in a modern and sci-fi way. Again, down to details like (view spoiler)[Thorne being blinded, just like the prince in rapunzel. I loved that so much. (hide spoiler)].
And where the first two had flaws with pacing and over-reaching, this book read as tighter and more finely tuned. You may not like the characters as much -- Cress is probably my least favorite of the fairy tale heroines -- but (view spoiler)[Iko is even better than ever so yay! (hide spoiler)].
Unfortunately I read these when the next book in the series -- Winter -- isn't expected out until November of NEXT YEAR so that's kind of a bummer. But, the reading group is already on to October's read and I'm already distracted by that one Strands of Bronze and Gold so I'll probably make it just fine.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>...more
I actually really liked this. I went into it happily optimistic just because even if I didn't *love* Cinder, I *did* like how Marissa Meyer retold theI actually really liked this. I went into it happily optimistic just because even if I didn't *love* Cinder, I *did* like how Marissa Meyer retold the fairy tale. So I was eager to see what she did with little red riding hood.
Once again, I wasn't disappointed. The take is unique and yet it still follows the original take quite closely, even down to some little details.
I liked this book better than Cinder and I'm not sure if that's because I liked Scarlett more as a character, or that I liked Wolf much more than Kai, or that I liked Cinder better in this book than I did in the first, or if it's just because I really like Thorne (the Han Solo or Starbuck character, both of whom I loved growing up (think the original Starbuck, not that blasphemous reboot of him being a chick)). It is probably all of those things.
Plus, the story has a lot more action.
Once again, though, sometimes maybe TOO much action, as if there is too much bitten off and trying to be crammed into one book.
A difference between this book and cinder is that the point of view flips between Cinder and Scarlet and so you you have two different main characters with different agendas and goals. Frequently in books narrated in that fashion, there is definitely one POV I prefer and I subconciously can't-wait to get back to it when I am reading the other one. In this book i enjoyed them both equally because both the story arcs are strong.
If you've read Cinder and liked it at all, you are probably already planning to read this so a recommendation is probably not necessary. But if you've read Cinder and liked it at all and are hesitating about this one, I say go ahead, because it's better than the first!...more
I wish I had written a review of this before I had read the second two because I feel like my liking of the second two has now skewed my opinion of thI wish I had written a review of this before I had read the second two because I feel like my liking of the second two has now skewed my opinion of this book and is making me remember it better than it actually was.
Don't get me wrong, because I definitely liked it. Enough so that I bought the second one immediately (straight from bed. how'd I live before the kindle!). But this book has some flaws.
Some of the characters are extremely flat, the plot is pretty predictable about 50 pages in, and then suddenly there is a lot more going on than can be handled in the end of the book. It reads like the author bit off more than she could chew. Or that the book was written under a tight deadline.
After reading the second two, which I think flowed much better, I can understand the above flaws. All that stuff DID need to be crammed in the first book, in order for the second two to flow as they did.
All that said, I do recommend this book if only for getting to the rest of the series! The twist on the cinderella story is unique and yet still follows the original tale pretty closely and really well. Given that i read this for my "fairy tale retelling" book club, that fact was a happy requirement. As noted in my other fairy-tale-retelling reviews, I can cut a book a lot of slack in this case given that fairy tales themselves are frequently disjointed, lacking character depth and full of plot holes. :)
I thought the telling of this story was rushed, lacked detail, and was on the younger end of "young adult."
TSame as my reviews of the other two books:
I thought the telling of this story was rushed, lacked detail, and was on the younger end of "young adult."
That said, I still found the story itself entertaining and interesting. As with the book, if I treated this in my head *like* a fairy tale -- where the telling of the story is really just a vehicle for the story itself -- then I quite liked it.
And I do think this series would be a good one *for* that younger young set. I don't really know anything else like it out there for that age group.
Of the three books I've read, this was my least favorite. This one seemed to have the *most* "let's cram as much development as possible into the fewest pages" going on so there was a lot of "from total strange to BFF" and that sort of thing going on.
As with the first book, I thought the telling of this story was rushed, lacked detail, and was on the younger end of "young adult."
That said, I stillAs with the first book, I thought the telling of this story was rushed, lacked detail, and was on the younger end of "young adult."
That said, I still found the story itself entertaining and interesting. As with the book, if I treated this in my head *like* a fairy tale -- where the telling of the story is really just a vehicle for the story itself -- then I quite liked it. ...more
The plotline and story idea of this book was actually quite good and quite interesting. Unfortunately, I can't go above "it was okay" because I thoughThe plotline and story idea of this book was actually quite good and quite interesting. Unfortunately, I can't go above "it was okay" because I thought the writing was rushed and shallow. I understand this is a very short book but it felt REALLY short, with giant leaps of characters and wild jumps of mood/understanding.
But, those downsides made the book just feel more juvenile than *bad*, if you know what I mean.
If I treated this in my head *like* a fairy tale -- where the telling of the story is really just a vehicle for the story itself -- then I quite liked it. and definitely want to see where it goes....more
this is smack dab in the middle of "it was okay." I probably won't ever read it again which is why it is getting 3 and not 4. but the writing was finethis is smack dab in the middle of "it was okay." I probably won't ever read it again which is why it is getting 3 and not 4. but the writing was fine and the story interesting. I'm not sure what was lacking to keep me from 4 stars - maybe just that I couldn't relate to the main character's issues. Definitely don't regret reading it though because it was an enjoyable read....more
Well, I read this right after having read The Paris Wife, which I enjoyed. The Paris Wife is historical fiction and, as such, is, well, fictiony. It rWell, I read this right after having read The Paris Wife, which I enjoyed. The Paris Wife is historical fiction and, as such, is, well, fictiony. It reads as a story. And one you either you enjoy or you don't. I quite liked it. Liked it enough to want to know "more" about Hadley and that's how I got to this book.
This book is biography and so less story. It's tedious in parts. It jumps around too much in parts, in efforts to support and substantiate things being said. It is, overall, pretty soulless.
I'm sure my view on each of these books is tainted by the order in which I read them. However, had I read this book first I never would have been motivated to read The Paris Wife. And if I somehow had gotten around to reading it, I probably would have been disappointed at the fluff job done to all the material covered in Paris Without End: The True Story of Hemingway's First Wife. As it is, I was free to enjoy A Paris Wife for what it was and enjoy this one for what it was. It wasn't the fault of this book that I occasionally had feelings of "c'mon c'mon I already know about this" given it covered the same time periods of the same people.
This book is worth reading on its own, but it did make an interesting "Deeper Look" if you enjoyed the Paris Wife....more
Is this book really as bad I as I think it is? I need more friends to read this, to reassure me that it really(EDITED: Updated star-status at the end)
Is this book really as bad I as I think it is? I need more friends to read this, to reassure me that it really is awful and it's not just that I'm sick (which I am. I mean, with bronchitis.) So do it! Read this! And tell me it is bad!! ("Ew, this is awful! taste it!")
Anyway, i'd say 2 stars just because i feel guilty giving only 1 star and I *did* finish it. So, 1.5 stars. Because you know something is wrong when "It Was Okay" sounds way too generous...
Where to start?
Could there be a more unlikeable main character? I know I'm not the target audience, age-wise, but geeze, as a female, I'd at least like to like her as a fellow female, even if a young one. And I don't. She's the exact sort of insipid, unintelligent, first-this-man-now-this-one type of female character I don't like. So, there's that straight off the bat. (Shay is a way better character.)
And then there is just the whole story telling, which is ridiculous for the most part. I mean, there is this whole section where Tally is with a primitive tribe (no! she really is! I can't even get into the whole 'what is this i don't even...' of that part as a whole) and she notices the women are making a fire for cooking (the men having just been out warrioring about, as it were) and she thinks -- snidely, I might add -- "oh yeah, i remember in Olden Times women used to get the crappy jobs". What? Leaving aside the fact that all of a sudden Tally seems to know/remember a lot of things, despite the fact that she was pretty clueless about ancient history in the first book (and this is a big thing to "leave aside" because it annoyed the f*** out of me), why on earth would she automatically assume cooking was a crappy job? I mean, she's never cooked. She lives in a society where food comes fully prepared to you pretty much technomagically and it has been this way for hundreds of years. Aside for that extremely brief period out in the wild where *someone* made stew (and I don't think it was Tally and I'm pretty sure it was likely communally done male/female equally), Tally knows jack shit about cooking. Certainly a person like that would never make an assumption that cooking = crappy job so OH NOEZ SEXIST PIGS (another concept that would be entirely alien to her in practice). And she's snide about the issue more than once.
It seems to me that, if anything, given her recent experience Outside the only and/or first thing she would have thought was "oh! hey! I wonder how THEY go about setting up their fire pit/spits/outdoor kitchens/etc" in the spirit of this-is-new-and-interesting-to-observe and not this weird misplaced snide feminism for pet's sake.
Alright, I'm probably belaboring what seems like a minor point but my point is the book is pretty much entirely full of little points like that. It's awful.
And then it all wraps up neatly (not without fanning the flame of LOVE TRIANGLE in the last few pages though! couldn't skip that bit!) and once again Tally (view spoiler)[is captured but instead of all these trouble makers being just done away with -- I mean it hardly seems like a government that goes through all this other trouble with society would balk at that -- now she's going to be SPECIAL (hide spoiler)]. Egad.
My heart wants to give this book one star but my head (sick as it is with bronchitis germs) is going to give it two, for the few bits I liked (Shay and Zane and some of the other characters) and for the fact that I actually did finish it.
But I will not be reading the third.
****UDPATE: I am going to have to downgrade this to 1-star. I still stand by that it is 1.5 stars but when I was putting it in the appropriate goodreads "shelf", I felt rotten for some other books that were in the 2-star category, that they should be considered the same level as this. For example, the poor ol' Time Baroness. The Time Baroness, for example, is nowhere NEAR as bad as this thing. So, i'm downgrading to 1-star for sake of categorizing but my actual ranking still stands at 1.5.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>...more
Eh. I would give this book 2.5 stars if I could, really, because my feelings were more in between It Was Okay and I Liked It. But, I maybe should haveEh. I would give this book 2.5 stars if I could, really, because my feelings were more in between It Was Okay and I Liked It. But, I maybe should have reviewed it right away when I finished it because I made the mistake of starting the next book (which is maybe less indication of Really Liking as it is indication of surfeit of free time at the moment - I'm stuck in bed with something bronchial) and I was only about 10% through the book before I was pretty much over it already. I mean, even stuck in bed with something bronchial, I was enough done with the second book of this series that I tossed it down and went and did the dishes instead! So, I'm afraid maybe that is coloring my view of the first book since now I sort of regret the waste of reading time.
But, the writing is fine in this book and that is frequently the first hurdle in YA fiction, for me. I didn't have any problems with the writing style. And I actually quite *liked* the style, as it applied to this book, because I did have a clear sense that the thoughts and things being projected *were* the thoughts of this age group. There was a good match between characters and style and I appreciate that when I am reading. (This was really brought to my attention for the first time when I read Stray, which I really enjoyed. Unfortunately the similarities to the goodness that is Stray end with the writing style not annoying me.)
I also liked the premise of the book. I found it quite interesting. I was quite willing and happy to sink right into the world building and the premise and see where it took me. And then it took me Outside.
I think my view of where the book went down hill is already covered in Sparrow's Review -- and the whole review is worth a read - when she says:
Luckily, said ugly teens (particularly our protagonist, Tally, through her bff, Shay) discover that if they flee to the wilderness, they will be able to live a life of freedom and romance. Oh, what's that? Did I say "romance"? Thanks again Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Percy Bysshe Shelley, Ralph Waldo Emerson, et al. Sometimes when characters go out into the wilderness . . . I don't even know. Does the phrase "it's been done" even begin to cover my feelings on that topic? Thus begins the cat-fight between Tally and Shay that is the uniting thread of this entire series. You see, there is a wilderness boy (imagine my surprise), who is quite a catch even though he's "ugly", and there's some jealousy and betrayal and kick-ass hoverboarding. You get the idea.
It was at this point in the book when I had to remind myself "you are not the target audience. you are not the target audience." So, bit of a crash and burn, mood-killer there. I would have quite happily kept reading about Tally venturing on following clues for far more of the book. That was the best part! (BIAS ALERT! I just re-read The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon as a comfort book so girl-alone-in-the-wilderness-trekking = WIN!) Once the reach "outside" everything speeds up with the rapidness common to YA fiction and everyone is in love and secrets revealed and all of that after about 2 days of knowing someone. You'd think cautious people would be cautious, but no!
The plot is forwarded due to DRAMA (it really is, had Tally acted like a rational intelligent person instead of FULL OF DRAMA there'd be no more story. Or, at least, not this story. don't want to spoiler you.) and that always sort of annoys me (see: "not the target audience") and then there is an almost entirely improbable Giant Escape and then ... cliffhanger ending!
If I would have read this book years ago, I might have liked it more. It's definitely not even close to being some of the best YA dystopian stuff out there, but it's certainly not the worst (although the second book looks like it is shaping up to be!). I'd recommend this if only if you are jonesing for some YA dystopian stuff AND you aren't paying 10 bucks for it... ...more
This was pretty much a waste of time. Maybe it would appeal to someone who actually *was* a junior in highschool, like these characters are, but otherThis was pretty much a waste of time. Maybe it would appeal to someone who actually *was* a junior in highschool, like these characters are, but otherwise.. eh. The *idea* for the book had promise, but it never delivers. The characters are flat and annoying, with the exception of one of them who is flat but at least sort of interesting, and the plot just sort of sputters out; I do understand there is a sequel and so they book was left sputtering out on purpose but it certainly wasn't done in a way to make me at all interested in reading the next book.
The typos and grammar errors got annoying and the flaws in logic and just plain flawed facts (i.e., where a hard drive is located on a computer) were REALLY annoying. I am able to cut some slack for holes in reasoning when a story deals with time travel because, well, it's time travel but the holes in the story were completely nonsensical even for a nonsensical situation. If you know what I mean.
The upside to reading it was that I actually went to bed early the night I started it and took a nap the following day, instead of being consumed with finishing it! Oh, and I'm going to give it an extra star for the potential it had -- I *did* want to find out where it was going, however painful the getting there started to be as the book neared its end.