I think it’s wise to keep a healthy interregnum between readings of this author, so I don’t run out of patience, which is hard to come by these days....moreI think it’s wise to keep a healthy interregnum between readings of this author, so I don’t run out of patience, which is hard to come by these days. Anyway, the last book I read from him was the successful The Longest Ride, so it kind of dulled my expectations. As we know, Nicholas Sparks is a hit or miss kind of author. He usually misses a lot more, and this one was no different from his standard formula. It flows and reads well, it kept my interest, it entertained me, but I never felt a connection with the characters, and didn’t feel the love between Dawson and Amanda. I won’t deny there were some really good moments, but they seemed to lack emotion. I actually felt more for Tuck and Clara, and they were only secondary characters. The final part was satisfactory. Predictable too, but, hey, that’s the man’s signature, and at the very least he wrote a decent closure. Now I’ll just have to wait for the movie. Judging from the trailer, it doesn’t look much better. (less)
If you’re going to name your book We Were Liars, you better have an actual story to back it up, and not just your average person kind of lying. To me...moreIf you’re going to name your book We Were Liars, you better have an actual story to back it up, and not just your average person kind of lying. To me it sounded more like We Were Rich, because this was more about richness than lying. And after all, it’s not that they were liars, they were just stupid rich kids, who should’ve known better than to play with fire.
Psychological thrillers are great, and the Sixth Sense kind of twist is nothing new to this genre, but this I did not see coming. Although I do think it was a great twist, I was disappointed by the supernatural element. The point of being psychological is that it’s all in your head, a figment of imagination, and it should’ve been the authors take on the whole twist, but she managed to screw it up with 180 pages of psychobabble, and 30 pages of how to ruin a great idea. Not just that, but the poor writing. I hate this style. It’s choppy, fragmented, and it does not help the story, which written by another person, another writing style, same twist, different take, would’ve been great, at least I’d like to think so. She tries too hard to sound poetic, and it just ends up sounding cheesy, and overdramatic. I even think the author got carried away, and forgot she was writing a book about kids, and not herself. Expressions like “My darlings” or “My dear old Johnny” don’t sound right coming from the mouth of a teenager. Maybe it’s just me, but no, this is not sophisticated.
I gave it 3 stars because I did like the idea, and thought it had a great twist, and I can see how this could work out as a movie, if they don’t screw that up too, that is. (less)
I'm torn. On one hand I think it's a great story with exceptional characters, on the other hand, it’s not as good as the critics lead me to t...more3,5 stars
I'm torn. On one hand I think it's a great story with exceptional characters, on the other hand, it’s not as good as the critics lead me to think. I’ll start with the writing. It is certainly peculiar, sometimes poetic, and fitting with the story, but it’s too unstructured for the entire context of the story. I like to imagine a story as a whole, because it has that much impact, so reading it in fragmented pieces, no matter how fitting or poetic, is off-putting. It’s also a very slow reading, so much so that at a certain point I went into stand-by mode, not feeling the will to pick it back up, but when I did, I read it till the end.
Having Death as the narrator was quite original, but I think it could’ve been better explored, I just didn’t feel like the author reached the character’s full potential. I did, however, like the sarcasm, and her ability to feel. Liesel & Rudy have a beautiful friendship, and it was probably their storyline that moved me the most, one last kiss, as well as the Hubermanns and Max. Not to mention The Standover Man and The Word Shaker. So many beautiful analogies found in this book. Specially The Book Thief herself, the power of words. It’s a beautiful story, it just didn’t have the impact I expected from something of this nature. (less)
Finally, I’m done. There’s not a whole lot to say about this… thing. I honestly can’t call this a book, because that would be demeaning towards other...moreFinally, I’m done. There’s not a whole lot to say about this… thing. I honestly can’t call this a book, because that would be demeaning towards other authors that do know the art of writing. You can’t just simply throw a bunch of random stuff into endless pages, and by the way, the number of pages does not a story make, and consider it legitimate for printing and ultimately, distribution to an audience. I doubt this was even skimmed, let alone read before going to print. So what, a story is downloaded by a lot of people, and that makes it a book?! I can’t help to think that nowadays they publish according to popularity and not value. To hell with value. Who cares if it’s a book about a silly girl falling in love with a 12 year-old ghost? Yeah, I was never a good student at math, but even I know how to do a simple account. If you failed to notice that crucial mistake right at the beginning of the book, no wonder the rest of it is just terrible. And what’s with the overused exclamation points!!! And the perfect guys (is there a single guy she hasn’t described as being a god?), and the annoying amount of fangirling, teenage drama, and overall silliness?!