It may go without saying that this book did very well, and a lot of people like it. I can appreciate how much work Brooks put into this book. I thinkIt may go without saying that this book did very well, and a lot of people like it. I can appreciate how much work Brooks put into this book. I think I also understand why it's so well liked. But it simply did not work for me. Any tension or excitement I might have felt was smothered by the constant historical and political references.
The premise is interesting. A zombie war has come and gone, and the story is told in the form of a collection of interviews about the war. In theory, this premise works due to the nature of zombies. Other monsters tend to live on a much smaller scale. Vampires usually lurk in darkness. Even if they try to take of the world, there aren't many stories of vampirism (meaning the virus) taking over the world. Even giant monsters like Godzilla only terrorize one part of the world at a time.
In contrast to most other monsters, zombies and the zombie virus traditionally threaten the whole world. Zombies threaten the existence of humanity as a whole. Because of this, a story that's a collection of interviews with people all over the world makes sense. If zombies are a worldwide problem, a worldwide zombie story should be perfect.
But for me, it wasn't.
For me, this book lacked tension, which was replaced by history and politics. From page one to the last page, the book simply did not hook me. Because of the sheer number of characters, I had no opportunity to become invested in any of them. The use of interviews as a storytelling mode did not help either because, as a result, I felt separated from the subject of each individual tale. World War Z was interesting and intriguing, but that was due to a gimmick that couldn't sustain my interest.
I might have felt tension were it not for the overwhelming amount of historical and political references—some fictional and some real. I spent every year of my time in college avoiding history classes. Yes, history is important. No doubt. But it was never my subject. I'm a math/science person who happens to also be a creative. The social sciences (like politics and history) have always escaped my understanding. All the history and politics in this book made my head hurt. Each reference drew me further out of the events of the story and made me want to run for cover. I felt like I needed to memorize facts instead of just enjoying the story. In short, this book felt like work.
On the other hand, it's hard not to respect how much effort and research must have gone into this. Brooks is a scholar, and World War Z is a masterpiece, weaving fiction and non-fiction together so deftly that I couldn't always tell where real history ended and fictional history started. Kudos to Max Brooks, but World War Z was not for me....more