Another great and well-researched book on the topic of Genesis 6. I just previously finished Van Dorn's volume on the topic Giants: Sons of the God wh...moreAnother great and well-researched book on the topic of Genesis 6. I just previously finished Van Dorn's volume on the topic Giants: Sons of the God which I found to be more in-depth and exhaustive in ways, I still found Chaffey's work to add additional information to the discussion.
As expected, he lists the alternate views, and then disassembles them by showing their weaknesses. In the end, only the fallen angel view can match all of the criteria of original language, other use in scripture, as well as other historical writings. The historical writings sections had some pieces I was unfamiliar with too, which was nice to see.
In both this and Van Dorn's book, they go the extra mile to show that there is a better than good possibility that God had his people on a mission to wipe out this giant threat, as is evident from the battles He sent them on. If this is true (and evidence seems to point that way), then it is a game changer when it comes to understanding the OT and all that was happening as far as the people being sent to wipe out whole people groups.
I give this book two thumbs up as a great starting point for the discussion of Gen. 6, the Sons of God and the Nephilim. (less)
Years ago I had done some study in the Gen. 6 issue about the "sons of god" and have thought to writing a book of my findings. Well, I am glad to say...moreYears ago I had done some study in the Gen. 6 issue about the "sons of god" and have thought to writing a book of my findings. Well, I am glad to say I can remove that idea from my to-do list, because this book far exceeds a anything I could imagine writing. This is my first Kindle book ever read, so I was not able to feel the end of the book coming, and when I thought there was nothing else he could possibly say, I would look to see I wasn't even halfway done.
When the main section did finally come to an end, I still found I was only half done. The amount of extra appendices as well as the endnotes added even more information of great importance to the study.
If you're looking for a book that pretty much seals the deal of proving the angels angle, and one that deals with every contrary argument, then this is for you. On top of that there is just so much more, making this a major tool in the discussion.
A great amount of information is provided about everything from giants in mythology and folklore, to stories passed down from all over the globe of historic dealings with giants. A wealth of information on the topic all in one place. Excellent.(less)
This is my first time reading a book by Nyland, and while overall, the content and her connecting the pieces together was good, but quite often the de...moreThis is my first time reading a book by Nyland, and while overall, the content and her connecting the pieces together was good, but quite often the delivery seemed lacking. The material feels a little like just a bunch of pieces of disjointed facts and texts tossed together with a bit of notes in an attempt to make a comprehensive writing.
Not much background to things is given most of the time, and no real leading up to a point and then proving it. Most of the time it feels like a bunch of pieces of scholarly points, laced together to be somewhat cohesive.
For me, already being familiar with many of the texts she quotes from, this was not a major distraction, but most people tend to give a little background on the books being quoted from and maybe a little lead in text, which would benefit the reader greatly. Maybe this is a good thing. Maybe this would be considered straight and to the point, and maybe I am just not used to it. It just struck me as an odd writing style that I am not used to, taking away from the scholarly aspect of the topic, and maybe not a good introductory type book for the uninitiated.
While some of the connections seem bit of a stretch and are often not fully explained, explored or proven - like making Romans 1 lean more towards discussing unnatural relations of angels and humans, instead of the often view idea of homosexuality - some of those points do open the door for further investigation down the line.
The main confusion with this book, for me, was how throughout the majority of it, she deals with just biblical and Hebrew texts. Then, all of a sudden she jumps into this long section dealing with the views of giants in Greek mythology. I felt that was a big disconnect and fail to see the relevance of it. While some of the terms and places may sound common to Hebrew writings, I cannot tell if she is putting the Hebrew writings on the same level as mythology or what exactly the purpose was for including such a large section of quotes from those sources. At one point, I almost wondered if I would find a reference to the giant in Jack and the Beanstalk mixed in there. Maybe there was a purpose for giving so much space to Greek mythology, but I did not find it fully explained as to why such fiction was incorporated in with a biblical discussion.
I found the early majority of the book very beneficial in piecing together so many texts to show a single joined story of sorts, but then it gets distracting, in the latter part tossing around with mythology, but returned somewhat at the end to the main story relating to biblical issues. Though the section on the origins of evil that deals with Adam and the fall, seems to again go off topic.
She goes into this whole section explaining how the term Adam in the original language starts off meaning a corporate entity and not a specific "male" but then a few verses later explains that it does become a term for a specific male person. Interesting language tip to a degree, but seemingly unrelated, and ultimately of no real purpose to the story. I mean, just because it starts off as a corporate term, it quickly becomes a single person term and the story continues about that single relationship, the fall, and a single lineage from it. The same can be said about the disconnected brief discussion on Eve and the Gnostic gospels.
There are a few such disjointed sections that appear here and there, but in the end, I found much of the content beneficial. I think a lot of the issues I find here with the presentation are the types we will continue to see with the further expanding of self published works like this. A professional publisher, proofreader and editor would have been a great benefit to fixing these presentation issue.
So, high rankings on much of the gems of information contained within, but minus one star for writing style and presentation.(less)
This is an easy-to-read, easy-to-understand book about fulfilled eschatology (preterism). The author starts with the angle that the title states, deal...moreThis is an easy-to-read, easy-to-understand book about fulfilled eschatology (preterism). The author starts with the angle that the title states, dealing with the gathering that was prophesied to take place in the "last days." This part alone is worth the price of the book, but she does stop there. The book continues on to hit on most every major topic and concern of eschatology like the resurrection, day of the Lord, death, Revelation, etc. All in all a nice introduction to many aspects of the fulfilled eschatology view. I think this, along with Glenn Hill's Christianity's Great Dilemma, would make a good combo set for anyone interested in looking into this position, since both offer easy to grasp introductory views on almost all major issues.(less)
This is a very nice, concise treatise looking back at the history of God's dealings with his people Israel and Judah, and all of the times of covenant...moreThis is a very nice, concise treatise looking back at the history of God's dealings with his people Israel and Judah, and all of the times of covenant breaking, idolatry, harlotry, etc. that they had performed time and time again, and how God promised over and over again how they would be brought under judgment for it. To me this is great to have, a single shorter work detailing all of the issues of the people over the centuries in one place.
Taking this detailed history, and comparing it to the words spoken to that harlot "Babylon" in Revelation, their is only one viable conclusion you can make; Revelation's mystery Babylon, the mother of harlots, drunk with the blood of the martyr's, is Israel, and specifically those in Jerusalem at the time of the prophecy being spoken.
In the end, this book shows how Revelation is speaking directly about the divine judgment that came upon those old covenant people in AD 70. Good stuff.(less)
In my continued studies on the Hebrew backgrounds to the Bible, including the New Testament language and culture, I ran across this title and scooped...moreIn my continued studies on the Hebrew backgrounds to the Bible, including the New Testament language and culture, I ran across this title and scooped it up. I found it to be very informative, even though somewhat brief. The major part of the book is set out to prove that the New Testament books, most specifically the four gospels, were originally written in Hebrew, and later translated into Aramaic or Greek.
The book then sets out to show how translating Hebrew idioms and known Hebrew cultural sayings can, and have, caused misunderstandings and mistranslations from Greek into English versions. While the main portion of the book briefly looks at some of the verses and issues created, it is the last portion of the book, the appendix, that is a more detailed examination of those verses.
One of the key parts I found the most beneficial, was the discussion on the term "kingdom." The Greek terms used in the translation are easily understood to mean not yet here, while the original Hebrew term for it actually means "It's here, it has arrived!" (pg. 62). It is things like this, where the Greek gives a totally opposite or greatly different view point when used, that make this small book pretty fascinating.
The concept of "kingdom" is perhaps the most important spiritual concept in the New Testament. In English or Greek, "kingdom" is never verbal. It is something static, something to do with territory. But, in Hebrew, "kingdom" is active, it is action. It is God ruling in the lives of men. Those who are ruled by God are the Kingdom of God.
"Kingdom" is also the demonstration of God's rule through miracles, signs, and wonders. Wherever the power of God is demonstrated, there is His "Kingdom." ... We see God;s Kingdom when we see Him in action. In the same way, people saw the Kingdom when they saw Jesus in action. This is what Jesus meant when he said: "But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the Kingdom of God has come upon you." (Luke 11:20)
Jesus also used "kingdom" to refer to those who followed him, the members of his movement. His disciples were now to literally be the Kingdom of God by demonstrating his presence and power in their lives. (pg 64)