Admittedly one of my favourite Shakespearean plays, and I had very limited time to read it. The "everything is really nothing" concept is completely mAdmittedly one of my favourite Shakespearean plays, and I had very limited time to read it. The "everything is really nothing" concept is completely mind-boggling (in a good way), and the final scene (the mechanicals' play), where Thisby and Pyramus talk through "a wall" is hilarious. ...more
This was actually, ridiculously, adorable. It got me out of a reading slump and it featured two very dynamic characters. I assumed that Lucy and JoshThis was actually, ridiculously, adorable. It got me out of a reading slump and it featured two very dynamic characters. I assumed that Lucy and Josh would be pretty static and dull, but their interactions proved otherwise. The banter, the detailed monologues, the writing style... all of it was excellent. My only complaint is that Lucy was a tad over-dramatic in the first 100 pages or so, but I didn't see that problem as much in the rest of the story.
I'm not much of a historical fiction reader in general, so it was with some hesitation that I picked this novel up, even after having read some of BroI'm not much of a historical fiction reader in general, so it was with some hesitation that I picked this novel up, even after having read some of Brodi Ashton's, Jodi Meadows', and Cynthia Hand's works. I was pleasantly surprised to note, however, that this novel turned out to be pretty well-written and enjoyable.
I mostly picked it up because I'd read raving reviews about how funny it was, and since I like reading pretty light-hearted books in general, I dove for it. So on that count, I have to say that each of The Lady Janies provided and exceeded my expectations. I even found myself laughing aloud at a few scenes just for the sheer ridiculousness of the dialogue and internal monologues. There was plenty of humour. I can sense that it must have been really fun to write this novel based on the humour alone. Besides that, this novel is based on the Tudors, and the family of King Henry V (or something along those lines - as you can tell, despite taking history courses for years now, I know next to nothing about European history). But despite my incapability to keep track of the royal ancestry, My Lady Jane wasn't too strict on understanding the historical context. The authors pretty much broke the "fourth wall", if you may, by providing these details in little side notes and in a midlogue. Plus, it's fiction, so none of the details even mattered. As long as I understood the story - which I did - the rest were unimportant to me.
And this novel had a pretty good story. Considering the fact that I picked it up thinking I would read a novel about a horse-boy and a girl, there was a lot going on in MLJ. It was predictable, yes, as I did figure out quickly what the perpetrators were doing, what was being planned, etc., but I believe the point was to just go along for the ride. To figure out how the protagonists would save the kingdom, rather than why. There was plenty of adventure to support that, which was exciting.
Also, My Lady Jane excelled at its solid characters and characterization. I would assume that would be a pretty important feature, since the novel was written by three authors, but every single character in this novel played a solid role in its making. Side characters, like Elizabeth and Bess, and even Gracie, were actually quite solid. And the main characters themselves (Jane, Edward, and Gifford) underwent a lot of development, and in doing so, contributed to the overall plot. While remaining funny and witty. I have to commend the writers on that, because even though they appeared pretty unremarkable at the start of the novel, they started to grow on me very fast.
... With the exception of Gifford. Don't get me wrong; all three characters were written very well, to the point where I couldn't differentiate the writing styles for each chapter. My issue was with Gifford in general. His characterization was pretty bland - in fact, I felt like I could have done without his perspective in the novel at all. I think he was a decent character (not a misogynist for sure, like Edward was towards the beginning and middle of the story). He was just... unremarkable. He was, overall, an improvement later in the story, but kind of annoying at the start. Maybe because he was almost always a horse? I don't know. He just felt kind of flat.
The thing that irritated me the most about the novel, though, was the sheer number of misunderstandings. So many misunderstandings. The miscommunication, I know, was supposed to be part of the plot, and add to the humour, but it just started to get more annoying, especially, when Gracie was convinced that Edward was in love with Jane, and Gifford thought Jane loved Edward back. It took wayyy too long for that mess to sort itself out.
Nevertheless, My Lady Jane was a perfect YA novel to end my summer. I definitely do recommend it - if you're interested in a historical romance with as much action and conspiracy as comedy. 4 stars!...more
Not terribly bad, just wasn't as interested as I thought I should have been, given the hype. I liked the characters (with the exception of Andie, who,Not terribly bad, just wasn't as interested as I thought I should have been, given the hype. I liked the characters (with the exception of Andie, who, for some reason, appeared a little one-dimensional), and Andie's relationship with her father was wonderful to read, but the story didn't suck me in as much as the characters did....more
This was surprisingly fun! I'm not exactly sure why it took me a more than a month to actually pick it up, given the raving reviews, but when I did, iThis was surprisingly fun! I'm not exactly sure why it took me a more than a month to actually pick it up, given the raving reviews, but when I did, it was a pretty quick read.
Whether you're a nerd or not (like me, who was pretty intimidated by the concept of references to geek culture that I'd never delved into before), this was ridiculously fun. The wit and humour quickly overtakes you as it did me, and I found myself laughing along with the dialogue (which was very captivating). And, strangely, I could relate more to Trixie than I could to a character in a long, long time. Sure, she has flaws, as is obvious in her basically-unwarranted hatred of Ben for a (large) portion of the novel, but I absolutely adored her - something I aim for in every YA novel I read. And of course, the same can be said of Trixie's friends, who were equally as fun - it was like being in high school again... only one where I liked everyone and we were all best friends. Trixie's group of friends, which merged with Ben's, was supportive, smart, and hilarious. Seriously, if you want to read this book for one thing, it's the characters.
Also, the romance. I was hooked from the start. I generally feel iffy about hate-to-like romances, probably because they're so exaggerated in a lot of YA and NA that I've read, but here, the hilarity made it VERY much worth reading. Especially when the romance came as a result of Trixie's meddlesome best friends. I laughed so hard when they were exposed in the end.
ANYWAY. This review is obviously scattered, but this was a great book. 4.5 stars....more
Thanks to Netgalley and Sourcebooks Fire for the e-ARC!
No one looks forward to Miranda Kenneally's books more than me. I love her writing, because it'Thanks to Netgalley and Sourcebooks Fire for the e-ARC!
No one looks forward to Miranda Kenneally's books more than me. I love her writing, because it's light-hearted in its simplicity, but her stories also contain deep, meaningful messages at the same time. There are lessons to be learned but I never feel as though her characters are embarking on philosophical, John Green-inspired journeys. What I love the most about Miranda's characters is that they are all developed, and they act like teenagers. They make mistakes, they learn from those mistakes by acknowledging and rectifying them, and in doing so, teach me some lessons as well. I don't think I've really read a contemporary novel that evokes that kind of response while still maintaining light-heartedness and humour.
Defending Taylor does not disappoint in that respect. Taylor, our protagonist, lies to protect her ex-boyfriend, (view spoiler)[who was dealing prescription drugs (hide spoiler)] because she knows he is less privileged than her and as a result, is kicked out of her prestigious private school and sent to Hundred Oaks, while also facing consequences such as her parents' disappointment (to such an extent that her father excludes her from his campaign advertisements, which just about gutted me), and ruining her chances of getting into good schools (like Yale). I have to say, I actually liked reading this part of the novel as much as the romance. It was heartbreaking to witness Taylor be rejected by so many people, including her new soccer team, considering how much of a free spirit she appeared to be, but I think that was the point. I liked that I felt like I was growing with Taylor as she learned to reconcile with her new fate, take chances, and (eventually) tell the truth.
The reason I docked .5 stars is because at some point, it felt as if Taylor was living the most tragic life - her parents seemed very unsupportive and the words read like a sob story. The stoty before and after that point weren't as melodramatic. Later on I think it righted itself, but I have to say I wasn't enjoying the extreme angst about halfway through. I also need to add that while everything eventually got better, as Taylor's parents had genuine conversations with her and she sought to mend fences with her brother and Ezra (and just about everybody), I didn't really appreciate that even though Taylor explicitly mentioned to her father that she didn't like working so hard that she lost sleep, he didn't acknowledge that enough. I know this would be one of the "characters make mistakes" thing I was referring to earlier, but in all honesty, I wish Taylor would have stressed that more, or that her father would have apologized for it. I kind of think Taylor spent the entire novel being on the brunt end of the stick that she was taken advantage of.
I have to mention the romance, because what is a Miranda Kenneally novel without it? You guys. I have never (with VERY FEW EXCLUSIONS) read a romance with the love interest as great as this author's. I think I tweeted to Miranda at one point that she could write about a leather pant-wearing guy with anklets who recites fables religiously and I would love him eternally. And Ezra is no different (minus all the details I just mentioned). I like that Miranda forgoes all the tropes you EXPECT to actually read (e.g. extremely swoony man who's broody but also hot, is skilled in such-and-such trade!) but don't see, and delivers on tropes that are even better (case in point: Ezra, Taylor's brother's best friend, a - REALISTICALLY IMPERFECT MAN! - who actually makes conversation, buys doughnuts and coffee, and is a good guy). Honestly, I can't even rank the love interests in order of my favourites at this point. They're all so good.
Defending Taylor is an all-around amazing book, with plenty of life lessons, strong female friendships, and romance galore. I can't wait for Miranda's next book. I think it's about swimming? Or speedos? Doesn't matter.
4.5 out of 5 stars!["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>...more
Not a fan. I expected this to echo Cosway's writing in her previous books, but it wasn't up to par. I didn't feel like I was reading a book by L.H. CoNot a fan. I expected this to echo Cosway's writing in her previous books, but it wasn't up to par. I didn't feel like I was reading a book by L.H. Cosway. Not sure, but reading her Hearts series, I felt more connected with the characters - especially the protagonists. Maybe the plot interested me a lot more then, but Showmance's setting and characters didn't interest me whatsoever. And holy shit, the amount of melodrama in this novel. Every possible cliche I could come up with was present. ...more
**spoiler alert** I feel like I get both ends of the stick when it comes to Jennifer L. Armentrout. While I absolutely love her Covenant series, I onl**spoiler alert** I feel like I get both ends of the stick when it comes to Jennifer L. Armentrout. While I absolutely love her Covenant series, I only like a select few of her Lux books, despise Cursed, feel pretty iffy about her new adult stand-alones, skimmed her first Wicked book, didn't bother to read any Titan books, but still - kind of - like Don't Look Back. I don't know what it is, but her work is still kind of addictive. I think it's that she writes so quickly.
Anyway, the problem with The Problem with Forever, to me, is the fact that it follows the exact same sequence of events as you'd expect. I feel a little bad saying that, but the story seemed a little predictable considering the praise and hype it was getting. While I completely sympathized with Mallory (and I do think her tale was one of the redeeming aspects of the novel), I mostly read Armentrout's work because it's easy to get hooked, and as long as a story keeps me sucked in, I'll give it credit for that. But TPWF didn't do that; in fact, I felt like it dragged on for longer than it should have, and nothing was really happening.
Not to mention the characters themselves. Rider played the same exact role as many of Armentrout's previous male leads, except a little more boring. His girlfriend became the stereotypical mean girl who had to be slut-shamed for basically... being his girlfriend? But near the end she gives Mallory dating advice to get Rider back? Why do authors do this?! Why are readers made to hate pretty girls in books just because they catch the male leads' interests? Oh, and let's not forget Mallory herself, whose internal monologues were so tiresome to read. She came across as a little baby, not a teenager. It got so annoying reading lines like this:
Rider looked... Goodness, he looked good.
His brownish-black hair was messy, as if he'd woken up, washed it and then let it dry whichever way it fell. Bright yellow light glanced off his high cheekbones. The full lips were slightly tipped up in one corner, the dimple in his right cheek absent. Stretched across his broad shoulders, the emblem on his blue shirt was so faded I couldn't make out what it was.
Rider wanted to hang out. Holy crap, this was like a red alert. I so needed to talk to Ainsley immediately.
(Ainsley, of course, being the stereotypical pretty girl that no one hates because she's not in a relationship with the male lead.)
And let me hasten to add that what happened with Jayden near the end of the story seemed so random and out-of-place. As a matter of fact, the whole side plot of crime/action mixed with romance/drama/family seemed pretty random and the only thing connecting the two was - of course - the stereotypical Puerto Rican characters who said stereotypically Puerto Rican things and did what white Americans assume stereotypical Puerto Ricans do. Reading it all, I feel like Jayden's story - (view spoiler)[his death (hide spoiler)] - was used to further the romance along and was forcibly misplaced to add to Mallory growing into her character. It felt a little bit like Ainsley's story, too, although hers was a little less contrived and more realistic.
I'll most likely read Armentrout's next books (I always do), but I'd suggest you pass on this one.
It's pretty disappointing that I had to rate it this low, considering how many weeks it took for me to pick it up, followed by a pretty good premise.It's pretty disappointing that I had to rate it this low, considering how many weeks it took for me to pick it up, followed by a pretty good premise. The writing was well done. I could see that the author clearly gave the plot a lot of thought, and I think the concept was complex enough to appear enthralling, but not too confusing or boring. By this I'm referring to the emphasis she put on holding breath underwater (and I can see a lot of symbolic connections between this and all the angst in the book, but that's just the English major in me talking).
What disappointed me was that I lost intrigue in the story after the events just got angstier and more miserable. Don't get me wrong; I love a good angst story and an "it hurts so good" novel gets me out of a slump when not much else can, but this story was just entwined in angst, to the point where it didn't seem realistic enough for a fictional story. It all seemed very cliché after a while: the creative, artsy teacher who just "understands" your situation, the outcast best friends (whose characters we never really get to see develop, like Del's), seedy motels. And I felt like a lot of things were left unanswered when I'd actually like to know why. Would we ever hear of Evan's (that was his name, right?) little brother again? What about the abusive ex's mother? I don't even know much about the male protagonist other than that he had blonde hair (I think), was well-humoured (at, like, random points before the whole prison break fiasco), and that his firefighting ambition somehow connected to his destiny to save what's-her-name from the police who tracked and caught up to them at a river, where the many years he'd spent learning to hold his breath underwater for an exact amount of time turned out to be quite useful, because, oh, right! (view spoiler)[He was supposed to pretend to die while taking the blame for killing the aforementioned abusive ex, while she would claim her freedom, and later they would meet up, change their names, and live happily ever after in a freaking houseboat. (hide spoiler)]
I don't feel like I know who Evan is, and it seems pretty unrealistic that Jo would accept his "dreams" as is without much skepticism, and follow him across the U.S. in pursuit of it. Not to mention, the prison break? That was completely skimmed over. Do you realize how much effort it takes to "bust out", even from a minimum security prison? If recent events in Mexico haven't proven that, then Prison Break should. AND, needless to say, I found the whole "male saviour" idea pretty typical and disappointing. While I see Scott's efforts to maintain Jo's character as strong in her vulnerability and outward demeanor, I found that this was overshadowed by Evan's need to put her out of harm's way by keeping her out of the loop and basically stringing her along on his quest to find the "center", and he being the one to save their asses in the end.
So yeah. The writing was great, it had me hooked for a while, but the lack of character development and many plot holes made me dock a few stars.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>...more
I wasn't actually going to read this book, because after all the terrible things I'd read (view spoiler)[ about Atticus (hide spoiler)], I didn't wantI wasn't actually going to read this book, because after all the terrible things I'd read (view spoiler)[ about Atticus (hide spoiler)], I didn't want to ruin the childish innocence that was To Kill A Mockingbird, which is my all-time favourite novel. My sister's friend bought the book as a present, though, so I was kind of obliged to read it.
I would save you the trouble of reading it, but I think everyone's curiousity would stop them from skipping it. But I don't think it's really worth it. It did ruin TKAM for me, a lot. As in, I don't know if I can go back to re-reading TKAM without thinking that the events in this book are inevitable. To make myself feel better, I keep telling myself that Harper Lee wrote this book before TKAM, and thus... nothing is real. ["br"]>["br"]>...more
Meh. This wasn't bad, by my standards at least - and Chokshi's writing surely made up for most of it, with the descriptiveness of the cultural landscaMeh. This wasn't bad, by my standards at least - and Chokshi's writing surely made up for most of it, with the descriptiveness of the cultural landscape (which I, as a Bengali person, can appreciate) - but I wasn't very interested from the start. The story was kind of all over the place, which made it pretty confusing. Between the characters being introduced so quickly and already having shared history and the succint dialogue between everyone (who, should I insert, seemed to all hate each other), I was left very confused.
Amar and Mayavati's relationship was just as incomprehensible. I know that Amar appearing enchanted with Maya within pages of meeting her was already unlikely, so there had to have been a reason for that, but I didn't like that us having to decipher what that reason was was jumbled in a series of complicated twists, strange characters, and descriptions of illusions. I get that there were years of events that only took place within a matter of pages, but, like I said, confusing. The ending definitely picked up, and I felt like I'd been swimming in a pool of bewilderment before I finally began to understand what was happening, but I didn't like feeling like I had to wait that long.
Regardless, it wasn't bad. There was much character development for a relatively short novel. The characters, including Maya herself, weren't exceptionally brilliant, and I even found myself liking them. Maya was a morally ambiguous character. And if I had to recommend it for anything, it would definitely be for the writing style, which I found poetic - the kind of writing I like to read for the sake of reading. But it also was not a captivating read....more
Lord, did this book bore me to sleep. It took me ages to complete it, and that too, only because I borrowed a copy from the library and had to returnLord, did this book bore me to sleep. It took me ages to complete it, and that too, only because I borrowed a copy from the library and had to return it the next day. Yes, it took me three weeks to complete. I think I dropped out of my avid-fantasy-fan phase, because I was experiencing massive déjà vu while reading this. I felt like I should like it, but I just couldn't. ...more