**spoiler alert** Since this book is basically throwing up pop culture at every turn, it's like 10 Things I Hate About You + A Cinderella Story (which**spoiler alert** Since this book is basically throwing up pop culture at every turn, it's like 10 Things I Hate About You + A Cinderella Story (which it's practically ripped off from) + Never Been Kissed + various 80's films like When Harry Met Sally and John Hughes movies. But really, it was a cute, sweet teen chicklit read. It's about this skinny, boyish figured blond 15 year old who, of course, turns out to be unbelievably beautiful and gets the hottest boy in school who turns out to be her best friend via a long-term IM e-relationship and ends up not really finding the right pair of shoes or going to the prom. But it's seriously it's very cute and I enjoyed reading it. ...more
I wanted to like this book so much more, but after giving it a fairly good effort on two separate occasions, I've decided that it's just not going toI wanted to like this book so much more, but after giving it a fairly good effort on two separate occasions, I've decided that it's just not going to happen. Three-ish stars it is. The novel is made of short stories mostly all about the title character, Rosie, from losing her virginity to visiting London to her first job and first love, etc. A few stories are about friends or family and seem to also be narrated by Rosie. I have to say that I really hated that this book is labeled as "chick-lit". It is NOT chick-lit. To me, chick-lit is that horrible Harlequin Romance shit or "light reading" novels by people like Fern Michaels and Debbie MacComber.
Anyway, I would recommend this book to anyone who enjoys short literary fiction in the form of witty, darkly comic and often TMI sex tales. (Of course, they aren't all about sex. But there is often TMI in other things.) Also, someone with the patience to stick with all the stories.
I would say that the best story in the book is "The Anatomy of Wolves", which is about Rosie's first major love—and first major breakup.
This book just couldn't hold my attention, in spite of everything so great and amazing about it. The prose is literary and excellent, the characters are human and realistic, the stories are funny and introspective. It makes me sad that I just couldn't get through the whole book. ...more
I loved this book! Carol Goodman has never disappointed me with her plots, characters, atmospheric thrillers or murder mysteries with so many interlocI loved this book! Carol Goodman has never disappointed me with her plots, characters, atmospheric thrillers or murder mysteries with so many interlocking twists! Her stories are so well-written with each seemingly minor detail coming later to fruition and unlocking a new secret that helps pull the reader towards full closure. Her writing is dream-like; I feel, each time I read one of her books, that I'm falling under a spell. They are the most perfect books and I am always drawn in immediately and never want to put her books down.
As I just finished this, I'm still processing and will review it further later. ...more
**spoiler alert** This was a very enjoyable read, light and fun. It's a retelling of the classic Hans Christen Anderson story "The Little Mermaid", to**spoiler alert** This was a very enjoyable read, light and fun. It's a retelling of the classic Hans Christen Anderson story "The Little Mermaid", told from two points of view: that of The Mermaid, Lenia and that of The Princess, Margrethe, of the North, who both fall deeply in love with Prince Christopher, of the South. Lenia gives up her voice and her family to become human in order to marry the prince, while Margrethe is determined to unite both kingdoms—North and South—in order to avoid another civil war, by marrying Christopher.
It was interesting to see the side and hear the voice of "the other woman", in this case, Margrethe, who longs for magic and love after seeing a mermaid bring a half-drowned, half-dead Christopher to her shore. It was also interesting to consider the idea of the mermaid Lenia fascinated with the concept of a soul and eternal life.
While the prose was lovely, there were also many repetitious phrases and paragraphs—the constant reminder of what Margrethe witnessed: watching the mermaid swim the prince to shore, bending over him, kissing him, singing to him as well as Margrethe's plan to marry the prince, because "as a woman, it's all she can do", and so on. The ending itself was a little weak; I would have liked to see more of what became of Christina, the hybrid baby of Lenia/Astrid and Prince Christopher (which was part of the twist on the classic), maybe have an epilogue chapter from her point of view. Still, I did enjoy the plot and the characters and it was a fun read. I would rate this a 3.5 just because of the rambly, repetitious ideas though. ...more
This was the novelization of the TV mini-series of the same name. There were subtle differences, which were somewhat unnecessary, especially given theThis was the novelization of the TV mini-series of the same name. There were subtle differences, which were somewhat unnecessary, especially given the fact that the novelization followed (presumably followed) the release of the mini-series. It's probably better to just watch the mini-series, instead of actually reading this. ...more
Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending), I decided not read this book past its 3 or 4 opening pages. As it was, I was highly put off by the prologueUnfortunately (or fortunately, depending), I decided not read this book past its 3 or 4 opening pages. As it was, I was highly put off by the prologue and my eyes glazed over before I even made it to the end of it (and I got really hung up on the detail in the prologue of the "grocer shining the apples with his flannel shirt", come on, that's disgusting). Frankly, I was very put off following that by the first paragraphs of the story where the narrator feels the need to insert her own explanations and defenses (or defensiveness, perhaps?) into the story she's trying to tell.
Why not just say, "Once upon a time, there was a king and queen who lived in a palace of snow and ice" and leave it at that? But no, the narrator has to tell the audience that "though you might think it strange, the king and queen have always lived in this world", etc. It was annoying! Plus, the subtitle for the opening character was highly ridiculous. I got the notion that either the author wasn't playing with a full deck when she wrote this book, or she was trying to be ironic and humorous, which surely isn't the intention in what's supposed to be a dramatic retelling of "The Snow Queen".
I know that this is awfully judgmental and nitpicky for just the first few pages, but I just can't suspend my disbelief enough to read further. I don't want to waste my time reading crap, and this is crap. Maybe it's just too middle-reader, dumbed-down, patronizing bullshit, but whatever the reason, it's not for me, but I have to say I wouldn't even recommend it to a child. Go read the Harry Potter series for quality "children's" reading. ...more