--- BEGIN DISCLAIMER --- I've been interested in computer history since my early teenage years when I would read about the industry in magazines like--- BEGIN DISCLAIMER --- I've been interested in computer history since my early teenage years when I would read about the industry in magazines like PC/Computing and devour biographies of Bill Gates. My favorite documentary of the 1990's was Bob Cringely's "Triumph of the Nerds" on PBS (along with its "Nerds 2.0.1" follow-up). Put together, they gave me a somewhat Microsoft-centric view of the personal computer revolution that more or less started with the Apple I in the 1970's through the Windows 98 "present" of the era when the web was in its Geocities youth.
My college years were mostly focused on learning technical contributions rather than about the people themselves.
After college, I had the great opportunity to meet several prominent computer scientists who were profiled in this book and had several fun discussions with them. In particular, Alan Kay noticed my interest in history and recommended that I read "The Dream Machine: J.C.R. Licklider and the Revolution That Made Computing Personal" by M. Mitchell Waldrop which filled me in on a lot of the details before the personal computer era, especially about Licklider and his contributions to the development of what would become ARPANET. I wrote a review of that book back in 2008.
I mainly listened to this ~17 hour audiobook at double speed to see if I'd learn new things not already covered in the other books I'd read growing up. --- END DISCLAIMER ---
This book gave a good overview of the "digital revolution" from the time of Ada Lovelace and her collaboration with Charles "If only these calculations were done by steam!" Babbage to roughly the IBM Watson-era. I would recommend it to others, especially to newcomers looking to get a curated overview from which they can dive in deeper elsewhere on sections that pique their curiosity.
Some fun new facts I picked up from this book:
* I didn't know Ada Lovelace was Lord Byron's daughter. In particular, I didn't know the reason she got into math was because her mom was worried she might otherwise turn out like her estranged poet father. * I hadn't heard of "Heathkit" before. Isaacson mentioned this electronic hobbyist kit multiple times when describing people of the 50's and 60's who liked to tinker and make things. * William Shockley was a paranoid boss (e.g ordering employees to take lie detector tests). This paranoia probably sprang from his concern about not getting credit for ideas. * AT&T's Bell Labs licensed its transistor patent relatively cheaply (perhaps too cheaply?) and provided lots of documentation and training which allowed companies like Texas Instruments to flourish. * The story of the Internet being primarily created as a way to allow communication in the event of nuclear attack was basically concocted after the fact to continue to get funding from the DoD. * I had heard of "Spacewar!" and even visited a machine that ran it when I visited the Computer History Museum, but I didn't realize how big of an impact it had. It had a lot of coverage in the book. * Steve "Slug" Russell created early versions "Spacewar!" (and Lisp) in his college days. Afterwards he got a job at C^3 and ended up teaching Bill Gates and Paul Allen how to program on the PDP while they were at Lakeside. * Nolan Bushnell loved "Spacewar!" and wanted to make a business from it. Through a series of events covered in the book, he eventually founded Atari (and hired Steve Jobs). * Early versions of Pong used no microprocessor and instead relied on simple logic chips. * Steve Crocker's humble "Request For Comments" title on documents describing how computers on the early Internet would communicate was instrumental in its success at being adopted by the community (which distrusted authority). * Bill Gates' lawyer dad helped Bill navigate some legal issues early on. * Bill was very competitive as a kid, even when doing things like memorizing the Sermon on the Mount in a contest put on by his family's pastor. * Bill's infamous "Open Letter to Computer Hobbyists", which effectively started the commercial personal computer software industry, had fun subtleties to it: 1.) The $40,000 value of computer time required to create Microsoft's BASIC was effectively provided free of charge by Harvard. 2.) The rampant early piracy of their BASIC was probably instrumental in its success because it became the de-facto standard and thus drove the demand that new computers have it (which would ultimately be paid for). * AT&T's monopoly on the phone network was a key reason why modems (and thus personal computer online connections) didn't take off earlier. It wasn't until a lawsuit was settled that these "unapproved" devices were allowed on the phone network. * Ward Cunningham (of "wiki" fame) grew up in Indiana and went to Purdue (my alma mater)
Sticking true to its focus on people rather than the technology, Isaacson often reiterated the importance of many people working together and sharing the credit rather than a "lone genius." He also stressed the ongoing importance of humans and computers working better together which highlights Licklider's "Man-Computer Symbiosis" vision.
Overall I enjoyed the book and it made for a quick read. I only had relatively minor nits with it: 1.) I feel that Isaacson only focused on larger scale online communities like The WELL, America Online, CompuServe, etc. and missed the great contributions of independent Bulletin Board Systems (BBSes) that was covered by Jason Scott Sadofsky's excellent "BBS: The Documentary" series. 2.) The book seemed to end a bit overly skeptical on machine learning (which I believe is the next major wave being lived-out in computer history). Although, I think Isaacson was justified in poking fun at overstated claims of AI in general always being a 20 year out mirage, I think that he might have downplayed what the very real machine learning subdomain can do as evidenced by impressive newer companies like DeepMind and the unreasonable effectiveness on Deep Learning on topics like speech recognition and image recognition. ...more
An older friend recommended this book to me in 2004. I finally got around to reading it. I'm glad I did. It's a quick, although sometimes quirky, readAn older friend recommended this book to me in 2004. I finally got around to reading it. I'm glad I did. It's a quick, although sometimes quirky, read.
It helps to realize that the book was really a collection of pamphlets distributed in the 1920's by banks and insurance companies. This explains a little bit of its bias, but I think the advice is still sound.
The book is set in ancient Babylon that begins with Bansir, a chariot maker, commiserating with his broke friend (a lyre player). They can't figure out how to get out of their living essentially paycheck to paycheck. The story follows him as he finds a wealthy person who shares his secrets with the him and the rest of the city.
The book has some timeless advice: always save at least 10% of your paycheck, have your savings earn good interest, pay your debts, etc.
Here are some of the other things that I highlighted in addition to what Wikipedia mentioned:
* "Thou makest me to realize the reason why we have never found any measure of wealth. We never sought it."* "A PART OF ALL YOU EARN IS YOURS TO KEEP. It should not be less than a tenth no matter how little you earn. It can be as much more as you can afford. Pay yourself first." * "Advice is one thing that is freely given away, but watch that you take only what is worth having. He who takes advice about his savings from one who is inexperienced in such matters, shall pay with his savings for proving the falsity of their opinions." * "When I set a task for myself, I complete it. Therefore, I am careful not to start difficult and impractical tasks, because I love leisure." * "If a rich man builds him a new palace, is the gold he pays out gone? No, the brick maker has part of it and the laborer has part of it, and the artist has part of it. And everyone who labors upon the house has part of it. Yet when the palace is completed, is it not worth all it cost? And is the ground upon which it stands not worth more because it is there? And is the ground that adjoins it not worth more because it is there? Wealth grows in magic ways. No man can prophesy the limit of it." * "Then learn to make your treasure work for you. Make it your slave. Make its children and its children's children work for you." * "Seek the advice of men whose daily work is handling money." * "A small return and a safe one is far more desirable than risk." * "Enjoy life while you are here. Do not overstrain or try to save too much. If one tenth of all you earn is as much as you can comfortably keep, be content to keep this portion."
* "He must pay his debts with all promptness within his power, not purchasing that for which he is unable to pay." * "He must make a will of record that in case God calls him, proper and honorable division of his property be accomplished." * "He must have compassion upon those who are injured or smitten by misfortune and aid them within reasonable limits. He must do deeds of thoughtfulness to those dear to him."
* "In this tale we see how good luck waits to come to that man who accepts opportunity." (don't be Procrastinator)... "wisdom of making a payment immediately when we are convinced our bargain is wise." "Good luck can be enticed by accepting opportunity. "ACTION will lead thee forward to the successes thou dost desire. "Men of Action are favored by Good Luck." * "To take his first start to building an estate is as good luck as can come to any man. With all men, that first step, which changes them from men who earn from their own labor to men who draw dividends from the earnings of their gold, is important." * "Wealth that comes quickly goeth the same way." * "If thou desire to help thy friend, do so in a way that will not bring thy friend's burdens upon thyself." * "humans in the throws of great emotions are not safe risks for the gold lender." * "Many other merchants of Babylon have my confidence because of their honorable behavior. Their tokens come and go frequently in my token box. Good merchants are an asset to our city and it profits me to aid them to keep trade moving that Babylon be prosperous." * "I will no longer lend any of it where I am not confident that it is safe and will be returned to me. Neither will I lend it where I am not convinced that its earnings will be promptly paid to me." * "Be conservative in what thou expect it to earn that thou mayest keep and enjoy thy treasure. To hire it out with a promise of usurious returns is to invite loss." * "Better a Little Caution than a Great Regret" * "We cannot afford to be without adequate protection." * "Ill fortune! Wouldst blame God for thine own weakness. Ill fortune pursues every man who thinks more of borrowing than of repaying." * "no man can respect himself who does not repay honest debts." * "Where the Determination is, the Way Can Be Found" * "Therefore am I more determined than ever to carry through, being convinced that it is easier to pay one's just debts than to avoid them." * "Great is the PLAN for it leadeth us out of debt and giveth us wealth which is ours to keep." * "Babylon is an outstanding example of man's ability to achieve great objectives, using whatever means are at his disposal. All of the resources supporting this large city were man developed. All of its riches were man made."
All told, a nice book that reminds us of timeless truths.
His basic thesis is that one morning a month, everyone in the company (devs, designers, ceo, etc) observes three people from outside the organization attempt to do a few tasks with your product (as well as some things like try to understand your home page). Each individual session is recorded with something like Camtasia and simulcasted to another room where the company has spectators that are taking notes. Each session shouldn't last for more than 50 mins. The result of all of the testing is a lunch debrief where people discuss some top problems and then there is ruthless focus on just fixing those, often by doing the least thing possible that will improve the situation.
One additional piece of advice is to start early in the process, even if it means showing a big paper napkin with sketches....more
As a kid, I read a lot about Bill Gates. To this day, I can still recite a lot of details about his story and the story of Microsoft. I hadn't reallyAs a kid, I read a lot about Bill Gates. To this day, I can still recite a lot of details about his story and the story of Microsoft. I hadn't really bothered to learn much about the Apple story since I've been a PC user since the early 90's by happenstance and then later by choice.
However, my first programming experience happened to be on an Apple IIe in our town's library. It was that experience as an 8 year old kid that started me down the path of being a professional programmer that I am today.
And yet, I didn't really know the history that led to that machine or what really happened after that time.
This book filled in a lot of those details.
Steve was obviously different than Bill. Bill grew up in a prominent lawyer's upper class family, Steve was adopted into a middle class family of modest means. Both of them were smart, but their styles were quite different. Both had their good points and both had notable flaws.
Throughout the book, you learn that Steve was a guy of the "counterculture" who credited dropping acid as one of the best experiences of his life and thought others (like Bill) would have been much better off had they done the same.
I was struck by the words "petulant" and "mercurial" describing Steve Jobs while reading this book. To be transparent, I didn't know the definitions of these words before this book but now I won't forget them because I think they fit Jobs quite well.
I was continually dismayed by stories of how Jobs treated people. I think there is a line between motivating people with tough love to do their best work and being brash and attacking people personally. I think Jobs crossed that line at times and it was sad to repeatedly hear about these events in the book.
Jobs was also very independent and went out of his way to not play by other people's rules nor care about opinions if he thought he was right. Sometimes this lead to great products like the Apple II and iPhone, but at other times led to him to do things like not have a license plate on his car.
Again, there is a line between being a hero by not playing by silly rules and just having an outright "petulant" disregard for others. I think he crossed this line too at times. For example, he refused to shower regularly or wear deodorant because he thought his strict vegan diet consisting of mostly fruit made him immune from any smells. Everyone interviewed in the book seemed to indicate this was a genuine problem, but Jobs seemed to blatantly refuse to believe it. It was so bad that he had to work the night shift at Atari because others couldn't stand his BO during the day.
Isaacson also painted a picture of Jobs that seemed a bit bipolar when it came to relationships. The book portrayed several relationships when Jobs was mesmerized by people one moment and then angry with them in another. Many of these outbursts seemed overly harsh, even by Jobs' standard.
A big focus of this book was the history of Apple itself. It became quite clear that the core of Apple reflects Jobs' vision.
Jobs very much was product focused and he obsessed over end-to-end experiences. This leads to some great integrations and experiences if you're willing to completely buy into the whole ecosystem (i.e. Mac, iTunes, iPhone, iCloud, etc) but some not pleasant experiences if you're not willing to cede everything to a single company. The book provided the back story of why iTunes on Windows has historically been a difficult product to deal with. It clearly was something Jobs didn't want to do early on but was only a concession to sell more iPods.
Jobs chided companies like Microsoft for not offering end-to-end experiences like Apple. The book detailed his reasons on this, but I also see the reasons why Microsoft, Google, and Amazon have for wanting to be more "open" in allowing outsiders to use their platform even if they can't control all aspects about its use. Before this book, I was a stronger supporter of the Microsoft way, but I'm a bit less intense on that now. However, I still favor the "open" way because it allows more choice and less fears about lock-in to a potentially inferior product.
The book shed a lot of light on other important early Apple events such as development of the Apple II, the failure of the Apple III, the failure of the Lisa, the development of the Macintosh, the infatuation and subsequent falling-out with Sculley that led to Jobs' resignation in the mid-80's.
I think Isaacson gave the clearest explanation I've read about how Jobs' getting let go from Apple changed him and ultimately led to things like Pixar's success. It also led to the resurgence of Apple in the late 90's when Apple bought his NeXT company and its associated NextStep OS which became the basis for OS X and whose fingerprint is still seen in all OS X and iOS APIs that begin with "NS".
The book also covered the background of the more recent Apple products and their motivation. For example, Steve hated tablets that used a stylus. This led to him pushing a team to create a great tablet (the iPad) that didn't need a stylus. He pushed for this first (before the iPhone). However, due to timing of things, he directed the technology to first go into the iPhone even though it was risky at the time (their initial plan was to have a phone using the wheel like the iPod). Isaacson also spotlighted how these products couldn't have come to be without other important people such as Jonathan Ive, Apple's top designer.
There are things that I respect about Jobs: he wasn't really motivated by money but rather sincerely motivated to create great products, he wanted to give his best to things he cared about, and lets not forget that he gave great presentations.
Isaacson's biography of Jobs also described what it took for him to deliver the products that millions of people enjoy: fractured relationships with friends and sometimes being quite distant from family. His intensity seemed at times too high of a cost to pay which left me feeling sad. ...more
Try things out, see what works by adapting. Think about "what's the worst that could happen?" rather than "what's the best that should happen?". Be agTry things out, see what works by adapting. Think about "what's the worst that could happen?" rather than "what's the best that should happen?". Be agile.
From the book: Experiment, play, immerse, define, reorient, and iterate. ...more
I picked this book up because I was interested in learning more about IBM's Watson.
Although it lacked deep technical details that I would have enjoyedI picked this book up because I was interested in learning more about IBM's Watson.
Although it lacked deep technical details that I would have enjoyed, it gave a brief overview of the team behind the machine including things like the politics of working with the Jeopardy staff....more
By far the best book on Google I've read although it still lacked the technical depth I would have liked.
Some random thoughts that stuck out: * Larry PBy far the best book on Google I've read although it still lacked the technical depth I would have liked.
Some random thoughts that stuck out: * Larry Page is highly annoyed people aren't more ambitious, especially technical people. * Google has become large enough to have a wealth of their own acronyms, some of which clash with traditional ones (i.e. GPS = Google Product Strategy), OKRs (Objectives & Key Results) that are defined regularly to serve as your goals. * Google has an intense program for training APMs (Associate Product Managers) who are fresh-outs with Computer Science degrees that are on the fast-track to becoming PMs. Part of this program includes two product rotations and trips all around the world to various Google offices. About half of the APMs eventually leave the company after a few years to work for other companies or start their own. * SafeSearch was a big part of winning a search contract with AOL. Matt Cutts was on the SafeSearch team and his wife baked cookies for early internal testers of SafeSearch who were able to find "bugs" in the filter. To this day, Googlers remember her for this. * Google is probably the world's largest server manufacturer. * Getting hacked in China was just the last straw of a bunch of things management didn't like about operating in China. * Google crawled services like Baidu to train their Chinese censoring filter on what should be censored. * Google has some interesting internal/code names (i.e. Google Buzz was internally known as "Taco Town" based off the SNL skit where they kept on smothering extra taco goodness layers) * The book seemed to imply that one of the reasons Google couldn't buy Twitter is because Evan didn't want Google to sideline it like he felt they did with Blogger.
My purpose in reading biographies and memoirs isn't to take a side on political issues, but rather to understand a little better how people think. FroMy purpose in reading biographies and memoirs isn't to take a side on political issues, but rather to understand a little better how people think. From that perspective, I liked the book.
I had a few random takeaways:
* I got the overall impression that Bush thinks his presidency will continue to look better in hindsight and that during his presidency too much politics/slinging took aim at him and strongly tarnished his perception. * 9/11 caught Bush (and most of the nation) by surprise and really forced a dramatic change in his presidency. When he visited NYC in the days that followed, I really think this had a huge impression on him, especially when he promised to avenge the horrible acts. * Bush gave the impression that he wanted act immediately to help Katrina victims but didn't have legal authority to do so (e.g. allow federal troops to patrol the state area) because the governor kept refusing to give that authority. He was eventually able to send in troops without the authority to patrol/engage/fire-a-shot-if-necessary and this helped. Had he known that it would have gone so well without needing the governor's approval he would have done it sooner. * Bush believes that the No Child Left Behind policy is extremely important as a social/ethnic justice issue. * I think President Bush's Christian faith is sincere * I honestly think Bush tried to do what he thought was best for the country without sinister plans. * Bush calls his mom (Barbara) "mother." I thought this was... unique.
On a lighter note, I listened to the audio edition of this book read by Bush himself. It added extra flair to the experience. Bush has a noticeably different/slower reading voice than his normal speaking/non-speech voice. This reading voice causes him to e-nun-ci-ate words more (e.g. "juuu-liiiie" for "July"). This at times made it amusing to listen to, even at very serious points in the book. For example, when Bush talks about how special ops caught Saddam and then the FBI interrogated him, he said this (imagine Bush reading it slowly, but with a "WHAT WERE YOU THINKING SADDAM?!" vocal tone):
"[Saddam] told agents that he was more worried about looking weak to Iran than being removed by the coalition. He never thought the United States would follow through on our promises to disarm him by force. I'm not sure what more I could have done to show Saddam I meant what I said. I named him part of an axis of evil in my State of the Union address. I spoke to a packed chamber of the United Nations and promised to disarm him by force if diplomacy failed. We presented him with a uniamious Security Council resolution. We sought and received strong bipartisan backing from the U.S. Congress. We deployed 150,000 troops to his border. I gave him a final forty-eight-hours' notice that we were about to invade his country. How much clearer could I have been?"
This book is so small that I bought the cheap Kindle version and read it on my computer screen in about an hour. It's definitely a good way to get a dThis book is so small that I bought the cheap Kindle version and read it on my computer screen in about an hour. It's definitely a good way to get a decent overview of the basics.
It has a lot of simple advice that makes sense. A few takeaways:
* If you get help, go for an independent fee-only advisor and not a broker. * Quote:"The right time to invest is when you have the money and the right time to sell is when you need the money." * Your most important decision is balancing risk by determining how you should allocate your money between cash [money market funds], bonds [fixed income], and stocks [equities]. * The most important long-term factors for returns are size (e.g. Large/Mid/Small cap) and valuation (Value/Growth). The more Small/Value you are, the higher the expected long-term returns. * Bonds should reduce volatility, so if you get them, go for short-term high quality ones. * Quote: "Efficient Markets Hypothesis - no investor will consistently beat the market over long periods except by chance." * Opt for passive investing instead of active investing. The funds are usually cheaper (e.g. less than 0.5% avg fee vs 1.3% for active ones). The fees really make a huge difference for returns. As such, actively managed funds always (on the whole) underperform passive ones. * Interesting quote: "Wall street brokers and press would have you believe (1) timing and (2) picking [specific] stocks/bonds (3) finding manager or mutual fund [matter], but this is wrong! Research shows that these factors make a negative contribution to the total return level of a diversified portfolio."
The book has an appendix that includes a chart for hypothetical allocations based on your risk tolerance. I think this chart alone probably made the book worth what I paid for it.
The book was written in 1948 (get it? 48->84) and portrays the life of Winston Smith (Winston because of Churchill and Smith because it is common). Winston is living in 1984 in the midst of "IngSoc" (English Socialism) that abhors everything about the capitalistic government that it overthrew in the 60's. There is a caste system where 2% of the people belong to the "Inner Party", around 13% belong to the "Outer Party" (like Winston) and then 85% are the "proles" which are effectively the unwashed masses in the book (e.g. they read rubbish, obsessed about the lottery even though no one actually wins, etc.)
The Party is on a mission of absolute power. Its head figure is "Big Brother" whose goal is to get in your head to prevent you from ever thinking about overthrowing The Party. They achieve this by dumbing down the culture and removing all traces of human emotion (except hate). They have a serious effort in creating a new language (Newspeak) that removes all unnecessary words (e.g. why gave "better" and "excellent" if you can say "plusgood" and "doubleplusgood"?) and any words that would allow you to think of going against the party (no words for overthrow, martyr, etc.. those are all "thoughtcrime"). If you try to go against The Party, you'll be caught by the Thought Police (who come at night... they always come at night).
The mind control and "double think" can be clearly seen in The Party's ministries:
Ministry of Peace (Minipax in Newspeak) - Concerned with war (there's always been a war.. there will always be one. It keeps people busy doing stuff for the benefit of the Inner Party, even though the Outer Party and proles always have severe rations) Ministry of Truth (Minitrue) - Concerned with falsifying the past Ministry of Love (Miniluv) - Concerned with absolute torture Ministry of Plenty (Miniplenty) - Concerned with lying about actual production
Winston works for Minitrue and spends his working life rewriting the past to agree with what The Party is currently saying. The Party can totally change its position in an instant which keeps Winston and Minitrue busy (e.g. who the country is fighting with.. and thus, making it appear that they've always been fighting with it). Minitrue has entire departments devoted to reprinting old newspapers with "corrected" information. There is no past as we know it.
The book outlines Winston's inner struggle about knowing that the culture is awful compared to his upbringing before IngSoc, but then Winston faces a struggle of what to do about it.
The end is predictable, although a little scary.
I'd recommend the book, especially since several terms from the book (e.g. Big Brother, Doublethink, Thought Police, "Room 101", etc) have entered into popular culture. It's insight into what can happen if you take some ideas of power way, way, way too far....more
According to this book, there are a lot of posers out there and that's one of the main reasons we got slammed by the housing crisis and (as a nation)According to this book, there are a lot of posers out there and that's one of the main reasons we got slammed by the housing crisis and (as a nation) are overcome with debt.
Most millionaire's out there don't have extravagant houses, cars, watches, shoes, suits, wine, liquor, etc. that we tend to associate with that level of wealth. Most of those high end things are really only consumed by the "glittering rich" such as high-end celebrities. The author contends that real millionaires are quite frugal (though not stingy).
The book covers details findings from his survey that was sent to real millionaires and offered some interesting findings:
1. One of the best things you can do for your perceived happiness (and to accumulate wealth) is to live in a house that is well below what you can afford. For example, 1-2x your annual income. The author implied that you should live in a neighborhood where you're in the top 25% income/wealth category compared to your neighbors but still live like them or even more frugally. The reason is that a lot of people buy houses based on if they can pay for the mortgage, insurance, and utilities. However, they don't consider the social pressure involved with living there to do things like have their kids go to a private school, go on expensive vacations, eat out more often, buy a certain type of car, etc. The author mentioned that mining engineers tend to have a disproportional amount of millionaires simply because they're paid a decent wage but tend to live a typical house in mining towns and have no desire to live much differently than those around them.
2. A lot of marketers of luxury/high-end items market to people that are acting rich ("big hat, no cattle") instead of real rich people so that they can impress other friends who are also acting rich. Stanley gave an extensive example of the rise of Grey Goose vodka's popularity among "aspirationals" (those wanting to be rich) in lieu of the actual rich people out there who tend to be more frugal and buy based on value rather than marketing tricks.
3. According to the author, more popular "low-end" car models are subsidized by people acting rich and especially those who are obese (and tend to need larger cars). Thus, car makers make a very low margin on their lower end models even though they're typically just as good in terms of quality. Car makers hope that as you get older (and "larger"), you'll want a more expensive/bigger vehicle and will pay a premium for this... and when you do, you'll get that brand. The take away is that real rich people tend to take advantage of this by not going for the high end models and getting more value from the lower-end ones that tend to have higher quality. Thus, the most popular brands among real rich people are Toyota and Ford rather than European makes like BMW or Mercedes. The sad fact is that the aspirationals tend to go after the later category and never end up actually being rich but rather mired in debt whereas rich people tend to pay cash for their cars. The author also related a similar story about shotguns, saying that Sam Walton (of Walmart fame) preferred the Remington 870 shotgun because it was the best out there even though it's around $400 even though aspirationals pick gilded ones that cost a lot more.
4. The author defines "affluent" if your net worth of liquid assets is greater than 10% of your age multiplied by your annual household income.
5. Most real rich people tend to give around 10% their annual income to charitable causes that are significant to them rather than the less than 2% average among aspirationals.
There wasn't anything earth-shattering in the book. It was pretty much a bunch of common sense "live below your means", "be frugal", "seek value", "value people, not things", etc. ...more
This book was sometimes hard to read because it had some awfully convicting ideas.
I use some post-it sticky tabs to keep track of notable quotes andThis book was sometimes hard to read because it had some awfully convicting ideas.
I use some post-it sticky tabs to keep track of notable quotes and I ended up running out of post-its while on a recent trip.
"We are molding Jesus into our image. He is beginning to look a lot like us because, after all, that is whom we are most comfortable with. And the danger now is that when we gather in our church buildings to sing and lift up our hands in worship, we may not actually be worshiping the Jesus of the Bible. Instead we may be worshiping ourselves."
"Consider the cost when Christians ignore Jesus' commands to sell their possessions and give to the poor and instead choose to spend their resources on better comforts, larger homes, nicer cars, and more stuff. Consider the cost when these Christians gather in churches and choose to spend millions of dollars on nice buildings to drive up to, cushioned chairs to sit in, and endless programs to enjoy for themselves. Consider the cost for the starving multitudes who sit outside the gate of contemporary Christian affluence."
(speaking on an underground Asian church): "Despite its size, sixty believers having crammed into it. They are all ages, from precious little girls to seventy-year-old men. They are sitting either on the floor or on small stools, lined shoulder to shoulder, huddled together with their Bibles in their laps. The roof is low, and one light bulb dangles from the middle of the ceiling as the sole source of illumination. No sound system. No band. No guitar. No entertainment. No cushioned chairs. No heated or air-conditioned building. Nothing but the people of God and the Word of God. And strangely, that's enough."
"This is the reality about humanity. We are each born with an evil, God-hating heart. Genesis 8:21 says that every inclination of man's heart is evil from childhood, and Jesus' words in Luke 11:13 assume that we know we are evil. Many people say, 'Well, I have always loved God,' but the reality is, no one has. We may have loved a god that we made up in our minds, but the God of the Bible, we hate."
"You will not find a verse in Scripture where people are told to 'bow your heads, close your eyes, and repeat after me.' You will not find a place where the superstitious sinner's prayer is even mentioned. And you will not find an emphasis on accepting Jesus. We have taken the infinitely glorious Son of God, who endured teh infinitely terrible wrath of God and now reigns as the infinitely worthy Lord of all, and we have reduced him to a poor, puny Savior who is just begging for us to accept him. *Accept him?* Do we really think Jesus needs our acceptance? Don't *we* need *him*?"
(speaking about a certain deacon's unfortunate private view on missions: "'David, I think it's great you are going to those places. But if you ask me, I would just as soon God annihilate all those people and send them to hell.' That's exactly what he said. I was shocked and speechless. I had no idea what to say in response. I wish I had said something, but I'm still not sure what I would have said."
"'God loves me' is not the essence of biblical Christianity. Because if 'God loves me' is the mesage of Christianity, then who is the object of Christianity? God loves *me*. Me. Christianity's object is *me*. Therefore, when I look for a church, I look for the music that best fits *me* and the programs that best cater to *me* and *my* family. When I make plans for *my* life and career, it is about what works best for *me* and *my* family. When I consider the house I will live in, the car I will drive, the clothes I will wear, the way I will live, I will choose according to what is best for *me*. This is the version of Christianity that largely prevails in our culture. But it is not biblical Christianity.... We are not the end of the gospel; God is."
"Jesus has much to teach us here. If we were left to ourselves with the task of taking the gospel to the world, we would immediately begin planning innovative strategies and plotting elaborate schemes. We would organize conventions, develop programs, and create foundations. We would get the biggest names to draw the biggest crowds to the biggest events. We would start megachurches and host megaconferences. We would do...well, we would do what we are doing today. But Jesus is so different from us. With the task of taking the gospel to the world, he wandered through the streets and byways of Israel looking for a few men."
"Jesus reminds me that disciples are not mass-produced. Disciples of Jesus-- genuine, committed, self-sacrificing followers of Christ--are not made overnight. Making disciples is not an easy process. It is trying. It is messy. It is slow, tedious, even painful at times. It is all these things because it is relational. Jesus has not given us an effortless step-by-step formula for impacting nations for his glory. He has given us people, and has said, 'Live for them. Love them, serve them, and lead them. Lead them to follow me, and lead them to lead others to follow me. In the process you will multiply the gospel to the ends of the earth.'"
"We are, by nature, receivers. Even if we have a desire to learn God's Word, we still listen from a adefault self-centered mind-set that is always asking, *What can I get out of this?* But as we have seen, this is unbiblical Christianity. What if we changed the question whenever we gathered to learn God's Word? What if we began to think, *How can I listen to his Word so that I am equipped to teach this Word to others?* This changes everything. All of a sudden the pen and the papepr come out..."
"... But we resist this plan, resorting to performances and programs that seem much more 'successful.' In our Christian version of the American dream, our plan ends up disinfecting Christians from the world more than discipling Christians in the world... Disinfecting Christians from the world involves isolating followers of Christ in a spiritual safe-deposit box called the church building and teaching them to be good. In this strategy, success in cthe church is defined by how big a building you have house all the Christians.... Discipling is much different. Whereas disinfecting Christians involves isolating them and teaching them to be good, discipling Chirstians involves propelling Christians into the world to risk their lives for the sake of others."
"We look back on slave-owning churchgoers of 150 years ago and ask, 'How could they have treated their fellow human beings that way?' I wonder if followers of Christ 150 years from now will look back at Christians in American today and ask, 'How could they live in such big houses? How could they drive such nice cars and wear such nice clothes? How could they live in such affluence while thousands of children were dying because they didn't have food and water? How could they go on with their lives as though the billions of the poor didn't even exist?'"
"But the beauty of this conversation is what the Bible tells us in Mark 10:21: 'Jesus looked at him and loved him.' What a wonderful phrase! Jesus was not telling this man to give away everything he had because Jesus hated him or desired to make his life miserable. Jesus was telling him to give away everything he had because Jesus *loved* him."
"If we conclude that people can get to heaven apart from faith in Christ, then this would mean there is something else they can do to get to heaven. Such a conclusion would not only undercut the previous truth we saw in Romans; it would also be tantamount to saying to Jesus, 'Thank you for what you did on the cross, but we could have gotten to God another way.' Romans (and all of Scripture) is abundandtly clear on this point. Faith in Christ is necessary for salvation."
"God sends his servants -> His servants preach. -> People hear. -> Hearers believe. -> Believers call. -> Everyone who calls is saved... Now look back at this progression and ask one question: Is there any place where this plan can break down? Think about it. Obviously everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved. No breakdown there. Everyone who believes will call. Many who hear (not all, but many) will believe. People will hear the gospel when we preach it to them. And god is most definitely still in the business of sending his servants. That means that there is only one potential breakdown in this progression - when servants of God do not preach the gospel to all peoples. We are the plan of God, and there is no plan B."
The author also had a good analogy of the SS United States was originally constructed for wartime and then was reconstituted as a luxury ship: "Things look radically different on a luxury liner than they do a troop carrier. The faces of soldiers preparing for battle and those of patrons enjoying their bonbons are radically different. The conservation of resources on a troop carrier contrasts sharply with the opulence that characterizes the luxury liner. After all, the troop carrier has an urgent task to accomplish; the luxury liner, on the other hand, is free to to casually enjoy the trip... When I think about the history of the SS United States, I wonder if she has something teach us about the history of the church..."
"Let me paraphrase what Jesus was saying here to help us feel the weight of it. Jesus was telling disciples who would face certain persecution and suffering. 'Don't be afraid of people. The worst they can do is kill you.' What kind of encouragement is that? We say, 'Well, if I go to this place, I could be killed.' Jesus replies, 'That's all?'"
"Why do you think Jesus would look at the crowds around him, with all their deep needs, and then turn to his disciples and tell them to pray for themselves? The answer is humbling. When Jesus looked at the harassed and helpless multitudes, apparently this concern was not that the lost would not come to the Father. Instead his concern was that his followers would not go to the lost."
"John Paton, Jim Elliot, and C.T. Studd all illustrate one fundamental truth: your life is free to be radical when you see death as reward. This is the essence of what Jesus taught in Matthew 10, and I believe it is *the key* to taking back your faith from the American dream."
There were more, but as I said.. I ran out of note post-its. I'd highly recommend anyone read the book to see the quotes in context and consider if what the author said matches up with the Bible.
The book ended with a challenge for the next year.
1. pray for the entire world; 2. read through the entire Word; 3. sacrifice your money for a specific purpose; 4. spend your time in another context; 5. commit your life to a multiplying community.
It was convicting and I think that's one of the best signs of a good book....more