An artist is, first and foremost, someone who sees the world differently than other people and helps others to see the world in that way.
Rob Bell is nAn artist is, first and foremost, someone who sees the world differently than other people and helps others to see the world in that way.
Rob Bell is not a theologian; he’s an artist.
Bell’s new book Love Wins: A Book about Heaven, Hell and the Fate of every person who ever lived should be first and foremost understood as a work of art. From the vivid imagery and stories that he uses, down to the careful arrangement of words on the page for visual effect, Bell does a masterful job of evoking questions, providing insights and causing the reader to see age-old questions in new ways.
That said, Love Wins contains theology, most of which isn’t particularly new. Bell even says as much in the preface. The theology that is included, while worded differently, often resonates with many Anabaptist understandings of faith.
One of Rob’s central theses is that heaven and hell are real, but that they are more of a state of being than a physical place — heaven and hell are not reserved for some time in the future but have already begun.
As I read this, I couldn’t help but think of the Anabaptist understanding of the kingdom of heaven — that the kingdom of heaven has already begun in the death and resurrection of Jesus, but that it has not yet fully been completed. Bell’s understanding and the Anabaptist understanding necessitate participation on the part of humans. Overall, many of the core theological concepts that Bell raises or alludes to can be found within various Anabaptist scholars and leaders and have, at some point, been taught at all of our church colleges.
Controversy has surrounded this book, even before it was released, and has mainly centered on the doctrine of hell. However, what seemed more challenging to me was the chapter on different biblical images of atonement.
Bell describes the plethora of images found in the New Testament to describe and understand Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection. Bell challenges the idea that there is one clean, simple way to understand the atonement of Jesus. This seems far more controversial and important than whether or not we have a precise understanding of hell — yet it feels as though this has been overshadowed in the controversy about the book.
Ultimately, Bell provides a provocative book that is adding fuel to an age-old fire. So if you’re looking for a well-footnoted, systematic theological treatise, this isn’t it. It is, however, biblically-based and rooted in scripture.
The book challenges certain understandings of the doctrine of hell, heaven and atonement. But I think these doctrines are more human constructs than biblical truth and rightly should be questioned. Even if Bell challenges beliefs that are seen as “orthodox,” this should not scare off Anabaptists. If it were not for challenging the orthodox doctrines of infant baptism, church and state relationships and faith-based violence, we Anabaptists would not be here today.
For those of us who grew up singing I John 4:7-8 at a church camp, and have grown to have a deep, tested, and sincere belief that these words are true, then Love Wins should be familiar territory for us. At the very least, it raises deeply important questions to our existence as humans and causes us to see ourselves and God in a new way. But then again, great art always does that....more
Overall he does a very good job of articulating the core convictions of a particular group of people who are coming to Anabaptism from outside of theOverall he does a very good job of articulating the core convictions of a particular group of people who are coming to Anabaptism from outside of the historical tradition. The core convictions (and the book) are strongly shaped by a lens of anti-Christendom, separation of church and state, and an understanding and skepticism of larger societal systems. If find myself resonating strongly with the 7 core convictions that he puts out, but I think that is because I probably come from a similar place on these others issues as well.
I did find myself questioning whether or not this description of the core of Anabaptism would apply to most modern Mennonites. I find myself coming to the conclusion that most Mennonites I know don't actually look like this. The most salient point on this though was that when talking about Anabaptism, there are many people who are outside of the historical tradition who are deeply rooted in Anabaptism and many within the tradition who are not, regardless of what title either might carry.
He seems to have a decent and strong grasp on the history of the 16th Ce. This is kind of a big deal because if one is going to call yourself an Anabaptist, then you'd better have the basics down.
My biggest critique is that he minimizes the influence of the Holy Spirit. I don't think he gives the influence of the real presence of the Holy Spirit enough credit in his analysis of the 16th Ce. history. Nor does he make it a core conviction either. Perhaps it's an accurate representation of the Anabaptist Network, but I would hope that it would have a bit higher place. This isn't to throw to many stones because, in practice, I would have a similar minimization of the Spirit, I just know it's a deficiency and am trying to remedy it.
Overall, I found it to be helpful and clarifying. It challenges my own beliefs and practices and it provides a helpful perspective of someone who has found, chosen and fallen in love with the tradition....more
The teaching of the 12 is an interesting little read. I found it to be a nice introduction to the Didache. It's only about 120 pages long and an easyThe teaching of the 12 is an interesting little read. I found it to be a nice introduction to the Didache. It's only about 120 pages long and an easy read for the non-theologian. He includes his own translation of the Didache and draws on enough other solid resources that it's clear he's coming from a real depth of understanding.
I would definitely recommend it for people who are unfamiliar with the scholarly world of the New Testament. It is not, however, an in depth, scholarly look at the Didache. There are other resources for that.
I do wonder how much of Tony's own biases come through in this. He's been a big voice in the world of the Emerging church. One who comes out more liberal than others. What struck me as I finished it up today was the recurrence of the ideas of "doing your best" if you can't reach the idea. It's a pragmatism that is legitimately present in the Didache but, for some reason, jumped out at me knowing more about Tony. It's a line of thinking that will surely cause conservatives feathers to be ruffled. Perhaps it's why Tony was attracted to it in the first place.
Overall, I think he does a fair job of connecting the teachings of this little document of the early church to our setting in the western world in a way that normal people can access it. Thumbs up from me....more
It's a great book, incredibly important information. I found it tough to get through because my primary vocabulary set is in a different field. The psIt's a great book, incredibly important information. I found it tough to get through because my primary vocabulary set is in a different field. The psych stuff seems to be quality, but was heavy for me....more