This book took me a very long time to read, because I wanted to memorize every bit of it. My copy is underlined with numerous margin notes, and I postThis book took me a very long time to read, because I wanted to memorize every bit of it. My copy is underlined with numerous margin notes, and I posted excerpts on Facebook on a regular basis. I learned SO MUCH from reading this book. Any white person interested in doing their part to resist the culture of white supremacy will find this book a fabulous resource. I couldn't recommend it higher....more
The African characters--if you can call them that--came straight out of central casting. Nothing but stereotypes. No wonder Chinua Achebe felt compellThe African characters--if you can call them that--came straight out of central casting. Nothing but stereotypes. No wonder Chinua Achebe felt compelled to write Things Fall Apart....more
This book has much to recommend it. With (very short) chapters entitled "No, But Where are You FROM?"; "If You Would Just Stop Talking About Race, RacThis book has much to recommend it. With (very short) chapters entitled "No, But Where are You FROM?"; "If You Would Just Stop Talking About Race, Racism Would Go Away"; "I Don't Mean to Be Racist, BUT"; "He's a Different Kind of Black"; "It's Not Easy Being White"; and "If They Can Say It, Why Can't I?" among others, Reyes-Chow addresses common misconceptions with straightforward honesty but also gentle compassion. This would be a great book to spark discussions among friends; the author is influenced by his Christian background and work and is looking for healing and reconciliation around the issue of racism. The book is really a practical guide to communicating about racism with those who are without malice but misinformed.
But...a caveat. In a section called "Intent; Language," Reyes-Chow states,
"In very general terms, I see racism as that which justifies and reinforces the use of prejudice or privilege in order to maintain power, influence, or control over another group or individuals. And no, I do not believe racist behavior is confined to any one particular group."
There's the rub. Because the author is grounding his discussion of racism in the present day and specifically in the United States, it appears he isn't considering how racism came to be in the first place, especially when defining his use of the words "race" and "racism." He's defining race and racism in terms of prejudice based in ethnicity and culture as well as skin color, but that definition muddies the waters by conflating the issue in a way that makes further understanding more difficult instead of less.
Racism has always been about a hierarchical structure that favors light skin over dark skin. Black skin was seen as a marker, by those with light colored skin, of a less evolved, less civilized, less HUMAN being. Racism is grounded in skin color, not in ethnicity and culture. Often those things go hand-in-hand, but not always. Reyes-Chow describes his own cognitive dissonance when confronted with a young man whose phenotype was clearly Korean but who identified as a white Southerner. In racism, phenotype trumps all. Racism is about devaluing dark skin. Albert Einstein understood this concept when he said, "Racism is a disease of white people."
There is a chapter in Reyes-Chow's book called, "Minorities Can't Be Racist," and in it, like in every chapter, the author sets out to debunk what he sees as a misconception. For evidence, he states:
"As an Asian-American, I know that White folks do not hold the corner on racism toward African Americans. A family member once told me, when we were discussing interracial dating, that there was a Chinese saying, 'The closer to gold, the closer to heaven,' which means that the lighter the skin, the better. I don't know if that's a real Chinese saying, but it can be a real part of Chinese culture in the United States and reflect real views toward dark-skinned people..."
So close! He almost sees that it's about skin color, but then,
"As more and more races interact with greater frequency, deeply held negative beliefs about others based on race [culture and ethnicity] will undoubtedly begin to emerge in new ways in systems and institutions. We must examine the racism that manifests itself in instances of society-wide discrimination as well as the racism that may play into our day-to-day interactions. We must be open to the idea that, now, racism is not solely White people's problem." [insert mine]
The definition of racism hasn't changed, despite the author's claim that "things are very different than they were even a generation ago, both in how people have experienced racism as well as how folks talk about it." Racism is about judging skin color and finding darker skin to be lacking, relative to lighter skin. Always has been. Wars between ethnic groups are not racism, they're tribal conflicts. Racism is a white construct to serve the economic and social purposes of white people. People of color are perhaps influenced by racism, and may buy into the idea that "white is right." But being influenced by racism is not the same as being racist. Racism is seeing white as the best, and seeing anything darker as lesser. It's undoubtedly a disease of white people. ...more
Fabulous book. I learned so much, especially about the near-history of racism and white hatred towards African Americans. Stunning, enlightening, andFabulous book. I learned so much, especially about the near-history of racism and white hatred towards African Americans. Stunning, enlightening, and horrifying....more
This book was all over the place. It felt jumbled and disorganized and uncomfortable.
There are many reviews that say, far better than I could, exactlThis book was all over the place. It felt jumbled and disorganized and uncomfortable.
There are many reviews that say, far better than I could, exactly what went wrong with the book. One of the best said something to the effect that this is an important story, but it's not Stockett's story to tell. I was uncomfortable all the way through the book knowing it was Skeeter's/Stockett's voice I was really hearing when Aibileen or Minny was supposedly speaking.
I know most people seem to love this book but I found it plodding. I kept asking myself, "why'd she put that in there?" Why Stuart, why Celia? How could she really forget the red satchel? How could she not see what a dangerous game she was playing?
I feel rather fractious for dumping on a book so many people truly loved, but I found myself thinking, so many times while reading it, that it just felt wrong....more
I read this book because a student in my secondary reading class chose it to read and I wanted to be able to talk about it with him. He chose it becauI read this book because a student in my secondary reading class chose it to read and I wanted to be able to talk about it with him. He chose it because he is of Shoshone descent and wanted to read about the Bear River Massacre.
The story itself is of a romance between two impossibly perfect people, Owen Woulfe and Reilly Stewart Madison. They are perfect for each other as they are both intelligent, courageous, witty, generous, wealthy, passionate, and stunningly beautiful paragons of virtue. Also they are sexually compatible; I know this due to the book's several explicit sex scenes (that always end rapturously and, ahem, simultaneously).
The actual account of the Bear River Massacre is told in the last few pages of the book. Our heroine, Reilly, and her parents and children are visiting their Shoshone relatives when, miraculously, their dog warns them of impeding danger. They leave shortly before the US militia descends on the Shoshone camp and kill the majority of the people gathered there for the "Warm Dance." The family watches the slaughter, described in great horrific detail, from a bluff overlooking the camp. They send their miraculous dog back to their home, several hours away, to fetch Owen, the husband, so that he can travel to them to help with any survivors. The dog apparently runs for hours, both ways.
This book suffered from not having a good editor who would have tempered the author's tendency to flowery speech, as well as corrected the many typographical errors and errors in spelling and punctuation. There were many commas in this book, but they never seemed to be in the right places. The word "comeuppance" was written "come up a pence." An example of a garbled sentence, "He knew it would be she that would be a problem."
This book was truly difficult to read. That said, I read it on my Kindle....more
Really good description of the day to day life of one of the teenagers who worked to integrate Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas. Her descrReally good description of the day to day life of one of the teenagers who worked to integrate Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas. Her descriptions are vivid and searing. ...more
I loved so much about this book, especially the laugh-out-loud funny parts, but my favorite moment is when Thurston envisions "passing off the. . .torI loved so much about this book, especially the laugh-out-loud funny parts, but my favorite moment is when Thurston envisions "passing off the. . .torch" making "the destruction of racism the official responsibility of white people." He quotes his friend damali,
There's only so much we can say to white people anymore about this, because we've been saying the same things to white people for generations, decades upon decades. It is now really up to them.
I found the premise of this book fascinating, and it was very readable and interesting as a courtroom drama. I was put off by how little faith LipstadI found the premise of this book fascinating, and it was very readable and interesting as a courtroom drama. I was put off by how little faith Lipstadt seemed to have in her legal counsel and in the judge to be astute, aware, and reasonable. Though her worries were unfounded time and again, she continued to doubt their methods and conclusions. This became very tedious....more