Probably best to read this before Requiem and not after, like I did. Makes events that happen in Requiem much more emotional.
The formatting for this eProbably best to read this before Requiem and not after, like I did. Makes events that happen in Requiem much more emotional.
The formatting for this ebook was horrible though. The font displayed very large by default, even reducing the font reading size to its very smallest it was still large. The fonts also changed every now and then, and not seemingly for any aesthetic reason. It was just a mess. I actually returned this because it was such a mess. All three of these short stories have had messy formatting, but this was the worst. Going to get the book with all three stories in instead, and hope that's not so much of a mess....more
I read the first half of this in bed one morning. I started on it and couldn't stop until I was forced to get out of bed because of the call of natureI read the first half of this in bed one morning. I started on it and couldn't stop until I was forced to get out of bed because of the call of nature.
There's some Quantum Leap style similarities, it is a fantasy, and there is a 'but what happened next?' type ending with unresolved questions - but it's not actually about that. That's just the plot device.
This is really about morality, empathy, friendship, the choices we make as people, human nature, our genetic make-up, control (what we can, and what we can't), diversity, relationships (in all forms), and love (of course) - to name a few things.
A has to be empathetic towards the people A is inhabiting for the day, for the body and life they have custody of, and try not to drastically change their lives or harm the body. But A makes mistakes, like we all do, and A learns that the things (and mostly the people) that we love can make us selfish. Which is fine, and human, because nobody is selfless.
I feel we have to be empathetic towards A too. I can only imagine how lonely it'd feel to be a new person every day and never be able to make any lasting connections or relationships. It's understandable that A wants to try, wants to know what it feels like for everyone else, even though A understands there will be collateral damage. Like I said, nobody is selfless.
I liked the fact that the people we meet each day are so diverse. It's another part of the theme of empathy in the book. I understand how some people might feel it's hitting you over the head with diversity, but I do feel that's part of the point. We're not all the same; sometimes the differences are external and obvious (gender, skin colour, nationality, weight), but other times they're internal and things we'll only know if they're shared (sexual preference/identity/orientation, likes/dislikes, our feelings - all the things that make me me and not you).
A has lived life in a way that we can't, and because of that A has learned to be more empathetic, more understanding, more tolerant than perhaps we can because we're just stuck inside our own heads and there's a limit to our scope of understanding (I would absolutely love to be inside someone else's head for the day). But it also means that A has no real understanding of how relationships work, how commitment works, how it feels to grow up with someone, and how it feels to get to know someone over time. All A gets is snapshots of these feelings. A window into what A can never have. So it's no wonder that A does what A does - wouldn't you?
I can understand how some people might find this book preachy and get annoyed with it, but it just worked for me. And that's fine if I like it and you don't, we don't all like the same things. After all, that we're all different is what makes the world interesting....more
Any book that keeps me up until the early hours reading, and that I pick straight up again when I wake can get no less than 4 stars. Doesn't seem honeAny book that keeps me up until the early hours reading, and that I pick straight up again when I wake can get no less than 4 stars. Doesn't seem honest otherwise.
Had a bit of a bumpy start with this, it didn't click with me until a few chapters in ((view spoiler)[basically from when Jackson jumps back to 2007 (hide spoiler)]), but from then onwards I really enjoyed it and kept reading 'just a bit more' so I could see what happened next. I've read quite a bit of dystopian fiction this year, so it was refreshing to read something different. Honestly, getting a bit bored of the currently popular dystopia theme ((view spoiler)[even though this does touch on it a tiny bit in the half-jump forward with Emily, but that's fine as it was a bit of plot and not overall theme (hide spoiler)]). Another enjoyable, different, aspect of Tempest is that our narrator, Jackson, and his love interest Holly are 18/19 - which is at the older end of the age range for YA fiction where the leads are usually 16/17. (view spoiler)[OK, Holly (and Adam) are temporarily 16/17 when we're back in 2007 for a while, but that's only temporary and Jackson remains 19 so it's an interesting dynamic. (hide spoiler)] This means that their relationship can be more realistically mature than with younger characters - and it doesn't have to be sanitised either! Hurrah. That's not saying it's like an 'adult romance' novel, I wouldn't want that, but when you are an adult reading booked intended for a YA market it's nice to come across a book where the romance is more than hand holding, hugging, and first kisses. First kisses are great, of course, but so are first other things. And then seconds, and thirds...
Another thing I enjoyed about the romance in this book is that, coupled with the time travel, we see them together (but not in a great place), getting to know each other (but in somewhat 'unreal' way), and back together (but in a good place). It's a very interesting, non-linear romance. One where one party (Jackson) is learning way more than the other (Holly), which could almost be viewed as cheating, but that's what gives the character growth from the start to the end of the book.
I liked the interesting time travel. I liked the realistic-feeling romance. I liked the complicated relationship with his father. (view spoiler)[I liked that Courtney actually died and it didn't end up with 'Surprise! She's alive and just been in a different timeline' or something similarly cliché. (hide spoiler)] I liked the fact that it felt complete, yet also that there's more to come. Which I'll be reading when it does come.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>...more
I'm honestly not sure when's the best time to read this. I read it a few chapters in to the book, but it might be best to read the opening statement oI'm honestly not sure when's the best time to read this. I read it a few chapters in to the book, but it might be best to read the opening statement of the book, and then start with this. It honestly doesn't add much, it's like a few bonus chapters at the start of Tempest.
I didn't 'click' with Tempest until the end of the first 2009 section ((view spoiler)[i.e. when Jackson does his first full jump back to 2007 (hide spoiler)]) and because I read this before that happened, it actually just ended up making the opening slightly too long. Maybe it's more interesting to read after the book? I don't know, because I didn't do it that way.
As an introduction to the book and a 'way in' to the series, I felt it was weak. As I understand it, this was published before Tempest came out so it's meant to be a freebie to hook you in to the main series. If I'd read this before thinking that 'Tempest' sounded interesting, I might not've bothered to continue.
Most short 'extras' often come between books, and add a little something to the story, but usually nothing too crucial. This is not that. Glad I did continue with the book though, turned out good in the end.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>...more
Looking back, it's almost exactly a year since I read the first one. I didn't have a very clear memory of the plot of the first book, so it was handyLooking back, it's almost exactly a year since I read the first one. I didn't have a very clear memory of the plot of the first book, so it was handy that there was a few reminders in the first chapter. Often I find these irritating when you're reading a series through consecutively, but in this instance they were very useful. They also didn't feel like so much recap that you'd get annoyed if you were reading the books consecutively.
This felt much tighter than I remember the first book feeling. The 'stuff happening' quota is high, and the absurd factor is high (but that's a good thing, it's just bonkers and entertaining). Aside from the absurd parts, Louise Rennison does a really good job of capturing the life of a teenage girl - feeling insecure about yourself, experimenting with stuff (make-up, snogging techniques), and how totally selfish life really is at that age. How you empathy is still developing, but really you've just too busy being mainly occupied with the state of your romantic prospects and adventures to give much of a thought to your friends. It's not that you *don't* care, it just that you really don't think about it. To me, Louise Rennison has perfectly captured the self absorbed life of a carefree teenager, and I loved it.
I was iffy after the first book whether I'd actually add these books to my permanent collection, but after this one they're definite yeses....more
This series did improve somewhat from Torn onwards. For example, the author mercifully decides to forget about Rhys/Michael being romantically interesThis series did improve somewhat from Torn onwards. For example, the author mercifully decides to forget about Rhys/Michael being romantically interested with Wendy and sidelines his character and pairs him back up with Rhiannon (thankfully, it was all slightly incestuous feeling in the first book). Tove is also clearly made a friend (even though the (view spoiler)[arranged marriage (hide spoiler)] can be seen coming from as soon as he's introduced in Switched) and it's nice that Wendy actually has a male friend who's not in the slightest bit interested in her romantically (and isn't her 'brother').
These aren't the best books you're ever going to read. Sometimes the writing is baffling ('The room was circular with rounded walls', couldn't stop boggling at that one), but it's solid brainless fluff; if that's the sort of thing you're looking for. It's entirely forgettable; I once actually forgot what book I was reading when I was reading it! I also found Wendy's name oddly unsuited to her, and kept forgetting that too.
The main thing that these books have going for them, however, is that she is a fairly strong female lead. The books pass the Bechdel test (there are more than 2 female characters and they talk, to each other, about things other than boys (powers, family, history, as well has clothes, hair, and make-up, and (obviously) boys too)). Wendy starts off kind of bratty and not totally being able to stand up for herself in Switched, but by the end of the series the 'bratty' has become 'feisty' and she has developed her powers to be self sufficient and not needing a man to come to her rescue. So she actually gets to save the boys, which is always fun.
So, mostly forgettable, but some 'not bad' things in them. Not the worst I've ever read, but no where near the best either (I'm sticking with 2 stars throughout as I feel it's the closest to 'meh'). They certainly improve as they go, but can also be a bit messy as the author seems to have changed her mind about things as she went along rather than having a clearly mapped out plot to start with.
Additional: After I finished reading these I discovered that the published versions (i.e. not the self-published versions) have additional material: short stories at the end of each, and tweaks for each book (which can only be a good thing). These tweaks seem to include a whole new character in Ascend, Mia (which was confusing when I read the short story at the end of Ascend). My friend had sent me the self-published versions to read, so I tracked down the published versions to read the extras (which were inconsequential). So, Mia turns out to be a hastily inserted love interest for Finn, and Tove is turned gay! So that means that the 'all the guys' thing *is* correct now as he was just closeted all along. Ugh. Honestly. Makes me wonder what other changes there were to the text, but I'm really not going to read them again just to find that out!["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>...more
Don't judge me too harshly; I just needed something brainless to read at this point in my life as things have been busy/stressful. And brainless it ceDon't judge me too harshly; I just needed something brainless to read at this point in my life as things have been busy/stressful. And brainless it certainly is, so it fitted the bill nicely. I liked that Wendy is kind of feisty and actually gets to fight her own battles (although she does still always seem to end up being ultimately 'rescued' by some male, but it's something positive at least), but I didn't like how bratty she was (that was just annoying). I also got annoyed with how ALL THE MEN FOLK are enamoured of her. I get that this is a teenage romance, but seriously - all the men? Couldn't at least one've been not interested or perhaps at least gay? Still, I have to say I would've eaten this shit up as a teenager. Who didn't wish that they were adopted and fantasise about turning out to be a magical special person? So, I can see how Amanda Hocking was successful with this, but ask me to recount the plot in 6 months to a year and I doubt I'll be able to remember. It's quite forgettable. To the point where I keep forgetting the main characters name! (I really don't think the name suits the character anyway.) So, yeah, I'll be reading the rest to see where this goes, but mostly because I still need brainless distractions....more
After seeing this in the Friends House bookshop, and in Meeting House libraries, for years I finally decided to borrow it from my Meeting House librarAfter seeing this in the Friends House bookshop, and in Meeting House libraries, for years I finally decided to borrow it from my Meeting House library. I'm looking forward to reading Forged in the Fire, the next book in the series, which I can also borrow from the MH library. I was also pleased to discover that there's a 3rd book in the series due out next month. Serendipity.
I believe this is the 1662 law mentioned in the book, if you wish to read it: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/repo... If you search the same site for 'quaker 1662' you also come up with a lot of other historical references and reports that may be of interest.
I found it to be a good blend of fictional story and Quaker history, although I would like to know more about Quakers in Shropshire in the 1660s (1662 being a mere 10 years after the 'official' founding of Quakerism). I wasn't quite convinced by the fact that they met in a public room in an ale-house, as most Quakers of that time were still meeting in private houses, fields, or barns (such as how the Eaton Bellamy Meeting is described), but I guess this was used as a storytelling device so that their Meetings could be broken up more publicly and forcibly (and therefore more dramatically). Nor was I sure that there would have been quite so many Quakers in the area at that time, but I have no knowledge of Quaker history in Shropshire for that time so I trust the author did her research.
There was lots of Quaker history to like though. The mention of Elders (which did exist then, although not in a formalised way as they do now), the descriptions of plain speech and dress, and the wonderful explanations of hat customs and oath taking. Overall I thought the Quaker aspect was well researched and well presented.
Looking forward to the next book. This has also made me keen to track down more fiction featuring Quakers to read. I'll have to see what else I can find in Meeting House libraries!...more
I really like this pair of books. I love the language that Megan McCafferty has created for this future society; it's very clever and fun. It's the kiI really like this pair of books. I love the language that Megan McCafferty has created for this future society; it's very clever and fun. It's the kind of language I could see myself adopting in to my own daily speech. I also like the future that she's created; I like that it's not all 'apparently-perfect-future-society-but-actually-you're-all-being-repressed-by-evil-government-types' that seems so popular at the moment. I like that the issues are complicated; that it's government, corporations, and citizens combined that're part of the issues. It seems to speak to our current conditions, and be a commentary on current social conditionings.
It's also a rilly fun read. I can see myself re-reading these some time....more
I read this book when I was a teenager. I found it in one of my many library visits and it's always stuck with me. Not because of it's story, I barelyI read this book when I was a teenager. I found it in one of my many library visits and it's always stuck with me. Not because of it's story, I barely remembered the plot at all (other than 'three Earth teenagers get transposed to Another World', which happens in Chapter 1, I drew a blank). It was the fact that I'd only managed to find the first two books in the library and I knew there was 1 more in the trilogy that they didn't have. Being a completist, I'd always wanted to re-read it, and finally read the last book, so I found them all online, 2nd hand, and bought them.
It's an odd book, that clearly draws a lot from Lord of the Rings. It even references the fact in the first chapter. Ent-like sentient trees; elves and dwarfs; elves sailing to 'the Blessed Lands' instead of dying; Kadmon being some kind of Aragorn/Gandalf hybrid; wraiths and goblins; as well as other things I'm forgetting. But more than the little things, the thing it owes most to LoTR is the theme of how our post-Industrial Revolution world is bad for the world and us in it. The writing is not brilliant, and at times the English in it is plain odd. The plot is quite breezy and moves along fairly quickly. The third person narrative switches every few chapters so that the story is told from the POV of all the three teenagers, so it's their story/journey, rather than just the story/journey of one of them. Characters die, but I can't say that I really cared as I wasn't too emotionally invested in any of them ((view spoiler)[except for the wolves, but that's because I don't like depictions of animals dying (hide spoiler)]). The deaths were nice and gory though, didn't hold anything back for a teen book that was written in the 90s.
Overall though, it seems less a story is being told and more a morality tale about the evil things Man has done to the world and each other. It's not great, but it's not terrible. I'm certainly going to read the other two though, because that was the whole point of getting them.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>...more
Considering I literally could not stop reading this book, I think it deserves 5 stars. Really, it's a four star book; I didn't think 'it was amazing',Considering I literally could not stop reading this book, I think it deserves 5 stars. Really, it's a four star book; I didn't think 'it was amazing', but I'm giving it that extra star because I literally stayed awake all night reading it. Don't be fooled by the 20 day reading period that's recorded; I started this but very quickly (like, just after the prologue) took a long break to re-read all of The Hunger Games.
Just like a video game, this book was totally addictive and impossible to stop reading once I was immersed in it. I'm tired now.
Added after a sleep: No, it's not the greatest book ever written. Some parts are predictable, some parts scream 'foreshadowing' so much that you're just waiting for them to resolve ((view spoiler)[like the 'glitch' in the chatroom, and the special quarter) (hide spoiler)], but the world was well imagined and described; I felt immersed, and I enjoyed it for what it is - a fun and enjoyable adventure.["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>...more
Didn't just re-read The Hunger Games, but decided to carry on and see if I still thought CF is good, like I remembered it to be. And indeed it is, andDidn't just re-read The Hunger Games, but decided to carry on and see if I still thought CF is good, like I remembered it to be. And indeed it is, and I still really enjoyed it....more
A re-read of the Hunger Games books, prompted by seeing the film. The film, for me, captured the overall tone and plot of the book but I wanted to re-A re-read of the Hunger Games books, prompted by seeing the film. The film, for me, captured the overall tone and plot of the book but I wanted to re-read it again to remind myself of the missing details.
Still a really good, gripping read, but I didn't hurry through it this time like I did last year. ...more
Some bits were obvious ((view spoiler)[her mother, Alex being alive (hide spoiler)]) but that didn't stop it being good. V. enjoyable, particularly liSome bits were obvious ((view spoiler)[her mother, Alex being alive (hide spoiler)]) but that didn't stop it being good. V. enjoyable, particularly liked the world building.
(view spoiler)[I'm not a massive fan of love triangles, so part of me really wanted Alex to be really dead, or for Julian to actually die, or for them both to end up dead, but I knew it'd never really happen. Of course I'm still going to read the 3rd book, but I'd have been interested to see how dark it could get if all the people she loved kept dying or being cured (i.e. as good as dead), how far she could've been pushed. (hide spoiler)]["br"]>["br"]>...more
An interesting short. Reminds you that because a book is written in 1st person you only have the narrators side of the story, so it was interesting toAn interesting short. Reminds you that because a book is written in 1st person you only have the narrators side of the story, so it was interesting to see Hana from her 'brain' rather than just Lena's view of her. To learn that they both have their insecurities, and that what one person viewed as an important conversation, the other kind of spaced out during.
Still, I can't bring myself to believe that (view spoiler)[Hana would report Lena, as is implied at the end of the story. Clearly, the reward money isn't the motivation as she has no need for money being from wealth and matched to marry into even more wealth. So to report Lena because of a wave of jealousy and then turn up at her house and (by all appearances) agree to help her seems out of character to her previous committed friendship to Lena. I could imagine post-cure Hana doing it, but not pre. So, in my mind, she just considers it in a moment of jealousy but doesn't actually go through with it.
Because, if she did report them, then it doesn't fit with the Hana who said at the evaluation day 'If they really want us to be happy, they'd let us pick for ourselves' and 'You know you can't be happy unless you're unhappy sometimes'. (hide spoiler)]