This play is Jean-Paul Sartre's only attempt to come to terms with the Second World War and German guilt -- as well as French guilt for the country'sThis play is Jean-Paul Sartre's only attempt to come to terms with the Second World War and German guilt -- as well as French guilt for the country's actions in Algeria. The Condemned of Altona is wordy and somewhat unnecessarily intricate.
Its subject is the von Gerlach family, whose shipbuilding empire spanned both the Third Reich and Germany's postwar rebirth. The paterfamilias, referred to strictly as Father in the play, has two sons and a daughter. His eldest son, Franz, never emerges from his second floor room, where he addresses the crabs who rule in the thirtieth century and who stand in judgment over his past misdeeds. He is cared for by his sister Leni, with whom he has an incestuous relationship. Neither the Father nor his other son Werner have seen Franz for thirteen years.
There is considerable meat interspersed among all the play's intricacies. It is worth reading, and it would be worth seeing, but if it succeeds at all, it would be from multiple readings or viewings. ...more
Bertolt Brecht was not interested in engaging the audience's feelings: Rather, he was after what he called the verfremdungseffekt, the alienation effeBertolt Brecht was not interested in engaging the audience's feelings: Rather, he was after what he called the verfremdungseffekt, the alienation effect. The Rise and Fall of the City of Mahagonny is about a Las Vegas-like city somewhere in the south, near Pensacola.
As one of the founders, Lady Begbick, predicts:
We will make it a snare Plump little birds will be eager to enter, Everywhere men must labor and sorrow, Only here it is fun. For the deepest craving of man is Not to suffer but to do as he pleases. That is our golden secret. Gin and whiskey, Girls for the asking.
Poet/translator W.H. Auden calls the city "Suckerville."
The rules of the city are simple;
One means to eat all you are able; Two, to change your loves about; Three means the ring and gaming table; Four, to drink until you pass out.
In the end, the worst crime is to be indigent, to not pay your bills. For this, Jimmy Gallagher is arrested and put to death. At the end, there is a long funeral procession whose refrain is:
Can't do anything to help a dead man No one can do anything for a dead man.
This is one of the most primitive Greek tragedies that has survived to our day: The protagonist is an undifferentiated chorus of fifty Egyptian maidenThis is one of the most primitive Greek tragedies that has survived to our day: The protagonist is an undifferentiated chorus of fifty Egyptian maidens of Greek ancestry who are being pressured into marrying their cousins. They arrive in Argos and pray to the gods and plead for the Argive King Pelasgus to save them from their pursuing cousins.
Aeschylus has written better plays, but The Suppliants does have its moments, such as at the end when the chorus hits upon one of the key Greek virtues:
Richard II has always been one of my favorite plays by William Shakespeare. In some of the Bard's histories, there are powerful kings, as in Henry V;Richard II has always been one of my favorite plays by William Shakespeare. In some of the Bard's histories, there are powerful kings, as in Henry V; in others, such as this play and the Henry VI trilogy, the ruler on the throne is weak.
Almost from the very start, Richard begins to show the white feather as his kinsman Bolingbroke attacks and manages to gather to him all the forces he thought were in his own court. In the end, Richard surrenders his crown to Bolingbroke, who becomes Henry IV. Then, almost as an afterthought, Richard is murdered by a couple of rowdies who think thereby to get into Henry's good graces.
But whate'er I be, Nor I, nor any man that but man is, With nothing shall be pleased, till he be eased With being nothing. [V.v.38-41.]
And here he have the self-composed epitaph of a man who would be king, but had not the sand.
The Gayev family seems to represent a level of fecklessness that is hard to believe. Their entire lives have been involved in the business of lettingThe Gayev family seems to represent a level of fecklessness that is hard to believe. Their entire lives have been involved in the business of letting money run through their hands until there is none left. And now it is the turn of their estate with its famous cherry orchard to be sold at auction and for the family to dissipate to the four winds.
Anton Chekhov has in his plays, particularly in The Cherry Orchard, concentrated on the sad case of the incompetent landed gentry gone to seed. Gayev himself is unable to talk without lining up a billiard shot in his head. His sister doesn't know whether to give a beggar a copper or a gold sovereign. Their daughter would like to get married, but nobody asks her. And there are the usual hangers-on who serve only to emphasize the damage being done.
Only Yermolay Lopakhin, the local tycoon, seems to know what to do; but he feels as helpless as the Gayevs, and leaves the possibility of marrying Gayev's daughter Varya by the wayside. Very sad.
Taking a few fragments from the 17th century Orkneys, George Mackay Brown weaves a poetic, folkloric sequence, intended, I believe, originally as a raTaking a few fragments from the 17th century Orkneys, George Mackay Brown weaves a poetic, folkloric sequence, intended, I believe, originally as a radio play. Interconnected are themes of music (the fiddler), the seduced girl (who is tried and burned as a witch), and the fecundity of the sea and soil. A Spell for Green Corn is a quick read, but one that leaves hooks in the memory, like all of Brown's works....more
This is not the same King John you know from history. For one thing, there is no Runnymede and no Magna Carta in this play. Secondly, Richard the LionThis is not the same King John you know from history. For one thing, there is no Runnymede and no Magna Carta in this play. Secondly, Richard the Lion-Hearted has already died, so there is no Robin Hood, Sheriff of Nottingham, or Guy of Gisbourne. No, The Life and Death of King John is about retaining one's power as king when confronted with the demands of the papacy and of other surrounding monarchs.
In the process of trying to hold on to his power, John tries to have his nephew Arthur killed; but the noble delegated to do the job doesn't have the heart for it. Shortly thereafter, Arthur accidentally falls to his death from the castle walls. In the end, the lingering suspicion is that John had him killed.
And shortly after that, John dies off stage having been poisoned by a monk -- and act for which we have not been prepared by William Shakespeare.
In the end, John is a powerful man who must struggle with his conscience, and who doesn't quite succeed. ...more
I read the version of Euripides's The Bacchae translated by Reginald Gibbons and Charles Segal published by Oxford.
Robert Calasso's The Marriage of CI read the version of Euripides's The Bacchae translated by Reginald Gibbons and Charles Segal published by Oxford.
Robert Calasso's The Marriage of Cadmus and harmony taught me about the dynamics of Greek mythology, and this play by Euripides is a good example. Dionysos comes in person to Thebes, with whose royal family he is related, but meets with nothing but disbelief from Pentheus, the ruler and son of his aunt.
This sets up the play for the revenge of a disbelieved god, at the expense of Pentheus and his entire family. ...more
William Shakespeare's Richard III is a veritable charnel house in which all members of the royal family and nobility that do not espouse Richard's ambWilliam Shakespeare's Richard III is a veritable charnel house in which all members of the royal family and nobility that do not espouse Richard's ambition to be king are put to death. Even when these "enemies" are children -- the "Princes in the Tower" -- Richard does not swerve from his bloody course. He is, as Queen Margaret calls him, "hell's black intelligencer."
There exists to this day considerable doubt as to whether Richard was as black as the Bard painted him. In her novel The Daughter of Time, Josephine Tey traces the anti-Richard sentiment to none other than Sir Thomas More, who wrote a work of political assassination on behalf of Henry VII.
Richard III is one of the best of the histories, yet it is too much along a straight line, until Richard is killed by Richmond at Bosworth Field.
The language of the play is what makes it truly great, as when Queen Margaret, widow of Henry VI, curses him in front of his own mother, the Duchess of York:
From forth the kennel of thy womb hath crept A hellhound that doth hunt us all to death: That dog, that had his teeth before his eyes, To worry lambs and lap their gentle blood, That foul defacer of God's handiwork, That excellent grand tyrant of the earth That reigns in gallèd eyes of weeping souls, Thy womb let loose to chase us to our graves.
The concluding part of William Shakespeare's Wars of the Roses trilogy ends with Edward IV firmly in charge and with about half the cast of the play dThe concluding part of William Shakespeare's Wars of the Roses trilogy ends with Edward IV firmly in charge and with about half the cast of the play dead -- but with Richard Crookback in the wings waiting to make his own grab at the crown, which he will do in Richard III.
Henry VI, Part 3 is full of of "alarums and excursions" as the partisans of York and Lancaster find it out to the bitter end. The play is Shakespeare's lesson as to what happens to the kingdom when the king is weak. And Henry VI is weak indeed, too full of the milk of human kindness to fight off the forces arrayed against him. Only in Act V, as he is confronted by Richard, Duke of Gloucester, in the Tower of London does he rise to any degree of courage, but only to be stabbed by Richard -- but not before cursing out his would-be assassin and insulting him to the point of drawing his dagger.
This is a play with a plethora of characters, such that I would imagine it would be better to see it than read it, what with all its short battle scenes.
The War of the Roses trilogy is not often read today, but it is worth the effort. Although not the best of the Bard, nor yet even the best of the histories, it still tells us a great deal about the times, which tend to be somewhat neglected even by historians.
Shakespeare's English history plays portray kings who are heroic, as in Henry V, or weak, as in the Henry VI trilogy or Richard II or just plain bad,Shakespeare's English history plays portray kings who are heroic, as in Henry V, or weak, as in the Henry VI trilogy or Richard II or just plain bad, as in Richard III. Henry VI, Part 2 is a continuation of the sad reign of the Lancastrian king, who attained the throne at the age of 9 months with the Duke of Gloucester, his uncle, as Lord Protector.
In the beginning, we see Henry's betrothal to Margaret of Anjou. Instead of receiving a dowry, he gives the King of France Maine and Anjou and pays a sum for his bride to be transported to England, which she calls "this nest of scorpions." Of course, she herself is not the least of the Scorpions, and the Duke of Sussex, who arranged the marriage, is suspiciously enamored with her and her with him.
Outright war erupts with Gloucester's assassination, shortly followed by the banishment and murder of Sussex and the grim death of the Bishop of Winchester. Richard Duke of York raises an army in Ireland and causes mischief by fomenting a rebellion by Jack Cade. The enmity of the other nobles against one another takes center stage by the end.
William Shakespeare is not best known for this trilogy, but it is a useful gloss on our own times. As the king and nobles go their separate ways, Young Clifford exclaims to the feckless Henry:
I would speak blasphemy ere bid you fly; But fly you must; uncurable discomfit Reigns in the hearts of all our present parts. Away for your relief, and we will live To see their day and them our fortune give. (2 Henry VI 4.14-18)
The stage is set for Part 3 of the trilogy, and the sad end of the Lancastrian monarchy in the Wars of the Roses....more
I chose to read this play because I liked the title. The play itself was not a success on Broadway, though I think it could have been. Tennessee WilliI chose to read this play because I liked the title. The play itself was not a success on Broadway, though I think it could have been. Tennessee Williams writes of a rich old lady named Sissy Goforth, having survived six marriages, and dictating her memoirs as her health declines. She is interrupted in this by a trespasser, a youngish (but not actually young) poet named Chris Flanders. Sissy treats him abominably -- the way she treats everyone.
Chris the Poet seems to be a tad mercurial. He creates mobiles. His one book of poetry was written ten years ago, And he likes to be a companion to dying old women, which earns him the nickname "The Angel of Death." In fact, he is no angel of any sort; and his dealings with Miss Goforth are ambiguous.
Even when he is not at the top of his form, Tennessee Williams is worth reading -- and worth seeing. ...more
Tennessee Williams is one American author whose work I feel we do not sufficiently appreciate. Perhaps that is because the theater in general is fadinTennessee Williams is one American author whose work I feel we do not sufficiently appreciate. Perhaps that is because the theater in general is fading away -- an art form that, like many others, has become just ... too ... expensive. Also, even in our times, there is still lurks a stigma attached to being gay.
Suddenly Last Summer is a blinding metaphor about the absent main character -- Sebastian Venable -- who in some Latin American beach city crossed an invisible line and paid for it with his life -- by being partially devoured by a pack of street children who chase him through the streets.
The story is told by his "girlfriend," Catherine Holly, who has been committed to an insane asylum. Sebastian's mother, Violet, wants to know what happened to Sebastian, but refuses to accept what Catherine -- having been injected with some truth serum -- tells her. In the end, the attending physician, Doctor Cukrowicz, says it is just possible that the story was true....more
I was first introduced to this play by George Bernard Shaw when I saw Gabriel Pascal's movie version back in the 1960s with Claude Rains, Vivien LeighI was first introduced to this play by George Bernard Shaw when I saw Gabriel Pascal's movie version back in the 1960s with Claude Rains, Vivien Leigh, and Stewart Granger. Even with my familiarity of the story, it was fun to see how Shaw handled by clever word play between Caesar and the young Egyptian queen. Caesar and Cleopatra is probably not Shaw's best play, but it has always been one of my faves....more
Anton Chekhov seems so deceptively simple in his great plays such as The Three Sisters that we sometimes don't see the mystery that is there. In thisAnton Chekhov seems so deceptively simple in his great plays such as The Three Sisters that we sometimes don't see the mystery that is there. In this case, we have a young family consisting of a brother and three sisters, all full of high hopes and expressing a wish to move to Moscow, where "the lights are much brighter there/you can forget all your troubles, forget all your cares." The mystery is in the curious entropy of life, that proceeds heedless of our wishes and dreams.
Even Andrey, the brother, whose "brilliant career" as a Moscow professor, comes to grief in the garrison town in the provinces:
Oh, what has become of my past and where is it? I used to be young, happy, clever, I used to be able to think and frame clever ideas, the present and the future seemed to me full of hope. Why do we, almost before we have begun to live, become dull, grey, uninteresting, lazy, apathetic, useless, unhappy.... This town has already been in existence for two hundred years and it has a hundred thousand inhabitants, not one of whom is in any way different from the others. There has never been, now or at any other time, a single leader of men, a single scholar, an artist, a man of even the slightest eminence who might arouse envy or a passionate desire to be imitated. They only eat, drink, sleep, and then they die... more people are born and also eat, drink, sleep, and so as not to go silly from boredom, they try to make life many-sided with their beastly backbiting, vodka, cards, and litigation. The wives deceive their husbands, and the husbands lie, and pretend they see nothing and hear nothing, and the evil influence irresistibly oppresses the children and the divine spark in them is extinguished, and they become just as pitiful corpses and just as much like one another as their fathers and mothers....
At the end, the garrison is transferred to Poland; and the three sisters have resolved to soldier on in their own way, perhaps even irrespective of happiness.
Reading Chekhov could be like a cold bath on an icy day. But there is something in his stories and plays that reminds us that happiness does not come to us as the result of the fulfillment of pipe dreams. It may not come to us at all. No one ever told us that life was going to be fair....more
Sherlock Holmes and Watson are surely immortals. Here, in these dramatic recreations by Frank Morlock, they interact with such well-known literary andSherlock Holmes and Watson are surely immortals. Here, in these dramatic recreations by Frank Morlock, they interact with such well-known literary and historical figures as Fantomas, Dracula, Lord Ruthven, Teddy Roosevelt, Lincoln Steffens, Queen Victoria, and the narrator of "The Telltale Heart." The longest piece is the title play, Sherlock Holmes and the Grand Horizontals.
Although none of the plays will give Conan Doyle any cause for anxiety, they are all of them amusing and well constructed. I am confused only by the mention of a flashlight in "The Silent Treatment." I am sure no device by that name existed during the supposed lifetime of the denizens of 221b Baker Street....more
Anton Chekhov's plays are so dense with the aura of disappointment that it is difficult to summarize them. Here we have a country estate which is runAnton Chekhov's plays are so dense with the aura of disappointment that it is difficult to summarize them. Here we have a country estate which is run by Ivan and Sonia, unmarried brother and sister, for the benefit of their selfish father, the now retired Professor Serebryakov and his young wife. Ivan loves Serebryakov's twentyish wife Yelena; and Sonia, Doctor Astrov, who is in turn also in love with Yelena and thoroughly tired of her aging husband's hypochondria.
Even Astrov realizes that his love for Yelena, in addition to being immoral, is morally suspect:
In a human being everything ought to be beautiful: face, dress, soul, thoughts. She [Yelena] is very beautiful, there's no denying it, but all she does is eat, sleep, go for walks, fascinate us all by her beauty and -- nothing more. Other people work for her. Isn't that so? And an idle life cannot be pure.
Be that as it may, that doesn't stop Astrov, Ivan, and Sonia from feeling trapped by their longings. Why? Because no one's perfect.
As for Yelena herself, she is exasperated not only with her husband, but with the two men who are chasing her and with herself as well. ...more
I had heard of Frank J Morlock from our joint participation in the Yahoo! French Literature Group. The Marquis de Sade's Justine is probably his mostI had heard of Frank J Morlock from our joint participation in the Yahoo! French Literature Group. The Marquis de Sade's Justine is probably his most approachable work. Morlock does a good job of turning it into a short play about a young woman who is pathologically virtuous in a world where everyone wants to use or abuse her, much like the old "Little Annie Fanny" comic strip in Playboy magazine. It was at one and the same time true to Sade and to its genre, though it might present difficulties to someone trying to stage the play....more
I had read this many years ago, remembering nothing after the passage of time. Upon rereading, I find it is an interesting comment on our own times. UI had read this many years ago, remembering nothing after the passage of time. Upon rereading, I find it is an interesting comment on our own times. Unlike most of William Shakespeare's history plays, the eponymous king, Henry VI, is a mere stripling who has not yet come into his own. Most of the action takes place in France, where England is losing many of its territories won in the Hundred Years War as a result of divisions in the ranks: between the White Rose of the Duke of York and the Red Rose of Lancaster (here represented by Somerset), and between Bishop (later Cardinal) Winchester and everyone else.
Henry VI, Part 1 is not one of the Bard's major plays, yet it is a well crafted study of how disunity leads to loss. I can almost imagine the U.S.'s own culture wars as I hear these words from Gloucester:
Confounded be your strife, And perish ye with your audacious prate! Presumptuous vassals, are you not ashamed With this immodest clamorous outrage To trouble and disturb the king and us? And you, my lords, methinks you do not well To bear with their perverse objections, Much less to take occasion from their mouths To raise a mutiny betwixt yourselves. Let me persuade you to take a better course. (IV:1.123-132)
Another item of interest is the character of Joan of Arc, here called Joan la Pucelle, with its pun of the meanings of virgin and whore. Shakespeare deals with her as if she were one of Macbeth's Weird Sisters, with inspiration more from below than from above.
It has been a long time since I had run any of Anton Chekhov's plays, but after I read his long short story "The Steppe" while on vacation, I wanted tIt has been a long time since I had run any of Anton Chekhov's plays, but after I read his long short story "The Steppe" while on vacation, I wanted to take another look. We are sometimes so cowed by Tolstoyevsky -- as my late mother called him -- that we ignore that there are other Russian writers who are just as great.
The central symbol in The Seagull is, of course, the dead seagull. I can imagine high school teachers making much of this, but I don't think one can assign any cut-and-dried meaning to the dead seagull. In the play, we are confronted with a group of characters who are far from comfortable in their own skin. Nobody seems to be what he or she wants to become. And when, in the course of the play, they do manage to become what they wanted, they become dissatisfied and drawn back to the scene where we originally met them.
The seagull is a bird usually found by the ocean, but the play takes place by an inland lake. The men and women meeting at Sorin's country estate would love to soar, but in their own ways, all are shot down like the seagull. In the end, the seagull has been stuffed by a taxidermist and has become a ridiculous reminder of crushed aspirations.
A wonderful play, with a keen appreciation of the ways people become dissatisfied with their lives and one another....more
It is odd that the oldest intact works from ancient Rome are the plays of Plautus. If you have never read any of his work, the closest you can get isIt is odd that the oldest intact works from ancient Rome are the plays of Plautus. If you have never read any of his work, the closest you can get is a modern work based on them: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum. It is a world of ne'er-do-wells, uppity slaves, bragging soldiers -- all comic characters roughly based on the New Comedy of the Greek Menander. Some scholars think that Plautus is merely translating originals from the Greek, but we'll never know because very little of the works of New Comedy have survived.
As for Plautus: Mostellaria, it is rather innocuous to a modern reader. We have a father who has gone to Egypt for several years and a son who has used his father's money to free a slave girl with the intention of marrying her -- all aided and abetted by the slave Tranio. When the father comes back, all hell breaks loose.
Even in William Shakespeare's minor plays can the reader descry a certain magnificence, accompanied by a glory of language that no writer today can maEven in William Shakespeare's minor plays can the reader descry a certain magnificence, accompanied by a glory of language that no writer today can match. The Arden edition I read was almost as insistent in its footnotes as one of the Variorum editions of the Bard, but past the first scenes, the main text carried me along; and I did not have to refer to the copious footnotes unless I ran into too strange a usage.
Timon of Athens - Arden Shakespeare is a rather simple story which can be summarized in a single sentence: A wealthy patron gives his all, but imprudently donates himself into dire poverty, and finding himself unable to borrow from the friends he has enriched, becomes a misanthrope in the wilds.
But there are three characters who make Timon of Athens more than a straight up-and-down tragedy in a minor key. First there is Alcibiades, who while not a beneficiary of Timon's generosity, is a true friend. Then there is the philosopher Apemantus, who mocked Timon while he was wealthy, and now mocks him when he is a hermit. Finally, there is Timon's honest steward, whose goodness runs contrary to most of the other characters, even Alcibiades and Apemantus.
Then there is the language:
Live loath'd, and long, Most smiling, smooth, detested parasites, Courteous destroyers, affable wolves, meek bears, You fools of fortune, trencher-friends, time's flies, Cap-and-knee slaves, vapours, and minute-jacks! Of man and beast the infinite malady Crust you quite o'er!
And then again:
Come not to me again; but say to Athens, Timon has made his everlasting mansion Upon the beached verge of the salt flood, Who once a day with his embossed froth The turbulent surge shall cover.
Perhaps this is not Hamlet or Lear or Macbeth, but it is nonetheless truly wondrous. ...more
This little bagatelle of Shaw's premiered in 1918, shortly after the Bolshevik takeover in Russia. Except that Russia is never named in the play: It iThis little bagatelle of Shaw's premiered in 1918, shortly after the Bolshevik takeover in Russia. Except that Russia is never named in the play: It is Beotia, lately controlled by the Panjandrum of that country. We are on the front lines of World War One with two Beotian officers, the senior of whom is still in his heart loyal to the cause of the deposed Panjandrum. The news reaches him that Annajanska, the Grand Duchess and daughter of the Panjandrum, has become a revolutionary. She is brought before him and cleverly manipulates him into listening to her.
Much is made of the many cliques of the Revolution, and how it is so difficult to know to whom to submit one's reports from the Front.
It's worth reading this one-act play if for no other reason than to see how the Russian Revolution impacted on the English, and particularly one Irish wit....more
I read a translation of this play into English. Cocteau's film version is so great that I was greatly disappointed to see how little the original playI read a translation of this play into English. Cocteau's film version is so great that I was greatly disappointed to see how little the original play had in common with it. There were no scenes in that strange underworld in the film, and the character of death (the great Maria Casares in the film version) seems even a little insipid.
On the other hand, Orpheus, Eurydice, and Heurtebise are recognizably the same. ...more
For years, I thought was familiar with Night of the Iguana, but it seems I was remembering only bits and pieces of the John Huston film, which is veryFor years, I thought was familiar with Night of the Iguana, but it seems I was remembering only bits and pieces of the John Huston film, which is very different. It was even more reinforced in my mind because I had visited Mismaloya Beach, the area south of Puerto Vallarta where the film was shot. In the end, I wound up liking the original play better, because of the touching relationship between the defrocked minister, Larry Shannon, and Hannah Jelkes. I particularly loved Shannon's description of God as a senile delinquent:
Yeah, this angry, petulant old man. I mean he's represented like a bad-tempered childish old, old, sick, peevish man -- I mean like the sort of old man in a nursing home that's putting together a jigsaw puzzle and can't put it together and gets furious at it and kicks over the table. Yes, I tell you they do that, all our theologies do it -- accuse God of being a cruel senile delinquent, blaming the world and brutally punishing all he created for his own faults in construction....
In that remote Mexican hotel overlooking the Pacific Ocean, Shannon goes mad, by bits and pieces, while Hannah tries to keep him together. All the time this is happening, Maxine, the owner of the hotel, wants Shannon for herself. Having known him from other visits during which he had breakdowns, she is willing to take the chance and wants a someone to replace her deceased husband Fred.
This is not Williams's best play by any means, but it is interesting enough that I would love to see a live performance of it. ...more
It's been a while since I've read any of Tennessee Williams's plays. As I finished the last act, I realized that his was not a gossamer reputation: ThIt's been a while since I've read any of Tennessee Williams's plays. As I finished the last act, I realized that his was not a gossamer reputation: There is something real about that sad, strange outsider who recognizes the same qualities in his readers. It has been quoted many times before, but Chance Wayne's closing lines as he faces the punishment for his many offenses encapsulates perfectly what Williams is all about:
I don't ask for your pity, but just for your understanding—not even that—no. Just for your recognition of me in you, and the enemy, time, in us all.
It was a brilliant touch to have the transgressive young stud Chance traveling with a washed up actress named Alexandra del Lago. In the play, both characters arrive at differently forking life paths, one positive, the other not.
A delightful short play about the visit of a very proper English officer to the court of Catherine the Great. The latter engages in some amusing loveA delightful short play about the visit of a very proper English officer to the court of Catherine the Great. The latter engages in some amusing love play with the captain (whose fiancée is with him in St. Petersburg), then moves on to other things as her imperial prerogative dictates....more
**spoiler alert** This play is short, sweet, and ineffably sad. The main (and only character) is Krapp, described by Samuel Beckett as "a wearish old**spoiler alert** This play is short, sweet, and ineffably sad. The main (and only character) is Krapp, described by Samuel Beckett as "a wearish old man" with "black narrow trousers too short for him." His only occupation seems to be replaying old audio tapes about his former life, and taking time out by running offstage, popping corks, and evidently imbibing large quantities of various potables.
In Krapp's Last Tape, we hear a portion of the tape that is identified in his capacious ledgers as box three, spool five. It tells of his breakup with his girlfriend some thirty years ago. The description of their act of love is, befitting its author, simple and touching: "I lay down across her with my face in her breasts and my hand on her. But under us all moved, and moved us, gently, up and down, and from side to side."
On one hand, Krapp says of his former self: "[H]ard to believe I was ever as bad as that. Thank God that's all done with anyway." And yet he is visibly touched as he quotes fragments of his old self. And finally, and finally:
Perhaps my best years are gone. When there was a chance of happiness. But I wouldn't want them back. Not with the fire in me now. No, I wouldn't want them back.
Like hell he wouldn't. And that is the sad fact....more
A pleasant, if unlikely diversion involving con men pretending to be noble, a husband and wife fiercely unhappy in their marriage, a captive French coA pleasant, if unlikely diversion involving con men pretending to be noble, a husband and wife fiercely unhappy in their marriage, a captive French count, a passel of highwaymen, and a deux ex machina brother. Not too much to be said except that the writing is spritely. ...more
This collection contains all eleven of Aristophanes' surviving comedies. Nowhere else are you likely to discover what the Athenian Man in the Street iThis collection contains all eleven of Aristophanes' surviving comedies. Nowhere else are you likely to discover what the Athenian Man in the Street is thinking during the Peloponnesian War. At one point, in Plutus, we have a list of the things that the average Athenian craved the most. They included, in order: loaves, literature, sweets, honor, cheesecakes, manliness, dried figs, ambition, barley meal, command, and pea soup.
The two main themes that run across the comedies are a strong desire for peace (The Acharnians and Peace) and women taking over because the men have made such a hash of things (Lysistrata and Ecclesiazusae). Socrates is taken down a peg in The Clouds; and we learn that making all good men wealthy can have untoward side-effects in Plutus. We hear men, women, gods, servants, housebreakers, scroungers, and even birds speak their minds.
I wish there were more current translations in this collection, which was first published in 1962, but, unfortunately, that is not likely in today's book-publishing environment. Still, the collection is edited by Moses Hadas, one of the great classicists of yesteryear. And old translations can be just as readable as newer ones, even if the language is more archaic.
If you have any interest in ancient Greece, this is a collection you must own and dip into from time to time, if for no other reason than to remind you that the men and women of Periclean Athens were human beings, just like you and me. ...more