Great content, all about the normalcy of the variety of human emotions; great art (from a local St. Paul artist!) and lots of opportunity for creativeGreat content, all about the normalcy of the variety of human emotions; great art (from a local St. Paul artist!) and lots of opportunity for creative outloud reading. ...more
Great story, mini-example where two actors who seem to be in a zero-sum game are able to change their paradigm into a win-win. Also, is warm and sweetGreat story, mini-example where two actors who seem to be in a zero-sum game are able to change their paradigm into a win-win. Also, is warm and sweet and the pictures and lovely and it's completely wonderful!...more
My daughter just brought up the story of the Mom who names all her sons Dave the other day! She was like - remember, Mom? I was thinking about the spoMy daughter just brought up the story of the Mom who names all her sons Dave the other day! She was like - remember, Mom? I was thinking about the sports figure who gave his 5 sons the same name, and was like, "Dave? I thought it was something else." But this is what she was talking about.. so it stuck with her! And sneetches.. what can I say. Quintessential, now for this content to reach the adults as necessary! Sigh.....more
Read it, loved it. It starts out happy and fun, then things go wrong (which kids enjoy, it's practically slapstick), then there is a decision (which kRead it, loved it. It starts out happy and fun, then things go wrong (which kids enjoy, it's practically slapstick), then there is a decision (which kids can understand) and an excellent resolution. Speaks well against the escape mentality, so has great message-content besides being a pleasurable experience. ...more
I've had this for a long time, put off reading it for a long time, now I think it's getting to be time to face it. Partly because of the change in theI've had this for a long time, put off reading it for a long time, now I think it's getting to be time to face it. Partly because of the change in the US at this moment, I feel we have stopped our march toward a reality too-similar to that of this book. I feel I can breath a bit more now, but also am curious to read this for comparison to here and to elsewheres that also may be closer to this book's contents than any of us would like to realize....more
This book for me was relatively excruciating. Partly because Charlie is so vulnerable, and I resonate uncomfortably (and especially did back then), anThis book for me was relatively excruciating. Partly because Charlie is so vulnerable, and I resonate uncomfortably (and especially did back then), and also because the idea of loosing ones intellectual facilites is nearly unbearable. Is very powerfully written....more
I was assigned this during my later (of only a few years) German language class.. read it and re-read it and re-read it. To have such a play as this bI was assigned this during my later (of only a few years) German language class.. read it and re-read it and re-read it. To have such a play as this be used for such a purpose is - some would say - twisted; but we contextualized it and it was great. I really have a fondness for it, both for itself and for the journey that I went through with it. It's basically that one piece of German literature which I actually understand - in German! A treasure.....more
foreign-related; also loss-of-self for integrated wholeness, very interesting! I wonder if loss-of-self includes temporary normal episodes such as escforeign-related; also loss-of-self for integrated wholeness, very interesting! I wonder if loss-of-self includes temporary normal episodes such as escape into reading/film/ etc.. as well as travel/at-home-travel (i.e. huge storm, for instance); I've always felt that those sorts of things caused one's essence to be more anchored....more
Sounds like something applicable not only to the writing I hope to do some day, but also to best crafting of one's approach to life.. depending on beiSounds like something applicable not only to the writing I hope to do some day, but also to best crafting of one's approach to life.. depending on being able to follow along adequately, of course....more
Ok, I've fully digested 'A Fine Balance' now, and teeter-tottered back and forth regarding the truth vs. NRI-sourced etc.. issues raised by it accordiOk, I've fully digested 'A Fine Balance' now, and teeter-tottered back and forth regarding the truth vs. NRI-sourced etc.. issues raised by it accordingly. And I'm ready to go back and this time start with his first novel. Perhaps this will lead finally to Midnight's Children even?
Really great. Will try and write review soon.....more
Actually sounds very interesting, is about understanding people who commit crime, and it's very deconstructionist. About 'understanding' a person, itActually sounds very interesting, is about understanding people who commit crime, and it's very deconstructionist. About 'understanding' a person, it talks about the various meanings of that - that mostly people mean 'to have empathy with a person' when they say that, but the interest of this book is to 'have knowledge of' and in particular 'to predict the activity of', and that having empathy for or appreciation for is often useless in predicting the activity. Talks about the uselessness of knowing 'why' someone does something, about reasons for action, cause of action, motive for action all being distinct often, and that there can be other factors such as one's environment (people doing something in a survival situation that they would never do otherwise), and internal factors such as one's mental state. Now I'm starting chapter 3, and it's all about continuities (of behavior) and contingencies; and talks about prophecy, forecast and prediction. Perfect tie-in with Macbeth! Anyway, I'll try not to keep writing about every aspect of every page, but it is very interesting! So the three uses of this book all appeal - understanding the behavior of people who commit crimes in interacting with the justice system (cause that's what the nonprofit I work at does), understanding criminal behavior in order to avoid being a victim of it (cause victimhood doesn't appeal), and understanding - more broadly - human behavior for those who would write fiction (cause someday I'd like to). Plus the style is interesting, part deconstructionist, part psychology (study of individual behavior), and part sociology (study of group behavior). Is kind of a sherbet course between other flavors..
The other thing I am hoping to get some shards of insight on is the behavior of riots/mobs of people/terrorists, and 'leaders' who set into motions such action, and the other related entities who are within close contact of either group....more
This review may contain spoilers, I didn’t check that box because it isn’t really that kind of book. However if you’re a readLove and Marriage: Review
This review may contain spoilers, I didn’t check that box because it isn’t really that kind of book. However if you’re a reader who likes to know things only via the author, and beforehand to know only what’s on the book covers, you probably don’t want to read this.
This novel of a family tapestry woven with many threads including those of terrorism will impact you not due to the intensely sensational nature but instead due to it’s quiet intensity. The aspects of terrorism are some of the most intensely quiet moments of this book, certainly by conscious design.
The book is very tightly structured, reminiscent of a vise - or a straight-jacket; the tone is flat and dry which forms a smooth surface for the wildly dramatic and turbulent content. I will try and keep my review free of excess emotion/words etc.. in response.
My interpretation of the structure of this novel is that it mirrors the structure imposed on a family by those individuals who make certain life choices. Like when a person chooses a military career, or to be in the police forces, or to be a politician, or to an extent to be a doctor - the family of that person is affected. There is a discipline imposed, a set of actions that are prohibited, a set of actions that are required. There is a format that is imposed - these things happen repeatedly and always this way, those things never happen. The structure of this book - very short chapters, everything told, but told minimally so that what is told does the showing to an extent, voice that is not always clear who it belongs to - requires the reader to adapt in a way perhaps similar to how the family adapts to their life structure.
In this book, a question is asked: is the choice to become a terrorist similar in these ways to the choice to be on the police force or in the military? Can a choice to be a terrorist be valid, if made earnestly and with the best intentions? Of the answer to that were yes, would it still be yes over any range of actions? Or only over certain actions? What about the family of a terrorist - are they still a family? Do the same family-rules apply about love and loyalty and keeping secrets and following rules? How does forgiveness work at the end of such a life?
I feel like at this point I should include a disclaimer of some sort - I don’t agree with this idea, or I don’t feel that way. But I’m not, because this isn’t about me, it’s my review of the work of someone else. She has included in her text all that she wanted to in that vein, any of my own feelings are irrelevant. And would violate the discipline (my German talking, a different word is probably more true) and the rules that are bound in with this book.
This is a piece of fiction, a novel; presented as a memoir of a family from the point of view of a member of that family. That creates also a great deal more work for the reader, as information is presented in a order and a format that is not conducive to rational thought or analysis.. For instance, the struggle of the Tamil Tigers is at first presented as having been triggered by a certain event, then later on more is said about the beginning that might color a person’s perceptions differently. That choice of the author also could be a suggestion about life in such a family - that incomplete information is often all one receives. Reading this actually coincided for me with working in a place in which I never received all relevant information about anything. There, as in this family (or atleast as a reader) the choice is available to feel less in response - knowing that if you knew more, you might feel differently. So in order to feel incorrectly / come to an incorrect conclusion, better sometimes to remain in suspended animation, withhold closure, stay detached. Of course, that detached state makes it easier to do as one is asked without being conflicted also.
This book explores:
Love-Marriages and Arranged-Marriages, Proper Marriages and Improper Marriages, and love: the choices and securities and risks involved with each and whether or not there are other kinds. Human will and personality and self, constructions of paradigms of self. The Asian diaspora experience: living in North America with people who aren’t aware of your home country, being different (or being in an enclave and then the same), much more. Family relationships and emotions: in particular the complexities and power of them. The Asian residence-at-place-of-birth experience, village life and rituals and customs, discrimination and injustice as well as internal community workings in all their variety. Terrorism: both exhaustively and incompletely; due to it being voiced as a family member and the terrorist himself. That choice of voice allows for freedom to leave out aspects and go in depth particularly according to choice. A lot of challenging content, with particulars about Sri Lanka, the conflicts between the Tamils and the Sinhalese, and the Tamil Tigers (LTTE - the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, formerly the Tamil New Tigers). Children and growing up: what effect do the parents’ choices have? What freedom does a person have regarding their opinions/feelings about family history, homeland history and struggles? What about a person who has a family member very involved in a struggle - do they have the same choices then about their opinions/actions? Do they have fewer choices? When are they ok? Always? Only if they obey? Only if they feel inside the correct way? Only if they accept/understand/confirm with their lives the choices/actions of their parents/other family members? Communities with injustice: What is the best response of the group suffering injustice? Does anything work? If a government is brutal, are they ‘bad’ in the same way that terrorists are ‘bad’? More bad? Less bad? Madness.
Many of these subjects are universal, one interesting counterpoint regarding that last set about a child and their choices comes to mind in Freedom Writers, the book and film. It’s very very different situation of course. But the core comparison is between parents who choose their actions/lifestyle vs. parents who didn’t; and what basis that gives the kid for their decision-making as they come into adulthood.
Anyway, this is a rich and complex book which I’m almost certainly not doing justice to. If the topics explored are of interest, I’d encourage you to try it! ...more