2ND REREAD; APRIL 2014: NO CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW
1ST REREAD REVIEW - 14 FEBRUARY 2011 This is still a 4-star read the second time around. It would2ND REREAD; APRIL 2014: NO CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW
1ST REREAD REVIEW - 14 FEBRUARY 2011 This is still a 4-star read the second time around. It would have been five if not for the reasons Jenre mentioned in her excellent review. I was more aware of the power struggle between Aubrey and Seht this time and was delighted to find I was fully invested in it and wondered how these two uber-alphas would resolve the dilemma.
While I liked the resolution (I had totally forgotten that was how this book ended!), unless you're aware Lost Star is the prequel to Victorious Star, you will find the ending very abrupt. So I recommend that you have Victorious Star ready before you get to the end of LS. A friend was telling me she wants to read LS because it's MM but will pass on VS as it's MMF. While I understand perfectly her distaste for girl cooties spoiling the broth, it is a pity in this case because Seht's and Captain Ravnos' relationship in Victorious Star is a thing to behold, indeed. I myself refuse to read MM romances that have girl cooties - the Interstellar Service & Discipline books are the one and only exception.
I agree with Jenre that Seht isn't as developed as Aubrey here and that's a pity as I would have liked to know him better. We get to follow Aubrey closely but know nothing about how Seht grew up and what made him gravitate towards Aubrey and get attached to him so quickly. At least in those werewolf books I occasionally read, they have a mate out there they can sense. In this case, there's not enough about Skeldhi culture and nothing of Seht's past (or even his present) to help me understand his character.
Despite this, LS is a great intro to the IS&D series. I'll move on to Victorious Star now and hope that I won't wish Victoria were a Victor instead!
1ST REVIEW - 9 APRIL 2009: Lost Star felt short even though it's novel length but it did complete Victorious Star in that we now know what the history is between Aubrey Ravnos and Seht, the skeldhi prince.
It tells the story of how Seht met the young Aubrey when the latter was a young guy, I think six months shy of 21 and on the run from the Moribund Company. Aubrey was caught by the Imperial Agency for his hacking into ships and taking them for joyrides. The ship he's serving on in lieu of imprisonment commits suicide after its crew is killed. Yeah, this is Morgan Hawke book so ships are "alive". They rape and kill.
Aubrey finds himself taken by Moribund and his Company (M & Co appear in all the Star books) and manages to escape but the torture during his capture by Moribund has left Aubrey at the point of death. He manages to escape, though I'm not sure how long he was imprisoned by Moribund. Aubrey's age, at this point, is also uncertain coz he's referred to as "kid" several times.
Moribund's ship comes under attack by the Skeldhis and in the ensuing fracas, Aubrey escapes. Moribund's guys are out looking for Aubrey, of course, since he's an extremely valuable commodity due to his programs. Seht arrives on the scene just in time to save Aubrey from recapture but has to turn him into a rehkyt (a skeldhi's hybrid sex slave) in order to save him.
Seht finds himself deeply attached to the human Aubrey and is heart-broken when he is told Aubrey needs to be returned to the Imperial Agency. They are separated but reunited after a period of time when Seht refuses to give up searching for Aubrey. Only now, Aubrey is an adult and commander of his own ship. He prefers to be called Ravnos and is even more determined not to be Seht's slave since his priority is to destroy the Moribund Company, not become a skeldhi's pet.
Seht couldn't ever give Aubrey up and has been looking for him. It's obvious Aubrey is much more than just a pet to Seht but why, we do not know. Towards the end of the book the two ubver-alphas meet up again, for the final face-off. The fight ends with Seht agreeing to the only thing that will keep him with Aubrey for the rest of his life.
I'll have to read Victorious Star tonight! ...more
REVIEW OF REREAD NOV 2012: Six years after I first read this, my star rating is still a 3-star meh. In fact, I couldn't even be bothered to get halfwayREVIEW OF REREAD NOV 2012: Six years after I first read this, my star rating is still a 3-star meh. In fact, I couldn't even be bothered to get halfway because this time round, it did sound like chick lit. This time I couldn't find anything to enjoy because there was nothing to attract me to either MC - the heroine was bland and so was the hero and six years after the book was released, the online dating plot device is so old that the only thing that could have saved the story was if the MCs were interesting.
RG has been a hit or miss with me since this book. More miss than hit, unfortunately so there won't be anymore attempts to reread any of the other titles.
1ST READING REVIEW FEB 2006: I thought Gibson wrote chick lit so I stayed away until the synopsis for this book caught my attention. It had a hint of mystery in it so I decided to live dangerously and bought it.
Not chick lit at all though it's hard for me to actually define what that is. It's one of those things that I know when I see it, know what I mean? Anyway, SL&OD turned out to be an enjoyable contemporary romance with a tiny bit of mystery to spice things up. ...more
This book opened the way for me in my own journey. Took me a couple of years but, utilizing Greek mythology, I was able to devise a therapy for myselfThis book opened the way for me in my own journey. Took me a couple of years but, utilizing Greek mythology, I was able to devise a therapy for myself and with my therapist, the road to wholeness was an exciting, even delightful, one despite the inevitable emotional potholes along the way....more
REVIEW OF AUDIOBOOK & REREAD; JANUARY 2014 Narrator: Jennifer van Dyke
This did not work for me at all:(
The Narrator: van Dyke's voice for Chloe aREVIEW OF AUDIOBOOK & REREAD; JANUARY 2014 Narrator: Jennifer van Dyke
This did not work for me at all:(
The Narrator: van Dyke's voice for Chloe and the narrative portions was alright but - and it's a huge 'but'...I was pulled out of the story because it struck me I was getting agitated and breathless listening to the audiobook. I knew it was connected to the book but the story wasn't suspenseful or that exciting so I listened carefully and realized it was the narrator. Her breathing could be heard at intervals, audible enough so that her narrating comes off as if she's been jogging. It's not that loud, unlike the awful wheezing of Roy Wells who did the Victor Banis book, but it's throughout the book and made for very uncomfortable listening.
That, however, is nowhere as dreadful as the voice van Dyke gave Bastien. He sounded truly ghastly - all nasal and cartoonish with a French-accented English that made him sound more like Pepe Le Pew on a bad day. If there were a contest for worse audio characters, van Dyke's Bastien would win hands-down, IMO.
The Book: After five chapters, I remembered one of the reasons why this book didn't work the first time I read it - the dialogue was like something out of a British Mills & Boon romance, complete with virginalvirgin-like heroine and arrogant full-of-myself hero. I actually don't mind those type of characters so what made this book horrible for me was that it all came across very dated, the dialogue being the main culprit. Read the way it was, every word Bastien uttered made me cringe because he sounded not only theatrical and eye-rolling lame, van Dyke seemed to do her best to make him sleazy. One reviewer said the narrator made Bastien sound like a bad Dracula! LOL!
So it was a double-barreled thumbs-down for me: terribly dated dialogue and ghastly narrator. I'm going to have to return this. The rest of the book are narrated by a different people. Haven't decided if I want to try another AS, though.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- REVIEW OF BOOK; JULY 2005 I have never read this author before and I'm still trying to figure out how Black Ice got such rave reviews. Some unrealistic scenarios are to be expected in this genre but Black Ice is so implausible that it prevented me from enjoying any part of it.
Stuart makes Chloe Underwood sound more like a heroine from an early Mills & Boons novels. Think virgin schoolmarm on her first trip abroad and totally clueless about everything. Everything about her is inconsistent and I couldn't help but wonder if Ms Stuart bothered with Chloe's character at all.
Chloe is from a rich, over-achieving family and is multi-lingual. Yet Ms Stuart's portrayal makes her naive and stupid. Nothing wrong with the heroine not wanting to follow the footsteps of her family and become a doctor; nothing wrong with her choosing to work in a publishing company. But I found everything wrong with the author making her heroine bored silly with her career and not doing anything but mope about it.
As for Bastien, his only redeeming quality was in knocking Chloe out to keep the twit from making too much noise and alerting the villains. The romance never develops. Bastien is too busy trying to figure out if Chole is out to kill him and when he realises she is too stupid to be an assassin he is too busy trying to get her back home to the U.S.
As for the oh-so-dangerous villains, why would this group of powerful, dangerous and wealthy arms dealers hire an outsider to translate their discussions for them? Isn't it more plausible that they would have their own resident translator, someone who's part of the group or works for them? Instead they bring in a stranger then worry about whether she's a spy or an assassin!
There is absolutely no chemistry between Bastien and Chloe whatsoever. But how could there be when Chloe spends most of the time in a state of shock? If there's supposed to be sexual chemistry, I didn't see it much less feel it.
I've read books given glowing reviews and agreed with them mostly but this was one of the few I'm scratching my head over. Which is a pity because it had all the right ingredients for an erotic suspense - dangerous situation, dangerous group, dark hero, multilingual heroine with full breasts, romantic setting. But it turned out like one of my pathetic attempts at baking - all the right ingredients but the result is something even my dog wouldn't eat....more
I had given this trilogy 4 stars but that was based on my hazy memory of the books when I read them more than a decade ago.
I finished my reread last nI had given this trilogy 4 stars but that was based on my hazy memory of the books when I read them more than a decade ago.
I finished my reread last night and am giving it 3 stars. Not because it's an okay read but because I finished it. Maybe if this were an MM romance, I might have given it 4 stars, 3 1/2 at least. But I'm much more demanding of my MF romances.
I don't have any issues with Lucky. He is what he is - a womaniser, nice-guy, suffers from 'white-knight syndrome', as the heroine snidely puts it. I do have issues with Devon, however. Man, does that woman know how to carry on. I already hate stories with virgins who do that morning-after blues and groaned when I realized this was one of them. Sure, Devon had a very good reason for her post-coitus attitude - she's married - but it still made for very annoying reading. She remained unlikeable right to the very end of this very weak offering from Sandra Brown who, back in those days, was an autobuy.
I was planning to read the trilogy but this first book has changed my mind because, apart from having to encounter Devon in the next two books, 1) I don't like the idea of Marcie taking Tanya's place so soon after her I just read about her death; 2) Sage is irritating in the worst pain-in-the-ass way.
If I hadn't had the chance to meet Chase's wife, Tanya, and known how much in love she and Chase were with each other, I could have read it. As it is, even though Chase and Marcie's story takes place two years after Tanya's death, it's been only a few minutes for me. I assume when I first read Chase's book, it was a year after Lucky was published - enough time for this reader to let Tanya go but now, 20 years later on this intended back-to-back read, Not Possible.
As for Sage, she made me run back to MM so I'm now enjoying Mia Watt's Handcuffs & Lace series which I've been meaning to read for ages....more
REVIEW OF AUDIOBOOK; APRIL 27, 2015 Narrator: Joyce Bean
Aborting the audio at 50%. Why? Same reasons: flashbacks to Kendall's marriage was disruptive tREVIEW OF AUDIOBOOK; APRIL 27, 2015 Narrator: Joyce Bean
Aborting the audio at 50%. Why? Same reasons: flashbacks to Kendall's marriage was disruptive to the flow of the story. Thankfully, this style of telling a story isn't fashionable anymore because, as audiobooks become increasingly popular, flashbacks are pain to try and follow when there are no datelines for the narrator to read out, as in the case of The Witness.
It's a good thing I've already read this book (20 years ago, in mass paperback) so while I'd forgotten minute details, the main incidents were easily recollected once I started the book. Otherwise, I would have been even more annoyed when sometimes it took two or three paragraphs before I realized it was a flashback, and only because Kendall's husband, or her father-in-law was mentioned.
I did not like this book when I read it back in 1995 but I like rereading such oldies that didn't appeal back then just to see if my response to this book has changed. It hasn't. This second time around I still could not buy into why the amnesiac MC would choose to stick to Kendall like a leech and go on the run with her when I kept hearing he does not believe anything she's saying. It's a no-brainer (since this is a ROMANCE you're reading, that Amnesiac John is more than just someone who happened to be driving the car Kendall was in when it crashed. Of course John's identity is revealed later and then we understand why he acted the way he did at the start despite his amnesia but...oh, so ho-hum, this amnesia trope. It ought to be banned.
SB has much better books featuring 'dated' themes (Southern old boys behaving badly). Any one of them is better than The Witness....more