The hero and heroine themselves are quite nice, but good christ with the references to other books in Balogh's repertoire. There are portions that areThe hero and heroine themselves are quite nice, but good christ with the references to other books in Balogh's repertoire. There are portions that are nigh-unreadable if you are not intimately familiar with the entire Bedwyn saga, not only because their family tree is ludicrously convoluted with everyone having their own special backstory, but also because you have zero emotional attachment to all of these characters making cameo appearances in their happily ever afters. Apparently I had the same commentary on Simply Perfect five years ago, even as I totally didn't remember reading the book (or any of the characters) until goodreads reminded me. ...more
Put it down 10% in because of dickbag hero; picked it up again and enjoyed it in a procrastinatey manner. Then, about 65-70% in, I was committed enougPut it down 10% in because of dickbag hero; picked it up again and enjoyed it in a procrastinatey manner. Then, about 65-70% in, I was committed enough to keep reading but spent the rest of the book yelling at the heroine to tell the hero exactly how much of a giant dickbag he was being. To my surprise and moderate gratification, she did, as well as a couple of other well-executed put-downs. I just - ugh. This book is built around the conceit of the hero and heroine saying goodbye to each other (well, let's be honest - the heroine shutting the hero down) multiple times (for good reasons that even the hero acknowledges are good reasons) but both of them regretting the goodbye, and the way the author gets them back together repeatedly is to have the hero repeatedly say, occasionally even explicitly, "I don't believe in her no." Which no matter how much you know he's right, she doesn't actually want to not see him again, I just can't get on board with a hero who ignores the heroine's no (thankfully never sexually, and how low a standard is that to have?) and where the narrative actively supports him in that. Blergle. ...more
Delicious hurt/comfort, with a particular relish of the hero rescuing the heroine from a wretched situation and showering her with both material comfoDelicious hurt/comfort, with a particular relish of the hero rescuing the heroine from a wretched situation and showering her with both material comforts as well as the support and opportunity to reclaim her dignity - a particular weakness of mine. ...more
This is the book I wanted The Secret History to be. I vastly prefer Cassie to whateverhisnamewas as narrator, and this book satisfies my fondness forThis is the book I wanted The Secret History to be. I vastly prefer Cassie to whateverhisnamewas as narrator, and this book satisfies my fondness for both lyrical musings and messing about with genre structure....more
**spoiler alert** The hero in this book is even worse than the book before, but at least I've figured out why I keep reading these books so voraciousl**spoiler alert** The hero in this book is even worse than the book before, but at least I've figured out why I keep reading these books so voraciously: Ramsey does an excellent "I will hold myself together in the face of extreme provocation and not only maintain my dignity but make equally cutting remarks in return" heroine, which I do adore. It's just that the extreme provocation is usually coming from the villain, not the hero.
And again, it's like I see the idea of what Ramsey's going for, the various plot mechanisms she sets in place to create the particular kind of tension she wants between the hero and heroine, but it's like the impact of those mechanisms get brushed aside, and the implications of what it means to be a person who does that sort of thing is never addressed. By which I mean the hero. Always the hero. Always being a raging dickbag. This one, after what I'm sure is a thoroughly unpleasant jilting, spends the next ten years manipulating the heroine's finances in secret so that she is ultimately unwittingly ruinously in debt to him, which he offers to write off if she will do whatever he says, in or out of bed, for four months.
I'm sorry; that's a shitty thing to do, and even if it's done out of hurt and to cover over love, it still makes you a shitty person to do it.
And even as the author does explicitly address the consent issues inherent of all of this (because of course there are still sexytimes in this scheme), she never addresses the conflict between describing the hero as a person hellbent on the humiliation and ruination of the heroine as revenge while also describing him as a wonderful person passionately in love with the heroine. I just. He never once apologizes for the scheme, even after he calls it off, and, I don't know, I just want it more narratively recognized that he did a bad thing.
But man I enjoy the viciously self-protective heroine, even as I seriously question her taste in men. ...more
**spoiler alert** Engaging writing, and what was good was quite good, but I had to skim through some of the hero/heroine conflict/sexual tension scene**spoiler alert** Engaging writing, and what was good was quite good, but I had to skim through some of the hero/heroine conflict/sexual tension scenes that read as abusive behavior to me, and thus I was unsurprised when the hero stepped fully into that abusive behavior when it suited him more than the sexytimes. I get that Ramsey is trying to play with the power dynamic between the two of them, that what is turning them both on (what is meant to be turning the reader on) is the power shift, that she is doing her damnedest to write these two as equals, but when one member of the relationship can have the other declared insane and sent to an asylum, can legally destroy the other's life work, can hold the other prisoner/hostage by means of finance and the law, well. And then when you have the hero actually threaten those things, to acknowledge that he has that power and can use it at any time and she makes him want to hurt her, well well. That's not a power play to me; that's abuse of power. She can't play, because she has no choice.
Her writing is otherwise snappy, and I do love the heroine's relationships with her female friends having depth and impact (and repercussions), but this hero/heroine dynamic (which book one in the series hinted at, too) is emphatically Not For Me. Ramsey is competent enough to make me think that she knows what she's doing, that she is actually striving for this dynamic (as opposed to the alpha Rapey McRaperson heroes in days of yore), that she is trying to play with it, but I cannot let go of real world (ha) implications enough to appreciate this fantasy dynamic. A million dukes existing at the same time? Blatant violation of the ton? Sure, whatever. I just can't get into using the legal dominance of a husband over his wife both as a plot point and as a driver of sexytimes and not think the hero's a total dickbag by the end of it all. ...more