I picked this one up at a huge annual book sale for a dollar. After finishing it, I realized it was signed by the author - a fun little moment in my dI picked this one up at a huge annual book sale for a dollar. After finishing it, I realized it was signed by the author - a fun little moment in my day.
First things first. This is not a "board book." It was released by Pocket Books and is billed as "pocket horror." I debate that it is truly horror as well, but it would make a truly disturbing board book nonetheless. I would imagine that kids reading a board book based on this novel would have some particularly bad nightmares.
Second things second, the book is missing a synopsis, so in brief-
Best friends Lisa (young widow) and Casey (recent divorcee) decide to pair up on their second cookbook - one based on Medieval English recipes. To make sure their research is authentic, they decide to buy a place in England for two years while they complete it. Casey has some projects of her own to take care of, so Lisa goes to England to find a place for them. She ends up enamored of a fairly creepy old English house/priory rumored to be cursed and the "horror" unfolds.
And third things third, my thoughts.
If this had been billed as mystery rather than horror, I would have liked it better. My expectations were leaning towards the spine-tingling, so the mild creepiness that ensued was a bit underwhelming. Also, there were several subplots knitted into the story for unknown reasons. That said, I did not dislike the way Wasser wrote the majority of the characters, her description was excellent, and I really enjoyed the fact that she included bits of medieval recipes and herb lore at the beginning of each chapter. I think if I had been expecting something different to begin with, this would have been a more satisfying novel to me. For anyone pondering the possibility of reading of this, think cozy English mystery, not crazy, jaw-dropping horror. ...more
One of the things that has always annoyed me about authors is when they start every sentence in with the same thing (i.e., "She_____." She_____" She__One of the things that has always annoyed me about authors is when they start every sentence in with the same thing (i.e., "She_____." She_____" She____."). It appears that this sort of thing irritates Morton as well. In order to avoid this, she has decided to instead simply truncate the pronoun from the sentence entirely. So far, this has led to quite a few incomplete sentences (which is OK in the case of a character speaking, but we are talking basic narration here), and it is driving me batty.
I will soldier on anyway....
...and I am exceedingly glad that I did. The incomplete sentences notwithstanding, I really enjoyed this novel.
The basic crux of the novel is this:
Nell is found at age four on a pier in Australia with only a child's suitcase containing a few personal items including book of fairy tales. She is taken in and raised by loving parents, and forgets the truth of her early childhood until years later when her father tells her how she was found. This prompts her(and later her granddaughter) to search for the truth of what happened. Morton does a first class job of spinning an intensely complicated tale - in fact, I imagine she probably had to finish this book with an outline sitting directly next to her computer - and I found myself staying up late and arriving early at bus-stops simply to have more reading time at my disposal. The narration is peppered with lyrical descriptions and broken up by periodic fairy tales (which makes absolute sense in the context of the novel).
From a personal standpoint, it took me some time to get into the novel. Aside from the sentence issue, I found it hard to believe that a girl who grew up in a completely loving, wonderful family would be unable to function as a young adult because she finds out that she is not their biological child. I have known too many happily adopted children who have no interest in finding their birth parents. But without this inner drive, there would be no story, so I let it slide and found myself able to really relate to the main characters.
My one caveat here for other readers is that if you dislike novels that jump back and forth through time, skip this. The Forgotten Garden bounds around in time more than any other book I have encountered (see my comment about the necessary outline above). ...more
I love Kate Atkinson. If I ever meet her, I will squeal like a school girl at a Beatles concert and proceed to make a general fool out of myself askinI love Kate Atkinson. If I ever meet her, I will squeal like a school girl at a Beatles concert and proceed to make a general fool out of myself asking for an autograph. This still can't quite touch my personal favorites (Emotionally Weird and Human Croquet), but anything Atkinson touches is still worth every word on its pages. Bravo, and for the sake of all that is good in this world, encore....more
The premise of Labyrinth is not bad: Alice Tanner volunteers on an archaeological dig in France and finds a cave with a grave, a labyrinth that looksThe premise of Labyrinth is not bad: Alice Tanner volunteers on an archaeological dig in France and finds a cave with a grave, a labyrinth that looks "wrong," a leather bag, and a ring. It takes a long time for the significance of these objects to be explained, and even longer for any sort of resolution begins to show a glimmering face. The other main character, Alais, is learning the truth of these same objects in the early 13th century (both women are monumentally annoying in their blind trust of people and their inability to help themselves in any situation).
This basic premise is riddled with inane details (the waking habits of characters on repeated occasions, for example), and similies. After dozens of chapters outlining everything at a crawling pace, it seems as though Mosse realized how long her book was getting and threw in a huge chunk of exposition that spans a good twenty-plus years of the life of Alais. The last part of the book is almost frenzied with the amount of action being crammed in, and the resolution leaves holes in the reader's understanding (plenty is spelled out for you, but what isn't comes entirely to the reader's own supposition).
And yet Mosse is not a horrible author. Her descriptions are exceedingly well-written, and the basic plot is well researched. It is almost as if she had this idea and began writing--and then The DaVinci Code was released--it is the same fate that awaits anyone writing a novel about wizards in a post-Harry Potter world. The comparisons are bound to be drawn, and I can feel for Mosse in that respect.
It is often said that all stories have already been written, and that all we have now are reproductions and twists on old themes. I think that is what went on here, and again I feel for Mosse. Common traditional themes will inevitably give rise to similar plots, and in the end, it comes down to who you think wrote it the best. My opinion? I honestly don't know anymore. I just recently finished The Eight by Katherine Neville (which was similar in plot), and have a sneaking suspicion that I would have rated this higher if my memory of that book was not so fresh.
So leaving aside all comparisons, to summarize I will say this. Mosse writes vivid and engaging description, her research is well done, but is slightly marred so many similies....more
This book illicits a lot of comparisons to the Da Vinci Code, but it has to be said that Neville wrote this in 1988. The plot is amazing...intricate,This book illicits a lot of comparisons to the Da Vinci Code, but it has to be said that Neville wrote this in 1988. The plot is amazing...intricate, steeped in history, surprising, etc. The characters are a little one-dimensional, and the "love story" subplots feel a bit like they were thrown in for the sake of being there. The writing is not completely simplistic, but neither is it spectacular. All in all, I was very glad that the plot was so amazing...otherwise I might have been miffed at buying this one.
Despite beating Dan Brown to the thriller-spanning-centuries punch, the comparison is not completely unwaranted. I will say if you have read the Da Vinci Code, you will most likely enjoy this one too (I actually liked it better)....more
Stewart's writing here is as poetic as ever as far as setting, but in the end that seemed to be the only point of reading the novel. I would only loosStewart's writing here is as poetic as ever as far as setting, but in the end that seemed to be the only point of reading the novel. I would only loosely call this one a mystery, as there is very little of it to be found, and what there is requires no effort, on the part of the characters or the part of the reader, to figure out....more
John Connolly has one of the craziest literary minds out there....several of these stories (The Cancer Cowboy Rides, The Inkpot Monkey, The Inn at ShiJohn Connolly has one of the craziest literary minds out there....several of these stories (The Cancer Cowboy Rides, The Inkpot Monkey, The Inn at Shillingford) disturbed me to no end. However, it is a good batch of thriller-chiller stories, extremely well-suited for reading during gathering storms, curled on a sofa, scaring the wits out of yourself as you drink something warm. Keep this one around and re-read it when you need a good "X-Files" sort of feeling....more