Patrick Brown Patrick's Comments (member since Feb 22, 2010)

Patrick's comments from the Goodreads Feedback group.

(showing 141-160 of 909)

1 I'm so sorry that you lost your comments and likes. That's absolutely a drag, and we wish we could've avoided it. Unfortunately, those malware issues are fairly serious and require very swift action from us. More than two days notice is not possible. They make the entire book page unnavigable for as long as they are on the site, so they need to be removed ASAP.
Aug 30, 2012 01:37PM

1 If you have concerns about a specific user, please email them to support. Posting in the feedback group about specific users you think are suspicious is inappropriate.
Aug 17, 2012 04:08PM

1 I think this thread has served its purpose. We are aware of the arguments against our review guidelines policy. Restating them isn't going to accomplish anything. If anyone has a new perspective they'd like to offer on this, feel free to open a new thread. But please note that new threads that continue with the hostile posts against fellow Goodreads members will not last long. If you want to complain about our policy, feel free, but please keep it friendly.
Aug 17, 2012 02:20PM

1 Guys, please keep it civil. Thanks.
Aug 16, 2012 02:38PM

1 Paula wrote: "Which part of it do you think supports your case?

You also need to bear in mind that this is not up to date and other decisions are currently documented in the Librarians group"

One of the many reasons this conversation would be better held in the Librarians group, as well. I'm going to close this thread. If you want to bring it up in that group, please feel free.
Aug 15, 2012 02:03PM

1 Bookwatcher ~Mary MooCow~ wrote: "You offer willaful the possibility to write you a PM, and you will tell willaful which and if a review is hidden. Can I do the same? I want to know it too."

Yes, that offer is for anybody. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Aug 15, 2012 11:52AM

1 Madame X wrote: "I do, however, think a little bit more transparency on this subject is in order. For example: if they're deprioritizing reviews for being "controversial", that's really problematic to me. Ditto if they're deprioritizing for being negative."

We are not doing that in any way. Period.
Aug 15, 2012 11:29AM

1 willaful wrote: "Given that staff has to be involved anyway, there is no legitimate reason for GoodReads not to notify people if their review is hidden. The only plausible reason for this policy is because they're ..."

Good suggestion. We can do this moving forward. For reviews you've already written, feel free to send me a PM and I'll let you know if you have any reviews that aren't being displayed on the community book page, and if so, which ones.

@Lisa: "2. Re authors: While it's fine to mention Goodreads groups as a place to talk about their books, it's crucial they be told they must read all group rules and introductory posts, and check all the threads, before they post as anybody other than a Goodreads' reader. Every group has different rules for authors, including sometimes specific places for author promotion posts, and some groups allow for absolutely no author promotions."

Also a good suggestion. That's in all of our existing messaging to authors right now except the guidelines, so it should go there, too. I'll make a ticket to add a note to check individual group rules.

On a more general note, please note that it doesn't matter if we receive a thousand flags on a review. If it passes the guidelines, it will be shown on the book page. That aspect of the system is not "game-able," as some have been suggesting.

Thanks again for the feedback, everyone!
Aug 13, 2012 08:18PM

1 Please ask any questions/make any suggestions you have in the existing guidelines thread. Thanks.
Aug 13, 2012 08:17PM

1 For simplicity's sake, please just ask your questions in the existing thread.
Aug 13, 2012 08:16PM

1 We don't need separate threads for each of these. Please just post your suggestions in the current thread.
fake accounts (56 new)
Aug 13, 2012 12:04PM

1 Jessica wrote: "I have another author I suspect has added some dummy accounts. I messaged Patrick several weeks ago about it, but haven't heard anything. Is there someone else I should message?"

Sorry Jessica, I didn't see your message for some reason. I'm looking into those accounts now, and they will also probably be deleted.
Aug 13, 2012 10:53AM

1 BunWat wrote: "Thank you for responding, Patrick. Can you tell us anything about procedures for notifying people if their reviews are going to be removed or hidden? Many - myself included - would like to know. I ..."

Good question. We are going to add a note that will show at the top of the review page to the person who wrote it, but we're not going to create a notification or direct message for it. There's two reasons for this. One, more than 99.999% of reviews are showing on the community book page right now. So it is exceedingly rare for that not to be the case. Creating a notification for something that happens so rarely is not feasible.

Two, we assume most people will go back to their review page at least once or twice after posting it (I realize this doesn't help people who want to know whether any of their old reviews aren't showing on the community book page, but going forward, it should make it easy to find out).
Aug 13, 2012 10:28AM

1 Thanks for the feedback, everyone. We had come company-wide business early last week that drew my attention elsewhere, so I apologize for the delay in responding.

Unfortunately, I can't really go through the thread and give a point-by-point response to every question. I did see someone wondering about people who shelve multiple editions to re-read something. That's fine and you've got nothing to worry about there. Our team is very, very good at figuring out what is someone "re-reading" and what is someone just trying to inflate or deflate a book's average rating.

I recognize that the phrase about "quality" sounds highly subjective, so we may look to rephrase that so it's clearer. What we're trying to say is that we are going to continue to curate the book page in the same way we have since the site was founded.

In the end, every flagged item is going to be looked at individually. This is how it's always been. We've always had to look at any given case and say "Is this over the line or not?" That hasn't changed. All we've done here is try to make the line as clear as possible. But of course it's always going to come down to our team's opinion of whether something is over the line or not.

Thanks again for your feedback, and sorry for the delayed response.
1 Thanks for reporting that. We'll take care of it.
1 This is the sort of customization that might be possible:

It's already offered to ad campaigns. It doesn't have any impact on how the reviews are sorted on the page or anything like that, it just lets the author or publisher feature a video or links more prominently and it removes competing advertising from the book page.
Aug 06, 2012 07:24PM

1 Thanks for the questions. With regards empty reviews where there are comments about the author...If a conversation starts about why you shelved a book a certain way, that shouldn't have any bearing on the review's status at all. If your post is just a "see comments" where you are essentially trying to get around the review filter, that's different. In the end, all of these are going to be looked at on a case-by-case basis by our team, so I can't say definitively that it will always be one way or the other.

Kaetrin wrote: "This is probably a stupid question but I'm going to ask it anyway. What do you mean by "commercial" as in "Commercial reviews are not allowed and will be deleted"?

That refers to pay-for-review services that authors sometimes pay for. We don't accept reviews from those services.

Ridley wrote: "I just want to say that your new guidelines emboldened the person(s) behind the Stop the GR Bullies site to redouble their efforts to intimidate and harass those of us they've targeted.

I'm sorry you feel that way, Ridley. That's not how we see it at all.
Aug 06, 2012 05:58PM

1 Okay, guidelines are up. Thanks for your patience. I'm going to close this thread, so if you want to discuss them, you can do so in the new thread.

One note: There will be a message that shows to the author of the review only that the review didn't pass our guidelines and isn't shown on the community book page, but it isn't ready yet.
Aug 06, 2012 05:56PM

1 Thank you to everyone who gave us feedback in the other thread. As promised, we’ve posted our review guidelines. These are the guidelines we’ve always used when looking at flagged reviews and evaluating whether they require action from us or not. What we’ve never done is make those guidelines public in an explicit way.

Please keep in mind that 99.96% of all reviews are never flagged for any reason. Of those that are flagged, each is carefully examined by a member of our team. And remember, we never delete or filter reviews for negativity alone.

We’ve also refreshed our author guidelines in order to better emphasize our standing key recommendations on having the best experience on Goodreads. This now incorporates all of the points that we’ve been making in presentations to authors.

Thanks for helping make Goodreads the great and vibrant community it is. We’re confident posting these guidelines will only make that community stronger.
Weird Secret Sauce (145 new)
Aug 06, 2012 03:54PM

1 This thread is getting a little heated. There is already a thread to discuss what kinds of reviews belong on the book page, so please keep that discussion to that thread. If you want to discuss the review sorting algorithm, you can, but please keep it on-topic and not about each other. If we all can't do that, I will close this thread. Thanks.

topics created by Patrick