Andrew’s review of Lord of the Flies > Likes and Comments

87 likes · like
Comments (showing 1-3 of 3) (3 new)    post a comment »
dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Abram (new)

Abram Martinez Great review. I can see how you chose to give it 4 instead of 5 because of the religious iconography, but I'm glad you clearly stated it as an opinion thing. It is true that the Simon=peter thing could be construed that way, but for me, I just took it at face value. Similar to the way I take the actual bible. I am an atheist, but I still believe in the good of man, which in my opinion is more of what Simon represented. But both perspectives are valid. Thanks for the review!

message 2: by Richard (new)

Richard Sometimes a trope is just a trope. But I do agree that Simon became more than just another boy with a child's idea of how people worked. When he suddenly realized that the Beast was the inhumanity latent in all of the castaways, he ceased to be another kid in a messed up situation, and instead became a stand-in for the author's ideas. I think that as a plot element is rather flawed, but I don't think there was religious iconography as blatant as you seem to be suggesting.

message 3: by Andrew (new)

Andrew I don't know. The Lord of the Flies is Beelzebub after all. Golding goes a long way towards identifying "the Beast ... latent in all the castaways" as Satan, and given that intent I can't believe the choice of Simon as a name was random. That and the "body on a hill" bit and I think we're pretty deep in Sunday School iconography.

back to top