Tatiana's review of The Reapers Are the Angels > Likes and Comments
62 likes · like
I'll be interested to see your review. I still don't quite know how to review it!
I liked the story, I was just constantly thrown out of it because of world building details that just didn't stand up under scrutiny.
I'm so glad you liked this, Tatiana! I was not bothered by the questions that went unanswered (some of the practical questions regarding supplies, different character motivations), just because I felt that this was such an allegorical tale, almost like a post-apocalyptic western. The story and the writing were both so compelling that it still worked for me overall...and I'm glad it did for you, too.
Wendy Darling wrote: "I'm so glad you liked this, Tatiana! I was not bothered by the questions that went unanswered (some of the practical questions regarding supplies, different character motivations), just because I f..."
Minimal details worked here well I think. It was an internal journey, rather than a large-scale save-the-world sort of narrative, so the intricate world-building wasn't a must for me as well.
Is he another lost soul looking for a purpose and who finds a very strange one? His vendetta is so... pointless. Your thoughts are very welcome.
I have to say I wondered the same thing. I reread the last chapter a few times, wondering if I just wasn't getting something. I really felt like a different ending would have been better. (view spoiler) My problem with the ending, paired with questions like how on earth are they still drinking sodas 20 years after the fall of modern civilization (I had a Prof. in college who collected Pepsis from every country he visited - I know what 20 years does to that stuff.) made it where I just couldn't seem to review a book that I actually REALLY liked. I also like the fact that Bell didn't feel the need to over-explain everything (I just didn't buy some of his details.) After reading your review, I feel a little better about not getting Moses.
I interpreted in an allegorical way, as all this book is:
First, his name, is self-explanatory. Moses. Moses means savior, deliverer and he is the one who brought the Israeli people to the "promised land". You can see the analogy here, I think, with Temple's quest (and I am sure you can do a whole analysis on Temple's name as well but I won't even go there).
On another level, I think Moses is an allegory of Temple herself, not quite a an alter ego, but more as part of her conscience. The one that she can't ran away from, no matter how hard she tries (he always finds her after all, right?) Again, analogy here with Temple killing Moses' brother and Temple feeling responsible for her own brother's death. This is why Moses is relentless in his task and has to get revenge because Temple herself is unable to forgive herself.
Did I make any sense?
Lisa O. wrote: "I interpreted in an allegorical way, as all this book is:
First, his name, is self-explanatory. Moses. Moses means savior, deliverer and he is the one who brought the Israeli people to the "promise..."
Oh yes, Lisa, you did. Thank you.
So glad you enjoyed this! Regarding Moses, I think Lisa has a point. I also believe that pursuing Temple provided him with an opportunity to take control of the situation around him. As many have pointed out, she represents the new world and until Moses conquers it, he is unable to find his own peace and move on.
I'm sorry I can't flesh out Moses for you more. I also found him so frustrating. The whole vendetta felt so pointless. I guess the way Bell ended it glaringly obvious that it was a wasted effort.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Michelle
(new)
Aug 05, 2011 11:20pm
I'll be interested to see your review. I still don't quite know how to review it!
reply
|
flag
*
I liked the story, I was just constantly thrown out of it because of world building details that just didn't stand up under scrutiny.
I'm so glad you liked this, Tatiana! I was not bothered by the questions that went unanswered (some of the practical questions regarding supplies, different character motivations), just because I felt that this was such an allegorical tale, almost like a post-apocalyptic western. The story and the writing were both so compelling that it still worked for me overall...and I'm glad it did for you, too.
Wendy Darling wrote: "I'm so glad you liked this, Tatiana! I was not bothered by the questions that went unanswered (some of the practical questions regarding supplies, different character motivations), just because I f..."Minimal details worked here well I think. It was an internal journey, rather than a large-scale save-the-world sort of narrative, so the intricate world-building wasn't a must for me as well.
Is he another lost soul looking for a purpose and who finds a very strange one? His vendetta is so... pointless. Your thoughts are very welcome.I have to say I wondered the same thing. I reread the last chapter a few times, wondering if I just wasn't getting something. I really felt like a different ending would have been better. (view spoiler) My problem with the ending, paired with questions like how on earth are they still drinking sodas 20 years after the fall of modern civilization (I had a Prof. in college who collected Pepsis from every country he visited - I know what 20 years does to that stuff.) made it where I just couldn't seem to review a book that I actually REALLY liked. I also like the fact that Bell didn't feel the need to over-explain everything (I just didn't buy some of his details.) After reading your review, I feel a little better about not getting Moses.
I interpreted in an allegorical way, as all this book is:First, his name, is self-explanatory. Moses. Moses means savior, deliverer and he is the one who brought the Israeli people to the "promised land". You can see the analogy here, I think, with Temple's quest (and I am sure you can do a whole analysis on Temple's name as well but I won't even go there).
On another level, I think Moses is an allegory of Temple herself, not quite a an alter ego, but more as part of her conscience. The one that she can't ran away from, no matter how hard she tries (he always finds her after all, right?) Again, analogy here with Temple killing Moses' brother and Temple feeling responsible for her own brother's death. This is why Moses is relentless in his task and has to get revenge because Temple herself is unable to forgive herself.
Did I make any sense?
Lisa O. wrote: "I interpreted in an allegorical way, as all this book is:First, his name, is self-explanatory. Moses. Moses means savior, deliverer and he is the one who brought the Israeli people to the "promise..."
Oh yes, Lisa, you did. Thank you.
So glad you enjoyed this! Regarding Moses, I think Lisa has a point. I also believe that pursuing Temple provided him with an opportunity to take control of the situation around him. As many have pointed out, she represents the new world and until Moses conquers it, he is unable to find his own peace and move on.
I'm sorry I can't flesh out Moses for you more. I also found him so frustrating. The whole vendetta felt so pointless. I guess the way Bell ended it glaringly obvious that it was a wasted effort.
