Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Trattato di ateologia” as Want to Read:
Trattato di ateologia
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Trattato di ateologia

3.77  ·  Rating Details  ·  2,394 Ratings  ·  135 Reviews
Dio non è affatto morto, o se lo era è ormai nel pieno della sua rinascita, in Occidente come in Oriente. Di qui l'urgenza, secondo Onfray, di un nuovo ateismo argomentato, solido e militante. Un ateismo che non si definisca solo in negativo, ma si proponga come nuovo e positivo atteggiamento nei confronti della vita, della storia e del mondo. L'ateologia (il termine è mut ...more
Paperback, 1st edition Le terre/Interventi, 219 pages
Published September 9th 2005 by Fazi (first published January 26th 2005)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Trattato di ateologia, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Trattato di ateologia

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jul 29, 2011 Mike rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
My beef with the book is not that he is atheist, or militantly so. So what. Smart and militant atheists are in ever-increasing supply these days, so it's hardly a shock to read their work. This is just not a good book. The blurb says that this book is "tightly argued." It is hardly argued at all. It is asserted. Assertion after assertion goes unsupported by evidence or reasoning. I'm telling you, my respect for philosophy as an enterprise--especially when compared to folks who make a ...more
"Comme bien souvent le psychanalyste soigne autrui pour mieux éviter d’ avoir à sinterroger trop longuement sur ses propes fragilités, le vicaire des Dieux monothéistes impose son monde pour se convertir plus sûrement jour aprés jour".

"Lathéisme nest pas une thérapie mais une santé mentale recouvrée"*.

Some time (2013) ago I had written some reflections about Onfray’s criticism on Psychoanalysis. They follow next….because they approach religion as well. They serve as introduction to my approach
Lee Holz
Mar 05, 2012 Lee Holz rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
“Atheist Manifesto” is more than a bit disappointing although the subtitle “The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam” accurately describes the book. What author Onfray is against and why is abundantly clear. What he advocates and why are much less so, or at least the arguments are unexamined.
Onfray’s “case against” rests on several grounds: (a) belief in God is irrational and not grounded in reality; (b) the three great monotheistic religions are focused on the hereafter to the detrimen
Susan Wood
Onfray is a contemporary philosopher and writer. Even so, this book is quite readable ;-).

His writing style is almost conversational, at times argumentative and punctuated with ironic interjections. It took me a couple of a chapters to get used to it, to ensure that I wasn't misreading his point.

If I dare to distill his argument, it would be this: Humanity's current struggle between secular and non-secular ideologies is evidence that we are transitioning into a post-Christian era. But most often
Mostafa Saad
Jul 15, 2013 Mostafa Saad rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: philosophy
انتهيت توا من كتاب (نفي اللاهوت) للمفكر الفرنسي ميشيل أونفري.. بغض النظر مؤقتا عن مضمون الكتاب نفسه - وهو مضمون أتحفظ على عدة أشياء فيه بشدة لكنه جدير بالاهتمام والقراءة عدة مرات ويصعب مناقشته في بوست عابر كهذا - أقول: بغض النظر عن المضمون: أعجبني بشدة جرأة الكاتب على اقتحام أفكار مخالفة لفكره ..الرجل –مع ملاحظة كونه ملحدا- يوصي بقراءة مقالات لابن باز وبمراجعة التلمود والبحث في القرآن والأناجيل.. يقول مثلا في ببليوغرافيا المراجع عن أحد كتب آية الله الخميني :( كتاب مبادئ لكل حكومة إسلامية ولكل حك ...more
Jordan Lari
Sep 04, 2007 Jordan Lari rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Everyone
I do not exaggerate at all when I say that I think this might be the most important book that's been published this century. For me, it was like finally reading through the exact system of beliefs that I've held for my entire life, but written down in a logical order, such that their validity and logic cannot be questioned. And though the revolution may not yet have won, if you look at the success of this book combined with the success of Sam Harris' "The End of Faith," and Dawkins' "The God Del ...more
Jan 27, 2009 Nat rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The translation from the French makes for reading that is a little labored at times, but worth the effort. In terms of the recent flood of atheist manifestos, this one stands out as being particularly critical of the three monotheistic religions. A no-holds-barred, scathing criticism on monotheism. One of the things I learned was how the Church influenced who and who was not 'remembered' as part of the Enlightenment. Only the critics that were gentler seem to have made in into the mainstream of ...more
Jun 19, 2011 Lynley rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
If you've already read Dawkins' The God Delusion, the style of this book may be a little unexpected. Perhaps it's the French translation - I was slightly annoyed by the exclamatory style - do French authors make use of more exclamation marks? I feel this style of writing detracts from any argument, especially when compared unavoidably with the cold logic of Richard Dawkins.

I considered abandoning the book, but flipped further forward to see if my interest would take hold, and I did end up readin
Daniel Solera
May 05, 2009 Daniel Solera rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: religion
I wasn't too thrilled with this book, not because of its subject matter, but because of the way in which it was written. I like my non-fiction to be structured, succinctly delivered and substantiated by data. Michel Onfray's "Atheist Manifesto" is not a "God Delusion" (Dawkins) or an "Atheist Universe" (Mills), in that it is meant to be read like a philosophical treatise, and not a systematic examination of religious practices. It also doesn't help that I read a translation from the French.

May 21, 2009 Andreea rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Great book overall with excellent, solid points to support not only atheism but the idea of religion (in particular, the three main monotheistic religions) as being oppressive on numerous levels. The book includes historical and textual evidence to support the claims and hypotheses made and is not an account built on personal opinion alone.

As a theist, I made a promise to myself to leave all bias aside when reading this book and attempt not to take things personally. Onfray's language can get a
Jonathan Karmel
Talk about preaching to the converted! This book didn't make any case against Christianity, Judaism and Islam. The author must believe that his opinions are true just because he has read a lot of books, has a large vocabulary and is extremely sardonic.

This book mainly makes fun of the three major, monotheistic religions by making a bunch of sarcastic remarks to indicate that religion has been used to justify a lot of terrible things throughout history and the sacred texts cannot literally be tru
Al Bità
Feb 20, 2013 Al Bità rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
It’s all rather simple, really: there are no gods.

Trying to get this simple message across, however, has not always been simple. In general, people have become so used to having the familiar figures of their gods so imbedded and integrated into their lives that emotionally they cannot seem to shake themselves out of their stupors: they feel a loss of identity, of culture, of difference, of rituals, of all those things that they have been taught are the essentials to their various faiths. They se
Mar 01, 2009 Mark rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Michel Onfray must be a reason that American Christians do not like the French. Take Sam Harris and George Smith (both atheist writers) and add a bit of French snobbery and you've got Onfray. This book is not altogether thorough, but presents its material, if not completely fairly, at least fairly credibly. It is not too long (245 pgs), but combs through quite a bit of material. It is a great introduction to many atheistic theories and viewpoints concerning religious belief. Onfray divides his t ...more
Philippe Malzieu
300,000 specimens for that. To my knowledge no religion exert in France a sufficient magister to endanger the Republic. Such a pulling can only leave perplexed.
In a surprising way, Onfray is undoubtedly the philosopher more listened in Ftance.
He had published a "contre-histoire" of the philosophy which, even if I do not share his opinion is relevant. He's gauchist, he has some style and he writes well. I think there is the principals reasons of his success. The troubles start when he is interes
Dec 30, 2011 Vanni rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
I found the Atheist Manifesto tiresomely repetitive and probably mean and nasty. As an atheist I have to say I'm glad this books out there and I especially found the section on Paul interesting and worthwhile, BUT on a whole it lacks finesse and versatility in the argumentation.
Sam Berner
Aug 10, 2011 Sam Berner rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: i-own
A book without footnotes and a bibliography is not an academic exercise, but an opinion piece. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But I don't find the hysteria appealing, especially from someone arguing a rational point of view. Too many adjectives, too much repetition.
Australian Atheist
Aug 17, 2008 Australian Atheist rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: To all those willing to be enlightened
Reality - beautiful elegant and succinct
I'm not usually one to complain about books written for the high brow crowd, but damn, the writing style in Atheist Manifesto is exclusionary--positively "ivory tower," if you will. Not up to date on your world philosophers, revolutions, or far-flung historical figures? Boy, are you going to be lost, because hardly a page goes by, without a reference to some conquest, or philosophical school of thought, or what have you, rarely with any sort of aside to fill you in if you aren't familiar with a ...more
Hanan Kat
Sep 17, 2014 Hanan Kat rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Atheists are a dime a dozen and preach the same ideology, yet Onfray manages to come out looking the worst. He asserts (emphasis on assertion, which is neither an argument nor a truth, yet he thinks it is.) that God is irrational, therefore not based on reality... but to him atheism is! (How so? since the same arguments that could be made to discredit the existence of God, could easily be made to discredit his non existence). And somebody should probably tell him that the ''bad use'' of religion ...more
This is a brilliant but hyperbolically written book in need of a fact checker. Onfray provides a brilliant insight into the nature of religious belief as an expression of the death instinct, into the nature of theocracy, into the origins of Christianity in Pauline inadequacy made universal, into the obsession with purity that mars the relation of believers to this worldly life, to the body, and to women. He describes how even our secularism and atheism is profoundly Christian- it carries forward ...more
Jul 08, 2012 Plucino rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: religion, philosophy
Il est difficile de donner un jugement définitif sur ce livre.
Surtout après avoir examiné les commentaires en italien sur aNobii, beaucoup d'athées sont en désaccord avec l'approche agressive d'Onfray. Des anobien(ne)s critiquent le livre d'être trop simpliste, d'autres d'être trop difficile.
Comme impression personnelle: Onfray ne fait rien pour gagner la sympathie du lecteur!
Il est trop "classe supérieure intellectuelle", normalien etc., pour être vraiment divulgatif, et je crains qu'il n'aie
Ioannis Apostolopoulos
" Τη στιγμή που διαγράφεται στον ορίζοντα η ύστατη μάχη –χαμένη κιόλας – για την υπεράσπιση των αξιών του διαφωτισμού ενάντια στις μαγικές προτάσεις, πρέπει να προαγάγουμε μια μεταχριστιανική κοσμική σκέψη, ήτοι, άθεη, στρατευμένη και ριζικά αντίθετη σε κάθε επιλογή κοινωνίας μεταξύ δυτικού Ιουδαιοχριστιανισμού και Ισλαμισμού που τον αντιμάχεται.
Ούτε Βίβλος ούτε Κοράνιο. Από τους ραβίνους, τους παπάδες, τους ιμάμηδες, τους αγιατολάχ και λοιπούς μουλάδες, επιμένω να προτιμώ το φιλόσοφο. Από όλες
Jul 16, 2009 Charlie rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Mar 12, 2013 Catherine rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
As an atheist, I don't view this as an Atheist Manifesto at all. It is far from "tightly argued" and reads more like an angry blog. He attempts to make several "points," but he does almost no further exploration of any of them. The book feels very shallow to me, and I certainly wouldn't recommend it to anyone by way of defending or supporting my atheism. I'd expect an Atheist Manifesto to provide in-depth reasoning behind the rejection of religious dogma and not simply a long list of (albeit wel ...more
Jan 27, 2016 Cocaine rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This Frenchman, a philosopher of note, knows his onions and yes, that is a pretty bad joke. Rather wordy at times but I like that. He still manages, with some snappy prose that wedges slabs of arguable fact, into his assertion. He not only decries organised religion, outlining its historical misdemeanour's, but also its clinging, warped pseudo morals that run like tramlines of convention through modern society. In other words even with atheism on the rise we are still trapped by its insidious do ...more
Toni Daugherty
Jan 03, 2009 Toni Daugherty rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
At first glance, I thought, "Oh, Michel Onfray, what possibly could this book say? How can an Atheist have a manifesto? Atheists are the one people who would not harm you for their God, for they have none." Since Onfray is France's leading philosopher, I just had to read this book. Now, I see why it is good to at least open the discussion.
(Only for the religiously courageous.)
Sep 27, 2015 Raymond rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: theology
Michel Onfray n’aime pas les grandes religions monothéistes. Mais quelle perspective est-ce qu’il peut offrir à ces lecteurs ? Pas grand-chose. J’aime ses observations surtout concernant l’islam. J’ai appris beaucoup sur cette religion, ce qui ne m’a pas rassuré. Par contre, ce qu’il écrit sur les contradictions dans la bible est très connu. Je ne suis pas toujours d’accord avec sa lecture de l’Ancien Testament. Le fait qu’une histoire se trouve dans la bible n’est pas une preuve de l’approbatio ...more
Mohamed Hassan
يتجني الكاتب سواء عن عمد او عن سوء فهم علي الاسلام فيلسوف بحجم اونفري كان يجب عليه ان لا يكتفي بنقد الاسلام من خلال الاعمال المتشوره عنه في الغرب فيلسوف يملك ادواته مثل اونفري المتوقع منه الحفر عميقا لتأسيس رايه الخاص عن الاسلام .يقع الكاتب في تناقضات بسبب ضعف او تحيز ترجمات القراءن فيذكر مثلا ان لحم الخنزير مباح في الجنه او ان الاسلام ورث العبوديه عن اليهوديه و المسيحيه دون ان يكترث بتحسين اوضاع العبيد او كما مطالبه الاسلام بان يتبني وجهة نظر واحده تجاة المؤيدين و غير المعارضين و المحاربين لا ي ...more
Atheeb Rahman
Harsh, polemic, rude, angry, rebellious and without many references. A dismissive dissection of the monotheistic cousin faiths. I liked it. He has a point.
each of the monotheistic faiths--islam, christianity, judaism--is not only indefensible, but pernicious, unless you judiciously select from the texts.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
The Hitler button 2 17 Jan 05, 2013 10:38AM  
  • The Quotable Atheist: Ammunition for Nonbelievers, Political Junkies, Gadflies, and Those Generally Hell-Bound
  • The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason
  • Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism
  • Atheism: The Case Against God
  • Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up
  • Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity
  • Everything You Know About God is Wrong: The Disinformation Guide to Religion
  • The Atheist's Bible: An Illustrious Collection of Irreverent Thoughts
  • Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life
  • Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists
  • The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture
  • Society Without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment
  • The Cambridge Companion to Atheism
  • The Atheist's Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life without Illusions
  • 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God
  • Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe
  • Atheism Explained: From Folly to Philosophy
  • The Born Again Skeptic's Guide To The Bible
Michel Onfray is a French philosopher. Born to a family of Norman farmers, he graduated with a Ph.D. in philosophy. He taught this subject to senior students at a technical high school in Caen between 1983 and 2002, before establishing what he and his supporters call the Université populaire de Caen, proclaiming its foundation on a free-of-charge basis, and the manifesto written by Onfray in 2004 ...more
More about Michel Onfray...

Share This Book

“The three monotheism share a series of identical forms of aversion: hatred of reason and intelligence; hatred of freedom; hatred of all books in the name of one book alone; hatred of sexuality, women,and pleasure; hatred of feminine; hatred of body, of desires, of drives. Instead Judaism, Christianity, and Islam extol faith and belief, obedience and submission, taste for death and longing for the beyond, the asexual angel and chastity, virginity and monogamous love, wife and mother, soul and spirit. In other words, life crucified and nothingness exalted.” 31 likes
“How strange that excision – female circumcision, with several languages using the same term for both kinds of mutilation – of little girls should revolt the westerner but excite no disapproval when it is performed on little boys. Consensus on the point seems absolute. But ask your interlocutor to think about the validity of this surgical procedure, which consists of removing a healthy part of a nonconsenting child’s body on nonmedical grounds – the legal definition of… mutilation.” 6 likes
More quotes…